• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
the-one-you-feed-podcast-eric-zimmer-logo-dark-smk
  • About
    • The Podcast
    • The Parable
    • Eric Zimmer
    • Ginny Gay
  • The Podcast
    • Episodes Shownotes
    • Episodes List
    • Anxiety & Depression
    • Addiction & Recovery
    • Habits & Behavior Change
    • Meditation & Mindfulness
  • Programs
    • Wise Habits
    • Free Masterclass: Habits That Stick
    • Coaching Consultation
  • Membership
  • Resources
    • 6 Sabotuers FREE eBook
    • Sign Up for Wise Habits Text Reminders
    • Free Masterclass: Habits that Stick
    • Free ebook: How to Stick to Meditation Practice
    • Free Training: How to Quiet Your Inner Critic
    • Anti-Racism Resources
    • Blog
  • Contact
    • General Inquiries
    • Guest Requests
  • Search
Wise Habits Reminders

Featured

Why Community and Courage Matter More Than Ever with Laura McKowen

May 9, 2025 Leave a Comment

Why Community and Courage Matter More Than Ever
Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, Laura McKowen explores why community and courage matter more than ever in making change in your life. She dives into the “messy midle” – theu ncertain space between giving up what umbs us and becoming someone new. She shares the story of the Luckiest Club, a global sobriety community.

Key Takeaways:

  • Understanding that real transformation is messy
  • Learning how sobriety isn’t the finish line, but the starting point for deeper healing
  • Understanding why community is so important and powerful
  • Discover fawning as a trauma response and how it shows up in life
  • Learning to balance honesty with fear
  • How discernment and clarity often comes in conversation with others


Laura McKowen is the founder and CEO of The Luckiest Club, a global sobriety support organization, and host of Tell Me Something True podcast.  Laura has been published in The New York Times, and her work has been featured in The Atlantic, The Wall Street Journal, the TODAY show and more and is the bestselling author of We Are The Luckiest: The Surprising Magic of a Sober Life,

Laura McKowen:  Website | Instagram

If you enjoyed this conversation with Laura McKowen, check out these other episodes:

How to Tap Into the Longings of the Heart with Sue Monk Kidd

A Journey to Self-Discovery and Sobriety with Matthew Quick

Special Episode: Finding Hope on the Path to Sobriety

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

Eric Zimmer  00:57

Transformation rarely arrives with a clean line or a tidy plan. It comes instead in the messy middle, the space between who we’ve been and who we’re becoming. Laura McCowan calls this the threshold where everything feels uncertain, uncomfortable and even sometimes unbearable. In this conversation, we talk about what it means to stand in that in between place, why change isn’t the end of pain but the beginning of healing, and how we can start to build a life that can actually hold us because the truth is, giving up the thing that numbed us, whether it was alcohol control, work or anything else, isn’t enough. We have to become someone new. I’m Eric Zimmer, and this is the one you feed. Hi, Laura, welcome back.

01:46

Hi, thank you for having me again. Yes,

Eric Zimmer  01:48

I am so excited to talk to you again. I loved our first conversation, and I’m excited for this one, but we will start like we always do with the parable, and I’ll give you another chance to answer it, because your first answer was unsatisfactory. Oh, probably I have no idea what I don’t have no idea what you said.

Laura McKowen  02:06

I was trying to remember, and I have no Yeah, I would

Eric Zimmer  02:10

imagine few of our listeners would remember, although I know a bunch of them loved it. And I often recommend your book to people early in sobriety, particularly people who love good writing. I think it’s such a great book about sobriety, but you’re also such a good writer, and people who appreciate literature appreciate your book. So yeah, in the parable, there is a grandparent talking with her grandchild, and they say, in life, there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear, and the grandchild stops thinks about it for a second, and looks up at their grandparent says, Well, which one wins? And the grandparent says that the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

Laura McKowen  02:57

Yes. So I couldn’t remember how I answered it the first time, I almost went to look it up, and then I thought, don’t bother. But my what it means to me right now, in my life and my work, the battle exists in having the courage to say the truth, speak the truth, even when it is going to disappoint and possibly piss off and possibly make people really hate me, and knowing that that’s not personal, I guess, another way of saying it is the bad wolf is playing it safe, or thinking that there is such a thing as safety when you have a public voice, and desiring that. And the Good Wolf is wanting to be free and doing whatever that means in the moment, especially when it comes to telling the truth. I had no problem. Well, it’s not that I had no problem, but I’ve been talking about hard things for a while, and I had no problem really doing that in talking about sobriety, because it was saving my life. But I feel like I’ve reached this point where, now there are other things that I really want to talk about, but I’ve got a bigger platform. There’s more people listening, there’s more people watching, and I get afraid. That’s a good wolf, bad wolf thing in my life right now. Yeah, I

Eric Zimmer  04:14

think it’s a really interesting point, because I think there’s two things that start to happen, at least this has been my experience. Thing. One is just a genuine fear, like, I don’t want people to not like me, etc. The other is I don’t want to drive people away from what I feel is like really important content or messaging. Like, for you, you’re talking about people about getting sober, it’s, it’s life and death, and feeling like I don’t want to drive people away from that by sort of moving, quote, unquote, off topic in a way that starts to drive certain people away. And so for me, it’s been this balance, particularly as I’ve begun not begun to as I’ve thought more about, how do I bring issues that are beyond personal development that I care about i. Two. There are things I want to talk about, there’s things I want to advocate for, there’s all that. And so how do I do that in a way that is helpful and useful, but I also don’t want to drive people away who can be getting something valuable out of what I’m doing. I mean, obviously there’s the like not wanting to drive away people, because you don’t want your numbers to go down. But then there’s a genuine there’s a genuineness. So I find both those. I find both. You know, I’m battling a variety of factors when I start thinking about those things.

Laura McKowen  05:27

Yeah, all of those things are true for me too. I think 2020 and 2021 were traumatizing. I mean, that’s an understatement for everybody, and one of the things that I experienced was being a person with a public voice. It can be really nasty in the online spaces and less so in the real world, but a lot of what I do is trying to present, distill and present information in an online space, and I’m choosing to do that so it’s like, I don’t want to be light and fluffy and easy and always be safe, right? I actually don’t want that at all, but I find myself challenged to, as you said, bring in other topics and not get sucked into the dark side of it. Yeah, it’s tough to put out what I put out with integrity and then let whatever’s gonna happen happen. Yep,

Eric Zimmer  06:18

and I think I’ve always sort of been like, well, we’re not a political show, right? Like, that’s not what we do, right? And then you hit these points, at least I did, where I went. Is this a political issue? This feels like it’s a issue about basic values. But even conversations about basic values seem to be political these days. And it’s, it’s challenging, you know?

Laura McKowen  06:38

Yeah, everything’s political now. So we, I mean, this is a whole rabbit hole, but everything is political now, you know, up to a vaccine being entirely political, yeah, so what? That’s just the world we’re operating in. So I’m learning how to have courage in that space. And it’s honestly, for me, it’s really humiliating, and like it brings up a lot of my old junk around people pleasing, and that made me really sick. You know, it was dishonesty at the end of the day and really feeling like I lacked a center that was not a good place for me. Yeah, there’s

Eric Zimmer  07:13

a line that you said in a blog post not too long ago. You said, there are some things that still undo me. The worst feeling like someone I care about is mad at me, and I completely resonate with that. I think that is my biggest Achilles heel, is that very thing is like, when someone is mad at me that I care about, it’s really difficult,

Laura McKowen  07:36

really difficult. Yeah, and it’s a small circle of people that can undo me like that. It’s the people that like that I actually care about. But it’s so easy for me to snap into just my my therapist says one of my defense mechanisms is called categorically wrong. I just go, you’re right. I’m wrong. Everything I’m everything I do is wrong, yeah, everything I’m wrong, and it’s like this really dark shame spiral. Not helpful. In

Eric Zimmer  08:10

that blog post, we hear about flight and freeze, and you mentioned that there’s, you know, something called fawning. Say more about that.

Laura McKowen  08:18

Oh, yeah, that was a big learning for me that we know of the fear response is typically as the fight, flight, freeze, the three F’s, but that there’s actually a fourth. I can’t remember the psychologist that coined it, but it’s called fawning, and it’s in response to fear. We fawn over someone, we go towards them. Instead of running or freezing, we go towards them. We kiss their ass, we try to appease them. We abandon ourselves entirely and our needs entirely. And that’s me. That was. My primary coping mechanism is fawning, not always, but with a certain type of person, you know, and of course, it mimics childhood stuff and everything like that. That was really helpful to me, because it named something that I’ve experienced so acutely. And you know, when you’re doing it, it doesn’t make sense. It feels terrible, but it’s all an appeal for safety, for keeping the attachment. It’s like keep your enemies closer, type of thing. If I just get closer to them, whatever I need to do to make myself Okay, in their eyes, then I’ll be okay. Yeah,

Eric Zimmer  09:28

it feels terrible, and so does staying sort of centered in myself and what I think and what I believe, which I think is the way we try and change a lot of old patterns, sobriety being a great example. It’s like, early on in that change process, it’s really difficult. Like, which of these feels worse? They both feel pretty bad. Yeah,

Laura McKowen  09:50

no kidding, it’s a true dilemma in the Greek tragedy sense of the word, you’re not thinking between one nice, peaceful road and one, you know, terrible road. It’s both. Both feel terrible. It’s just right, which is gonna, you know, good wolf, bad wolf type of thing. It’s like, yeah, it does feel terrible. I mean, for me, you know, I found it was intolerable to sit with myself, discomfort if someone was mad at me, was absolutely intolerable. So, you know, I have to give myself some credit that I don’t do it so much anymore. But there, of course, still in instances here and there where, you know, one is where my partner and I got into a fight about three months ago, and we’ve been together for almost a couple years at this point, and have a really beautiful, solid relationship. And when we got into this fight, and it wasn’t like World War Two, it wasn’t even a big fight, but this is where we go, right in conflict. For me, it felt like the relationship was on the line. And I it took everything in me not to just try to fix it, just immediately fix it. And the couple days where the storm was brewing between us and just had to, like, wait for it to settle, were really, really difficult for me. And when I told him, you know, after we finally did talk, that it feels to me like the relationship is threatened, he was shocked. It’s like, what do you really, you know, we’re just fighting like this is settle down. Laura, yeah, we’re just fighting like this is, this is fine, but that’s trauma stuff kicking up. That’s right.

Eric Zimmer  11:24

It doesn’t feel fine. I think that with stuff like this, I think we often think that we’ll get to a point where we’ll do enough healing and enough inner work, where we’ll be able to do that sort of thing, like I’m going to say something’s not okay with me, and then I’m going to step back and I’m not going to fawn. I heard this from somebody recently, step into my power, and I was like, Well, yes, you are stepping into your power, but it’s really important that you recognize you’re not going to feel powerful. Probably in that moment, you’re going to feel terrified. If you wait until you feel powerful to do it, there will be no doing it, you know. And so I think what you’re saying is so important, is like, yeah, I was able to do it, but, boy, it didn’t feel very good. No,

Laura McKowen  12:04

it felt terrible, not sleeping, not eating. You know, the full the full catastrophe. But you do it, and that’s what it means to be in love with someone, whether it’s a partner or a sibling or a friend, if you feel comfortable 100% of the time, and you’re never afraid and you’re never hurt, and you’re never feeling the weight of loving them. My friend Jim zartman, who’s a coach and a pastor, says, you know, like get being married. This is quite gruesome, but it’s like each of you has a revolver that you put your partner’s finger on the trigger, and you just trust that they don’t point it at your head, and you trust that they’re not going to pull it, you know. So that’s just the way it is. If you’re really open, you’re going to risk being shot,

Eric Zimmer  12:52

you know? I think that’s an interesting idea. I’ve seen more and more of this. I feel like when I first got sober, which was like 1994 but I think even probably around when, when you got sober, and when I got sober again, the second time, you know, there was a lot of talk about CO dependency, and I think some of this I got from Buddhism, which can be interpreted this way, if you’re not careful, the sense was that the psychologically healthy person was this independent, whatever you do doesn’t affect me. I’m so secure that I don’t get ruffled by anything. And what I’ve seen really change over the last, really, probably last four or five years, is more of an understanding that kind of like you’re saying that Healthy Love means that we are vulnerable to someone and we can be hurt. So I think it’s sorting that out, like, what’s trauma informed response, what’s unhealthy response, and what’s normal? Human like, my partner’s upset with me, so of course, it feels bad. God,

Laura McKowen  13:59

yes, absolutely. I’m so glad you brought that up. Codependency is real. You know, there, there is very dysfunctional codependency. But I think the truth is always somewhere in the middle, as we know, and healthy places in the middle, in balance, it’s murky. I’ve said to him many times, you could really hurt me. You know, at the beginning of our relationship, it was like, wow, you know you could really hurt me, and I hadn’t really been in a partnership like quite like that before. It’s wonderful because you’re all in and it’s terrifying because you’re all in and we do depend on each other. It is murky. I definitely don’t have the answers to that. It’s like, you know it when you feel it kind of but to give a point by point description of the difference is really difficult. I think even healthy relationships can have a small amount of codependency. You know, if you’re an attuned person, I mean, I’m very attuned to other people’s energy, then my daughter too, and when they’re upset, I feel upset. Yep. Is that? Does that make me. Are unhealthy, I don’t think so. It’s I guess what I do in response to that, if I need them to be okay, for me to be okay, then we are drifting into unhealthy territory. But I think otherwise, it’s just loving 

Eric Zimmer  15:16

I think what you said there’s really important, like, how do I respond to them in a way that doesn’t make it about me, exactly, doesn’t make them being upset, them being down into suddenly about me. And there are people I’ve had in my life before. Maybe I was one of these people at some point where, no matter what it is, it immediately sort of flips into like they feel bad, you know, I no longer even feel comfortable feeling bad. Yeah, now

Laura McKowen  15:45

I have to rescue you. Yeah, exactly, yeah. It’s a responsibility thing, I think at the end of the day, but it’s overlapping circles. You know, there’s not you exist here and I exist here, and we never cross, we do, but at the end of the day, you feel responsible for your own experience. 

Eric Zimmer  16:02

Yep, you mentioned fight flight freeze, fawning. I heard another term recently for it, which was flopping. She made me laugh. I was like, that kind of just, yeah, that’s that sort of describes me, fight

Laura McKowen  16:18

freeze, yeah. So none of those are flopping. That’s hilarious. You

Eric Zimmer  16:22

You just use kind of collapse in on yourself. Yeah, go to sleep.

Laura McKowen  16:26

Yeah. I that I’ve flopped. The flopping and fawning feel more true to me than the other three. Yeah.

Eric Zimmer  16:34

Exactly Me, too. Yeah, too. Yeah. We were talking about this a little bit beforehand, but maybe we could hit on this as a general topic. You recently published something on one of your social channels about some books that you’ve loved recently, and maybe before we go into what any of them are, the books you’ve talked about were fiction books. Talk to me about what fiction specifically gives you that feels so important, valuable. Okay,

Laura McKowen  16:59

I love this topic. You know, I would say I’m traditionally much more of a non fiction, memoir lover like that would be my first love, maybe. But ironically, several of the books that have been instructive to me and helpful to me, I would say the top three or four of them are not memoir or non fiction. They’re novels. And I’d have to say it’s the mythology of it all. What we get to experience in fiction is some representation of a myth. So then it kind of widens the aperture of what’s possible, because real life is just real life. It can only get as strange as real life gets, or whatever. But fiction, I mean, you can include magical surrealism, you can include fantasy, you can include, you know, historical fiction. You can include things that are true and not true, and anything you know. And so you can use those tools to create a myth. And to me, the myths are what we’re always after, this timeless stories, the archetypal stories that live within us. And so, for example, one of the books that I posted was the book of longings, which you and I talked about, which is a fictional story about an alternate story of Jesus, obviously summon kid wrote, obviously researched widely. And there was, I mean, it was beautifully researched. You could tell she abided by what we know to be true about the story of Jesus, but also had to add, like, all kinds of things. And there’s something in that that made it feel more real and more true, because she allowed her imagination to fill in the blanks. So yeah, I just also love the writing the literature of fiction. You can see that sometimes in memoir, but in memoir, you know, they’re trying to tell a true story. So the writing tends to be different. I won’t say always, but it tends to be different, even if you look at writers who do both memoir and fiction writing, the fiction writing just has a different feel. It’s, you know, there’s more prose, it’s more lyrical often, so it feels like you just can get immersed in that world. Yep,

Eric Zimmer  19:16

it’s one of the things about doing this show that is hardest for me, is I have so much reading to do for guests that I don’t get to read as much fiction as I used to, but I still try and squeeze it in. There’s something about it that I deeply love, that book of longings, book I found so fascinating to see her describe somebody who is in relationship with Jesus. Like, what might it be like to be the intimate partner of somebody who’s that single minded

19:50

of Jesus Christ, of the like, most meta, yeah,

Eric Zimmer  19:56

yeah. And character in history you. You know, it’s not easy, you know. You think like, well, you know, but if you really think about like, Well, Jesus was kind of a, not always an easy to get along with guy, like, you know, like, it’s, it’s just, it’s, it’s amazing. But that’s not all it is, because she is an amazing character in her own right. I know you’ve got a line from that book that you love, which I’ll let you share in a second. My favorite line from it was, I think it was a prayer she offers or something, which was, bless the largeness inside me, no matter how I fear it.

Laura McKowen  20:30

Oh, I just got goosebumps. Yes, that was also one of mine. Bless the largeness in me. Yeah, I love when I am dust, singing these words over my bones. She was a voice

Eric Zimmer  20:42

that’s so good. Yeah, I know I was going to interview her. I think I had read something of hers years before, but hadn’t in a while. So we just, I just kind of immersed myself in her world for like, three weeks. And it was just lovely. You know, when Jenny and I drove to Atlanta and back, we listened to some of the books on tape, and I read that book, and it was just because they’re not books on tape anymore. I guess it’s not what that’s not really what it

Laura McKowen  21:06

is that’s okay. I understand what you mean. I listen to books on tape too. Okay? On my iPhone. Yeah. She is an extraordinary, extraordinary writer and woman, and her female characters are some of the best that have been written. You know, her first book, The Secret Life of Bees. That was when I fell in love with her work. And I think when a lot of people did first or it was their first novel, and with the women in that book, and then, you know, Anna in the book of longings, was among the best I’ve, I’ve ever read, too and strong female characters. The Divine Feminine is what she really captures

Speaker 1  22:02

you. Let’s

Eric Zimmer  22:13

change directions a little bit and talk about you know, your book was called the luckiest but you’ve created something called the luckiest club. Tell me a little bit about what that is and what’s happening there

Laura McKowen  22:25

the luckiest club. So TLC very nice. Makes it easy to remember, and it’s also kind of meaningful. So yeah, I created TLC in Well, what happened is in around early March of 2020, when the world started to shut down, I remember sitting on my couch. School had already been canceled, so my daughter was home, and we were still in that stage of where is this, like, how okay, it’s gonna be for a couple weeks, or, you know, it’s like it was all new. We weren’t quite sure how big it was or how long it was gonna last. And I remember sitting there working, and Facebook posts from the AA group in my local town saying we’re not hosting live meetings from you know, here on out, and we’ll stay tuned. And I went, Holy, okay, for some reason it was that not not school closing, or because that that room had stayed open in every blizzard. I’d never seen it get shut down. So I thought, This is bad. People need that meeting, those meetings, to be open. And of course, it wasn’t just my town. It was like everywhere. So I thought, I know how to host meetings, not AA meetings, but I I can host a meeting, and I put together this format. My experience in a helped me actually think of a format, but I included different readings of my own choosing. So I got to include poetry and literature and whatever I felt like reading, which was really fun to me, and I just kind of decided to do it. I didn’t think through much. I posted something on my website, people could sign up. When they signed up, they came to a page that showed the schedule. And I just and I was hosting all of them, and I was hosting one or two a week, right? So seven meetings at least a week, a couple times a day. And you know, I did that for two months, and it was awesome. It actually helped me so much in that time, and hundreds of people started to show up. And you know when you just know something is happening, like something was happening. And so many of these people had never been to a meeting because they never did A a or they weren’t even sober yet, but they had been on my email list, or followed me, or whatever. So this was their first experience of community and sobriety. And that’s life changing for people. If you’ve never felt that, never experienced that, and they could do it, you know, especially with what was going on, it was really neat. But it got to be obviously, like, Okay, I can’t keep doing this, because this is a lot. And. Yeah, so I thought I was like, in real time, in meetings, talking to them, like, I don’t know what I’m gonna do. I’m thinking about it. I’m trying to figure it out. And then I set a date. I was like, I’m gonna and I’m gonna stop them. At this point, it was like, three or four weeks out, right? And people who are like, please don’t stop them. We would pay money do what you need to do. You know? We hope these continue. And I, over a couple weeks, put together a team, hired people to lead the meetings. Came up with a format essentially, you know, rolled up a quick like business and TLC was born. So we started with about 10 meetings a week. I led one or two of them, but the rest were led by other people that I knew in sobriety, which was really neat, because people that from all different traditions and backgrounds and demographics and experiences, and it was just really cool to see what was going on. So we started, you know, having we had a private forum off of Facebook where people could talk, and then just the meetings, that’s all it really was. There was nothing much to it. And then, of course, it evolved, because it was really working, like it was giving that core group that I started with where, like, some of them had been in sobriety for 20 years, and they were like, this is I needed this. Like, this is revitalizing my own sobriety. And, you know, we have a guy named Mike B who’s in his early 80s, who’s a host, and he has been sober for 35 years, and he’s like, this is the best thing that’s happened to me. And you know, we have younger people older people. It’s something that I knew was really special, and we all felt that. So fast forward to now, February 21 2022 and we have 35 meetings a week. We have newcomer meetings and beyond one year meetings and bipoc meetings and queer meetings and newcomer, or did I say, Yeah, newcomer and all kinds of other programming too. Beyond just meetings, we have something that’s called the academy, because, as you know, like we get sober and then it’s like, okay, then what? Now? What? Yep, so we have content to help people. The way we sort of look at it is like your life is a relationship, you know, with several different things, and in sobriety, you have to strengthen that relationship, go from unhealthy to more healthy, if possible, in that relationship. So the relationship with self, the relationship with others, relationship to body, the relationship to money, finances and the relationship to work are the ones that we focus on right now. And it’s been quite a ride, I bet. And, you know, it’s got its own culture. And I’ve seen people, you know, just like you do in AA, get sober, miraculously and change and then go on to, you know, start a subgroup in their own area, or for their, you know, like something that they’re interested in. And this will be our two No, I can’t even remember what year we are in 2021 this will be our two year anniversary in May. It’s wild to think that this didn’t exist at some point, because it’s just this, like, almost fully formed child. Now, I’d say it’s like a teenager. I was saying before we got on that, I didn’t really expect to do it. But it’s also like, of course, it makes sense that this is what was going to happen. Yeah, this is what was coming. Everything was sort of in preparation for that. And it’s probably the most special thing that I’ve ever been a part of.

Eric Zimmer  28:19

You know, in AA, there are different aspects of what make up. Aa, there’s obviously the fellowship, the getting together, the meeting with people. And then there is the program, which is you follow the 12 steps. I’m kind of curious, in the luckiest club, is it primarily fellowship? I know you’re starting to offer program related things. Say a little bit about that. And what I think this raises the more interesting question, is we see more and more recovery modalities starting to pop up, which I think is wonderful. You know, as I think about that, I’m like, Well, what is it that makes a modality more successful or less successful? And I’m kind of curious what your thoughts are on that, having been through a bunch of the ones that already existed, and now having two years of working on your own, great

Laura McKowen  29:06

question. So, you know, we read a script. There’s a few things we say at every meeting. We do have a culture, but I wouldn’t say yet that we have a program we don’t have. Okay, here’s the steps that you work or here’s what you go through, and that’s being developed right now. That’s actually the book that I’m writing. What I wanted, actually, was not to have that in the beginning. And what we say is we respect all paths to recovery. We don’t do dogma. We lead with compassion. We welcome you as you are. That’s who TLC is today. And I don’t, I don’t ever want to do dogma, right but, but I have also seen the need for something, for people to work against, to apply themselves against, kind of, yeah, a program, an actual program. Say what you mean by the word against. Like, we need, we need a program. You know, I’ve seen people go, Okay, I love going to these meetings, because right now it is, I would say, 99% fellowship. It’s community. It’s not that we just get on the meetings. It’s. Very intentional. The meetings are very structured. We have speaker meetings and topic meetings, and there’s a lot that goes into those. So it’s not like this free for all, but it’s mostly Community Fellowship, and that’s great, and it’s a big part of it. But people want something to work. They want to be able to do the work of sobriety against a program. And of course, I would say what we have as far as a program goes right now, which isn’t really a program. It’s more like a mission statement or a credo or something. Is at the beginning of my we are the luckiest book. The epigraph is actually a list of nine things, and says, One, it is not your fault. It is your responsibility. Three, it is unfair that this is your thing. Four, this is your thing. Five, this will never stop being your thing until you face it. Six, you can’t do it alone. Seven, only you can do it. Eight, you are loved. And nine, we will never stop reminding you of these things. And that is what we say at the end of every meeting, and that’s what my new book is built on, is those nine things. So to answer your question, it’s been largely fellowship up until this point, and then we’ve started to add in programming. And the reason I think that’s interesting is because I think there’s this idea that modalities show up fully formed, you know, but the best ones are built in community. Yeah, yep, you know. They’re built as a response to a community need not dictated from on high. Even Dr Bob and Bill Wilson did that. You know, they weren’t. Yeah, they wrote the book. They wrote the big book. And I think one of the places where it’s unfortunately fallen short is that they haven’t updated that literature to be inclusive of modern times. And every spiritual tradition that is the marker of whether something stays relevant or not, and it’s usually done as an oral tradition. You know, it’s it gets modernized and relevant to the context of the times, but that is what we’re doing with TLC, what we’re trying to do, you know, it’s imperfect. Also, as soon as you nail something down, you’re saying what you think is important, yeah, and you’re excluding other things, right? You can’t do all the things. No program can be all the things. And that’s something I’ve had to come to terms with. Like that. I just have to say, this is what we’re about, and make it as expansive and open as possible, and open to interpretation, but also be clear, right?

Eric Zimmer  32:33

Yeah, there’s a little bit of that idea. Like, if you stand for everything, you stand for nothing, kind of thing, right? Like, if you hit a certain point, you have to start to say, well, there is something here that works. But I think you’re right that these things emerge over time, and AA emerged over time. I mean, Bill Wilson didn’t suddenly sit down one day and be like, Oh, I’ve got aa figured out. Like it happened by meeting, you know, Dr Bob, and these things happen, and

Laura McKowen  32:58

Carl young and all these other people, right? Yep, that we don’t hear about, but it was very much a project of many minds.

Eric Zimmer  33:07

Yeah. And the thing I’ve heard, also, just to tag on to that, is that there were some people in AA who really pushed on that line at the end, God, as we understand him, that they pushed for that, whoever the few people were who pushed for that saved millions of lives,

Laura McKowen  33:24

absolutely. Well, it’s like founding father language, you know, it’s, you kind of look back and you go, how, how did that decision get made? And it was very prescient at the time. You know, yeah, yeah, that did save millions of lives. God, as we understand him, it’s been really interesting. You know, for example, a lot of people have said, well, what about like, moderation and what about harm reduction? And why can’t that be part of this? Or California sober? You know, What’s your stance on marijuana? And it’s like, I know I’m not

Eric Zimmer  33:57

close enough to the recovery community that I hear that term very often. So every time I hear it, it makes me laugh. Me too.

Laura McKowen  34:02

Me too. But it’s like, no, we’re not about moderation, management, we’re not a harm reduction we’re abstinence based community, and that’s okay. So, you know, stand for something, you fall for anything, or try to say everything. You say nothing, all those things. It’s a good check for me, because, as you know, we get pretty self righteous about certain things, and I’ve had my mind changed about a lot being in community, and that’s why, as my friend Jim says, There’s sanity in community. Yeah, right. That’s why we have it, because one person doesn’t know that is

Eric Zimmer  34:33

a great line. There’s sanity and community. Makes me think back earlier in this conversation, we were talking about, like, how do you know when you know something is like sort of Healthy Love or dependence and and the word that came to my mind was, well, it’s really about discernment. And one of the things that I certainly have come to believe, I think I believed it a lot earlier in my recovery, and then maybe I lost it a little bit, and I’ve really picked that thread up much more strongly, is that like, well. Discernment happens in community. It happens with other people. If you’re trying to discern all by yourself, it’s not to say that none of it’s possible, but you know, for me, I almost feel like true discernment needs a community, even if that community is one or two other people, 100%

Laura McKowen  35:14

that’s why we talk about relationships. We’re always in relationship to things. We’re not islands. As much as we like to think. We do things alone. We don’t not well. You know, ultimately, it is a relationship, and discernment happens in community, and everything we do is a negotiation with the world. It’s a call and response and a conversation that we have, right? I think when something gets to be unhealthy and cult like is when there is no conversation, when there’s only rules, when there’s only one way. Again, it’s that middle way, that fine balance. Yep,

Eric Zimmer  35:50

and some people might say A is a cult, but I think the fact that the traditions were created is what sort of to me, stopped it from becoming truly cult like, because nobody had the power. I mean, in cults, very few people have all the power as brilliant as I think maybe the steps are in some ways or what they did. I think the traditions are the thing that most blow my mind, that I’m like, how did they see that coming? Like, how on earth did they design a decentralized organization like that in like 1940 I

Laura McKowen  36:24

think there’s God in that. You know, not God is a creator person, but Christ consciousness, God consciousness. Yeah, it makes so much sense. Mere Mortals did not create. You’re not that good at that stuff. You know, our egos get in the way they

Eric Zimmer  36:38

were certainly working from a deeply inspired place, yes, regardless of how you want to quantify that they were Working somehow from a non egoic place, absolutely yes. You so I want to go to the nine things that you read at the end of the meeting, which were the epigraph to your book. We covered some of these in our first conversation, but given the fact that you read them in every meeting, means you like I probably believe you can’t really hear these things too often, and I love it that at least some of them are just pairs. They’re paradoxes, right? That you sort of put in there. And I’d love to talk about it’s not your fault, but it is your responsibility, because I think this is such a critical piece of recovery, regardless of what it is we might be trying to recover from, whether it be alcoholism or addiction or trauma or any number of different things, but this idea that it’s not your fault, but it is your responsibility, and share a little bit about why that’s so important, and maybe share what happens if you get stuck on either side of that? I agree,

Laura McKowen  38:03

this isn’t specific to recovery, even this is just life. This is, I think, what delineates the difference between, like what Carl Jung called the morning of life versus the afternoon of life, or what Richard Rohr called the first half of life versus the second half of life. You know, in the first half of life you’re usually very entrenched in one or the other of those things, and in the second half of life, you hold them both. So what they meant to me and why I wrote them that way, I think people tend to fall well, I don’t think I know from talking to lots of different psychologists in the research for this book that our tendency is to blame. It’s sort of our innate reaction as kids and even as adults, is to not take responsibility, because we’re not really taught how you know something you have to learn. And so a lot of what we do going throughout life is either take on all the blame or put all the blame somewhere else and or we mistake responsibility for things like duty and obligation. So we think we’re being responsible, but we’re not. We’re doing something out of obligation, and women especially do this like I am being responsible to my family. Let’s say I do everything they ask me to do. I show up everywhere I am at the mercy of everyone else’s needs. No, that’s not actually responsibility, because you’re not in there. You’re not taking responsibility for your experience. You are excellent at duty and obligation. But that’s like below the line of responsibility, as Christopher Avery developed, it’s called the responsibility process, and he was really helpful at explaining these things to me. So when we enter into recovery, or when we’re mired in addiction, our self blame or other blame, blame on others is very thick. It’s a world that we’re living in tons of shame. Not only is this terrible, but I’m terrible, and nothing happens there. We can’t get anywhere. With just it’s my fault. It’s just all my fault, and obviously, for cultural reasons, do believe it is our fault. You know, we still very much live in a world that doesn’t understand addiction, that addiction, where addiction is a moral issue, where people who get addicted or just need to make better choices, they lack control, will power all those things. It’s getting better, but unfortunately, that’s still very, very true, and so we feel, you know, like pieces of crap. So when people first hear it’s not my fault, it gives them permission to breathe, essentially. And then when you say, but it is your responsibility that also actually gives them permission to breathe, because people actually really want to take responsibility. They might not think they do, but we actually really do, but we just have it confused. Like the reason we want to take responsibility is because that is actually where our freedom is. That’s where our power is. That’s where we can actually effectuate change. That’s where we can have peace. For me, I thought everything was my fault. I never was. It’s that person and this person, and you know, the world’s against me. I was never that. I was like, very much the opposite, which is equally as damaging, right? Because it’s not true, and they’re two sides of the same coin. As long as I’m blaming myself or other people, I am unable to be effective right now, right? It’s just a bad story. I

Eric Zimmer  41:28

think what you just said there really caught my attention, which was when I say it’s not my fault, I can breathe right? Because up to that moment, even if I do think it is my fault, there is still I’m trying to defend and justify myself to some degree. Of course, if I think it’s all my fault, I’m sort of in a battle. Whereas, if I can go, oh, it’s not my fault, like you said, I can draw blame for a second. I can stop fighting something for a second, and then, yeah, oh, it is my responsibility, opens that up. I want to go back to something you said a minute ago, though, because I’d love to get your thoughts on this. You talked about duty or obligation, and I’m really interested in values. What are our values? Living out of our values, but living out of our values, and duty and obligation are very close cousins, right? Like, if I go, Well, my value is that I have a value that caring for family members is important, okay, there’s a value that very quickly can bleed into duty and obligation, right, in feeling. And so I’m kind of curious for you, how do you keep those apart? Do you think?

Laura McKowen  42:37

Yeah, great question. I’ve had a lot about this, because it’s complicated. If you’re truly operating out of your values, that means you’re living in choice, and if you’re living in choice, then you are taking responsibility. But a lot of times, people their actions, in the way they’re running their lives, are actually not in line with their values, they’re in line with someone else’s values, with society’s values, with their parents values, with someone else’s script, and then they’re just resentful, even if they won’t say it. So it’s not that when you live in responsibility, that suddenly your life looks different and you’re not doing anything you don’t feel like doing. It’s that you’re choosing, and you know why you’re choosing, even if it’s things that are terrible, that feel terrible, I mean, or that aren’t your preferences, necessarily, you can be in responsibility in them by making the choice and knowing why you’re choosing it. It’s when we follow script that we either aren’t aware because we’ve never actually thought of what our values are, it’s and for good reasons, like, it didn’t occur to us that we could, yeah, you know, we just took what was given, we did what we were supposed to do. We don’t know why we’re so miserable. And someone telling you like, Have you thought about what you want and what’s really actually important to you? That can be a revelation, and then letting that animate your choices is another revolution, and it might mean your life looks wildly different, or it might not mean that, but it’s the energy of which you approach things. Are you just reacting to your life, or are you consciously choosing the things that you’re doing because they’re based on your values? And look, this is a lifelong process, but that’s the difference to me, is that I

Eric Zimmer  44:31

totally agree, and I think that the thing that’s important in there also is to sometimes keep circling back to choice, right like, I think that we can get clear on what we value and what’s important. This happens with me taking care of my mother, right? Like, sorry, Mom, if you’re listening, but it starts from a place of, like, I care and I want to do it, and it’s a value. And then if I’m not careful, it starts to start to feel like duty and obligation, because I forget. It that you’re choosing I forget that I’m choosing it. So then I have to go, stop. Hang on. Nobody’s making me do any of this circle back. What’s my value, you know? So it feels like there’s a loop that needs to be maintained, you know, which is like totally value driving choices. Choices start to become habitual, because we habituate right, and then going, all right? I don’t want to be driven off habit, back to choice. Oh, yep, still lines up. Okay, you know? And it’s this looping process. It’s

Laura McKowen  45:27

an active living process that we are in every day. It’s not and your values change over time, you know, of course, yeah, that’s another thing people don’t necessarily get or appreciate or feel they have permission to do the things that were important to me 10 years ago are not important to me really anymore. Part of that is I’m older. Part of that is I’m sober. We change, we evolve. And I would say, you’re allowed to change. You’re allowed to change. This is such a fascinating topic to me. I am actually about to start on a two year program in existential psychology. It’s very popular in Europe. It hasn’t quite come to America, but it’s this merging of philosophy which talks a lot about the concepts of freedom and choice and responsibility, but also psychotherapeutic models. You know, how do you humanize that? So I spend a lot of time thinking about responsibility and the difference, because it can get really murky for me and other people, it’s probably one of the most worthwhile endeavors, is to commit yourself to discerning the difference to that in your life and to finding a way. Because look, the other thing is, like we don’t have control over so much, so it’s always done through the lens of your own skills, your reality, your present circumstances, your values at the time. It’s always very contextual, right? Yeah, there are, of course, many times in our lives where we’re faced with things that we didn’t choose. You know, you’re taking care of your mother, she didn’t choose that, and you didn’t necessarily choose it either, but it’s something that you’re faced with making a decision about now, the way to not become resentful of that is to be in responsibility in that choice.

Eric Zimmer  47:11

Yeah, yeah. I think the other thing that’s really difficult, and I’d love to keep hearing from you about this as you go through this program and as you learn more and get your thoughts now, but like, determining our values and which values are really ours and which values are the ones that we inherited, and recognizing that. What’s the way to say this, everything about us is conditioned by the past. I get kind of not hung up, but I spend a lot of time thinking about like, well, what’s my real value? Well, okay, what does that mean? Like, how do I know? Because, yeah, like, who am I? I’m a combination of the forces that have acted upon me, and so I don’t want to be just that, and that’s very real. And I think this idea of figuring out what we value is an easy phrase to say, but is extraordinarily difficult work. Yeah,

Laura McKowen  48:04

it’s some of the hardest work we do, because it often means rejecting people and institutions that have many times done well by us, you know, have sometimes even raised us. And you know, I read something amazing from Adam Grant the other day. I don’t know if you’re familiar with him, but I shared it actually. He said, Too many people spend their lives being dutiful descendants instead of good ancestors. The responsibility of each generation is not to please their predecessors, it’s to improve things for their offspring. It’s more important to make your children proud than your parents proud.

Eric Zimmer  48:39

Amen to that. Yeah, in the spiritual habits program that we do, we’ve got the main program, then there’s a second program in intensive and we were talking about legacy recently, and the phrase legacy sort of being like a connective tissue between generations, right? Like, I inherited a legacy, and I’m passing one on and getting really clear on which parts of that like, yep, keep that flowing and Nope, that stops here. You know, that’s

Laura McKowen  49:07

right, that’s a beautiful way to put it, like a river. You know, we’re gonna keep this part of it going, and we’re gonna put a block up here. Yeah, I love the word legacy, and I think that has a tremendous amount to do with values. It is the hardest work that we’ll do. I mean, some of the values that my parents had are not mine, and some of them aren’t mine because I just weren’t part of my DNA, like written in not literal DNA, but it’s like not in my soul. I was born not valuing those things, and maybe I assimilated and tried to value them for the sake of pleasing my parents and just getting along. But then you grow up. You know, Carl Jung thought that the highest evolution of a person is individuation, and I think that has everything to do with values and being in touch with yourself. I mean, that’s the prerequisite, is you. You have to actually be in touch with yourself. At any given point in time. And what does that mean? You know, get be in touch with with what I think. There’s a couple answers to that and shit. I don’t know this is like, well, out of my depth, but this is how I understand it. Is my unique blueprint, you know, my dharma in yoga philosophy, my fingerprint, my soul, what I was set here to do. And I look at that as the part of me that is most connected to God, as I understand God, I feel we all have a role that we’re here to play. I mean that quite literally. If you think of nature, everything is sort of by design, you know. And I don’t look at this like there’s a big creator and it’s all, you know, pulling strings. It’s bigger and more weird than that. But animals, for example, don’t get confused about their dharma. You know, like a cat is not trying to be the dog or the squirrel or the frog or whatever in my yard. They’re just freaking cat. And we’re a lot more complicated than that, but I do believe that we have in us a blueprint of sorts. And this isn’t something I made up, like this is the story deals with archetypes, but it’s also the story of like Arjuna and Krishna and the Bhagavad Gita. You know, it’s this idea of dharma. And I do believe that. And I think that ironically, when we do that, when we take on that mission fully, it actually destroys the ego, and we become less us in the egoic sense, and more in service of world.

Eric Zimmer  51:30

Boy, I could unpack that for about six hours, because I have so many questions in there and so many thoughts that we can’t follow that down its deep rabbit hole. At some juncture I would love to, because I’ll just say this about it. As I’ve gotten deeper into my various spiritual awakenings, it’s almost the deeper I’ve gone, in some sense it’s been that the personality sort of dissolves. And so the question that I end up with is, is there a particular nature of quote, unquote, Eric that exists beyond the genetics that I came into this world with, and things that have happened to me is that I’ve just sort of brought that form into my source energy that came flowing in, right? Or which just means that then, okay, you know, there are these elements, but at which point do I go, Oh, that experience was part of my dharma. That experience is part of my conditioning that I don’t want you know, yeah, gets very philosophical very quickly. Well, I think one

Laura McKowen  52:36

way that makes sense to me, this is why I really love the first half of life, second half of life, idea I’m rereading right now Richard Rohr book, falling upward, so it’s fresh in my mind, but that the first part of life is all about building the container we actually need. The first part of life, it’s not that it’s less important, or it’s somehow stupid, or like it’s not, you know, we need ego. We need to have a healthy ego. It’s like you need to learn all the rules so you know how to break them. Type of thing. We need a healthy ego to establish ourselves in the world, to build that container and to begin the individuation process. And then the second half of life is deciding what to put in that container. And I think as we put the things in the container, we kind of disappear at the end of my book, one of the last lines was, what I’ve come to understand about sobriety is like this unfurling, and over time, it’s become less me and more God. And I didn’t even write that like I I know that’s true. I don’t want to sound like this religious person, because I’m really not, but I am becoming more and more spiritual as time goes on. And I’m I’m just drawn to those teachings because it’s what feels the most true

Eric Zimmer  53:47

to me. There’s a quote I used in this spiritual habits program yesterday that I love from Jack Kornfield. He said there are two parallel tasks in spiritual life. One is to discover selflessness, the other is to develop a healthy sense of self, both sides of that apparent paradox must be fulfilled for us to awaken. Ah, that’s

54:06

beautiful. I need to look at that. Yeah.

Eric Zimmer  54:08

So we’re kind of doing these two different things in our desire to be like, is it this or that? Right? You know, I’ve often been like, which is it wisdom would say, Well, of course, you’re doing both, you know, and whether you’re doing them in parallel, whether you’re doing one of them at one point in life, another at another point in life, paradox, as you were talking about Dharma and Christian I was thinking about, I think there’s so much wisdom in some of the older Hindu teachings. And one that has always struck me has been that there are different things that you do at different stages of life that makes sense, that are absolutely like they’re all part of your spiritual path. Like there’s a period where family and career are part of your spiritual development. It’s not a distraction from it’s part of it you go through it. And I just love that. Instead of saying, like you just said that. That early part of building the container is like, it’s only there so you can get to the later part. No, it’s all important. And all part of it. It all belongs.

Laura McKowen  55:09

It’s all important. Yeah, the second part wouldn’t be meaningful if United did the first what Richard Rohr says, and what Carl Jung has said, is that most people don’t get to that. They don’t accept the mission of the second half, and I think that’s absolutely true. That’s why I get excited when I actually talk about sobriety. I’ve learned that’s what is most animating to me about it is because I knew, even when I didn’t want it, with every cell in my body, that it was my invitation. I knew it,

Eric Zimmer  55:38

yep, yeah. Well, we are out of time. Like I said, I feel like I could go down 50 different rabbit holes here, and hopefully we’ll get to do it again sometime. But thank you so much for coming on. You’ve got a new book coming that’s really exciting. Got the luckiest community. We’ll put links in the show notes, where people can get access to your book, to that community and another wonderful place for people to have a chance to work on recovery. So thank you so much, Laura, thank you. This is awesome. Thank you so much for listening to the show. If you found this conversation helpful, inspiring or thought provoking, I’d love for you to share it with a friend. Sharing from one person to another is the lifeblood of what we do. We don’t have a big budget, and I’m certainly not a celebrity, but we have something even better, and that’s you just hit the share button on your podcast app or send a quick text with the episode link to someone who might enjoy it. Your support means the world, and together, we can spread wisdom one episode at a time. Thank you for being part of the one you feed community. You.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

Anxiety, Beauty, and the Unknown: A Map to Emotional Resilience with David Whyte

May 6, 2025 Leave a Comment

Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, David Whyte explores anxiety, beauty, and the unknown as a true map to emotional resilience. David shares how anxiety can be a doorway to deeper understanding and connection. He and Eric discuss the paradox of holding both joy and struggle, the surprising wisdom hidden in everyday emotions, and how poetry and language can bring us closer to the heart of life. This is an inspiring look at how we can build resilience by embracing life’s uncertainties.

Key Takeaways:

  • Exploration of human emotions, particularly happiness and anxiety.
  • Discussion of the duality of human emotions and the internal struggle between positive and negative qualities.
  • Insights from David’s book”Constellations Two,” focusing on the rehabilitation of common words and their deeper meanings.
  • The significance of the parable of the two wolves in understanding personal struggles.
  • The relationship between anxiety and unspoken truths about care and vulnerability.
  • The role of poetry in expressing and understanding complex emotions.
  • The importance of recognizing and embracing both happiness and unhappiness in life.
  • The concept of horizons as boundaries that inspire imagination and growth.
  • The idea that nagging in relationships can be a form of love and care.
  • Encouragement to engage in meaningful conversations and reflect on personal emotional landscapes.


David Whyte is the author of twelve books of poetry and five books of prose. David Whyte holds a degree in Marine Zoology and has traveled extensively, including living and working as a naturalist guide in the Galapagos Islands and leading anthropological and natural history expeditions in the Andes, Amazon and Himalaya. He brings this wealth of experience to his poetry, lectures and workshops. David’s life as a poet has created a readership and listenership in three normally mutually exclusive areas: the literate world of readings that most poets inhabit, the psychological and theological worlds of philosophical enquiry and the world of vocation, work and organizational leadership. His latest book is Consolations II: The Solace, Nourishment and Underlying Meaning of Everyday Words.

David Whyte:  Website | Instagram

If you enjoyed this conversation with David Whyte, check out these other episodes:

The Art of Poetry and Prose with David Whyte

Beautiful and Powerful Poetry with Marilyn Nelson

The Power of Poetry with Ellen Bass

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

Eric Zimmer 00:01:08  We often take ourselves so seriously the name we carry, the identity we’ve constructed, the projects we chase. And yet, as David White reminds us, the whole endeavor might be just slightly absurd. In this conversation with poet David White, we explore the deep truths that reveal themselves when we let go of our need to name, to define, to fix. David talks about anxiety as a mask for unspoken truths about the real meaning of care, and about the strange, sacred humor that arises when we realize how much we don’t control. From Zen koans to Irish folklore to yak mangers in the Himalayas, David weaves together the poetic and the practical. And somewhere in all of it, he helps us see that maybe the goal isn’t to be extraordinary, but to recognize the unordinary beauty of what’s already here. This is an episode about loosening our grip. Living with paradox and letting language lead us closer to the world, not away from it. I’m Erik Zimmer, and this is the one you feed. Hi, David. Welcome to the show.

David Whyte 00:02:16  Very good to be with you again, Eric.

Eric Zimmer 00:02:18  Yes, I am very honored to have you back on and very excited to talk with you.

Eric Zimmer 00:02:23  And we’re going to be talking about your latest book, which is called constellations two, which is a series of essays about, I don’t know if you call them common words, but words that all of us would know that you are putting under a little bit more of a microscope, I would say. But before we get to that, let’s start like we always do with the parable and the parable. There’s a grandparent who’s talking with their grandchild, and they say, in life there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear. and the grandchild stops and they think about it for a second. They look up at their grandparent and they say, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

David Whyte 00:03:13  Well, that parable would have meant something very different to me a few decades ago than it does now. And with all of my Zen sitting and Zen study, but also the deep states of attention that poetry and walking around, I might say bring. I’d say the one you feed is the one that holds both together, actually, that you don’t choose. We’re always choosing between what we think are opposing qualities, and there’s actually some invisible part of you that’s able to hold both horizons and to live in the territory between those horizons. I was just working with the story of of the young Finn McCool out on the road. he’s taken in under the tutelage of a wild bandit called Cormac McCall. And Cormac McCall takes the young Finn under his wing and teaches him the ways of a warrior. But he shows Finn their spear, which is bound to a tree with tight cloths, and it’s bound to a tree. Because this spear is so full of the spite of killing, as it says in the Irish mythological tradition, it’s so full of the spite of killing that it will kill anyone.

David Whyte 00:04:30  It comes across. And McCall says to Finn, you must never unbind this unless your life is at stake, and then you can unleash the spear and use it. And so there’s an understanding that we mostly operate through cooperation, through kindness. But there are times for cutting through and for eliminating. I’m not saying people, but eliminating qualities that are standing in your way. And they take a kind of fierce, ruthless presence, actually. And so human beings have never been able to choose just from the standpoint of evolutionary survival between their kind of cooperative qualities that they hold and the necessity to take a stand in the world, that not choosing that ability to hold both sides of the world. You could say these inner and outer horizons are very necessary and very powerful. I often think that horizons are enormously powerful in an individual human life. And one of the essays in constellations two is horizon. The way that we’re constantly seeing edges between what we know and what we do not know. And the horizons out in the world are certainly representative of that.

David Whyte 00:05:51  There’s nothing more beautiful than a far horizon to a human being, whether it’s mountains or the ocean or a far plane. And we’re finding out, actually, through medical research, that human beings are actually much calmer, much more at home in the world and much happier, actually, when they’re looking at a far horizon, when they have their heads up and their eyes gazing into the distance. And we all know the forms of unhappiness we have from gazing too closely at our screens, you know, whether it’s a phone or a laptop. But it’s interesting to think that we also have an inner horizon. We have a horizon insiders between what we can understand or actually feel physically about ourselves and what lies beneath. But we often feel that horizon inside us as a horizon of resistance or disturbance. We often see it as negative, actually, because what lies below will actually break apart. What lies above, what lies below. In many ways is the latest edge of our growing maturity, but it’s way beyond the life that we have actually constructed for ourselves on the surface.

David Whyte 00:07:08  So when you unbind that spear inside yourself, it feels as if it’s going to destroy and kill your present life. And so the ability to live with both what is nourishing in the world and what feels like qualities that will end your life is a real necessity. So the ability to actually go inside yourself and physically lean against that horizon, almost rest against it, and get used to what feels like a horizon of resistance and disturbance until it opens into something else. Often the qualities we feel there are what in your story, your parable, would be Associated with the consuming wolf, and so the ability to live in the territory between those two horizons, to hold both wolves inside you is what is called for in life.

Eric Zimmer 00:08:03  There are so many things you said there that I would like to respond to, and I’m only going to be able to hit a couple of them. But one, when you were talking about fierceness, I couldn’t help but think about Manjusri, the Buddhist, and what would you call him? A deity, a figure, it doesn’t matter.

Eric Zimmer 00:08:19  But he wields a flaming sword, right? To cut through delusion. I also was thinking about, in one of your essays, you write about Zen, that one of the things about Zen is it refuses to choose between different things. And then the last piece, I think, underlies a lot of what I think the book is pointing towards, which is that these words that typically, as you said, might fall under bad wolf category, or we might put under negative emotion category or however we want to label them are actually very useful and instructive. And when I look at the words that I picked for us to talk about this may be a personality test here in disguise. Anxiety, shame, guilt, injury, nagging. You know, unhappiness. You know, I left alone. Moon and reverie and sojourn again. Diagnostic, perhaps. Yeah, but the point is that the reason I picked those words is because you help turn them on their head to a certain degree. You help us see where indeed those things anxiety, shame, guilt can be not good within us, right? They can be destructive, but they are also hugely constructive, seen in the right light.

David Whyte 00:09:39  Exactly. And that’s the task of all these micro essays, both in constellations one and two, is to rehabilitate words and language that we use against ourselves. My understanding is that if there’s a quality that we feel, whether it’s jealousy and hate, then there’s a place for it in the constellation of our identity, actually. It’s necessary to understand what hate is saying to you. What anxiety is saying to you in my essay on unhappiness, which is one of my favorite ones. I say, if we’re happy now, unhappiness is how we got here. You always get to your happiness through the travails of your discontent and your difficulties. You have being in the world and being at ease in the world. And happiness is actually knocking on our door telling us this is the way to happiness. So it’s a rehabilitation of so many parts of ourselves that we’ve consigned to the negative, to one world for another. When you’re not supposed to choose, you’re supposed to live in the intimacy between them. And I’m thinking now of a Zen cone, where at the end of the story says that not knowing is most intimate, not knowing is most intimate, and you can think about that in a love relationship with your partner, your wife, your husband, that the more you can see them as if you’ve seen them for the first time, the more possibility you have of loving them for who they actually are, rather than the illusory identity that you’ve granted them.

David Whyte 00:11:14  So resentful part of the partnership and, and so but also not knowing allows you to look at a bird. You know, I was trained in zoology and marine zoology, and we learned all of the Latin names of animals and birds. So you’re automatically in the presence of a bird singing out the double barrelled Latin name of it, as if that tells you what you’re looking at. It’s actually a delusion. It’s actually a gate I had to teach myself when I went as a young naturalist to the Galapagos Islands. Not to say the Latin name to myself, to let the bird announce itself literally through its behavior, through its song, through its presence, through its flight. You know, to get another essence that lies beneath the name. Yeah. So we’re constantly naming things in ways that allow us to handle it, or I should say, allow our strategic minds to handle it. Yeah. Because we can be so terrified by the fierceness of the world in our evolutionary past, when we were gathered at night around the fire, and you listened out into the darkness and heard all of these cries and trumpet calls, and I’ve had this experience.

David Whyte 00:12:28  Actually, in today’s world, in the African bush, you told stories, you know, about what was out there and the story helped you to make sense of your fears and also of your communal protection, psychological protections. But it didn’t mean to say that your stories were true about what you are hearing or what you are frightened of. And all of our great traditions going back for hundreds of thousands of years, always say that the real ability to be present in the world is through deep, prolonged, silent attention and the ability to shape a deeply attentive identity that can sustain that form of attention is how we come to ground in this world, and how we actually live in the territory between what we call unhappiness and what we only call happiness.

Eric Zimmer 00:13:27  I want to go back to something you said a couple minutes ago about once we name something, we cease to see it. I think Krishnamurti had that quote, which was something like, you know, once the child learns the name of the bird, they never see the bird again pointing to what you’re saying.

Eric Zimmer 00:13:42  And at the same time. One of the things poetry does is it it’s specificity about what it’s seeing. It’s seeing a birch tree, not a tree. Even the Zen koan, you know, it’s not a tree in the courtyard. It’s the oak tree in the courtyard. So there is also at the same time, the concept and the name takes us away from the thing. There are ways in times in which the name brings us closer to the thing.

David Whyte 00:14:10  Yes, Emily Dickinson said a word is dead when it is said. Some say, but I say it just begins to live that day. There’s a poet speaking. I mean, the task of poetry is to use language in a way which grants life and is just as moveable as the thing that you’re speaking of. And so it’s why you’ll almost never see the word God in good poetry. And if you do see the word God, it always brings the poem to a halt. You have to use language that opens up the physical quality itself, and opens up the silence behind that word and the kind of gravitational pull of the world.

David Whyte 00:14:52  I often talk about the conversational nature of reality, and the ability of a human being to create a more conversational identity in that world, but you could say that every conversation is based on a mutual invitation. And we all know the way in intimate relationships that the conversation stops when our invitations stop. When you stop making an invitation to your partner in a marriage or a relationship, almost always the conversation and the relationship is coming to an end. So the invitation we make is through our eyes, our ears, and then our speech. So poetry is invitational speech in a way, and it’s joining the invitational nature of the world. The world is constantly calling us out from any subscribed or circumscribed perimeter that we’ve laid down for ourselves in the in the dust around our feet. It’s constantly calling us over the horizon that we’ve arranged for ourselves. And it’s one of the reasons the world is so nourishing. It’s one of the reasons the world is so terrifying at the same time, and our ability to submerge in screens and not be physically present in the world is definitely one of the ways where we’re hiding.

David Whyte 00:16:10  And especially in North America, it’s almost become a cultural norm to walk into places where everyone has their head down in screens. You know where they are controlling, what they see, what they’re listening to in many ways. And the wilder, more abandoned edges of the world, you know, are kept at bay, where you don’t have control of who you meet, where the conversation leads you, how your physical body is behaving in the presence of other physical bodies. So inner and outer horizons, the conversational nature of reality, the invitational nature of reality that will never, ever lead us alone. Which which is why we so often get anxious about the world. But anxiety is one of the telling qualities that tell us we’re supposed to respond to a certain knock on our door in a way other than the way we’re responding to it now.

Eric Zimmer 00:17:08  So let’s move on to anxiety. It’s one of your essays, and I was wondering if maybe you could just read the first couple paragraphs of it?

David Whyte 00:17:18  Yes. Yeah, I was just revising this the other day, actually.

David Whyte 00:17:22  So this is the latest version or just a few sentences changed, but, crucial sentences. I think anxiety is the mask that truth wears when we refuse to stop and uncover its face. Anxiety is the mask that truth wears when we refused to stop and uncover its face. The disembodied state I feel when I pretend to put things right by worrying about them instead of conversing with them. The disembodied state I feel when I pretend to put things right by worrying about them instead of conversing with them. Anxiety is my ever present excuse for not truly resting into the body or the breath, or a world where I might find out that truth. Anxiety is the temporary helper. Going by the name of worry, who, when turned into our constant living companion, becomes our formidable jailer in the midst of anxiety. We always haunt the body like an unhappy ghost from the past, instead of living in it as alive. Anticipation of our future Anxiety creates the ghostlike sense of living timidly in our mortal friends so that we begin living in the world in the same way as a troubled guest, a guest who does not believe they deserve the rest, and hospitality that the body, the breath, or the world can offer.

David Whyte 00:18:58  Anxiety is the mind refusing to be consoled and nourished, either by the body itself, or by the beauty of the world that this body inhabits. Anxiety is an extended state of denial. The refusal to put right something that needs to be put right, because putting it right often means feeling real anguish, a real sense of the unknown, and the need to change at a fundamental level.

Eric Zimmer 00:19:31  That’s beautiful.

David Whyte 00:19:32  That last line is crucial about the refusal to feel real anguish. Anxiety is often a limbo state where we refuse to actually fall down into the grief that we’re actually feeling. You know, if you read back into our mythological past or even into the Bible, the King James Bible, you see people are constantly falling down, weeping or tearing their clothes. There was an understanding that a full state of physical grief is actually a form of enlightenment. We’ve all had that experience where we lose someone close to us, you know, without just breaks apart all of our defenses, and we break down weeping. And for many people, that is the nearest experience they will have to what is called kensho in the Zen experience of breakthrough, of enlightenment.

David Whyte 00:20:30  Actually, you’re on an edge. There’s nowhere else to be in the world. There’s no further place to go. You’re intimate with the loss. You’re intimate with your own physical body in the world. You’ve given up your hopes for an easy explanation, and you’re just plunged into the sheer physical absence of the person that you’ve lost. And there was a moment back in the 13th century where the great Dominican mystic Meister Eckhart was asked by someone, obviously in the state in a state of grief because he said, Where is God? Where is God? And Eckhart said, God is nowhere. God is pure absence. The person he must have thought a lot of the person he said this to. Because, you know, it’s asking a lot of the person to whom he’s speaking. So it’s probably someone who was a student of of Eckhart, that he’d be worthy of this description, that he’d be up to and able for understanding God in this way. That God is, is the far horizon of your you’re young, it’s where you’re being pulled to out of yourself.

David Whyte 00:21:37  Yeah, it’s the greatest context you can imagine. And, you know, even as you’re imagining it, that it will lead you to places that you still cannot imagine.

–

Eric Zimmer 00:22:07  Back to anxiety. I think part of the problem with anxiety is that I think it arises out of uncertainty. Let’s say I’m anxious about something. If that thing were to actually occur, I have developed some degree of capability of allowing myself to go into the grief, the heartache, the pureness of all these things we’re talking about. What I found harder to do is when that loss is looming and may or may not happen. And it seems those are the really difficult things to set down. The ones that could go either way.

David Whyte 00:22:43  Yes. Yes. So this is, you know, the powerful physical gift that deep silence gives you is to allow the world to be itself and to announce, as it goes along, what’s actually occurring. Because we all know how many of our anxieties will never actually come to pass. And we all know the way that things we should be anxious about will come to pass.

Eric Zimmer 00:23:09  Right.

David Whyte 00:23:10  So quite often.

Eric Zimmer 00:23:11  That we have no idea. Or even coming.

David Whyte 00:23:13  Yeah. What we’re worrying about is not what we should be worrying about. Precisely. And the ability to see to the center of the pattern also strips away all of these necessities that the surface that we think we need in order to be ourselves. Silence always leads you to a radical kind of Of simplicity and so many of the things that you’re defending on the surface, you realize are ridiculous and part of some absurd project that you decided are your ancestors decided to hand down to you, and you immediately eliminate a lot of the things you’re going to worry about just by paying attention in deep silence and starting to shape an identity that’s in that deep silence.

Eric Zimmer 00:23:58  The horizons that you were talking about. I was actually going to save that kind of end of the interview, because I think it is such a uplifting and hopeful, although there’s fear embedded in it. But ultimately, for me, it ends up being hopeful because this idea that there is a horizon out there that I can’t yet imagine is really consoling to me, because I think what we all tend to do is we have something that feels important to us, and it’s out there in the future and it’s uncertain, and we want it to go a certain way, because all we can imagine, as far as we are able to imagine, is how this thing we want won’t happen. And that’s as far as we can see. But a horizon says there is something beyond that.

David Whyte 00:24:46  The definition of a horizon that you can’t actually see what’s beyond it, but your imagination is drawn to it. Yes. And your physical body is drawn to it at the same time, we’re migratory creatures, actually. We came out of Africa hundreds of thousands of years ago, following horizon after horizon. It was part of our ability to survive and be in this world, actually. But it’s also part of our joy, the joy of our beauty and of exploration. Often when we lose our relationship to beauty, we also lose our relationship to courage, which is really our heartfelt love of the world and care for the world. And so there’s another paragraph here in the essay on anxiety. The way we use it as a defense against beauty and against nourishment, and against all the ways that the world is actually giving to us. You know, through the blue of the sky, the green of grass, you know, the wind across the mountainside.

David Whyte 00:25:53  Constant anxiety is an unconscious defense against what is calling us to a deeper understanding, ever present anxiety actually covers over and prevents me from feeling fully what is preying on my mind, or what is trying to be gifted to me. Constant anxiety is our constant way of not paying attention. Anxiety is the trembling surface identity that finds the full measure of our anguish too painful to bear. Constant fretting is our way of turning away from and attempting to make a life free from the necessities of heartbreak. Anxiety is our greatest defense against the vulnerabilities of intimacy and a real understanding of others, allowing our hearts to actually break. Might be the first step in freeing ourselves from anxiety. That’s probably the most radical line I wrote in the essay. Allowing our hearts to actually break might be the first step in freeing ourselves from anxiety. There’s another essay in here called Care the word care, and my favorite line in that essay is care doesn’t care if you don’t want to care. Human beings don’t have a choice about caring. They always care about something.

David Whyte 00:27:16  Yes, and care is the measure of our heartfelt participation in the world. And the only way you can stop caring is to actually close yourself off from the world. Yeah. So opening up the path of care is also opening up the path of heartbreak. There is no sincere path a human being can take in this life without having their heart broken. And yet we spend enormous amounts of energy trying to find a path where we will not have that imaginative organ broken open and displayed to the world. Right?

Eric Zimmer 00:27:56  I had something I was going to say and it just zipped away. Okay.

David Whyte 00:28:00  The heartbreak of interviewing.

Eric Zimmer 00:28:05  You just redeemed that. That’s probably going to end up staying in the interview. Now. Chris isn’t going to cut it. Exactly. Yes. Anyway, I’m going to move on because it’s gone. But I’m going to stay with anxiety for a second. And I’d like to talk a little bit about what do we do with this? Because again, I think sometimes, yes, it’s a way of avoiding what we’re actually feeling.

Eric Zimmer 00:28:27  And I think in the other way, it’s what we talked about. It’s this uncertainty. And there is care in it because we are seeing that this thing really matters to us, and we don’t know what’s going to happen with it, which is, I think, what causes the anxiety. And you say that anxiety is difficult to shed because it always refuses to rest, and rest is where the answer to anxiety lies.

David Whyte 00:28:54  Yes. And actually rest lies under our anxiety. The very thing you’re being anxious about is the very thing you’re meant to converse with in a different way than your anxiety is allowing you to speak.

Eric Zimmer 00:29:09  That’s a beautiful way of saying.

David Whyte 00:29:10  Anxiety is both my protection and the sure indication of my deepest vulnerabilities, all at the same time. What seems completely wrong with my life, with the world, and with the time in which I live, is often my greatest manufactured defense against being fully part of this world, this body, and this time. What I worry about and fret about for my children’s future is often what keeps me from helping them into that future.

David Whyte 00:29:39  What I worry about, and what I am anxious about, keeps me in an insulated, busy state of mind that stops me feeling the true depth and vulnerability of how much I care, how much I want to make a difference, and how much I feel powerless to do it. So underneath anxiety lies this deep well of care. I care about something, but I’m afraid of caring to the depth to which it’s calling me, because it calls for a kind of physical vulnerability in the world that probably my parents or my schooling or my society did not initiate me into. So I need help. You know, you can get it from the poetic tradition, And from our great contemplative traditions that talk about the vulnerabilities. You know, we tend to think of Zen, for instance, and I’ve got an essay on Zen. We tend to think of it as this beautiful, clear state. And it’s all about polished floors and bronze bells and the clarity of sitting in silence. Very organized. But really, the path of Zen is the invitation to heartbreak.

David Whyte 00:30:49  And all of the Zen koans are often about physical breakdown, about not understanding something because you can’t stand being so fully invited, so physically into the world, and the breaking apart into tears are a great shout, or the moon reflected in the surface of the water in the bucket. The bucket breaks open, the water runs out, you know. And then it says, and then the monkey’s enlightened. And you don’t realize the physical experience of breakdown that the said monk went through at that time. Yeah.

Eric Zimmer 00:31:26  Yep. It’s always monk. So-and-so stubbed his toe, hit his head, was struck by lightning, was locked in a tomb. There’s always something like that to your point, which causes this breakthrough. 

I wanted to pause for a quick, good wolf reminder. This one’s about a habit change and a mistake I see people making. And that’s really that. We don’t think about these new habits that we want to add in the context of our entire life. Right. Habits don’t happen in a vacuum.

Eric Zimmer 00:31:54  They have to fit in the life that we have. So when we just keep adding, I should do this, I should do that, I should do this. We get discouraged because we haven’t really thought about what we’re not going to do in order to make that happen. So it’s really helpful for you to think about where is this going to fit and what in my life might I need to remove? If you want to step by step guide for how you can easily build new habits that feed your good wolf, go to Good Wolf Range and join the Free Master class. Let’s move on to a couple of the other things. There’s so many that I want to talk about, and the book is amazing in that way. I don’t know how many you wrote, but there’s a lot I ended up choosing like 25, and then I had to edit way down from there. So I want to make sure we get a little bit of a tour.

David Whyte 00:32:41  The number is important actually, because it was a part of the story.

David Whyte 00:32:45  I began very naturally writing these essays, and I created a reader circle and did 24 people signed up for it, and I did 24 one every two weeks for people. And that got me writing. And then I did another 24, and then I said, oh, I have a book. And then I added a few more and lo and behold, it came out with 52 essays in the first book. And all of the reviewers said, oh, a pack of cards of one for each week of the year. But it was just sheer luck that I put 52 out. And so I decided to do 52 again in the second one, just because the number had been so talismanic, so luckily talismanic for the first one. And I actually wrote 65 essays in seven months last year in a kind of delirium. And it was a delirium, actually. And then I chose 52 out of the 65 to put out in the book.

Eric Zimmer 00:33:37  I think that’s very interesting, because one of the things that I noticed in beginning to read the book, and this is a this is a feature of our modern life, right? That we’re going so fast is that at first reading of some of the essays, you know, I’m talking about the first hour in the book or so.

Eric Zimmer 00:33:55  I’m feeling impatient because I’m like, this is beautiful, but what’s the bottom line? You know, David, lay it out for me. What’s the bottom line? And as I had a little bit more time with it and I began to slow down, then they start working on a completely different level. And so I think a week is actually an interesting amount of time to think about spending with one of these.

David Whyte 00:34:18  As well, said Eric, because you’re not meant to start this book and read it all the way through, and it would probably kill you in the way it killed me to write it. You did.

Eric Zimmer 00:34:28  That? Yeah.

David Whyte 00:34:29  You’re meant to take one essay and spend a few days with it, actually, and they’re short enough that you can return to them. And yes, exactly the physical experience itself. It’s like poetry. You can’t speed read poetry. Poetry itself actually engages you to slow down to the same physical experience in which it was actually written.

Eric Zimmer 00:34:50  Yes. There’s an old Chinese line, something like read a book for the thousandth time, and the truth will emerge. And when I started studying with the Zen teacher, really? Seriously, I remember he was like, okay, here’s the book to read. And it was, I think it was Appreciate Your Life by, Mizuki Roshi doesn’t doesn’t really matter. But what I noticed was I was told and encouraged to read that book in a totally different way. This is in the last decade since I had this podcast and as part of having this podcast, I’m reading a lot, right? Because I’m trying to honor every guest by reading their things. I’m trying to understand the material, so it’s the way I show love to the guests, to the audience, right? But it’s fast. And I suddenly realized when I was doing this reading for my Zen practice, I was reading a book that I could have read in an afternoon for six months. Yes. And your essays, I think, provoke a similar thing. There’s a lot of facets as you turn the diamond around, you know, the diamond being the word.

Eric Zimmer 00:35:49  Right. There’s so many facets. And of course, there’s that thing that happens when we read, which is that if we truly are engaging, we are not the same person that we were the first time we read it.

David Whyte 00:36:01  Yes, exactly. I mean, the essays are written in a poetic fashion and in poetry you only need one line. Actually, they are like koans. In my essay on despair in the first book. The only line you need from that essay is despair takes us in when we have nowhere else to go. Despair takes us in when we have nowhere else to go. Everything’s in that line. You know the shelter that’s in despair. The invitation to give up. It’s a temporary form of giving up. Where we pretend we can’t go on. In a sense, in order to go down to another layer of ground. And so, yes. Prolonged attention. You’re much better reading one line and staying with that for a good few hours or one paragraph. Then you are running through the whole book, you know, so quickly.

David Whyte 00:36:48  So as you know, Eric, we have a our educational systems Commoditize learning. And I think actually one of the bright sides of what’s also going to have a big shadow, you know, with artificial intelligence is that we’re no longer going to be able to test people on rote learning. Right. It’s going to free us up. We’re going to have to reimagine what learning and testing what learning means. We’re going to have to go back to more of a, you know, the ancient oral inheritance of testing presence. Yes. And testing understanding at a deep level.

Eric Zimmer 00:37:26  What you say about only needing one line. It’s funny, when I listen to you read, there are so many lines that could be the line that I expect. That’s the end, right? Like you just hit it with the line that ends up and and then it goes on. And I say that as a compliment, not as a negative thing. Right. Because each of these lines is good enough that it could be an ending.

Eric Zimmer 00:37:49  And you’d have so much to ponder and reflect upon. Let’s move into another essay I am going to skip. Bye for now. To that, I really want to talk about guilt and shame because it’s really important, right? Those are really big things, but I feel like I want to hit one that just was the one that I most was like, That I didn’t see coming. And it’s about nagging.

David Whyte 00:38:14  Yes.

Eric Zimmer 00:38:16  You say nagging is love and listened to from both sides. Say more about nagging. I found it a really beautiful essay and surprising.

David Whyte 00:38:25  Well thank you. There’s a number of essays that are begun. Tongue in cheek. The one now you know. Yes, they are now. Where I say now is not what it was. Yeah, but then it goes into more serious territory. And I just wanted to choose something that we all have to work with in relationship. And I thought, have I ever come across a long term relationship where nagging doesn’t occur, you know, either in your own life or witnessing other marriages? Yeah.

David Whyte 00:38:56  And I realized what an emblem of care it is, actually. And if you’re in a relationship where you’re never nagged, you do have to ask yourself if the person really cares about you. I mean, we know all the evidence of the way that in relationship, especially for men, you’re going to live longer being in relationship, most especially with a woman who’s actually asking you if you’re taking care of yourself in the right way. And men live so much longer in relationship. Unfortunately, women don’t, so they need to kind of help. But but nagging is love and listened to from both sides. The helpless nagger and the equally helpless naggee nagging is something both sides want to turn away from. Something both sides would rather not experience, but something that is also an abiding and ancient necessity in every long term relationship. Love meets powerlessness. Love meets powerlessness. Nagging is our way of knocking on a door when those living inside most need our help but refuse it, or when we ourselves neglect again and again to ask for the necessary help.

David Whyte 00:40:14  Nagging is necessary in every committed human relationship. Because nagging is the way love tries to survive when it feels it has no other way.

Eric Zimmer 00:40:27  Yeah, the two lines there for me are when love meets powerlessness and then the last one. Nagging is the way love tries to survive when it has no other way. And yes, I love it because it goes back to these things that we see as negative point towards what we truly care about and what matters. And nagging is just another example of that. It is. There’s something that I want. There’s something deeper I want here in this relationship, and I’m not getting it. And it’s partially why nagging often the relationship advice is like, look underneath the thing. It’s not about the thing. It’s not about the trash being taken out or not being taken out. It’s not about it’s usually about something far deeper. Which gets to another essay that you’ve alluded to, which is where we’re feeling uncared for. So we’re nagging as an attempt because it’s the way we’re trying to keep love alive when it feels it has no other way.

Eric Zimmer 00:41:24  Just such a beautiful idea.

David Whyte 00:41:26  Yes, it can also be, you know, proactively helpful in a way that can help a person who’s refusing to get diagnosed, you know, for some kind of pain they have in their body. They’re just trying to soldier on. You know, most especially in the masculine psyche and the necessity to keep knocking on that door and to find different ways of saying it until it’s heard.

Eric Zimmer 00:42:08  I think that’s so tricky to figure out. I’ll give you an example. I’ve got a friend and her husband is taking terrible care of himself. Right. High blood pressure, you know, high cholesterol, way overweight, eating terribly, not exercising. And his father went in his 50s from heart disease. And he is now in his 40s. And they have young children. So she is really flummoxed by this and frustrated by it. Right, because she doesn’t want her kids or herself to be left without their partner in potentially 5 to 10 years. And so I think what you come up against here is this also love meets powerlessness.

Eric Zimmer 00:42:50  Like, what can you do that doesn’t destroy the relationship by trying to get somebody to do something they don’t currently want to do?

David Whyte 00:42:59  Yes. I mean, it’s the invitation on both sides is on the one side to say it in a way in which there are no defenses against what you’re saying. And on the person who’s being asked. It’s listening at another level. Yes, but sometimes in order for that listening to occur, you literally have to get down on your knees. You can’t just keep saying it as a logistical invitation. Get to the doctor, get to the doctor. It may actually necessitate you as the nagger going to another level of intimacy, literally getting down on your knees in tears and saying why it’s so important to you. You know, if that doesn’t work, it may be that the relationship is coming to an end. There are certain points, you know, where you try sincerely, metaphorically and mythologically three times. Yeah. And if it’s not received then you’re meant to hold a different conversation with that person.

David Whyte 00:44:00  But you won’t find out until you follow what looks like nagging on the surface to its foundation in a real invitational conversation that displays your vulnerability in why you’re asking this.

Eric Zimmer 00:44:14  And I think it gets to a really challenging thing, which is what are we willing to or able to live with in a relationship? And what is our relationship with ourselves about the trade offs that life inevitably involves? Yes, I’d like that to be your next book. Take the Serenity Prayer and write an entire book about how the wisdom to know the difference in lots of really knotty situations. Why don’t you tackle that one next?

David Whyte 00:44:43  Mark, that’s your next book.

Eric Zimmer 00:44:45  Actually, I honestly think it might be. I really sort of jokingly, but not because that idea of, well, you just accept the things you can’t change and you change the things you can is lovely on the surface. But boy, it’s complicated because we don’t know, right? You don’t know, am I? One more ask from the person changing.

David Whyte 00:45:06  Well, you know, there’s another level to this is the way we nag ourselves. We nag ourselves in unproductive ways. Nagging is, you know, you will often say to yourself in the mirror, oh my God, you know, you need to lose some weight, you know? But it’s really underneath that the need to be lithe, to be young, to be healthy in the world, you know, and the ability to actually talk to yourself in the mirror in a way in which you would want to listen to yourself, is a whole discipline in and of itself. If you talk to your friends the way you talk to yourself in the mirror, you’d never have another friend in your life, actually, right? So the ability to have compassion for yourself, you could say that’s a practice of deepening the conversation, deepening what looks on the surface like nagging. Yeah. The conclusion of the micro essay on nagging is nagging. Is that heavily disguised? Beautiful. But unlistened to invitation to a Better Life. We all want to receive nagging. Is that heavily disguised, beautiful but unlistened to invitation to a better life we all want to receive always despite ourselves. And always, always, always, always. Despite the other person trying to be brought out of the place where it is presently hiding. Nagging is love. Just love. unlistened to from both sides.

Eric Zimmer 00:46:30  That point you made about. We’re nagged quite often because we’re not really listening right to our conscience, to what is good for our health, to the courageous, beckoning path we refuse again and again to take. And I think that’s what’s so interesting also points to a lot about what you talk about in the essay on guilt. Right? Which is we tend to think we should move away from it, but it could be enormously instructive. So that nagging voice inside of us, I think, calls upon us to have some degree of discernment about is it nagging us unnecessarily and in unkind and habitual ways like you just described. Or is it nagging me because there’s a deeper call that I’m not answering? And like many things, that’s difficult to figure out. But one of the things that you’ve said multiple times, and I’ve heard you say it before, but I don’t think it landed for me in the same way that it did today, is that it’s about the conversations that we have with these things and going to a deeper level of conversation with them than we normally do.  That seems to be an underlying theme of what you’re pointing us to in all of these.

David Whyte 00:47:39  Yes, and we can tend to think of conversation as just some kind of verbal exchange, you know. But the Latin roots, the etymology of conversation, lead us to its original meaning, which is inside out. Actually, converse means inside out, and you’re literally meant to bring the inside to the outside. That’s the true invitation in every conversation. We all know the satisfaction when we have an exchange and they’re rare, you know. Although you can make them less rare through practicing deeper conversations, we all know the pleasure and satisfaction we get when we suddenly say something we didn’t realize we knew, and that we we suddenly say something together. I mean, I’m having that experience with you, Eric, in this interview where we’re saying things about things I’ve written here, which I’d never quite said before. That’s incredibly satisfying. It’s bringing the inside of an experience out into the world again. Yes. And the essays themselves are meant to do that.

David Whyte 00:48:42  But it’s interesting to try and think of more than interesting to think of conversation as a physical experience of bringing the inside to the outside. Yeah. Not just what’s hidden verbally, but the physical experience that’s hidden under the words out into the world.

Eric Zimmer 00:49:01  That’s beautifully said. Let’s lighten things up here quite literally, because you say that humor is a disguised form of spiritual discipline. I’ve often called it a spiritual virtue. Levity is a spiritual virtue. Talk to me about how humor is a disguised form of a spiritual discipline.

David Whyte 00:49:20  Humor tells us that whatever context we’ve arranged for ourselves, in our minds, or in our religious beliefs, there’s always another context that makes your context absurd. Right. And just understanding that from the get go gives you a real sense of humor, a real ability to live at many different levels at once. And, you know, humor’s really big in the Irish culture, and it’s big because it fits with the Irish understanding that whatever you say always has another context that contradicts it. Exit.

David Whyte 00:50:00  Yeah. Yeah. And every conversation in the west of Ireland is actually based on this dynamic, every real conversation. You try to subvert the original basis on which the conversation started, and then everyone’s really happy. And you can go on to the next subject. Actually, I’m serious about humor. As serious about humor as the understanding. Now, however you’ve described yourself. It will not survive meeting with reality. I had this experience many years ago up in the Himalayas of almost dying from amoebic dysentery. I was hallucinating for three days and three nights, actually, in a yak manger at 10,000ft. And that’s outside where this family were keeping me alive, actually. And, the culminating experience after three days was sitting up covered in dried yak dung and straw, just laughing outrageously. The whole family ran out, actually, to see what was happening. And my experience was that this whole David White project was totally absurd. Yeah. Yeah. Yep. And I had this name. I had this idea about myself, and it was just absolutely ridiculous.

David Whyte 00:51:15  And I was literally raving sitting up. But it was a real powerful breakthrough that stayed with me after I came out of the hallucination. And beneath me was this river in the valley, the high valley that came out of the slopes of Del Aguirre. And I realized, looking at the river, we’d given a name to that river, the Martian river valley. But actually you were naming something that was already gone. And you might as well try to understand the human being, you know, through this essential movement, through the world, through the way they hold the conversation of life rather than through any static nomenclature, we often will try to dismiss a person by labeling them. You see it in the adolescent behavior emanating from the white House at the moment. You know, naming and nicknaming people, giving people names that make them small in the eyes of the world that embarrass them, you know. You know, this is the way that we behave as adolescents in trying to keep the world at bay and trying to keep other adolescents at bay.

David Whyte 00:52:24  We want a more mature experience of the world. We stop naming people too early in the process. You know, we stop calling our wife wife, our husband husband, our partner partner. We start releasing them from the names we’ve given them. You’re good at this. You’re bad at that. You know it’s your fault. It’s my fault. And you start to let the words emanate from another, more movable, more conversational, more invitational, more vulnerable. Robustly vulnerable. Where vulnerability is not a weakness, but a strength, a place. And it’s actually not a place. It’s more of a wave form or it’s a tide. It’s. It’s the sea that lies beneath you and between you and the world. I have a whole book of love poetry called The Sea. And you actually. And it’s the ability to stay in love with a person by actually feeling that tidal give and take inside them. They don’t even know who they are. So how could you give them a name, right, and say you know who they are, they’re just finding out who they are.

David Whyte 00:53:38  We give names to our son, our daughter, and about who they are, but they’re often out in the world trying to find that out themselves. So how could you, even as a father or mother, name fully the child that you brought into the world? Actually.

Eric Zimmer 00:53:54  And as soon as you name it, it’s something else, right? I mean, that’s the Taoist view of reality. And Zen comes out of Taoism, which is that life is all process, it’s all event, it’s all relation. These things that we are giving nouns, they aren’t that way really at all. And the same thing happens if you dig deep down into the fundamental level of reality, right? If you get down into quantum physics, you find things aren’t things in the way we think they are.

David Whyte 00:54:23  Yeah, there are great lines in a love poem by Pablo Neruda. He says, when the rice withdraws from the earth, the grains of its flour, when the wheat hardens its little hip joints and lifts its face of a thousand hands, I make my way to the grove, where the woman and the man embrace to touch the innumerable sea of what continues.

David Whyte 00:54:48  El Mar innumerable. Continues to touch the innumerable sea of what Continues. So we’re afraid of what continues, because what continues may take the other person away from us. And that’s the risk we take, you know, in loving fully, it’s always the full measure of your ability to give the other person away to the world. And most of the time they come back to us. But there may be a tide that takes them away from us completely. Yeah. And that’s what we’re afraid of, is, is the change in the world that will break your heart. So the ability to understand that heartbreak is part of your sincere dedication to the other, actually, and the sincere dedication to our world at the same time.

Eric Zimmer 00:55:39  So listener and thinking about that and all the other great wisdom from today’s episode, if you were going to isolate just one top insight that you’re taking away, what would it be? Remember, little by little, a little becomes a lot. Change happens by us repeatedly taking positive action. And I want to give you a tip on that. And it’s to start small. It’s really important when we’re trying to implement new habits, to often start smaller than we think we need to, because what that does is it allows us to get victories. And victories are really important because we become more motivated when we’re feeling good about ourselves, and we become less motivated when we’re feeling bad about ourselves. So by starting small and making sure that you succeed, you build your motivation for further change down the road. If you’d like a step-by-step guide for how you can easily build new habits that feed your good wolf, go to Goodwolf.me/change and join the free masterclass. 

I think that is a beautiful place for us to wrap up. You and I are going to talk for a couple more minutes. In the post-show conversation. We may get into shame and guilt. We might get into injury. There’s so many good ones. Unordinary listeners, if you’d like access to that post-show conversation and all the other post-show conversations.

Eric Zimmer 00:56:54  AD free episodes. A special episode I do just for you each week. You can go to one you feed, join, and become part of our community and help support this show. David, thank you so much. It is always a pleasure to talk with you. I feel like I could do it for hours. Thank you.

David Whyte 00:57:10  Thank you Eric, that passed very quickly. Always a good sign. An experience of the timeless in the conversation. So thank you too.

Eric Zimmer 00:57:18  Thank you so much for listening to the show. If you found this conversation helpful, inspiring, or thought provoking, I’d love for you to share it with a friend. Sharing from one person to another is the lifeblood of what we do. We don’t have a big budget, and I’m certainly not a celebrity, but we have something even better. And that’s you just hit the share button on your podcast app, or send a quick text with the episode link to someone who might enjoy it. Your support means the world, and together we can spread wisdom one episode at a time.  Thank you for being part of the one You Feed community.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

Unlock Your Inner Anthem: A Tribute to Mike Peters

May 2, 2025 Leave a Comment

Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

This is a special episode from our archives with one of my favorite musicians, Mike Peters. Mike recently passed away, and this episode is more than a conversation, it’s a tribute to a beautiful soul. In our chat, we explored the idea of our lives being anthems; how defiance, hope, and inner strength were a soundtrack for the formative years, and later in life. This was an open hearted talk about what it means to fight not just with force, but with love. We talked about instinct as a spiritual guide, about staying true to yourself when the world tries to pull you off course. And about how music can be both a weapon and a healing balm in a world that often glorifies noise and speed. Mike’s life and his music were reminders that strength can come from stillness, from surrender, and from the simple act of standing up for light when everything around you feels dark.

Key Takeaways:

  • Mike’s experiences with cancer and resilience.
  • The founding and mission of the Love Hope Strength Foundation.
  • The significance of positivity and community support in overcoming adversity.
  • The impact of music as a source of strength and healing.
  • Reflections on the parable of two wolves and nurturing positive traits.
  • Early musical influences and the evolution of Peters’ career.
  • The deeper meaning behind the song “Strength” in relation to Mike’s health journey.
  • The inspiration and themes behind the song “Blaze of Glory.”
  • The role of spirituality and self-trust in navigating life’s challenges.
  • The communal aspect of music and its ability to foster connection and unity.


Mike Peters is a Welsh musician, best known as the lead singer of The Alarm. Between 2011 and 2013, Peters was the vocalist for Big Country as well as The Alarm. Mike was the founder of the Love Hope Strength Foundation, which has found close thousands of potentially life saving bone marrow donor matches; built the first ever children’s cancer center in Tanzania; supported the Bhaktapur Cancer Center in Nepal with life saving equipment and registered over 60,000 donors through it’s ‘Get On the List’ program.

Mike Peters:  Website | Instagram

If you enjoyed this conversation with Mike Peters, check out these other episodes:

The Journey of Life Through Song with Frank Turner

Mike Scott of the Waterboys

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

Mike Peters 00:00:00  When you take advice from someone else sometimes and you go along with it and you think it doesn’t feel right, you end up bang, there’s a crash at the end of the road.

Chris Forbes 00:00:16  Welcome to the one you feed. Throughout time, great thinkers have recognized the importance of the thoughts we have. Quotes like garbage in, garbage out or you are what you think ring true. And yet, for many of us, our thoughts don’t strengthen or empower us. We tend toward negativity, self-pity, jealousy, or fear. We see what we don’t have instead of what we do. We think things that hold us back and dampen our spirit. But it’s not just about thinking our actions matter. It takes conscious, consistent, and creative effort to make a life worth living. This podcast is about how other people keep themselves moving in the right direction. How they feed their good wolf.

Eric Zimmer 00:01:00  Mike Peters was one of my earliest musical heroes. In high school, I probably listened to his band, The Alarm more than any other.

Eric Zimmer 00:01:09  They’re anthems of defiance, hope and Inner Strength were a soundtrack for those formative years, and later in life, Mike became a hero to me in an even deeper way for how he faced 30 years of blood cancer with astonishing grace, how he kept making meaningful music, and how he gave his life to service through his foundation. Love, hope, strength. Sadly, Mike passed away yesterday, so today’s episode is more than a conversation. It’s a tribute to a beautiful soul. A few years ago, I had the great good fortune to sit down with him before a show he was doing in Akron, Ohio. What unfolded was an open hearted talk about what it means to fight not just with force, but with love. We talked about instinct as a spiritual guide, about staying true to yourself when the world tries to pull you off course. And about how music can be both a weapon and a healing balm in a world that often glorifies noise and speed, Mike’s life and his music were reminders that strength can come from stillness, from surrender, and from the simple act of standing up for light when everything around you feels dark.

Eric Zimmer 00:02:22  I’m deeply grateful to have had this conversation. I hope it brings you some of the strength that Mike brought to me in my life, and so many others. I’m Eric Zimmer and this is the one you feed. Hi, Mike, welcome to the show.

Mike Peters 00:02:35  Nice to be.

Eric Zimmer 00:02:36  Here. I am very excited to have you on. I was reading the other day. You were talking about meeting Bruce Springsteen, you know, and how you what it’s like when you meet somebody that you looked up to at a certain age. And so when I was 16, I was a huge fan of the alarm and have remained. So it’s a real honor to meet you and get to sit down and talk with you.

Mike Peters 00:02:54  Nice to meet you too.

Eric Zimmer 00:02:55  So our podcast is called The One You Feed, and it’s based on the parable of two wolves, where there’s a grandfather who’s talking with his grandson. He says, in life there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear.

Eric Zimmer 00:03:15  And the grandson stops, and he thinks about it for a second, and he looks up at his grandfather and he says, well, grandfather. Which one wins? And the grandfather says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your own life and in the work that you do.

Mike Peters 00:03:29  Well, well, straight off the top of my head, it means to, feed the positive side of your personality. And, which is something I’ve always tried to do throughout my whole musical life. And my life is an adult and a human being and, you know, raise my own kids in a good way. Treat the people I meet in the way I want to be treated myself. You know, even with an audience, when I go on stage, I always try to put myself in the audience and think, well, what do they want from the show tonight? And, and, and just try to have as much respect for the other people that, come into the journey that I’m on in life.

Mike Peters 00:04:10  And, and there’s times when we walk the path together, sometimes people go off on their own, and then they come back and, and let’s allow people to, always be at one with you as you are in step with people. Come in step. That’s great. They fall out of step. That’s just life. And once they come back into line again, then we just carry on. And I’ve never wanted to, have enemies in life. I don’t think I’ve got any enemies. And I’ve always tried to, treat people, with care and, and, and understanding and, you know, and there’s times when, life has forced people I know apart from me, and, and I always try to see everything from both sides of the story and so that you can heal any rifts that happen in, in life so that when life brings you back together, which it always does, either fatefully or, through, strategy, you can still have a relationship with people from your history, without ill will or rancor or bitterness.

Mike Peters 00:05:21  And, it’s all part of life’s rich pageant of understanding and learning and, and and that’s the wolf I try to feed.

Eric Zimmer 00:05:28  Excellent. So you you sort of emerged onto the music scene. You know, some of your songs refer to seeing the Sex Pistols, seeing The Clash being involved in that scene. And yet everything you know, from the very earliest alarm work, there’s a there’s a positivity that’s in your music that that just is expressed differently than a lot of that other music. There’s a there’s a defiance in your music, but there’s a, there’s a clear positivity. Where did that come from so early in your career?

Mike Peters 00:05:58  Well, I think, you know, I sometimes talk about it on the stage when I play in the spirit of 76, that that which was, you know, seeing the sex and the clash in that early 76, 77 period when punk broke into Britain. I saw both bands up close. In the earliest days, I saw the Sex Pistols in 76, in October 76th, and it was a life changing experience.

Mike Peters 00:06:22  And hearing Johnny Rotten sing anarchy Pretty Vacant Submission. I didn’t know they sounded amazing, right? But I didn’t know what the language meant, and no one taught me what anarchy was in my high school or submission. They were brand new words. I heard them for the first time from the mouth of Johnny Rotten. And I went up to him at the gig and asked him what anarchy in the UK meant, and he told me to f off.

Eric Zimmer 00:06:47  And that’s not surprising.

Mike Peters 00:06:49  No, it’s not, but he I think he was his way of just challenging me and Smashing the preconceptions and, almost like slapping you across the face to wake you up. Right. And so that was a big moment. And then and then I did see the clash in 1977 on the White Riot tour in the Electric Circus in Manchester. And I was, followed the tour down to Barbarella to see they were doing a sort of secret gig there, and they were supposed to play at, Birmingham Rag Market, and it got cancelled, but they turned up and I was and they were playing a secret gig in Barbarella, and I could see the amps going on.

Mike Peters 00:07:26  I knew they were going to come on, and I went to the bathroom, and I stood in the doing my thing in the toilet, and I ended up stood next to Joe Strummer and the whole of the clash. And I asked Joe Strummer on the way out what the riot was all about. And, because I didn’t quite fully understand it from just hearing the record, I thought I did in, you know, internally and viscerally, but I didn’t know what a white riot was. Us. And he said to me it was about the future. And, and he gave me something positive back. And I think so from having, the sort of polarization of the seeing the two bands, that was really it was like the Flint. You know, it was created, the fire that the alarm came from, the positive and the negative. And I always leant towards the positive. I always remember thinking, if I meet somebody who comes up to me in that way, looking for advice, looking for, a sign, a sign, then I’ll give them something positive back.

Mike Peters 00:08:26  And, so I wanted to put that into my music. I wanted it to be uplifting for people, liberating for them. If they came to see a gig, especially if they were, you know, young and naive like I was when I saw the pistols, I, I didn’t know how to become a punk. Right. There was no manual. I didn’t know how to get skintight black jeans. I had to find them and I didn’t know how to get certain records. You had to go on incredible journeys across Britain to get records, and there was no internet. It wasn’t brought to your doorstep. And when we came on tour in America, you know, we were I was from a small town. We had no Svengali upbringing, like the pistols that had the benefit of an older guy like Malcolm McLaren and and Vivienne Westwood to dress them and Jamie Reed to do their artwork. We had none of that. You know, The clash had Bernie Rhodes and he’d been involved in the pistols camp, and they were helping shape those bands and shape the way give them books to read, give them clothes to wear.

Mike Peters 00:09:20  Help them with their stance and the way. Educate them a little bit about when they spoke to the media. We had none of that. It was we were just four kids from Real North Wales. We wanted to be in a band and we learnt our lessons the hard way and so we wanted our politics. If you like to be personal and we wanted it to be, a message that the listener got that empowered them a little bit or made them ask questions to go and find their their own answers. And and again, we grew up in a very extreme political time in the 80s that was, you know, came down from the Iron Lady at Margaret Thatcher. And, you know, we were brought up in a very musically, aggressive time in the music papers in Britain. The enemy was very politicized. In the 80s. There was the miners strike and and they were closing steelworks down. And it was a tough time. And every band that that walked into the enemy offices, it was demanded that they had the political rhetoric to back up what they wanted to hear.

Mike Peters 00:10:26  and we we weren’t like that. We our politics were different to that. It was easy for me to write about the villains. They were all there on the newspaper every day. You could knock them down easily. But to write about somebody who was struggling to make something from nothing in the aftermath of the political turmoil, that that required a different sort of approach musically. And, And that was what I was interested in. And, and, you know, I think I’m lucky that there’s still people who come to see me play now who were at a gig in Omaha, Nebraska, who had their life changed by seeing the alarm in a positive way, or someone who comes back to me and say they were at the brink of doing something drastic with their life and and they put on a strength album as their last record before they were going to do something they would regret, and it pulled them back from the brink. And and to me, how having that those testimonies come to me through the internet now or through the Facebook or the alarm com that’s, that’s all I ever wanted from my music, was to touch people and, and be meaningful to them and have some value.

Eric Zimmer 00:11:32  Yep. And, so you are out now. We’re sitting in Akron, Ohio. You’re going to play here in a little bit. And you are, a big part of what you’re doing is the 30th anniversary of the the strength record. I was curious, looking back on that record now. And you’ve done some rerecording of it, what does the song strength mean to you today, 30 years after you wrote and recorded it the first time?

Speaker 4 00:12:03  Who would like to fire that you need to survive? Who will be the lifeblood coursing through my veins like a river flowing. That will never change. I need someone I can’t keep. Oh.

Mike Peters 00:12:40  Well, it means more to me than it ever did. Because the. In the opening lines, it says. Who will be the lifeblood coursing through my veins. Now, that was more of a metaphoric line when I was writing it in 1985, but it’s a literal line for me now, because I’ve had to live with cancer for 20 years. You know, I’m at the point in life where I might need to have a transplant and have somebody else’s lifeblood flowing through my veins.

Mike Peters 00:13:06  That’s a very real, step in life I might have to take at some point in the future. So, when I sing that song and particular that line, it always stops me dead every, every night, because it’s literally come through in my own life.

Eric Zimmer 00:13:23  Now, one of the things that you did is, as you, have battled cancer is you founded the love, strength and hope of hope.

Mike Peters 00:13:29  Strength.

Eric Zimmer 00:13:30  Love, hope. Strength. Thank you. Foundation that has done a lot of work for people with cancer. One of the things you’ve done has been registering a lot of people to be, as I understand, bone marrow donors. Will you be doing that at the show tonight?

Mike Peters 00:13:43  Yeah, we will be tonight. We always hosted donor registry All our gigs. Okay. And through the charity’s formation in 2007, we’ve been able to work with over 10,000 other recording working artists in the world from Robert Plant and the Foo Fighters, Enrique Iglesias, Frank Turner.

Eric Zimmer 00:14:01  Yeah, we had Frank on the show.

Eric Zimmer 00:14:03  Yeah.

Mike Peters 00:14:03  And, you know, we’ve worked with all Dropkick Murphys, all kinds of bands, right down to the alarm and thousands of bands, you know, that are just up and coming who embrace what we do, which is we try to turn rock concerts into life saving events by holding a donor booth at those gigs, getting people to sign up to the International Bone Marrow Donor Registry by giving a cheek swap, giving their information, personal information so we can track them in life if they’re lucky enough to be called to save the life of someone who has blood cancer, like leukemia, like I have, and we’ve signed over 100,000 people to the registry. And we’ve we’ve found close to 1800 potentially life saving matches for people. And and it’s become, you know, as much of my life’s work as the alarm and and, you know, but it’s a real communal effort. It’s run by volunteers. We haven’t got any staff. We’ve got no staff in Britain. It’s a completely voluntary, charity in the UK.

Mike Peters 00:15:05  But with America being so big and we’re working with so many bands every night, we’ve got staff to facilitate some of it. But we still rely on volunteers, and public donations to help fund what we do. We work in partnership with Elite Blood Cancer. They they’re an organization with a massive donor, registry. And we put the people we find our gigs through our get on the list campaign onto their registry. And so someone who signs up to the show tonight in Akron, Ohio, could become a lifesaver for someone in Britain or Germany or anywhere in the world, who matches their DNA profile. And our if you do become a life saving donor, it’s it’s just an outpatient procedure. 99% of the times, it’s a just giving blood in hospital. And it’s an in and out procedure in a day. And then your blood will then give someone life.

Eric Zimmer 00:15:57  Yeah, we’ll definitely put on the show notes to the page and all that links to the foundation and fantastic.

Mike Peters 00:16:02  Thanks.

Eric Zimmer 00:18:13  In the 2000, there were some new alarm work that came out. It was a little bit I loved the energy and the and the aggressiveness of some of it.

Eric Zimmer 00:18:20  One of them is a song called Situation is Under Control.

Speaker 5 00:18:28  Everything is black and white. As the roof sings all around me everything is upside down. There’s a cardboard box at my feet. I’m going through hell. And I can’t speak. I’m going through hell and I can’t breathe. Oh, the situation is under control. Everything is as it should be. But that’s acceptable.

Eric Zimmer 00:19:02  Can you tell me a little bit about what went into the writing of that song, and what was going on with you when you wrote it?

Mike Peters 00:19:07  Yeah, I think life was completely out of control when I wrote that song. I had not long been diagnosed with leukemia, and, I just made an album for the local under attack, and, I didn’t know really 100% why my instinct was telling me that was the album title, and we’d finished making the album. We’d recorded a video for every single song in 24 hours. It was an audio visual release as much as it was just about the songs we want people to see the music as well as hear it.

Mike Peters 00:19:42  And, and then all of a sudden now I was diagnosed with leukemia for a it was my second cancer diagnosis. I had lymphoma before that. And I was off the charts ill and, I didn’t know it. And I went into hospital with some symptoms and they wouldn’t let me home. They sent me immediately to another hospital for treatment to bring me out of the danger zone. The doctors didn’t know how to even walked in the hospital. My blood was so thick with what I thought was dead white blood at the time that it was like oil. It just wasn’t even moving. And so I was taken to hospital to get out of the critical, region I was in. And and while I was there, my wife brought my iPod in so I could have some music to play while I was going through these procedures, and, And I’d forgotten that I’d put this Under Attack album on while I was out and about listening to it randomly to get a sequence going for the record. And I was lying in hospital.

Mike Peters 00:20:38  I was having this pretty intense procedure called Luka paresis. And, I was kind of in a bit of shock at the time as well. And going under and my iPod was on and this track came on. I didn’t know what it was. And, and it had the title that came to the title and it said, I’ll never give Up without a fight. And I knew that was that was the alarm that was on new record. And, and, and then I realized then I was so ill, my subconscious was driving this record. And then situation under control was was part of a series of music we created. it was called counterattack. And it was like the opposite to Under Attack, where I’d written the record under the pressure of cancer coming into my life and taking over, I decided to write music. That was my counterattack to that was me fighting back against the cancer. And songs like Situation Under Control were really me writing music that gave me a mental arsenal to be able to fight cancer in my mind and fight it, psychologically as well as physically.

Mike Peters 00:21:47  And I think I’ve always believed that music is is a great tool to have whenever you’re facing any adversity in life. It’s, it can release you from some of the pressure. It can help you fortify yourself for that big day that’s coming up, or when you’ve got to face that situation that you’re nervous about. You can play that favorite piece of music, and it lifts you up, and it gives you that little bit of courage, to, to face the day and, and, and so the situation and the control and the counter-attack series of music was, was really my way of being able to put myself in in a position to stand up to cancer.

Eric Zimmer 00:22:29  You’ve battled cancer twice. you know, it’s you’re still battling it, right? That’s got to take a toll. You remain so outwardly positive. Where do you turn when you are really internally struggling? When you just, you know that that that optimism isn’t there? What do you turn to to give you the strength that you’re then able to project out in the music?

Mike Peters 00:22:49  I’m lucky to have a really solid life outside of rock and roll.

Mike Peters 00:22:53  You know? I’ve got a really strong relationship with my wife. She’s my best friend. We’ve been married for 28 years, you know, we met, we got engaged within a week and nothing has taught. We’ve been tested and tested all through life in that time. But nothing has ever taught us apart from each other. And we’ve got two beautiful boys that we’ve had to fight hard to get her to go through. My wife had to go through IVF to get my kids because of all the situations we’ve been in. She’s been to Kilimanjaro with me, helped building the cancer center in Dar es Salaam in Africa and suffered a DVT. Nearly lost a life on the way back from Africa. And we’ve both been through an incredible amount together and we fall back into each other when when we’re really, struggling to cope with with certain situations in life as they crop up. But, I always feel grateful for the life I’ve got because my music started out life as a hobby, and it still is a hobby for me.

Mike Peters 00:23:55  It’s still my passion. It’s still where I would go if I had a normal 9 to 5 job. I’d be playing in the garage at night, or setting up the gear at the weekend and ripping into a gig, because I love it. And that’s. And I’m very lucky that I can express myself within my passionate thing in life every day. And and I’m also grateful for the life I can come home to. And, and I’ve got people there who love me, who understand me, who stand up for me when the stones are getting thrown, you know, because that’s what happens. That’s what you put your head up, up the parapet in rock and roll. And it’s not always praise stones or get thrown as well. and, you know, you have to have a really good, fallback to be able to cope with that because it is hurtful at times, you know, and and you see it from people who love you the most musically. They can still want to tear you down and challenge everything you do.

Mike Peters 00:24:53  And you can’t please all the people all of the time. As the famous American quote goes. But, so you need that. And and when I close the door on rock and roll, when I come home and I see my boys and it’s the best thing in the world.

Eric Zimmer 00:25:09  How old are they now?

Mike Peters 00:25:10  My boys are eight and 11. Dylan and Evan, they’re into music. They play piano and drums and guitar. They’re brought up to see it as a hobby like I am. And they come to the shows with jewels and we’re very, very, very close.

Eric Zimmer 00:25:23  Wonderful.

Speaker 5 00:25:27  It’s funny how they shoot you down, but your hands are held up high and you open But that’s not enough for most. I remember this much. There is nothing. You should have. Because if you’ve got something to say and there’s no one to be scared, I’ll just get them out of the way. Going out in a blaze of glory. My heart is open wide. You can take anything that you want from me. There is nothing left to hide. Going out in a blaze of glory. My hands are held up high. I’m learning how to hit back. I’ve learned how to fight.

Eric Zimmer 00:26:16  Tell me about the song Blaze of Glory.

Mike Peters 00:26:18  Well, that was written. Really? When we first played with U2. It was on the water and we played with them in December 1982. just before New Year’s Day came out as a single and the album wasn’t due out till 83, and we played a momentous night with them in London and one of the songs that were new to their audience and them as a band was a song called Surrender. Now that was the the theme of war, I think. You know, Bono described it as like a, you know, slap in the face against pop music was his quote. But really it was it was seeing war as a different from a different perspective, seeing war from the through the color. Well, without the color, with the white flag, the war where people surrender to win.

Mike Peters 00:27:11  And and that was what Bono was putting across in that music. And I saw them ripped to pieces in the music press in Britain. And I think it was really it was only because I think people were envious of the fact that they were taking their music to America, and they were starting to help other bands. I think the British press thought it was their preserve to make or break bands, and all of a sudden a band like U2 came along and opened the door for unknown musicians like The Alarm to get to America for the first time, which we did. We came with them in 1983. No one had heard of us in America. We were almost unknown in Britain, and we had our first hit record in America because of the tour we did with U2. And you two were going on the radio and championing the alarm’s record, The Stand, and saying, don’t play New Year’s Day. Play the band that are opening for us tonight. Come and see them. They’re amazing. And and they were breaking us and they were creating their own power base.

Mike Peters 00:28:08  And the music press in Britain didn’t like it one bit. And they started trying to smash them and they tore them down, I could see and I had this image. I saw this image of Bono with his arms held high. Surrender on the war tour and I the line came into my head. It’s funny how they shoot you down when your hands are held up high, because up to that point you’ve been praised. And all of a sudden here they were, on the verge of breaking. And they were being torn apart. And it was so obvious to the world that you set them up. You knock them down. And it was it was such a cliche. And here’s the music press accusing bands like U2 being cliched when they were pulling out all the cliches in the book. There was no depth to the criticism of U2. It was just targeted at them. They would target their Christianity or target the the fact that was selling out, playing huge gigs and it wasn’t the same anymore. And there was no real balance to it.

Mike Peters 00:29:04  So that prompted the line. It’s funny how they shoot you down when your hands are held up high, but the song really became more than that. When the full lyrics came down and it was all, I think it’s all about really staying strong. Believe in yourself. You know, when I first went out as a punk rocker and real and ripped up my jacket and went out with safety pins. People want to tear you down because they’re scared of the way you look, but you. And it’s easy to back down to that kind of peer pressure. It’s easy to give in and think, oh, I’ll just go along with the flow of the river and I look like everyone else, and life will be easier. But life isn’t like that. You have to have courage to take those steps forward out of the crowd to to find your own inner self, find you the place where you belong in life. Because we’re all brought up in the image of our parents, and really, we’re all individual and we want to be ourselves.

Mike Peters 00:30:06  and some people, they give in to the peer pressure and, and they suppress who they really are. So we wanted our songs to liberate people, allow them to find their courage and be who you really want to be.

Eric Zimmer 00:30:19  Yeah. There’s a sense in a lot of your music, I’ll say this, a military sense in that there’s there’s a lot of marching you you put on the camouflage when you were battling cancer. there’s, there’s those sort of analogies, and yet there’s maybe the right word that you used is, is, you know, fighting war by surrendering. But I’ve always been sort of amazed how you’ve managed to weave those two things together in a really powerful way.

Mike Peters 00:30:42  Yeah. I don’t know how we’ve done it, really. it has always been there, and I don’t know why. I don’t know. I think we, for the first thing, I sort of got into where I remember seeing the who with medals on their jackets, and that was pop art. And I remember putting some medals on my jacket, and then I.

Mike Peters 00:31:03  And then I thought, I saw I got into the sort of seeing the 60s psychedelia thing, and people were those Red Guardsmen jacket, and that was sort of the start of I really look in the alarm of Western psychedelia look. but the term military got attached to us rather than pop art, psychedelia. And, and I think that there was that. I think our image didn’t help our music in some ways, because I think it threw up some conflicts that that people would read these lyrics and they wouldn’t kind of lie with the big hair or the over the top look that we had on stage, because we all adopted it. And it was it was very the front line of the band was it was all attack. It was all out bang. Yep. And the we didn’t have a John Entwistle like the who did that. We could be the polar opposite of. We had three guys flowing themselves around the stage, and there wasn’t the quiet member, you know, the who who amplified the power of the individual in the band.

Mike Peters 00:32:09  We we came across like four. Like a gang. Yeah. And and I think and we weren’t really a gang that I think when people met us, they could see that we were all quite different. But we did have this, gang mentality that came out of of the look of the band and the way we played on stage. And I don’t think that helped some of the the subtlety that was in the music in a way. which is, you know, as, as you go through life and you know that you make a record in the 80s. It stays. It stays in the 80s. But you write a song in the 80s, it lives beyond that. It comes alive in the 90s, comes alive again as you get older, in life. And that’s what interests me about the alarm’s music, not just what we made in the 80s, but what it continues to be today.

Eric Zimmer 00:33:02  Yeah, I’m really looking forward to seeing how you interpret that music this evening. What would you say is the lesson that’s taking you the longest to learn in life?

Mike Peters 00:33:10  To, keep my mouth shut? You know, I always have an I always have been brought up to be answer people politely.

Mike Peters 00:33:19  And if someone answers your question and you ask answered it back. And sometimes I should just stay quiet.

Eric Zimmer 00:33:25  Yeah. One of the things we talk about on the show a lot is, we talk about spirituality being this very nebulous thing. Does the word spiritual have any meaning to you, and if so, what? What does that word mean to you?

Mike Peters 00:33:38  I equate it with with with faith. Really? I mean, faith that that life’s going to work out the way you hope it is going to work out. And, you know, some people think in the short term and some people think in the long term. And I like to think I fall in the latter category. And so, I, I’ve always, trusted my instinct in life. And I think that’s sometimes gets confused with spirituality is I think instinct is a very powerful force. And it’s, and if you can learn to trust your instinct, then you won’t go far wrong in life. And, there’s so many outside forces who make us distrust ourselves.

Mike Peters 00:34:19  and and the way we think as individuals, that it’s easy to be sidestepped from your mission in life and your goals or what your your hopes are. Again, I think spirituality I think of as instinct, really. And, I, you know, I’ve tried always tried to follow my instinct and, and when I’ve really followed my instinct, it’s it’s never very rarely let me down, if ever. and when you take advice from someone else sometimes and you go along with it and you think it and you think it doesn’t feel right and you end up bang, there’s a crash at the end of the road and you think, why didn’t I trust? Why didn’t I trust myself?

Eric Zimmer 00:35:02  Yep. And, so last question. I think the song, We Are the Light, that’s sort of what I took from that. You know, we are the light of our lives. We’re our own light.

Mike Peters 00:35:10  I think so, yeah. That was written for declaration. It was written in, in London. It was a little folk song I put together in a major key. And, I think that’s what I was trying to get to. I didn’t understand spirituality or instinct so much. In 1981, when we moved to London, and 82, when that song was written.

Speaker 5 00:35:36  Who was standing on the corner? For he cannot see hope. There’s a blind man standing at the crossroads. For he cannot see light. Unless we find a candle. We must make sure they burn through the night. But if they should die. There’d be no light. We are the light. We are the light. We are the light of our life. We are the light. 

Mike Peters 00:36:25  Like when you play in concert and you see people really get hold of it and they’re all saying. We are. And you think, wow.

Mike Peters 00:36:33  That’s how come that’s taking hold? And you start asking a few questions yourself and thinking, what does it mean? Not just to me, but to others? And, and it was always the song that was it was like a little communion in the gig. It was the it was the moment, really, when the sound and the fury would come to an end.

Mike Peters 00:36:53  And our instinct as a band or my instinct as a as the singular band. But let’s not leave everyone right up there. Let’s just, let’s have a moment to calm it all down and and just celebrate in a really human way, this experience we’ve all had, where the audience have given everything to this band, they’ve jumped up on the stage, they’ve given physically, they’ve lost tons of weight.

Mike Peters 00:37:17  Jumping up and down to the band. They’ve sung along every word And I always remember saying to man, let’s get down to the front of the gig. Let’s leave the drums behind there. Let’s get one acoustic guitar. All gather around the microphone and we’ll sing this song with the audience, and we’ll just enjoy what we’ve all just been through. and, and I think that’s how it seemed to us that that we were creating a little bit of light for ourselves in the darkness. You know, we will again, as I say, in the early 80s, it was a very dark time in Britain politically.

Mike Peters 00:37:49  It was divisive. We saw all the politicians I saw. I always thought politics was supposed to be about bringing us together as a community and uniting people. And here they were doing the complete opposite and really polarising opinion. I think it was the first time, you know, in, in the war time that not, you know, wasn’t that only there was only a couple of decades before us politics brought everyone together. And then all of a sudden in in the 60s, we started to see that division come. And, and I think it really became massive in the 80s. And so I think we all felt like unsure of who we we were. He felt very difficult to have an opinion because everyone was telling you what to think. The government was telling you who to vote for. The NME was telling you who to get behind, and it was very hard to think for yourselves and and find that light in the of, of enlightenment that you need that. So we I think, thinking back to it now that they were the moments that really made the relationship, we have the audience strong, that little communal moment when we just all sang together, you know, sometimes we’d lose the power in a gig and we’d just jump in the middle of the audience, and it was always way other light, and we’d play that stood in the middle of the audience.

Mike Peters 00:39:10  And there was no amplification, no, there’s no stage lights, just complete darkness. And that I remember doing it in Hamburg and it was one of the most amazing special nights of all time and special moments, because it was taking us back to the simplicity of music. We love Woody Guthrie in the simplicity of, one person with one guitar singing in the street with a message.

Eric Zimmer 00:39:35  Wonderful. Well, thank you so much for taking the time to talk with me. It’s been a real pleasure.

Mike Peters 00:39:40  I look forward to hearing the podcast now.

Eric Zimmer 00:39:42  All right. Bye.

Mike Peters 00:39:43  Thank you.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

Fluke or Fate? Embracing Uncertainty to Live a Fuller Life with Brian Klaas

April 29, 2025 Leave a Comment

fluke or fate
Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, Brian Klaas explains the concept of whether things are a fluke or fate, and explores how embracing uncertainty can lead to a living a fuller life. Brian makes the case how randomness and chaos might be exactly what make our lives matter so much and how we tend to worship at the “Altar of Progress in the Church of Control.” We make plans, set goals, and these are good things, but we only have so much control. And Brian teaches that accepting this can be a relief, because the point isn’t to control everything, but to influence what we can.

Key Takeaways:

  • The concept of happiness derived from intrinsic values rather than material possessions and social status.
  • The importance of thoughts and actions in shaping our lives and experiences.
  • Exploration of chaos theory and the unpredictability of life.
  • The idea that we control nothing but influence everything, emphasizing the ripple effects of our actions.
  • Personal stories illustrating how random events can profoundly impact lives.
  • The empowering nature of recognizing the influence of our choices.
  • The tension between control and acceptance of life’s randomness.
  • The critique of societal values that prioritize material success over personal fulfillment and relationships.
  • Encouragement to embrace individual uniqueness and create for personal expression rather than external validation.


Dr. Brian Klaas is an Associate Professor in Global Politics at University College London, an affiliate researcher at the University of Oxford, and a contributing writer for The Atlantic. He was recently named one of the 25 “Top Thinkers” globally by Prospect Magazine. Klaas is the author of five books, including Fluke: Chance, Chaos, and Why Everything We Do Matters (2024) and Corruptible: Who Gets Power and How It Changes Us (2021). Klaas writexs the popular The Garden of Forking Paths Substack and created the award-winning Power Corrupts podcast, which has been downloaded over three million times.

Connect with Brian Klaas:  Website | X

If you enjoyed this conversation with Brian Klaas, check out these other episodes:

What If You’re Wrong? How Uncertainty Makes Us More Human with William Egginton

How to Find Zest in Life with Dr. John Kaag

Unsafe Thinking with Jonah Sachs

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

Eric Zimmer 00:00:00  Hey, friends. Eric here with some exciting news. I’ve been writing a book and it’s about to be out in the world in April of 2026. The working title is how a Little Becomes a Lot, and it’s all about how small, consistent actions, the kind that we talk about all the time on this show can lead to real, meaningful change. Right now, the book is in the editing process, and there’s still some shaping to do, which is where you come in. I’d love your input on what to focus on, how to talk about the book, even what it should be called. If you’ve got a few minutes and a couple thoughts on what would make this book most helpful for you, I’d be really grateful to hear them. Just head to one You Feed survey. You’ll also get early updates, fun giveaways, and a behind the scenes look at what it actually takes to make a book. Editing marathons, title debates, existential spirals, and me questioning all of my life choices at 2 a.m. over one stubborn sentence again, that’s one UFI survey.

Eric Zimmer 00:01:04  Thank you so much for being part of this. Your feedback really means a lot to me, truly.

Brian Klass 00:01:10  Often have written about ideas around what I call the false gospel of stuff and status, where the road to happiness is paved with more stuff and higher status. I have not found that to be true. I find personally that there are things that I care about in the world that are intrinsically valuable to me, that other people might not find value in whatsoever, and chasing those things has made me much happier.

Chris Forbes 00:01:37  Welcome to the one you feed. Throughout time, great thinkers have recognized the importance of the thoughts we have. Quotes like garbage in, garbage out or you are what you think ring true. And yet, for many of us, our thoughts don’t strengthen or empower us. We tend toward negativity, self-pity, jealousy, or fear. We see what we don’t have instead of what we do. We think things that hold us back and dampen our spirit. But it’s not just about thinking our actions matter.  It takes conscious, consistent, and creative effort to make a life worth living. This podcast is about how other people keep themselves moving in the right direction. How they feed their good wolf.

Eric Zimmer 00:02:23  I’ve always hated the phrase everything happens for a reason. It’s tidy. It’s comforting. And to me, it feels completely out of step with the messy, painful, and often absurd reality of life. But after talking with today’s guest, Brian Klaus, I started to realize something. Just because life isn’t following a script doesn’t mean it’s meaningless. In fact, his new book, fluke, makes the case that randomness and chaos might be exactly what make our lives matter so much. We get into how we all continue to worship at the Altar of Progress in the Church of Control. We make plans, set goals, and these are good things, but we only have so much control. And Brian teaches that accepting this can be a relief, because the point isn’t to control everything, but to influence what we can. Brian also shares some wild stories, like how a cloud saved one city from an atomic bomb, and tells another. That hit me especially hard how a family tragedy led directly to his birth. Without that fluke, he wouldn’t be here and neither would this episode. I’m Eric Zimmer and this is the one you feed. 

Eric Zimmer 00:03:20  Hi, Brian, welcome to the show.

Brian Klass 00:03:34  Thanks for having me.

Eric Zimmer 00:03:35  I’m excited to talk to you. Your book is called Fluke Chance Chaos and Why everything we do Matters. But before we get into that, we’ll start like we always do with the parable. And in the parable, there’s a grandparent who’s talking with their grandchild, and they say, in life there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love. And the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear. And the grandchild stops. They think about it for a second. They look up at their grandparent and they say, well, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

Brian Klass 00:04:20  Yeah. So I think the bad wolf is a response to a perceived lack of control. And I think a lot of the worst impulses that humans have are lashing out. When you feel afraid of what you don’t know is going to happen next to your life, or you fear those consequences and therefore lash out to try to assert control. And a lot of what I’m arguing is that you have to change your worldview to accept that lack of control, to embrace the influence you have over the world. And that gets you closer to being the good wolf that you want to be.

Eric Zimmer 00:04:52  All right. There’s no way for us not to just dive into the deep end of the pool, I think, with this material. So let’s just go. There. You’ve got a phrase in the book we control nothing but influence everything. What do you mean by that?

Brian Klass 00:05:05  Yeah. So it’s riffing off a statement from the social scientist Scott Page. And what I think is the key takeaway here is that the world is an incredibly complex, uncontrollable entity.

Brian Klass 00:05:17  Right? There’s 8 billion interacting people. And all of those people influence our lives in small ways or in big ways, right? Some more than others. But it’s constantly changing. And the ability of any one person to control the world is minuscule. We simply don’t have that ability. And I think a lot of the misery that people have in modern life is that they keep trying to assert control over an uncontrollable world. And what I’m arguing is I’m taking the scientific concept of chaos theory, which we’ll dive, I’m sure, into more details, but it’s taking that notion of chaos theory and saying that even in a world where you don’t have control, small changes can have big effects, which means that your influence over the future of the universe and the future of your life is profound. And so it’s changing the framework from one of control to one of influence. And the influence framework is both correct. And also, I think, much more liberating and uplifting for us to navigate.

Eric Zimmer 00:06:12  Wonderful. All right.

Eric Zimmer 00:06:13  We’re going to go into that more because I think a lot about these ideas of control and influence and what’s out of our control. But I first want to start with a story. Maybe you could tell us about a mass murder that happened in Minnesota, I believe, some time ago.

Brian Klass 00:06:30  Yeah. So this is a story. It’s actually from Wisconsin, next door to Minnesota in 1905, and it’s the story of a woman named Clara, Madelyn Jansen, who has four children in a very short period of time for young kids. And by 1905, I think the oldest was five years old. And so she has a mental breakdown at some point. We don’t know exactly what happened, but she she snaps Apps and decides, in a moment of sort of tragic madness, to take the lives of those four children herself and then to take her own life. And she was alone at the house, but her husband came home and discovered this horrific tragedy. Probably the worst thing that a human being can experience seeing their entire family wiped out.

Brian Klass 00:07:10  And the reason that I talk about this, and I mentioned it early on in fluke, is because when I was 20 years old, my dad sat me down and told me this story about the man who came home, who was my great grandfather, and the woman who killed all of those kids and took her own life was his first wife. He remarried after the trauma subsided a bit about ten years later, to the woman that was my great grandmother. And so the first thing that I reacted to that story with was obviously shock, right? I mean, it’s just an unbelievably bizarre and terrible thing to learn about your family. But then the second thing that really hits you over the head is that your existence is completely predicated on this story, that if those kids didn’t die, I wouldn’t exist because the lineage would be different and it would not have led to me. Right. Right. And so this is the stuff where when you start to think about that, I think about how my existence is predicated on this horrible tragedy.

Brian Klass 00:08:03  But then I also say to everyone that I meet, right, that every conversation I have is also predicated on this mass tragedy, every podcast interview. People listening to this wouldn’t listen to it if those kids hadn’t died. So it really affected my worldview about how the tiniest things and the distant past even can really change the trajectory of our lives, even when we’re oblivious to them.

Eric Zimmer 00:08:24  It’s tremendously disconcerting to see this, right? Let’s stay with the stories for a minute, because I think the stories illustrate this point better than any other. Why don’t you tell us about Japan?

Brian Klass 00:08:36  Yeah. So this is a story from a little bit after the mass murder I talked about. This is from 1926 and 1926. There’s an American couple that decides to go on a vacation, and they end up in Kyoto, Japan, and they fall in love with the city. It’s one of the most charming cities in Japan, and they sort of get a soft spot for it the way that many people do when they go on holiday somewhere.

Brian Klass 00:09:00  And, you know, it’s the kind of banal story that is very, very commonplace in normal life. Except for 19 years after this vacation took place, the husband and the couple turned out to be America’s secretary of war. At the tail end of World War Two, a man named Henry Stimson. And so he ended up by happenstance, being in a very consequential place when they were deciding where to drop the first atomic bomb. And the target committee, which was a group of generals and scientists, picked Kyoto as their top location to destroy with the first atomic bomb at the tail end of World War two. And Stimson, largely because of his previous personal experience with his wife in 1926, twice met with President Truman and convinced him to take Kyoto off the bombing list, and so the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima instead of Kyoto. And the second bomb was supposed to go to a place called Kokura, which many people have not heard of because it was not bombed. And the reason it was not bombed was simply out of luck, which happened because there was a brief bit of haze or cloud cover over the bombing site when the B-29 arrived, and so it diverted to the secondary target of Nagasaki.

Brian Klass 00:10:10  And so this is a story of an estimated 180 to 200,000 people dying in two cities, rather than a different two cities, because of a vacation that happened 19 years earlier, and a cloud that was just at the right place at the right time. And so, you know, when we think about why things happen, we never think about these tiny details. We think about the big explanations, and we don’t think about certainly things that happened 19 years earlier. And the point that I try to make to people is that Henry Stimson had no idea he was changing the world. The people of Hiroshima had no idea that their fate hung in the balance over this vacation destination. But it did. And that’s the way that that sort of everything we do matters. Aspect of chaos theory is tied to influence. That every choice we make has ripple effects that we cannot foresee.

Eric Zimmer 00:10:54  So I think the takeaway here is your city’s tourism board is really, really important, right? Like when people come to your city, they need to like it.

Eric Zimmer 00:11:03  Right.

Brian Klass 00:11:04  I guess the flip side of that is if he really hated it, he probably would have loved to bomb the city.

Eric Zimmer 00:11:08  So again, this is a really disconcerting idea.

Brian Klass 00:11:11  You know, it’s funny. So almost everyone has that reaction to it. And I’ve never had that reaction. And I.

Eric Zimmer 00:11:16  Think never.

Brian Klass 00:11:16  I think the reason why I don’t have that reaction is because I think that the lie of control is one that constantly makes us disappointed, right? This this notion that we can just tame the world every single moment of our lives. We get evidence that we can’t. Right? Things happen to us, and they’re not always the things that we want to happen to us. Now, I think that the idea that every vacation choice you make, every conversation you have, every time you turn left rather than right, is reshaping the future of the world in ways that are small or big, and that you might not know. I think that’s the most exciting and uplifting idea I’ve ever come across, because it means that there is no throwaway moment to life, right? And so I swapped out when I was starting to do the research for this and starting to change my philosophy of life and researching the book, I started to swap out what I thought was a really empty and constantly disappointing framework of understanding the world, for one that is, on the face of it, really disconcerting because everything has influence, right? But also, in my view, really empowering and uplifting because there’s not a moment that we can just say is meaningless.  Personally, I find that latter viewpoint much, much more empowering than than the sort of false gospel of control.

Eric Zimmer 00:12:29  Well, I am not a believer in the false gospel of control, and this idea that every moment matters is empowering, except when it becomes overwhelming or frightening. Because it’s one thing to think every moment matters. Because I’m sort of shaping my destiny. And I can think about the fact that, like today, if I go to the gym, it’s probably more likely I’ll go to the gym tomorrow, which makes it probably more likely that I’ll be healthy in ten years. And I’m using the word probably here on all of these things. And so that my actions, I’m directing them in a certain direction with the belief they’re going to go a certain way, versus the idea that I have no idea what filling up my water bottle at home instead of here at the studio today is going like, what impact is that going to have on the world? And I think there are people who are anxious already who are thinking that everything they do is so important.

Eric Zimmer 00:13:26  And I think what you’re saying is just let all that go. So how does somebody who still wants to influence the world in a positive way change their life in a positive way? How do we work with these ideas of influence and control? This is like a nine part question. The last thing I’ll say is when we think about controlling nothing. The obvious question is, did I not control what shirt I put on today? So I’ll hand it over to you.

Brian Klass 00:13:53  Yeah. So, you know, I think there’s a few things that I would say to that. The first is that, yes, it is overwhelming. If you think about every choice and, you know, it could be paralyzing, right. The idea that any action you make is going to have an effect on reshaping your life, which I think is true. Yes. But if you have never come across that idea before, it can be very paralyzing. So there’s a few things that I tried to tell people. The first one is that you have to still think probabilistically.

Brian Klass 00:14:19  So what I mean by that is it is possible that if I went out and planted a tree tomorrow, that in 100 years a child could climb that tree and fall out of it and die? And I would have been part of that story. Right? Now, that does not mean I shouldn’t plant the tree, because most of the time planting trees is good, right? So it’s the same thing. Like, I could step into traffic and it could be an epiphany for me where I have a near-death experience that reshapes my life. But I’m not going to do that because most of the time you die, right? Yes, yes. So I still make choices in a way that is based on what mostly happens. But I also recognize that there is something liberating about accepting the limits of my control. So for me personally, I have become less anxious over time, especially since writing this book. And it’s I had not like anxiety in a clinical sense, but sometimes I worried about stuff a little bit more.

Brian Klass 00:15:09  I sweated the details a little bit more, and the way I feel now is I just sort of feel like there’s things that I can influence more directly, things that I can’t influence more directly. And you have to just sort of accept some of that limit and enjoy the ride. And that’s sort of, you know, the ethos of my life in a way, is, you know, I might get cancer tomorrow. I really hope I don’t. Yeah. But, you know, you sort of have to embrace that sense of enjoying the ride that you do have because you only have one. Right? Yeah. It’s something that you have to really grapple with. And I think some people I talk to really struggle with these concepts. And I’d like to sort of just pretend that you have certain aspects of life that are noise. But, you know, the interconnected nature of our lives is also really, really important. And even when you say the control aspect. So yes, you control what shirt you wear.

Brian Klass 00:15:53  You don’t control how somebody responds to it. Right? And like, how many times do relationships start because someone notices an item of clothing and then they say something nice to you, and then you either have a friendship or they becomes your partner. I mean, like all of these things where if you’d worn a different shirt. Yes. You know, this never happens. And so even in those details, yes, we control the little things where we can make choices and have agency and so on. But our lives are, you know, a symphony of 8 billion people, and some of them are much more important players in that orchestra. Right? Like, it’s clearly the case that the people around you in closer proximity matter more. But on the other hand, all of us were affected by a pandemic that started by one person getting sick in China, right? So, you know, that aspect of sort of the short term influence being more close to you, more visible, more seeming like the illusion of control.

Brian Klass 00:16:43  And then all of a sudden, our lives are upended by something that happens thousands of miles away with someone we’ll never meet. On a microscopic level of a virus. That aspect of life is the push and pull, where we get the glimpses of how little control I think we actually have.

Eric Zimmer 00:16:56  A couple thoughts on that. One is I often think of this stuff in terms of two games. One is the lottery. Like whether I get cancer between now and the end of my life is, to some degree a lottery by trying to do all the things that we know, that we think make you less likely to get cancer, to me, is like just buying more lottery tickets. The other game that I like to think about is backgammon. Backgammon is an interesting game because there is a certain amount of skill, but there’s also a tremendous amount of luck, like the dice roll. And if somebody rolls all good things, they will beat someone who’s far more skilled than them in backgammon, because they just will.

Eric Zimmer 00:17:37  And I think that is a model for me. That always makes sense. Like there’s an element of this that I can do something about and I should do that. I love your idea of thinking in probability, and there’s so much that I can’t control, and it brings to truth more clearly, the old Hindu idea of Arjuna and Krishna, where you’re just encouraged to do your best and let go of the results because you just don’t control those.

Brian Klass 00:18:04  Yeah. You know, the two things that come to mind, I think your analogies are excellent in terms of these different games, but the two things that come to mind to this. The first one is when I think about the most important things that have affected the trajectory of my life in the grand scheme of it. Right. And I think I controlled exactly zero of them. So I think this is what time period I was born in my life would be much shorter if I was born 100,000 years ago, right? Much worse. Also if I was born 200 years ago.

Brian Klass 00:18:30  Yeah. Also who my parents were. And you have issues of how my brain works, right? If I don’t have, I have a mental illness or anything like that, that would constrain me and also where I was born. So one of the places that I do some research in, for example, is Madagascar, where the average person lives on less than $500 a year. And I think to myself, if I was born in that society, I don’t care how skilled I am, I don’t care how great my parents are. I am in a rough position. I’m not going to be on this podcast, right? I’m still going to be in rural Madagascar, probably without electricity. So the things that I think have most affected my life trajectory, none of them were things that I had any influence over. So that humbles us in a way that I think gives you the freedom to take less credit for your success, but also less blame for your failure. And to me, that’s a much healthier way to live, right? I haven’t really sort of fleshed this out, and I didn’t talk about this in fluke, but the more I’ve thought about the ideas in the book, the more I think that we live in the most luck prone era in all of history.

Brian Klass 00:19:29  And the reason I say that is because if you take somebody who lives in complete isolation, right? So a hermit in the woods, luck has way less of an influence on their life because they’re completely independent from the rest of society, right? Like, maybe there’s some luck with what foraging they get up to or whatever. But like basically other people have a much lower influence on that person. If you take the modern world, in which it’s the most interconnected system that’s ever existed, where economics, politics, public health, all these things are affected by these massive numbers of people, and we have limited control over them. I think our lives are swayed by things we don’t control more now than ever before, precisely because of that interconnection. Right. And the logical conclusion of that is that we have less control over things that we did in the past, but more influence, because the ripple effects of our lives are much greater than that. Hermit. Right. The hermit might still have some influence, but it’s going to be probably smaller and probably less immediate if they truly are alone.

Brian Klass 00:20:30  Whereas, you know, you can really make an impact on the world as a single person today because the ripple effects can go global very, very quickly. I mean, whether it’s a social media post, a pandemic or just, you know, starting a movement, whatever it is, all these things are possible in ways that simply were not possible even 500 or 50 years ago. And so I think that the analogies you’re using, they’ve dialed up the luck scale, which comes with the influence factor.

Eric Zimmer 00:21:13  You’ve got some great lines in the book, like motivational posters tell you that if you set your mind to it, you can change the world. I’ve got some good news for you. You already have. Congratulations. Or you matter. That’s not self-help advice. It’s scientific truth, right? These ideas that everything happens. And I talk about this a fair amount that like we do a lot of things I think that put good out into the world and we never get to see it. Like it ripples in ways that we just don’t know.

Eric Zimmer 00:21:42  And I tell this story about somebody who went through one of my programs because I just love this little story. So this person heard a lesson I did on generosity. So they were at their local supermarket. They were in their normal line. There’s a woman who is the checkout girl. She never smiles. She always seems unhappy. And this woman goes up to her and says, hey, I always get in your line because you just get everybody through it so much faster. And this woman just lights up like a Christmas tree, right? And then she says, oh, well, would you tell my boss that? And so this woman goes and tells your boss, and the boss is like, that’s so great to hear. I’ve been trying to decide who’s going to be employee of the month. I’ll do that. It gives her a bonus. Now the boss is happy. The woman is happy. You imagine her going home to her family. All this stuff, these ripples that go, go, go, go. That example allows us to see the first couple of them, but so often we just don’t see any of them. But they’re there.

Brian Klass 00:22:33  Yeah, the two things. Well, there’s one of them is a story from the book. So there’s an amazing story that I came across, and I was like, this just illustrates this so perfectly, where a man went out to sea off the coast of Greece and he was swimming and, he got sucked out by a riptide. And so for 24 hours he was missing. And, you know, the overwhelming majority of times that people go missing in the ocean for 24 hours, the outcome is very, very bad. Right. And this guy, as he was about to drown a soccer ball, popped into view on the surface of the waves and he clung on to it. It’s still an acronym, and he was able to use it to float and survive. And so already this was one of these stories of like, wow, this, this amazing thing happened.

Brian Klass 00:23:11  The soccer ball arrived just the right time. But as they were covering this on the Greek news, this woman was watching it. And I sort of like to imagine her dropping her coffee or whatever, you know, when she sees this report. But the reason she was astonished by this is because she recognized the soccer ball and her kid had kicked it off a cliff ten days earlier, 80 miles away, and they had thought absolutely nothing of this because this happens every so often. You know, you lose a ball, it’s fine. They went out and bought another one. But it turned out that on the waves, it drifted at just the right moment and saved this guy’s life. Right. And so, like, these are the kinds of things where when people see this story, often what the takeaway they take is. What an amazing coincidence. Right. My takeaway is that is how the world is working 100% of the time. You just don’t know. And every so often you get these glimpses like this person did, where it’s just so obvious and it pulls back that illusion of control.

Brian Klass 00:24:04  The other very flippant thing that I sometimes say is, can you name Albert Einstein’s great grandmother? And everyone says, no, of course not. And I said, well, she didn’t realize she was very important, but she was, because if she didn’t exist, Albert Einstein doesn’t exist. Right. Right. So I think there’s this aspect where every individual matters. They might not know that they matter in the short run. They might not know they matter in the long run. But if it’s not you, it’s someone else. And that changes the universe in some way. Sometimes good and sometimes bad. But the idea of meaninglessness, which I think a lot of people feel in the 21st century, is, in my view, scientifically, nonsense. It’s just not. It’s not true.

Eric Zimmer 00:24:41  Yeah. You’re coming at this from sort of the scientific angle. A lot of things that I bring in are coming from more of a spiritual tradition angle. And if you look at Buddhism and even Taoism, which predates Buddhism, this idea is just baked in, right? This idea of Thich Naht Han called it inner being.

Eric Zimmer 00:24:59  And, you know, the classic story he tells is, you know, in this piece of paper I have here is also the sun and the rain and the clouds and the person who cut down the tree, and the person who made the lunch of the person who cut down the tree. I mean, I could go on and on. I don’t need to, but that all of that is right here. And to your point, that’s the universe all the time. There’s a line from someone who studies the Dao that I love, which is that basically life is consumatory relatedness, right? That’s all it is. It’s countless causes and conditions that we can’t even begin to imagine that have come together to create this moment. And what you’re pointing us at is that if you can let go into that, then you’re part of sort of a sparkling, mysterious, amazing thing.

Brian Klass 00:25:52  It’s funny because I think for a long time and, you know, without going too much in the weeds of the history of science, the Scientific Revolution had a very simple assessment of how things happened.

Brian Klass 00:26:03  Right? And it seemed like we could tame the world if we just got the right equation, sort of the Isaac Newton sort of idea. What I’m dabbling with is ideas of chaos theory and what are called complex systems, which actually are much more, I think, amenable to ideas that underpin a lot of the religions you’re talking about in eastern philosophy. Right? Yeah. And that’s because the central idea in complex systems is interconnectedness. It’s that one change in one part of the system affects another part of the system, which is very much at home in a lot of eastern philosophy. There are some, you know, more top down Western ideas in religion, especially when you overlay it on individualistic culture like the United States has in spades, which give you this idea of what I call the illusion of control, that if you just if you just do things to sort of bludgeon the world the way you want it to be, then you will eventually create the outcome you want. And I think a lot of the philosophical ideas that underpin things like Daoism are talking about the interconnectedness of literally everything.

Brian Klass 00:27:04  I mean, one of the problems is that when you start saying these sorts of words in traditional scientific communities, you sound like, you know, sort of a mystical figure. I think what you’re just trying to do is say, like, how do we apply these ideas in a context? From my perspective as an academic, where we can test them or sort of theorize about them. But it’s not a million miles away from the philosophical underpinnings of religions, certain religions. And so I think to me it’s also obvious, right? Like, I don’t think it is possible to truly believe that we are individuals who have control over the world. That idea does not make sense to me when you scrutinize it for more than a second. So. Right. Yeah. So I’m very amenable to the ideas you’re talking.

Eric Zimmer 00:27:42  About just on Substack. This morning there was a article by a psychologist, Paul Bloom, which was about another article by a psychologist, Michael Intellect. And the basic idea was you could perform some of these studies in a laboratory, but that doesn’t mean they translate in any way, shape or form out into the world itself.

Eric Zimmer 00:28:03  And it’s not that doing some of these things in the laboratory is always a waste of time. That’s not it. Because I think science moves forward in two ways, right? It moves forward often by isolating something, reducing it down, figuring out how this little thing works. And that can be valuable. And it only becomes more useful when you realize how that thing fits into a bigger System that, as you’re pointing out, is hopelessly complex.

Brian Klass 00:28:30  One of the hallmarks of science is replicability, right? That if you do the same experiment twice, it will produce the same results. And I think the problem when you get into a complex system is that is not always true, right? If Henry Stimson went on vacation to Osaka, Japan, that would not necessarily lead to the deaths of 100,000 people in one city versus another. If the timing had even been slightly different, if he was appointed the Secretary of War six months later, he would not have played this role right. So you can’t say that if we just replay this exact same sort of scenario, but we only change 1 or 2 things that it will play out in the same way.

Brian Klass 00:29:07  The idea of chaos theory is that if anything is even a tiny bit different, it can play a very, very big role. And so when I think about these concepts about how they fit in with science, the lab is not as interconnected, not as complex. Right. It’s deliberately designed to avoid all of those things that many people treat as noise. But actually, I argue, noise often is the stuff that dictates outcomes, right? These tiny little details of a split second change, or all of us have experienced this in our lives. I think at some point where you have these moments where you sort of realize, oh, if I had just done that one thing, none of this would have happened. And of course, the crucial point is not that you dwell on that specific decision. It’s that you’re aware that that is happening all the time and you’re just oblivious to it. Right. That’s the much more profound idea that I think chaos theory tries to convey in a scientific literature, but actually it applies a lot to humanity as well.

Eric Zimmer 00:30:05  When you were talking, I just had an insight or a thought that I’ve never had. I doubt that it’s new. New to the world. You’ve probably thought of it as you call yourself a disillusioned social scientist, is that if you try and replicate a psychological experiment, say, 3 or 4 years later, the whole culture and thought process of how people view psychology could be really different by then. And so there’s so many things that have changed in the broader world and about how people view the world, that of course, those things may come out differently.

Brian Klass 00:30:36  Yeah. And that is why it’s important. When they do replication studies in psychology, it’s important to have large numbers of people and also to do them repeatedly because the most solid findings do stay the same. Right. And there are there are some very solid findings that you can take 500 people in this place or that place. You do the same study. They have the same reaction, right? There’s a lot of psychology, literature, and I would argue a lot of social science literature where it’s not done that way, and it’s relatively small numbers of people relatively contingent on the context.

Brian Klass 00:31:06  And then we conclude that it is a big finding. And so the reason I’m a disillusioned social scientist is because I think there are some of these findings we have, which if you did repeat them and you did take into account context, you might find something different. And so it’s not to say that we shouldn’t do the research. It’s just to say that you have to be so careful about context and all those other parameters that might change.

Eric Zimmer 00:31:30  Yeah. It’s interesting, as a person who has done a lot of one on one coaching with people and run programs, part of my job is to help people make the changes in their lives they want to make. And early on in that. I thought, oh, okay, I just teach them x, y, Z, have them do A, B and C, and they’re on their way. And I quickly realized like, okay, that that clearly doesn’t work because people are so different. You just can’t apply the same thing to everybody and think it’s going to come out the same way.

Eric Zimmer 00:31:59  And that humility is, is important to recognize that there are things we can say probabilistically. I’m going to give you a better chance of this or that, but everybody’s different. And I’ve often said that one of the mysteries that haunts me, I’m a recovering heroin addict is why some of us get sober and others don’t. And I look for a reason or reasons. And after I read your book. Part of me just relaxed a little bit and went, maybe there’s not. I mean, it’s not to say that there aren’t any reasons or there aren’t contributing factors, but that in an individual case there just may be no answer. Like, you just never know. It’s not like if I got to talk to God, he would be like, oh, it’s because x, y, z a right? You’d have to unravel the entire universe.

Brian Klass 00:32:45  Yeah. You know, for me, that’s one of those areas where, again, I find it quite liberating because I think that sometimes people who have bad things happen to them.

Brian Klass 00:32:54  Sometimes it is comforting to try to come up with a reason. Yeah. But other times there is no reason. And the search for it is crippling because it’s just not going to. It’s not going to exist, right? Right. So I’ll tell the short version of the story. But basically, one of the people who I had the pleasure of meeting after I published the book and wrote about him a little bit, was a man who went to New York City for a conference, and he was delayed in his flight, and his coworker was supposed to meet him for dinner, and they ended up meeting for breakfast the next morning because he had gotten in so late, and she provided him with a gift that was a monet tie. So it’s a tie with a painting of a monet, and she knew that he loved this. So it was just a nice gesture from a colleague, right? And he decides that he’s so touched by this gesture of kindness that he’s going to go back to his hotel room, change his shirt so he can wear the Monet tie with something that isn’t hideously clashing.

Brian Klass 00:33:47  And so she goes up to the conference, and he goes to the hotel room to iron the shirt, and while he’s ironing the shirt, he sees out the window as the first plane hits the World Trade Center in New York. Right. Because the conference is in New York City and this is it’s held on like the 100th floor. And so in this moment, she dies as a result of this, and he survives because of this tie and changing his shirt. And, you know, I had written about this. I knew his story. He’d spoken a little bit about it publicly, but when I met him, the most profound thing he said to me was that the crippling guilt of survivor’s guilt that happened afterwards, which really upset him and affected his life in a very big way for a couple of years was because everybody said the same thing. Everything happens for a reason. And he said the burden that put it on him, that his co-worker Elaine was supposed to die and he was supposed to live was so crushing, right.

Brian Klass 00:34:37  It really upset his life. Whereas if you just say, look, you know, she was in the wrong place at the wrong time, she did something nice for you and you survived by an accident. That in a way, you know, was liberating for him. And so I think to me, it’s one of those aspects I haven’t had, you know, such a close call with death like that. But I think for many people, they get that that sense of the constant search for explanations and reasons can really, really derail your life. And accepting that you are in some ways just an accident, the way I feel very much to be an accident because I’m derived from a mass murder. To me it takes a weight off my shoulders. You know, accidental things happen, arbitrary things happen. And that’s why I say, you know, the enjoying the ride mentality is, is sort of the best and most liberating way you can deal with that.

Eric Zimmer 00:35:23  That’s an incredible story. I was able to tell after like, talking to you for like two minutes, that you indeed had a mass murder in your family.

Eric Zimmer 00:35:31  It’s just in your personality, I think. I just I just kind of saw it.

Brian Klass 00:35:36  It’s funny you say that because, like, bizarrely, my my grandpa, who, you know, was more directly affected than this because it was his dad that found out the, you know, found the family. He had a very dark line where he said, you know, that branch of the family tree severed itself. So we’re not related to it?

Eric Zimmer 00:35:51  To that? Yeah.

Brian Klass 00:35:52  So, yeah, mass murderer gene would not have been passed.

Eric Zimmer 00:35:54  Down, not have been passed down.

Brian Klass 00:35:56  Yeah. The trauma that he experienced, I’m sure was horrific. So.

Speaker 4 00:35:59  Yeah.

Eric Zimmer 00:36:25  This everything happens for a reason thing always kind of drives me crazy too, because I don’t know people who have that belief I’m actually often jealous of because they seem to have a comfort in things. If I could believe it, I think I might, but I can’t, right? So I have no choice but to sort of operate on the other.

Eric Zimmer 00:36:42  What I think is interesting about this, there’s a companion phrase to Everything Happens for a reason, which is that everything happens for the best or something like that. Right? And I think that is also nonsense. I think you can invert that phrase, though, and get something useful out of it, which is that you can make the best out of everything that happens. Yeah, I don’t think it’s that the thing that happened has meaning in and of itself, but you can make it meaningful with how you choose to respond. I don’t know that me being, you know, a homeless heroin addict at 24 will ever. We don’t know why. There’s no there’s no real thing there. And I don’t believe it happened for a reason. Like I was appointed to some higher purpose. But I do believe that I was presented an opportunity in which I was able to give that thing meaning by what I did in an ongoing way. And I think that’s the more actually compassionate view of suffering, because as soon as everything happens for a reason, you reference the secret in the book.

Eric Zimmer 00:37:40  Which drives me crazy, because if you follow that thing to its end, everything happens for a reason. You have to come to terms with the fact that as you and I are talking right now, like some child is being hideously abused for a reason and the child somehow attracted that to themselves, I find to be sort of morally repugnant.

Brian Klass 00:38:01  I agree with this completely, and I think that my issue is also that it breeds complacency around questions of justice. Because if you look at something that’s a gross injustice, you can just say everything happens for a reason. If you say that some things are the culmination of an arbitrary set of forces, or that some people are inflicting harm on a child, and we need to stop that. Then those things don’t have some sort of grand moral arc to them, and they require action, right? That you need to save the child. One of the most interesting interviews I did around the ideas that I was grappling with in writing the book, was actually with a Christian podcast that I was talking to a person who’s a very devout Christian, and I’m personally not religious, but what was striking about this was that he was actually much more okay with some of the ideas I had said, because his idea of providence, in which everything does happen for a reason, because in his view, God was dictating things, meant that he would never know the reason.

Brian Klass 00:38:57  Right? And because it was completely unknown to him, he sort of just said, I have to just try to do my best in life, you know? And I was thinking to myself, like, okay, I have a very different philosophical framework from this person, but I’m thinking from chaos theory that due to the fact that these tiny little tweaks in life can culminate in really big changes over time. I will never know or understand some of the reasons why things happen to me. I also feel like I should just try to do the best in life because I don’t have control. And so there’s a weird sort of horseshoe, right where the origin for me is the Big Bang in physics. That’s where I’m thinking about the sort of framework of of how these things work. For him, it was a sort of divine presence dictating everything in the universe. But the acceptance of a lack of control ended up with us at the same point. Right. Yeah. And so this is where, again, you both operate probabilistically.

Brian Klass 00:39:48  You don’t know what the right strategy is necessarily going to be. Even if you think God is testing you. So you just try to do the thing that you think is best. And that’s what I do. I try to do the thing that I think would be best, and that I hope the ripple effects of my life play out in a good way, as opposed to a catastrophically bad way. But I will never know. And that’s the interesting aspect of accepting the limits of control. I think that can exist in multiple worldviews.

Eric Zimmer 00:40:12  Yeah, that’s absolutely fascinating that this person arrives at the same place, which is I, I believe it’s all happening for a reason, but I can’t know the reason. You describe this a couple of different ways in the book, sort of religiously, which I love. You say this makes us devoted disciples of the cult of because or we worship at the altar of progress in the Church of Control. Those are great examples of how that world view is almost religious in its belief.

Eric Zimmer 00:40:38  Say a little bit more about that.

Brian Klass 00:40:40  Yeah. You know, I mean, I grew up in the United States, and I think the United States has a very strong sense. And in some ways this has probably helped American economic growth and so on. But it has a very strong sense that you are the master of your own destiny. Right. The sort of pulling yourself up by the bootstraps, this sort of aspect of if you work hard, you’ll you’ll get what you deserve and so on. And so as a result of that, you know, I was really hit over the head, I think, with messages that if anything bad happened in my life, it was my fault because I am the master of my own destiny. And if I just have a setback, I should just work harder. I also think that this discounts structural problems in society. Problems with things we can’t control, like mental illness, setbacks from other people doing harm to us, etc. that you continually sort of beat yourself up when something goes wrong.

Brian Klass 00:41:28  And so I do think there’s almost a sort of devotional disciple aspect to this. What I think is a myth that we’re masters of our own destiny, what I call the illusion of control or the delusion of individualism. And to me, it was liberating to get out of that mentality and to start to think about the things that I have influence over the role my life plays in changing the lives of other people, but also accepting that I don’t need to pretend that those things are true anymore. Something that you said before really made me think of this is that when you were talking about coaching people, right? I also look back at my life and all the things that I was told I was supposed to want, and then I could imagine that I was, you know, going to go to someone to say, how do I get there? And there’s been loads of times in my life were the things that I thought I wanted were not the things that actually were good for me, right? Yep. And so, you know, how did I discover that? Well, often by accident.

Brian Klass 00:42:19  Right. Like where? I didn’t try to do something. I stumbled into something and found that I loved it or that I was passionate about it. And, you know, I often have written about ideas around what I call the false gospel of stuff and status, where the road to happiness is paved with more stuff and higher status. I have not found that to be true. I find personally that there are things that I care about in the world that are intrinsically valuable to me, that other people might not find value in whatsoever. And chasing those things has made me much happier. So that’s the other flip side of this sort of disciple aspect of of searching for control is that it’s often what other people think you want. Yeah. And that is, to me, is just another one of the myths of that sort of cultural aspiration.

Eric Zimmer 00:43:03  Right. There’s two really big points that you hit on there that maybe we can go and order, although we’ll probably tangent off somewhere else if I know how I do things.

Eric Zimmer 00:43:12  But the first is this idea of how much agency or control do we have? And I think this is an important thing to think about, because we have some amount of agency and we have some amount of our lives are the way they are based on what has come before. And I think that it’s really tricky to get that balance because I use myself as an example, just because it’s the easiest thing to use. Right? But if I were to have believed that my genetics and my family and my upbringing and all that meant I was destined to die as an addict. That would have been a problematic view. At the same time, had I believed that I was just a bad person because I was doing this and didn’t see all those other factors would have also been a harmful belief. And so somewhere in there is this triangulation on this idea of, well, there is some amount of control in here. And to your point, there’s a lot that’s not under my control. And I just love the line that you’ve used a couple times, which is like, how do I do my best? But I think if you can hold both those views at the same time, it allows you to go a little bit easier on yourself to relax a little bit, but also stay in sort of the driver’s seat of your own life.

Brian Klass 00:44:40  I’ve talked several times about chaos theory and chaos. That word is the opposite of order, right? It’s the opposite of control. All of our lives lie between order and disorder. Everything that’s that’s the entirety of our life. There’s bits that are ordered and structured and that we have some predictability about. There’s other bits where just things just wallop us out of the blue, and we have no idea that it’s going to hit us. And the difficulty is that I think a lot of people respond to that middle ground. That is life, by thinking, if I just got closer to the order, then everything would be okay, right? But it’s never going to happen. That’s the point that I say is like, yes, you just you know, personally, I think that the times where I’ve felt the worst in my life are when I’ve been trying to impose order on something I can’t. And the times that I have felt sometimes the best is where I’ve sort of accepted that disorder and just enjoyed the moment.

Brian Klass 00:45:36  Yeah. You know, there’s an example. I took this from a very good philosopher. I like his work a lot, called Hartmut Rosa, a sociologist. He has this phrase called resonance, which I think a lot of people would sort of recognize this moments where you just feel sort of just wonderful in the moment and the point he makes, which he has a little line where he says something to the effect of, you know, even in life’s planned celebrations, it’s the unplanned flourishes that we remember the most. And so I think about, you know, those moments of celebration. It’s like everybody thinks about like their wedding day, the birthdays, anniversaries, all these sort of big milestones. And then you tell stories about them, and it’s usually the stuff you did not expect where somebody did something really funny or just really heartfelt and that stands out. Whereas if you just try to say that, you know, this is going to happen at 10:00, this will happen at 1005 and so on. It sucks the joy out of it because there’s no unexpected uncertainty.

Brian Klass 00:46:30  And so, you know, I think we would be utterly crippled as a species if we were fully certain. And if we were fully uncertain, both things would be terrible for us. But living in that middle space is actually where you have the best of both worlds. And and so that’s where I really do disagree with a lot of the people who just say, you have to control your life. I think a world of complete control would be dystopian. I think it would be horrifically terrible. Yeah, and I like the uncertainty that I have to navigate. Even though uncertainty brings tragedy, sometimes it’s the price of a life that I think is enjoyable and exciting.

Eric Zimmer 00:47:03  Precisely that life where you knew everything that was going to happen and you got everything that you want, would be a very dead life. And again, if we believe this idea that most of us don’t actually even know what’s best for us, it would be a problematic life, right? The same for me. Like if I’d gotten all the things that I thought that I wanted, my life would look very different.

Eric Zimmer 00:47:25  You know, this is obviously some bias, but who knows what it would be like, but it wouldn’t be like this, right? It wouldn’t be like this. And this is kind of what it is. And I think that’s a really good place to be. I want to go back to what you said a minute ago about, what’d you call it, the gospel of stuff and success.

Brian Klass 00:47:42  Stuff and status.

Eric Zimmer 00:47:43  Yeah, stuff and status. Okay. So let’s just take that at face value to say, okay, this idea that if we get more of this or we get more status, we’re going to suddenly be happy. Let’s just say that’s not true. Why do we continue to believe that. Like, I’ve heard that line and said it and thought about it a thousand times at least. And I’ve seen through that delusion a thousand times. And yet my first book is going to be published in a year, and I am thinking very much about how many copies it sells and all of that.

Eric Zimmer 00:48:22  Right? So I know that if it sells 10,000 copies versus 25,000 copies, I’m not fundamentally going to be a happier person, because if I sell 25,000, I’m suddenly going to be like, well, why didn’t I sell 50,000? So I see through this illusion, goodness gracious, it’s persistent, and it just comes roaring right back in. Why do you think?

Brian Klass 00:48:43  It’s a great question. My argument on how to deal with this is I coined this phrase after the book. So it’s one of the ones that didn’t make the cut because I didn’t come up with it until after it was published. But I try to argue in favor of people and passion rather than stuff and status, which is nice alliterative phrasing. Yep. And the issue with people and passion versus stuff and status is that people and passion, by which I mean relationships and things that you care about deeply, that are individual to you. Those are not easily quantified. They’re not easily measured. Right? Right. Stuff and status are extremely easy to measure.

Brian Klass 00:49:15  And there are also things that in a social community are very easy to have relative rank. Right. So you can understand whether someone has a bigger house than you. You can understand whether someone makes more money than you. You can understand if they are above you in the corporate hierarchy, you cannot understand whether someone has a better relationship with their son or their father, or, you know, a friend. You cannot understand whether they have a deep satisfaction from the fact that they really enjoy woodworking or walking their dog. Right. And so when I think about this stuff, like, I have had a tremendous amount of joy from going for hikes with my dog, with loved ones, etc. and there is absolutely no metric that is tied to that. Right? But I feel good. And so what does that culminate towards? What am I striving towards? You know, that’s the other aspect. We’re really striving creatures. We try to always embed our position and, you know, walking the dog doesn’t do anything on an objective level to quote unquote, better my position in society.

Brian Klass 00:50:10  It might fulfill me, but this thing is so funny about this to me, is that it’s so obvious when you put it in the framework of a finite life and the idea of death and so on, that you’re going to look back on your life. I mean, I have never, ever encountered someone who has been asked the question of like, what did you value most at, you know, in your life in old age? And they say, the moment I got the promotion and the Ferrari, you know what I mean? It’s just like those things are not if you if you really love them, if they make you happy. It’s not saying that you shouldn’t chase things that are important to you, it’s that you have to make sure that you’re motivated. In my view, intrinsically, which means that if there were no other people on the planet, would you still value this? And for me, a lot of the things that I’ve started doing more of the answer is yes. And a lot of the things that I’ve started doing a lot less of the answer is no.

Brian Klass 00:50:57  Other people care about that, but it doesn’t really make me happy. And that’s extrinsic motivation or external motivation. Right. So all of society is built around external validation. And all of what makes us happy is built around internal motivation. And that’s the paradox of how to navigate it. Because obviously the ability to do things that you like is tied to being able to have enough money, for example, that you’re not stressed. So it’s not that they’re completely separate. It’s not that it’s important to just jettison them. And all of us should live in the woods and be subsistence farmers. It’s that you have to calibrate it so that you understand which thing is a means and which thing is an end, right? And if your entire life is means where you’re trying to get somewhere and you never enjoy the end, then you’ve basically mortgaged your life for a goal that never comes. And and I worry that there’s a lot of people who are doing that because they’re on the gospel of stuff and status, and they never understand what it’s for.

Brian Klass 00:51:48  They’re just playing the game until they die. So it’s a bleak way of saying it, but I think there are people who are living that life.

Eric Zimmer 00:51:54  Back to some of our earlier points. We are creatures that are wired up a certain way. We are wired up to look at status and hierarchy. It’s embedded in us, so it’s not bad that we do that because I don’t think you can not do it. And I think we can also recognize, oh, that way is not the path of fulfillment and happiness. And I think it gets further muddled because so many things end up being both. You write a book, there’s a big intrinsic motivation in it. Whatever it is for you, you like writing or you have a message you want to get out to the world or whatever the intrinsic thing is, and you’re going to measure it extrinsic. I talk about this podcast all the time I can get caught up in. It’s not as big as X and it’s not as big as Y, and is it going to pay the bills? And because those are all realities, when I live in that world, though, I’m not happy when I reorient and say, oh, I do this because I get to talk to really interesting people, right? I just love doing this.

Eric Zimmer 00:52:54  I get to put something out there that countless people tell me has helped them. I get to interact with my friend Chris around. He’s our editor around something I love, and when I get back to that framing, the job comes alive in a different way. And so for me, it’s sort of I feel like I’m always sort of lured over this way towards status and stuff, and I have to keep turning my attention back to people and passion.

Brian Klass 00:53:18  If I’m being honest about this stuff. I’m not some guru who’s immune from these things, right? Like, there’s no there’s no way in which even if you say these things, that you are immune from these aspects of the rat race. And when the most recent book, fluke, came out, I was refreshing review sites. I have read every review of the book. I think that’s on the internet. There were times where people said some really mean stuff. Other people, the majority of them said some very wonderful things, right? Yeah, but some people said some really mean stuff.

Brian Klass 00:53:43  And the mean things sort of stuck with me, of course, and I had to sit with it for a little bit. And the two things that were important to realize that have totally made me immune from this. One of them is realizing That I would have written the book if no one read it, because I cared about it and I wanted to do it. And it was a profound experience and sort of understanding what I thought about the world. So that’s the first part, right? That I would do it if no one read it. That’s intrinsic motivation. And the second thing that I think is also important and does go to a lot of different domains, is you don’t write a book or whatever it is that you do professionally, personally, whatever. You don’t write a book for the person who hates it. You write the book for the person for whom it’s going to change their world. And if that person experiences this in a positive way, I will take a thousand people who think I’m an idiot and hate the book because I didn’t write it for them, you know? And so there’s an aspect to this where I think that parable really applies to lots of other parts of life.

Brian Klass 00:54:39  You can’t make something that is going to be universally celebrated or universally affecting in the same way as creative, whatever it is, but you do it for the people who it empowers and changes their worldview and makes them think differently. And that’s enough. And so, you know, I think there’s so much of that aspect where we’re trying to be universalizing. We want it to be 100% of people. It’s impossible, but it’s still it’s still worthwhile if those things make a difference, and also if you find them personally fulfilling. And it’s made me a lot more comfortable with the horrible comments that people make online when you are an author, because, you know, the majority of them are actually very positive, and those are the people for whom I was spending time, you know, sitting in front of a laptop and really trying to get this right.

Eric Zimmer 00:55:21  Well, I think that is a great place to wrap up. You and I are going to continue in the post-show conversation where we’re going to see what we cover.

Eric Zimmer 00:55:27  We might cover the idea that probability theory works well in certain contexts, but fails catastrophically in others, understanding the difference between risk and uncertainty. And we may discuss the mating habits of spiders and why you might want to do more of this in your own life. So we’ll see what happens in the post-show conversation. Listeners, if you’d like to get access to that conversation, all of the other post-show conversations, special episodes that I do just for you. And you want to contribute to the podcast because we can always, always, always use your support. Go to one you feed. Join. Brian. Thanks again. I’ve really enjoyed this. I loved the book. I think your Substack is outstanding. What’s it called?

Brian Klass 00:56:08  It’s called The Garden of Forking Paths. It’s an idea that’s also on fleek as well.

Eric Zimmer 00:56:12  Yeah, you’re a great writer across the board, so I encourage people to check that out. And thank you so much.

Brian Klass 00:56:17  Thanks for having me on the show.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

The Bittersweet Truth About Beauty, Sorrow, and What Makes Life Worth Living with Susan Cain

April 25, 2025 1 Comment

Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, Susan Cain explores the bittersweet truth about beauty, sorrow, and what makes life worth living. She emphasizes the transformative power of music and bittersweet emotions and also discusses how acknowledging grief can lead to deeper connections and creativity. This episode encourages listeners to embrace their emotions and seek beauty in life’s bittersweet moments, offering profound insights into the human experience.

Key Takeaways:

  • Exploration of the relationship between sorrow and beauty.
  • Discussion of the transformative power of music and its emotional connections.
  • Insights into the concept of bittersweetness and its significance in human experience.
  • The importance of acknowledging grief and its role in personal growth.
  • Differentiation between “moving on” and “moving forward” in the context of loss.
  • The concept of poignancy as a blend of joy and sorrow.
  • The role of creativity and art in navigating difficult emotions.
  • Emphasis on seeking beauty in everyday life, especially during challenging times.
  • The impact of personal experiences on understanding grief and longing.
  • Encouragement for listeners to embrace their emotions and foster connections through shared experiences.


SUSAN CAIN is the author of the #1 New York Times bestsellers QUIET: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking, and BITTERSWEET: How Sorrow and Longing Make Us Whole, which was also an Oprah Book Club selection. She has spent the last twenty years exploring a particular realm of human nature: the quiet, the sensitive, the thoughtful, the bittersweet. It has always seemed clear to her – and to her millions of readers – that this way of being can lead to a richer, deeper form of happiness. Susan has also been named one of Watkins’ Most Spiritually Influential Living People in the World. Her books have been translated into 40+ languages, and her record-smashing TED talks have been viewed over 50 million times on TED and YouTube combined. Susan is the host of the bestselling Audible series, A QUIET LIFE IN SEVEN STEPS, and the QUIET LIFE online community. Her Kindred Letters newsletter is read by people in all 193 countries and all 50 American states.

Connect with Susan Cain:  Website | Instagram

If you enjoyed this conversation with Susan Cain, check out these other episodes:

How to Embrace Your Authentic Self with Carmen Rita Wong

Faith, Identity, and Finding Your Voice with Dante Stewart

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

Eric Zimmer 00:00:00  Hey, friends. Eric here with some exciting news. I’ve been writing a book and it’s about to be out in the world in April of 2026. The working title is how a Little Becomes a Lot, and it’s all about how small, consistent actions, the kind that we talk about all the time on this show can lead to real, meaningful change. Right now, the book is in the editing process, and there’s still some shaping to do, which is where you come in. I’d love your input on what to focus on, how to talk about the book, even what it should be called. If you’ve got a few minutes and a couple thoughts on what would make this book most helpful for you, I’d be really grateful to hear them. Just head to one. You feed a survey. You’ll also get early updates, fun giveaways, and a behind the scenes look at what it actually takes to make a book. Editing marathons, title debates, existential spirals, and me questioning all of my life choices at 2 a.m. over one stubborn sentence again. That’s oneyoufeed.net/booksurvey. Thank you so much for being part of this. Your feedback really means a lot to me. Truly.

Susan Cain 00:01:10  The same thing that can, when it’s not working right, predispose us to anxiety. And depression is the very thing that can bring us to our highest and deepest selves.

Chris Forbes 00:01:29  Welcome to the one you feed. Throughout time, great thinkers have recognized the importance of the thoughts we have. Quotes like garbage in, garbage out or you are what you think ring true. And yet, for many of us, our thoughts don’t strengthen or empower us. We tend toward negativity, self-pity, jealousy, or fear. We see what we don’t have instead of what we do. We think things that hold us back and dampen our spirit. But it’s not just about thinking our actions matter. It takes conscious, consistent and creative effort to make a life worth living. This podcast is about how other people keep themselves moving in the right direction, how they feed their good wolf.

Eric Zimmer 00:02:14  It’s technically sad music, but what I feel really is love. A great title outpouring of it. I’ve never had a good answer for why I find yearning music so strangely uplifting. Until this conversation. This week I talked with Susan Cain, author of Bittersweet and Quiet, about the strange alchemy where sorrow becomes beauty and longing becomes connection. We dig into why certain types of music make our hearts ache in the best way, and why that ache might actually be pointing us towards something sacred. Some spiritual traditions can seem to treat desire and longing like enemies. This conversation offers a different view That yearning can be a spiritual force in its own right. Susan also holds a special place in my heart, not just because of her work, but because she kindly introduced me to her literary agent, who later became mine. Susan and I talk Leonard Cohen grief, transcendence and how turning towards the bittersweet might just be the path home. I’m Erik Zimmer and this is the one you feed. Hi, Susan, welcome to the show.

Susan Cain 00:03:23  Hey, Eric. It’s so great to be here.

Eric Zimmer 00:03:25  I am really excited to have you on. You’re sort of a patron saint to introverts everywhere, of which I lean in that direction. And your latest book, where we’re going to be spending our time, is called bittersweet. How sorrow and longing make us Whole. But before we do that, let’s start like we always do with a parable. In the parable, there’s a grandparent who’s talking with a grandchild, and they say, in life there’s two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear. The grandchild stops, thinks about it for a second, looks up at their grandparents, says, well, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you and your life and the work that you do.

Susan Cain 00:04:12  So I love that parable, and it actually seems to me to echo another parable that I came across while I was researching bittersweet, which I have found to be such a great guiding star and consolation of how to live.

Susan Cain 00:04:31  And I’ll tell you this parable. And I think you’ll see the parallels, but we can talk about them. So in this other parable, this one comes from the Kabbalah, which is the mystic form of Judaism. And in this parable, the idea is that all of creation originally was an intact divine vessel, but that the vessel shattered and that the world that we are living in now is the broken world following the shattering, but that scattered all around us still are the divine shards from when the vessel was still intact. And that one great way to live a life is to look around us and to notice the divine shards, wherever they have happened to land around us, and to bend down and pick them up. And you will notice different shards from the ones that I will. But we can all do our own gathering. And I love this. And it reminds me of the parable that you shared, because it’s acknowledging the pain and the tragedy and the evil that exists in the world, without feeling that we have to become a prisoner to them.

Susan Cain 00:05:41  So it’s not telling us to look away from them and pretend that they’re not there. Which is, I think, what our mainstream culture would, would tell us. It’s telling us they’re very much there, and we can admit that and tell the truth about that. And at the same time, we can turn in the other direction, in the direction of beauty and of love, and that we have the ability to decide to turn in that direction. I find that parable to just be such a relief, a relief to be able to tell the truth. Also just a great way to live, to know that we always have that option. So I think it’s very much what the grandparent in your parable was telling the grandchild, just with a different image.

Eric Zimmer 00:06:17  Yeah, it’s one of the things I love about the Wolf parable is exactly what you said, which is it just sort of says like, hey, we all have this in us. That’s the human condition. It’s natural. It’s normal. I’ve always liked that normalizing of it.

Eric Zimmer 00:06:29  And I love the parable that you told from Judaism, which is a beautiful, beautiful story. And as you were talking about it, I actually had another thought which was, not only are we walking around collecting the shards, we are ourselves the shards in some ways. And when we come together, we are putting them back together in a way that sort of flashed into my mind as you were telling that story?

Susan Cain 00:06:52  Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. And I think that what the grandparent was saying also is that we can’t deny that these two aspects of ourselves exist at all times. With denying it comes a kind of blindness, but we can acknowledge it and then decide to turn in a particular direction.

Eric Zimmer 00:07:09  Let’s jump into the book. I mean, I kind of have to start close to where you start, which is by talking about music, and you start the book by really trying to find out why. Do some of us really love what would be considered sad music? And it’s funny. This is an interesting thing in my own household because I am that type.

Eric Zimmer 00:07:29  I listen to melancholy music, give me any chance and I’ll listen to it. My partner really doesn’t because it makes her sad, and I haven’t been able to explain to her why I like melancholy music very well. I haven’t been able to put it into very good words. I was reading your book and I just stopped and I said, I have to read you something, which is rare. I normally just interview prep and she’s always like, I wish you’d share more about what your interview prepping, and I just am kind of going on my way. But it was so good it stopped me and I’m just going to read it really quickly, if that’s okay. Yeah, sure. You said it’s hard to put into words what I experience when I hear this kind of music. It’s technically sad, but what I feel really is love. A great title, outpouring of it, a deep kinship with all the other souls in the world who know the sorrow the music strains to express. But the music makes my heart open, literally the sensation of expanding chest muscles.

Eric Zimmer 00:08:21  And I’ve been looking for that description ever since I started listening to melancholy music. So thank you.

Susan Cain 00:08:27  You’re welcome. I just got goosebumps knowing that you’ve been looking for that explanation as I had been to. I mean, it was only when I started writing this book that I actually like, put into words exactly what the sensation is and why it matters so much. The reason I put music at the heart of the book, I mean, partly just because it literally was the catalyst for why I went off on this bittersweet quest in the first place, but also because the way in which sad music is a gateway to love, because it unites us in our state of longing, our state of like exile from Eden. You could say that’s the power of Bittersweetness itself. Not just the music, but the bittersweet condition itself. Like the fact that all humans are united in existing in this state of what feels to us like a grand imperfection and impermanence and, you know, longing for the world to be different from the way that it is, you know, to see the joys and the beauties in the world and wish that they could last forever, and wish that they comprised all of the world instead of only a part of it.

Susan Cain 00:09:30  All those longings, the fact that we’re in that together is just this great uniting force, and the fact that we live in a world that tells us not to talk about any of that and not to talk about our sorrows and our longings, is like living in a world that is telling us not to love each other as deeply as we could.

Eric Zimmer 00:09:50  Yeah. And I really want to get to what you just said a little bit more in detail, which is about telling us not to love things as deeply as we do, because not only does our culture tell us that some of the spiritual traditions I’m most attached to almost seem to be saying that, and but we’re going to save that for a little bit later, because we got to talk about Leonard Cohen for a second. Who you talk about as your favorite musician and is mine. He was the guest I most ever all time wanted to have on this show, and it didn’t happen. I got close at one point. I was talking with a guy who knew him, who was a monk at the center that Leonard was at, and he said, you should know that Leonard’s monk name means great silence.

Eric Zimmer 00:10:31  So just to give you an idea of how likely you are to get a conversation with him.

Susan Cain 00:10:36  So that’s so interesting. And can I interrupt you to just say that? Yeah. He’s my guy. Artistically, after my book quiet came out, you know, which is all about introversion and the power of quiet. He actually tweeted out of the blue about the book and about quiet and how important it is. You know, that was like a glory day for me. And I can’t believe I can’t even find the tweet now, but I will always remember it.

Eric Zimmer 00:10:58  So yeah.

Susan Cain 00:11:00  Yeah. So you just had to share that.

Eric Zimmer 00:11:01  I remember where I was when I heard that he passed. I wanted to talk a little bit about a conversation. I think Adam Cohen was saying in an interview with Rick Rubin. But I loved this line at the end. He’s describing what Leonard Cohen’s music did. And Adam, his son, said he was giving you a transcendence delivery system. That’s what he was trying to do every time.

Susan Cain 00:11:23  Yeah. I love that. I mean, I don’t have the quote in front of me, but I think he was talking about that in the context of talking about how, you know, his music was famously kind of sorrowful and gloomy. And his record producers at one point were joking about how they should give out razor blades along with his, along with his, his albums and, you know, and that’s what he was famous for. But what Adam was saying is. Yes. And I mean, it wasn’t only about brokenness. It was about brokenness pointing in the direction of transcendence. The song that is best known of his and has been covered maybe more than any other song in music history, is Hallelujah and Hallelujah is about. I mean, it’s literally in his words. It is about the broken hallelujah, a cold and broken Hallelujah. So I think in all his music, he’s constantly expressing and wrestling with the bittersweet, the way in which everything is so fundamentally broken and so fundamentally beautiful.

Eric Zimmer 00:12:20  Yeah.

Eric Zimmer 00:12:20  Yep I agree. So there’s one other thing I just want to talk about with music for a second. Something else that you said that I really love. You said this type of music, you’re talking about a specific song, but it doesn’t matter of the world. Don’t simply discharge our emotions. They elevate them. And also, you say it’s only sad music that elicits exalted states of communion and awe.

Susan Cain 00:12:41  Yeah, this is an interesting thing. I did a little bit of research and studying of the whole nature of sad music and why we love it so. And you and I are not the only ones who feel this way. Many, many people do. The people whose favorite songs are happy listen to them. 175 times on their playlist. But the people whose favorite songs are sad listen 800 times and they tell, yeah, you know, they feel this deep sense of connection, and they tell researchers that the music makes them feel connected to the sublime and the wondrous. And it’s not just because of, quote, negativity, per se, because this does not happen for music that expresses anger or disgust or, you know, any other negative emotions you can think of.

Susan Cain 00:13:27  It’s specifically something about sadness. And in fact, there is this one study done by an MIT economist. It was published in an MIT review under the title How are you, My Dearest Mozart? And in this study, the Economist, he took all the letters that Mozart, Beethoven and List had written throughout their lives, and he coded each of the letters based on the emotions expressed within them. And then he correlated the time at which those letters had been written and looked at what music the composer had produced at that time. And he found that the most and the only predictive emotion of all was sadness, that when the letters expressed sorrow, that was what reliably predicted the most profound and the greatest of their works. And again, not any other negative emotion. Just sadness. Just sorrow. So there’s something about this state of sorrow. And I think anybody who feels a kind of creative spirit in them, we all know this. We’ve we’ve been there. There’s something about a state of sorrow that puts us in mind of a kind of like longing and reaching upwards, wanting to transform the sorrow into something else, into something high, and to something sublime.

Eric Zimmer 00:14:43  Yeah, I think that’s really fascinating, that sorrow is the emotion that, as you say, can sort of lead us to these higher states of transcendence, of or of beauty. And it’s not the other negative emotions. And it made me think a little bit about the idea of neurosis, right? Neurosis being very often something we’re layering on top of to avoid feeling maybe the core emotion, which might be sorrow. And so these sort of more neurotic emotions, for lack of a better word, I’m going to use them. Anxiety or depression? I’m a depression sufferer. We’ll talk about that. These things actually are ways of avoiding what is actually most healing in some ways.

Susan Cain 00:15:24  Yeah, yeah. That’s right, that’s right. And it’s interesting that you use the word neurosis, because one of the things I did when I started researching this book, I basically was researching for years what I call the bittersweet tradition, which is all the religions, wisdom, traditions, Musicians, artists, philosophers, poets who have been talking about this bittersweet state of being for thousands of years all across the world.

Susan Cain 00:15:48  And I looked also at mainstream psychology. In mainstream psychology, there really is no word for this state, this state of, like, this beautifully piercing longing that I was trying to investigate. The only word that comes close is the word of neurosis, as you said. Except when psychology talks about neurosis, it’s only talking about the problem of it. It is a real problem when it goes too far and it descends into anxiety and depression. And for anyone who’s been there, those are not pleasant states. But there’s nothing in psychology or in this terminology that talks about the great transcendent longing that’s at the heart of human nature, and that is intimately connected. The same thing that can, when it’s not working right, predispose us to anxiety. And depression is the very thing that can bring us to our highest and deepest selves. And so a lot of the challenge of life is figuring out what to do with that thing and how to use its powers, its powers, which can be dangerous, but which can also be beautiful and transformative.

Eric Zimmer 00:16:57  You wrote this idea of transforming pain into creativity, transcendence and love is at the heart of this book. And when I read that, I was like, that’s as good a description of what we’ve been trying to do over 500 episodes, right? Which is, you know, I’m a recovering addict, I have depression, you know, my whole thing is, how do we take this difficult stuff that we all face every human life? You know, Buddha says we’re all brothers and sisters and sickness, old age and death. Right? So for all of us, how do we take that and create something meaningful and beautiful?

Susan Cain 00:17:28  Exactly. You know, in the book I have this quiz that we developed. It’s called the Bittersweet Quiz. I say we because I did it together with the psychologists David Eden and Scott Barry Kaufman. David Evans at Hopkins and the quiz basically asks a bunch of different questions. Questions like, do you draw comfort or inspiration from a rainy day? Do you react very intensely to music, art and nature? And there’s a bunch of questions.

Susan Cain 00:17:52  You can find it either in the book or on my website. And what we found is that people who score high on the quiz, meaning that they tend to this bittersweet state of mind, these same people, they have maybe exactly what you would predict in terms of strengths and vulnerabilities. Their strengths are that they also score high on measures of receptivity to wonder and awe and spirituality. That was a strong correlation. But then there was also a more minor but still significant correlation with anxiety and depression. It’s like the quiz codified. I think what you just said and what we’ve both been reaching towards, which is there is something in this bittersweet state, this state in which you’re aware of life’s joys and sorrows, and you’re aware of its impermanence, and you’re deeply connected to that and connected to its beauty. There’s something about that state that if you’re following it and you’re in your best self moment, let’s say it can. It can deliver you to states of great wonder. And if you’re not careful to manage it right, it can also deliver you to a place of depression.

Susan Cain 00:19:00  The question is how do you do it right?

Eric Zimmer 00:19:27  I’ve asked that question. I feel like hundreds of different ways, which is why do some people take pain and turn it into something beautiful. And I don’t only mean art, right. It could be. It could just be love. It becomes a creative force in their life. And I would say a good thing in the world. Why does that happen? In some cases. And in other cases we see people just broken by the difficulties in life, you know? And so what are the factors in there? And you in the book later on say there’s different pathways to the peace we all seek. You’re trying to sort of answer this question, at least it seems to me. And I’m just going to read the four that you came up with and let you kind of talk about them. First one was sort of, you know, let it go some degree of, you know, just letting things go. The other is to know how resilient we are to really lean into resilience.

Eric Zimmer 00:20:20  The other is non-attachment, right. And trying to aspire to a love that is bigger than possession. And then the last one you say, this is the one you’re going to need to explain is the way of even so carries a different wisdom, one that expresses the longing that many of us sense is the force that will carry us home.

Susan Cain 00:20:40  Yeah. So that last one comes from a poem that was written by Issa, one of the great Japanese Buddhist poets, and it was written after he lost his beloved young daughter to smallpox. And he says in the poem, basically he says, I know that this world of doo doo, like D.W., I know that this world of dew is just a world of dew. But even so, but even so. And he’s basically saying, you know, I get it that everything is impermanent. I get it that we’re just dewdrops. Who are we’re all of us going to evaporate any minute now. I understand that. And yet there’s something in me that doesn’t accept that there’s something in me that will insist on feeling sorrow and feeling grief for my lost daughter, no matter what.

Susan Cain 00:21:30  And I think there’s so much beauty and wisdom in that poem. He’s a trained Buddhist. He’s saying, even I feel this way. And implicit in the poem, because there’s a reader at the other end of that poem and he knows it, he’s not writing it to himself. So implicit is there’s a reader on the other end who feels the exact same way, who, no matter what, will feel a grief and feel a longing, and that we are united in that feeling. And there’s something about the uniting of that, the fact that all humans are in that state together. That is a great joy of its own. There’s one young woman who I quote in the book who calls this the union between souls, and she’s talking about how she experiences that at her grandfather’s funeral. At the funeral, there’s a barbershop chorus who sings a song in tribute of her grandfather, and she sees her father for the first time in her life, crying in front of her, crying, crying in public. And she says, what she remembers of that funeral is not the sorrow, but the union between souls that happened there.

Susan Cain 00:22:34  And I think that’s what is bringing to life when he says, I may be a Buddhist and I may understand it about the dewdrops, but come on, we’re all in this together.

Eric Zimmer 00:22:44  I love that idea. You say this is the ultimate paradox. We transcend grief only when we realize that we’re connected with all the other humans who can’t transcend grief because we will always say, but even so, even so, what I love about that poem, and I’ve tried to articulate this and listeners have heard this before. I try to articulate and talk about an experience I had when I had to put to sleep a dog that I loved deeply beyond all measure, and I had had to put down another dog like eight months before. And for whatever reason, I was able to sort of like say, you know what? Yep. This is a world of do. It’s a world of do we come? We go as creatures, we get sick, we die. This is what happens. So I sort of set down my argument with the universe, and I just was able to descend into the grief itself.

Eric Zimmer 00:23:35  And it felt beautiful. It was so clear to me that that grief was the parallel, the other side of the great love. You know, I was having great grief because I’d had great love. But in order to do that, I feel like I had to set down my defense against it. I had to sit down the. But it shouldn’t have happened. He’s too young, but I just had to put down another dog eight months ago that all my arguments with the universe, like you said. But even so, even knowing all that, I’m really sad. And yet there was a deep beauty in it that I had not experienced in other grieving situations where I had sort of grieved and argued my way through them. I don’t know if that resonates with you.

Susan Cain 00:24:15  Yeah, absolutely. Thank you for sharing that story. Yeah. It does, it does. I think there’s something about setting aside our grief too soon. Maybe that feels not human and deprives us Of the process the way it is, even for somebody who does get through grief with a great measure of resilience.

Susan Cain 00:24:37  And, you know, as I as I write in the book, the Columbia psychologist George Bonanno, who studies grief, has found that the vast majority of us kind of surprise ourselves by how resilient we end up being in the face of grief. It’s not true for everybody. Some people really get into chronic grief, but many, many people are more resilient than they expect to be. But that doesn’t mean they don’t pass through the moments of feeling it so incredibly intensely, and it doesn’t mean they might not feel it. You know, 50 years from now, 50 years from the day they’ve lost their beloved, it can come up upon them unawares. Yeah. So all of that is part of the same messy soup.

Eric Zimmer 00:25:15  I agree, I think there’s this idea that is in certain circles, and your book is part of this, which beautifully says, hey, difficult experiences can become really beautiful things. And we hear that and we buy into that. And yet they’re still brutal. When you’re in them, they’re still like, that’s a lovely idea.

Eric Zimmer 00:25:38  I find it helpful to hold a kernel of it in my mind some of the time when I’m in the darkness, like, okay, yeah, this is transforming, but you still got to go through it and it is not pleasant at certain moments for sure.

Susan Cain 00:25:51  Absolutely. And I also want to take a minute to acknowledge that I think there are, for some people, some griefs and some traumas that are so enormous and so horrible and so beyond what any human should be exposed to that, that maybe you don’t ever get to that place, or maybe you only get to glimpses of that place. And I’m thinking in particular, there’s someone I’ve come to know over the years who, as a child was just exposed to such a heart wrenching and horrible degree of abuse that you just can’t even imagine. Well, I guess you can say two things about him now as a grown adult. One is that his life is forever marred in a very deep way. I’m in touch with him every day. I don’t think I’ve seen him go through a single day without suffering emotionally as a result of what happened to him as a child.

Susan Cain 00:26:38  It’s also the case that he is an incredibly loving soul who writes poetry every day and does great acts of love for the people around him almost every day. And so both of these things are true at once. But I’m invoking him to say, I don’t think it’s easy, and I do wonder if there are some degrees of grief and trauma beyond which maybe a full healing isn’t possible. To me, the jury’s out on that question.

Eric Zimmer 00:27:06  I agree, I agree 100%. I believe some degree of healing is always possible, but how much is is up in the air? I yeah, I wonder about this a lot. You know, being a recovering addict and alcoholic, this is a question I think about a lot, which is we know that trauma is a huge indicator for addiction, and we know the more traumatic experiences you’ve had, the higher that relationship really is. And so we see some people who get sober and you’re like, well, my God, what they went through was just I can’t fathom, you know.

Eric Zimmer 00:27:39  And yet they get sober and then you see other people that don’t even with much less trauma. So I think this sort of healing process, to me, it’s deeply mysterious. And one of my great mysteries of my adult life has always been, why do some of us get sober and others don’t? And for every answer I give, I can find people that contradict whatever answer I come up with. And I’m left with a mystery. Yeah, I don’t think we can fully articulate something as complex as healing. And the world is is deeply complex. And I think that’s what the bittersweet to me also takes into account. There’s some measure in it to me of this is all deeply mysterious, and that that mystery can be deeply both terrifying but also deeply beautiful.

Susan Cain 00:28:21  Yeah. That’s right. You know how in the book I give different examples of people who have been engaging with the bittersweet tradition all over the world, and one of them is the poet Gabriel Garcia Lorca, and he calls the longing aspect of the bittersweet, like that mysterious longing that so many of us feel.

Susan Cain 00:28:38  He calls it the great force that everyone feels, but no philosopher can explain. And I think that really embodies the mystery that you’re talking about.

Eric Zimmer 00:28:48  Yeah. In the bittersweet tradition, you actually say what I call the bittersweet is a tendency to states of longing, poignancy and sorrow, an acute awareness of passing time, and a curiously piercing joy at the beauty of the world. So I thought for a minute we could talk about those states individually. We’ve talked a little bit about sorrow, so I don’t know if we need to go back to sorrow. Maybe we’ll land there. That seems to be where I often, even without meaning to know I’m. I’m joking. Sort of. But let’s talk about longing, because this is a really interesting one, because I’ve seen longing as a deeply beautiful thing. And yet as somebody who studied a lot in Buddhism were also told to watch out for craving. And you stumble right into this in the book and talk about it. So I really wanted to talk about that for a little while, because I think that is such a big and confusing sort of distinction.

Susan Cain 00:29:45  Yeah, I agree with you, of course. And there is a state of longing, a state of yearning that exists across all the traditions. Right? There’s the longing for the Garden of Eden and the longing for Mecca, the longing to be united with God, the longing for somewhere over the rainbow. You know, in Homer’s Odyssey, like that’s a story of epic adventure. That’s the way we think of it. But really, that’s a story of Ulysses longing for home. The adventure happened because he was filled with homesickness for his native Ithaca that he hadn’t seen, I think, for 17 years or something like that. And he’s weeping on a beach with homesickness, and that’s what sets him off on the journey that ultimately brings him home. But this idea of, you know, I’m a poor wayfaring stranger, longing for that world of home. There is something about that, that this longing for home, this ultimate home, whether we think of it explicitly in terms of the divine or more metaphorically, in terms of like longing for perfect union, perfect love that is central to what human beings are, that is central to who we are.

Susan Cain 00:30:58  We are creatures who long for an ultimate union and longed for an ultimate home. And we come into this world crying, as psychoanalysts would say, well, it’s because we left the womb. But you know, going more deeply, the womb is the representation of that ultimate home for which we long and so many of the great theologians and mystics have taught across all the traditions that we should go deeper into the longing, because it’s the longing itself that brings us closer to that for which we long. Rumi says that, and he’s talking about God or Allah. He’s saying the longing you express is the return message from the divine that you seek. The grief you cry out from is what draws you towards union, your pure sadness that wants help. That is the secret cup. So all these traditions, and particularly the Sufi tradition, which is the mystic side of Islam, all these traditions speak of this divine nature of longing. And as soon as I started learning about all this and diving into these traditions, I felt like a kind of homecoming because I felt like, oh my gosh, you know, this is what I have been experiencing all my life and never really understood what it was.

Susan Cain 00:32:08  But then, like you, I had this big question of like, I mean, I’m not an expert in Buddhism, but I know something about it. And the way that Buddhism warns us against craving. And I thought, well, how do these teachings about the you call it divine nature of longing? How do these teachings square with Buddhism’s warning against giving into craving? So I went to ask a Sufi teacher about this. Actually, this is Llewellyn Vonleh, the great Sufi teacher who’s based in California, and I asked him this very question at a retreat that he gave the difference between longing and Sufism and Buddhism. And he says longing is different from craving. Longing is the craving of the soul. You want to go home, he says. In our culture, it’s confused with depression, and it’s not depression. There’s a saying in Sufism. Sufism was at first heartache. Only later it became something to write about. And then he said to me, if you’re taken by longing, live it. You can’t go wrong.

Susan Cain 00:33:05  If you’re going to go to God, go with sweet sorrow in the soul. And I say all this as an agnostic myself, and yet, like there’s such a deep truth in this message and one that I think coexists with the exhortation against craving, because this longing that we’re talking about is more about a longing for everything that is good and true and beautiful and love, and where’s the harm in that?

Eric Zimmer 00:34:04  I think that we find this paradox right in the center of Buddhism. I know I’ve talked about it with many Buddhist teachers, which is this idea of why are we even practicing if we don’t want something, like, what are we doing if there’s not some desire? Like we’re not sitting around meditating for no reason, we’re doing it because there’s something that we are after or we want. And even the Buddha talks about, you know, great determination. Determination comes when you’re like, well, there’s something I want and I’m determined to get it. So I think that even within Buddhism, we sort of just have to sit with this paradox that says, yeah, there are some things that we want and that longing is okay.

Eric Zimmer 00:34:43  I love the way Houston Smith in his book The Great World Religions, it’s a classic, but he talks about Hinduism and he paraphrases this. So I want to make sure I’m saying that it’s what he said, not what Hinduism said. But he said about Hinduism that basically what Hinduism is saying is your desire is great. You just are desiring the wrong things. It’s not strong enough, it’s not big enough, and that that’s the normal path through life, that when we’re younger, we desire the things of the world, and that’s natural and normal. And as we grow old, we start to go. Wait, there’s something more. The things of the world aren’t satisfying. So what is this bigger thing? So I just love this question, because it’s another one of the things that I feel like has been central to what I’ve asked people on this show for 500 episodes, which is this longing seems clear, it seems real, it seems true, it seems innate to human nature, and it feels right.

Eric Zimmer 00:35:40  And we also know that craving over attachment causes a great deal of suffering. And so trying to balance that paradox, I think, is really important work. It’s kind of similar to like trying to balance that thin line of, okay, I’m going to turn difficulty and sorrow into beauty, or I’m going to fall off the other side.

Susan Cain 00:35:59  Yeah, that’s a really good way of putting it. That’s a great way of putting it. Yeah. And I don’t know, I mean, do you think that the idea of saying that what we’re all ultimately longing for is love, by which I don’t mean like a new relationship kind of love. I mean, like Like love. Maybe that’s something that unites all the different religious traditions, including Buddhism. I mean, Buddhism would say a love without attachment.

Eric Zimmer 00:36:22  Yeah. Yeah. I’ve always loved the Joseph Campbell quote around, you know that we’re not looking for the meaning of life. We’re looking for the feeling of being alive. Yeah. You know, we could call that love.

Eric Zimmer 00:36:35  We could call that transcendence. We could call it connection. You know, when I think about spirituality and I’ve got a course called Spiritual Habits, right? So it’s a word I use when I think about what it means most deeply. It just to me is about connection to what matters. That’s going to be different for everybody, but it’s about connection to what matters. And so, you know, the words we use might be different, but I do think that that’s what we’re after. And as we’re talking, I’m thinking about early days of Alcoholics Anonymous. And Bill Wilson was the founder. And he got into a correspondence via letters with Carl Jung. And Jung made the connection that said, you know, what alcoholics are Hereafter is an experience of the transcendent. It’s in the word spirit, spiritus. You know, we call alcohol spirits.

Susan Cain 00:37:19  Yeah. That’s right.

Eric Zimmer 00:37:20  That’s what’s being chased. And the only thing that’s going to be a cure for that is something that addresses that need. Which is why A.A. became a spiritual program, very religious in its early leanings, and it’s diversified, but it’s pointing to that same thing.

Eric Zimmer 00:37:37  That there’s some connection we need to something that’s more than us and our little wants.

Susan Cain 00:37:43  Absolutely. Oh my gosh, that’s so true. You know, it’s funny as you say that. So I wrote most of my first book, quiet, in this amazing, beautiful little cafe in Greenwich Village. No longer exists, but it was called DOMA. And DOMA had this magical spirit about it. And it drew artists and writers and actors from all over the city. They would come and hang out there and work on their stuff and have conversations. It was such a magical place. I hung out there all the time for a number of years, and once or twice a week I would notice there was this group of people who would come in the evening to Douma, and they would sit together and talk, and I always noticed them because they seemed so alive and so full of spirit, and I wondered where they came from. And then at a certain point, someone told me, oh, there’s an AA group that meets down the block, and this group is coming from there.

Susan Cain 00:38:37  And it was such a striking group of people like you just noticed. As I say, you notice them immediately, and they had a kind of magical property about them, like even more than the usual denizens of DOMA.

Eric Zimmer 00:38:47  Yeah, absolutely. It can have that effect. And I think the other thing you talk about in the book is that sometimes the things that lead us most commonly to transcendent and exalted experiences is difficulty, sadness, a understanding that life is finite. You know, and I think a lot of people, particularly early on in AA, I mean, I was so close to death when I came in, you know, as a heroin addict, that I was just so aware of it that it made life sort of glow in a different way. Sometimes I wish I could recapture that, you know, a little bit more with the emotional maturity I have now, and the spiritual energy I had then would be perfect.

Susan Cain 00:39:25  Oh, interesting. Interesting. Yeah. And I mean, there are all those studies that I talk about in the book, like, David Eden at Johns Hopkins, the guy who I developed the bittersweet quiz with.

Susan Cain 00:39:36  He’s done studies where he has tried to track what are the conditions that cause people to experience the great spiritual and transcendent moments of their lives. And he’s found that one of the most reliable ones is being at moments of transition, including moments of great loss, including approaching death, and other studies that have found that if you ask people to imagine what are the emotions that they would feel upon approaching death, like people assume the emotions would be, you know, like feel depressed and angry and like that. But when you talk to people who are actually dying, it’s nothing like that. They’re reporting much more uplifted and much more spiritual emotions a lot of the time. So there is something about being open to these states of transition. Those are some of our great gateway moments, even the transitions that feel really difficult and that feel as if they’re full of loss.

Eric Zimmer 00:40:28  It certainly has been the case for me. Transitions of all different sorts have been big moments, and most of them have been ones that I wouldn’t have chosen.

Susan Cain 00:40:37  Yes, exactly. Exactly. You never choose it. You never choose it. This is a very innocuous one or a very mild one, but I, I went through an experience like this a little bit, just this past summer, my two sons went to sleepaway camp for the first time. Like, my husband and I really have devoted everything, you know, to our kids over these years. And and suddenly they weren’t home. And we knew they weren’t going to be home again for the rest of the summer. And that in and of itself was a kind of like foretelling of them going away to college and growing up and all the rest of it. And the first day or so, I just felt such a blue feeling, you know? Yeah, like a blue sense of loss. And then life went forward and I don’t know. My husband and I, we went to the beach, just the two of us, for the first time in so long. And it was such an incredible experience.

Susan Cain 00:41:28  And it was like a kind of second honeymoon, like, like we had only just met. And at the same time that we had known each other all our lives, it was just this great thing that would not have happened, but for passing through that blue moment of transition.

Eric Zimmer 00:41:41  Yeah, I mean, that’s a real one that children going away, as you mentioned in a small way, summer camp and then the big way in college like that is a big thing for people. That emptiness to me is a really real thing and it can be very difficult, but it’s also very fertile as as you sort of found and yeah, you just used a word in there that brings me to something else I wanted to talk about with you, because you talk about the author Nora McNerney. Am I saying that right?

Susan Cain 00:42:10  Oh. Nora McInerney. Yeah.

Eric Zimmer 00:42:12  Yeah. She has a Ted talk and uses a phrase in the middle of it, which is she makes a distinction between moving on and moving forward. And you just actually used that word when you talked about what happened with you and your husband.

Eric Zimmer 00:42:25  You moved forward.

Susan Cain 00:42:27  Oh, that’s so interesting. I didn’t even really realize I was using her phrase, but it’s it’s such a helpful framework. Yeah. So Nora McInerney, she’s a writer who lost her first husband at a very early age and was full of grief and felt that the culture and everyone she knew was kind of sending her the message. After some period of time, you know, time to move on, move on, move on. And she said moving on was impossible, but what was possible was moving forward. Which is to say, she will mourn her first husband for the rest of her life. At the same time that she went on to remarry and create a blended family with her new husband. So she has moved forward with him and with her husband’s memory. You know, the person she is in this second marriage is not the same person that she would have been had she never known and loved and lost her husband. So she has moved forward with him and with that loss.

Susan Cain 00:43:25  And I think that’s such a liberating way to think about loss, because it’s like allowing us to acknowledge the enormity of it at the same time that we’re still living our lives. You know, I think there’s a feeling if you’re ever going to feel happy again, that that’s a kind of abandonment of the person who’s gone. But the idea of moving forward is telling you that there is no abandonment at all. You’re carrying them with you. You’re moving forward with them.

Eric Zimmer 00:43:51  I love that idea. It makes me think of another phrase around grief that I love. It was a guest we had on the show. Her name is Megan Devine, and she says some things can’t be fixed. They can only be carried. And I loved that idea too. to like, okay, you’re not going to fix the fact that you lost your husband or, God forbid, your child or your dog that you love deeply. That’s not fixable, right? But it can be carried. You know, there is a way to carry it.

Eric Zimmer 00:44:18  And as she says, move forward. You know, while you’re carrying it. That phrase is always stuck with me. And it sort of resonates a little bit with that one about moving forward versus moving on.

Susan Cain 00:44:28  Yeah, I love that. I’m going to have to remember that one. That’s that’s a really great image.

Speaker 4 00:44:32  So let’s talk about poignancy.

Eric Zimmer 00:44:34  That’s not a word that is used a whole lot. Talk to me about poignancy, what it is and how it ties into everything we’ve been talking about.

Susan Cain 00:44:43  The happy tears that we so often feel is poignancy. It’s like a grandparent watches a grandchild splashing in a puddle. The grandparent has tears in their eyes as they watch that child splashing. And why are they crying? Where do the tears come from? You know, this is like a beautiful moment. It’s a moment of incredible love and appreciation for this child. It’s also a moment of understanding, maybe not on a conscious level, that the grandparent may not be there to see the child grow up, and that the child herself won’t live forever.

Susan Cain 00:45:15  All of it is implicit in these moments when we cry those happy tears. You know, when you tear up at a beautiful TV commercial like that’s poignancy. It’s poignancy. It’s like the perfect blending of joy and sorrow.

Eric Zimmer 00:45:29  I am enormously susceptible to it.

Susan Cain 00:45:32  Yeah. Yeah. I was just going to say, I think some of us kind of dance at the tip of that needle or whatever the expression is at every moment.

Eric Zimmer 00:45:38  Oh yeah. I’m just known for tearing up at nearly everything, from something that’s sad to something, like you said, that sort of poignant to something about an entire crowd of people cheering in the same way. There’s something about that. It’s even beautiful. It just gets me. I won’t bore you or the listeners with it, but there are a number of running jokes in my family about the absolutely preposterous things that That have made me cry. But yeah, poignancy is a great word for it. Also, the you know, the thing you said earlier about exactly what you said, what I feel really is love, a great title, outpouring of it.

Eric Zimmer 00:46:12  You know, it makes my heart open. There’s an elevation. Use that word about sad music. It elevates us all those things feel wrapped into what I’m feeling when AT&T makes me cry about calling your grandmother, right? I mean, I know I’m being yanked and manipulated in a very obvious way, but what’s happening inside me is still beautiful, I think.

Susan Cain 00:46:34  Yeah, well, the reason the manipulation works is because it’s pressing your an our deepest, most potent buttons. Throughout our whole conversation, I kept thinking of the two word phrase by E.M. Forster. Only connect, only connect. That’s what he said. And I came across that phrase when I was a young girl, and it just struck me. I was like, oh my gosh, that’s the the truth of everything. And every single one of those examples you just gave was a moment of only connecting.

Eric Zimmer 00:47:03  I love that phrase. I also love something you say near the end of the book. You say there’s the simple exhortation to turn in the direction of beauty.

Susan Cain 00:47:12  Yes. Yeah, that’s something I’ve really come to believe. And I also think it’s a way for people like us who exist naturally in this bittersweet state of being. And, you know, we were talking at the beginning about the great power of the bittersweet way of being is that it can deliver you to these states of wonder and awe and spirituality and transcendence. And the dark side of it is that it could deliver you to anxiety and depression. Well, one of the best ways of marshaling the powers of a bittersweet way of being is to proactively and consciously turn in the direction of beauty everywhere that you can. because it’s all around us. We think of it as being reserved for the moment. You take the family vacation to the Grand Canyon and you and Or, you know, you go to church and you see the light through the stained glass windows or whatever, but it doesn’t have to be confined to those specific moments. It can be daily and it can be constant and it can be proactively sought and even chased.

Susan Cain 00:48:12  I think we can chase beauty. So like during the time that I was writing this book, well, during part of it there was the pandemic and there’s been all the social and political strife, and I found myself waking up every morning and being tormented by my Twitter feed. And I ended up asking people to recommend to me their favorite art accounts. And I started following all these artists and my my feed now is just like one giant cascade of art. And then I started every morning posting a favorite piece of art onto my social channels and pairing it with a favorite poem or quote or whatever. And that ended up attracting this whole community of people who loved to start their days in that same way. And so it was like a whole group of people connecting around, turning in the direction of beauty. And I think that’s one of the best ways we have of channeling this bittersweet power.

Eric Zimmer 00:49:05  I absolutely love that I create an episode each week for supporters of the show. I call teaching song and a poem, and I talk about something that’s on my mind, and I play a song I love and a poem that I love.

Eric Zimmer 00:49:16  And what it does for me is it orients me all the time looking for that sort of beauty. So I think that’s a beautiful place for us to end, which is with you encouraging us that beauty is all around us and to look for it. You made a bittersweet playlist which people can find on your website and on Spotify. I could not help but match you and make my own bittersweet playlist.

Speaker 5 00:49:42  Oh my gosh, I’ve got to listen to it.

Eric Zimmer 00:49:44  I’ll. I’ll send it to you. Yeah.

Speaker 5 00:49:46  Please do.

Eric Zimmer 00:49:47  We’ll put links in the show notes to Susan’s website, to her playlist, to my playlist. On your website is the bittersweet test, which I scored, as you might imagine, very, very highly on.

Susan Cain 00:50:00  I’m shocked.

Eric Zimmer 00:50:02  Yeah. So where can people find you?

Susan Cain 00:50:04  So the best way to find me through my website at Susan Kane net. You can sign up for my newsletter, which will always keep you up to date. And I’m also on LinkedIn and Facebook and Twitter and Instagram.

Susan Cain 00:50:17  And you can find the bittersweet book really anywhere you get your books. And I also have a bittersweet quiz that I’ve developed, which is so cool. We deliver text messages to you every morning with little sound recordings from me or art to look at written messages for you. So it’s just like a one minute thing that you get every morning, a kind of little uplift. Start to your day and you can find that on my website as well.

Eric Zimmer 00:50:40  Awesome. Thank you so much for coming on, Susan. You and I are going to go into the post-show conversation, and we are going to discuss some very specific songs that were on your bittersweet playlist, and maybe I’ll introduce you to 1 or 2 from mine listeners, if you’d like access to the post-show Show conversations to that special episode I talked about a couple minutes ago. You can go to one newsfeed. Susan, thank you so much. I loved the book. I’ve loved this conversation, and I’ve been wanting to talk with you for a long time, so I’m really happy we got to do this.

Susan Cain 00:51:10  Thank you so much. It was really so lovely to talk to you. I love the frequency that you’re on. It’s very different from many podcasts and I so appreciate it and admire it.

Eric Zimmer 00:51:20  Thank you. Thank you so much for listening to the show. If you found this conversation helpful, inspiring, or thought provoking, I’d love for you to share it with a friend. Sharing from one person to another is the lifeblood of what we do. We don’t have a big budget, and I’m certainly not a celebrity, but we have something even better. And that’s you just hit the share button on your podcast app, or send a quick text with the episode length to someone who might enjoy it. Your support means the world, and together we can spread wisdom one episode at a time. Thank you for being part of the one You Feed community.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

Flaws as Fuel: Harness Doubt, Cynicism & Ambition for Real Growth with Claire Hoffman

April 22, 2025 Leave a Comment

Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, Claire Hoffman explores the idea behind how our flaws, doubt, cynicism, and even ambition aren’t signs of failure, but can be used as fuel. She tells the story of Aimee Semple McPherson, a woman who built a religious empire and faked her own kidnapping. But this episode isn’t about scandal. It’s about the tension that we all carry between our light and dark sides. Claire says sometimes the bad wolf does good work. This conversation is about embracing contradiction and finding grace in the mess.

Key Takeaways:

  • Claire’s book: “Sister Sinner: The Miraculous Life and Mysterious Disappearance of Aimee Semple McPherson.”
  • Aimee Semple McPherson’s duality of character, embodying both “good” and “bad” traits.
  • The impact of McPherson on American religion and her role in establishing one of the first megachurches.
  • The complexities of fame and its effects on personal identity and mental health.
  • The concept of “audience capture” and its implications for public figures.
  • Societal pressures and judgments faced by women, particularly in the context of McPherson’s life.
  • The significance of grace, forgiveness, and personal transformation in the human experience.
  • Reflections on authenticity, compassion, and the challenges of extending grace in a judgmental world.


Claire Hoffman is the author of the memoir Greetings from Utopia Park and a journalist reporting for national magazines on culture, religion, celebrity, business, and more. She was formerly a staff reporter for the Los Angeles Times and Rolling Stone. She is a graduate of UC Santa Cruz, and has an MA in religion from the University of Chicago and an MA in journalism from Columbia University. She serves on the boards of the Columbia School of Journalism, ProPublica, and the Brooklyn Public Library. Her new book is Sister, Sinner: The Miraculous Life and Mysterious Disappearance of Aimee Semple McPherson

Connect with Claire Hoffman:  Website | Instagram

If you enjoyed this conversation with Claire Hoffman, check out these other episodes:

How to Embrace Your Authentic Self with Carmen Rita Wong

Faith, Identity, and Finding Your Voice with Dante Stewart

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

Eric Zimmer 00:02:22  What if your so-called flaws, your doubt, your cynicism, even your ambition weren’t signs of failure but fuel? This week I talked with journalist Claire Hoffman about Aimee Semple McPherson, a woman who built a religious empire and faked her own kidnapping. But this episode isn’t about scandal. It’s about the tension that we all carry between our light and dark sides. Claire says sometimes the bad wolf does good work. And honestly, I get that as someone who’s had to make peace with parts of myself I used to run from. Whether that was addiction, cynicism, or even the days when solitaire felt like an emotional support animal. I found this conversation personal, moving, and honestly kind of freeing. This one’s about embracing contradiction and finding grace in the mess. I’m Erik Zimmer, and this is the one you feed. Hi, Claire, welcome to the show.

Claire Hoffman 00:03:21  Thank you for having me back.

Eric Zimmer 00:03:23  Back? Yes, a long time back. I think you said nine years ago.

Eric Zimmer 00:03:28  It astounds me. I’ve been doing anything for that long. It’s a career anomaly for me, for sure. To have continued in one line for this long. But you have also been a writer since then. Your previous book, we talked about you growing up in a transcendental meditation community. I guess you would say.

Claire Hoffman 00:03:48  Yeah, we say movement, but the movement. Movement.

Eric Zimmer 00:03:51  Okay. A movement? Mint? Yes. And your new book is called Sister Sinner The Miraculous Life and Mysterious Disappearance of Aimee Semple McPherson.

Claire Hoffman 00:04:04  Yeah. It doesn’t seem related, but I think they are.

Eric Zimmer 00:04:08  Yes. And we’ll get into that in a moment. But we’ll start, like we always do, with a parable. And in the parable, there’s a grandparent who’s talking with their grandchild, and they say, in life there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear.

Eric Zimmer 00:04:31  And the grandchild stops. And think about it for a second. They look up at their grandparent and they say, well, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

Claire Hoffman 00:04:47  Thank you Eric. I mean, I had not heard that parable before we did the podcast together nine years ago, and I think it is just incredibly. Important and relevant, especially in terms of the ways that we sort of strive. And, you know, a big part of this new book is about a woman who had incredible ambition and incredible desires to do good in the world, you know, like a very powerful, good wolf. And she also had a really ferocious bad wolf inside of her. And I think for me, kind of thinking about my own journey and writing this book, I think that parable to me is about recognizing the value of both wolves. You know that the bad wolf does good work, you know, and sometimes you need a bad wolf.

Claire Hoffman 00:05:42  So I’m sort of interested in embracing the bad wolf.

Eric Zimmer 00:05:46  What do you mean by the bad wolf does good work.

Claire Hoffman 00:05:50  I mean, you know, I think with my first book, we talked about how doubt and cynicism had kind of led me back to meditation. It had been this thing that had pulled me away, and it changed my perspective on the world that I’d grown up in and taken me away from the beliefs of my community. And then, you know, as a young mother, I was just so sick of the voice. You know, I was so sick of the doubt, and I was so sick of the cynicism, and I was really looking for something else. And, you know, that led me to going back to meditation. But in doing so, I also sort of accepted that that doubt and cynicism had played a really important role in getting me out, you know, and getting me into my own space and into, you know, a set of beliefs that were more comfortable for me.

Claire Hoffman 00:06:45  I would say.

Eric Zimmer 00:06:46  Yeah, I think almost any quality can have its good and bad uses, depending on how we use it, when we use it, how much of it we use. You know, cynicism in its original sense of the word is not a bad thing, right? It’s probably closer in its original use to what we would call skepticism. But skepticism is not a bad thing, and doubt is not a bad thing, right? It’s questioning. In Zen, we talk about the three essentials, and they’re great faith, great doubt, and great effort. And so right there, you’ve got faith and doubt right next to each other. You know, because the doubt, the question what is this all about is what drives a lot of the endeavor.

Claire Hoffman 00:07:34  Yeah, I’ve spent six years on this biography and looking at Aimee Semple McPherson’s life, I think I see that she really bifurcated and divided, you know, the good and bad. I mean, at one point in her life, she said, I’m either you know, the most wonderful saint or I am a total sinner.

Claire Hoffman 00:07:54  It’s only those two choices. Yeah. And I thought, well, there’s your problem because you’re both. You know what I mean? They’re done. There’s your title and there’s the stories that you have created this division. And I think what I mean by saying embracing the bad wolf is instead of alienating that darkness, kind of seeing the functional side of those dark feelings, I would say.

Eric Zimmer 00:08:20  Yeah. I mean, it’s one of the reasons that I based this show around a parable that you might imagine. Now, I have read something like 800 times to people, I think. Yeah. Had I known you’re going to live with this for 11 years. I might have been like, well, is that the one I want to use? But here we are. But the thing that I really do like about it that I think stands up through any different interpretation of it to me is important, is it normalizes that both of these things are inside of us and they’re inside all of us. And that, to me, is the important thing, right? There’s nothing wrong with us because we have, quote unquote, what we might think of as bad or dark or negative thoughts, emotions, ambitions.

Eric Zimmer 00:09:07  Like, that’s just what it is to be human. And we have all these beautiful aspects of ourselves to. And that’s what I love about it is just unlike what Amy did, which is I’m either this or I’m that. It says we’re all both.

Claire Hoffman 00:09:24  Yeah. And I feel like, you know, I mean, since after I did my first book and I think this is why we have a shared landscape, I got so many letters from people who, you know, were former Catholics, former Mormons, former, you know, evangelicals. And of course, you know, lots of people who had been part of the Transcendental Meditation movement. I see this real appetite for a conversation around embracing the positive things about, you know, institutional or structured religion and the community of religion, and also recognizing all the kind of really shitty things that happen in these organizations and people really wanting to think that through individually. Right. This is the spiritual but not religious giant chunk of Americans that we are. And I think this question about that dichotomy really is fundamental to it.

Eric Zimmer 00:10:25  Yeah. So let’s talk about Aimee Semple McPherson. Who is she?

Claire Hoffman 00:10:31  I grew up in a sort of quasi Hindu meditation community, but it did mean that I became really interested in religion and after journalism school. I went to divinity school for a year. And, you know, I thought, oh, I’m going to study fundamentalism or, you know, these sort of an anthropological look at religion. But instead I was really drawn to the history of Christianity in America, because it’s actually I think it’s a shared story. And if you’re interested in these questions that we’re talking about, the story goes back 400 years and looking at the way that, you know, new faiths and religious beliefs are born and evolve and fight and die, you know, I mean, it’s fascinating. And when I was at divinity school, I learned about Aimee Semple McPherson, and I was kind of fascinated that I’d never heard of her because she was sort of celebrated as a 20th century pioneer of American religion. She did not start Pentecostalism, which is the evangelical Protestant faith that is the fastest growing religion in the world.

Claire Hoffman 00:11:42  A quarter of the world’s Christians identify as charismatic and Pentecostal. And, you know, it’s this idea of a living Jesus, right, that you have a personal relationship with Jesus, that Jesus connects to you and can provide, you know, the gifts of divine healing and speaking in tongues is really the signature Pentecostal faith. But Amy, you know, was a poor Canadian woman who felt called to spread the gospel. Her mother, since she was a little kid, kind of praised her as God’s promise. And, you know, she grew up in a religious household. She converted to Pentecostalism only like four years after the faith had started in 1906, in Los Angeles. And Amy, you know, just had this incredible appetite and drive to share her story and share her experience and try and help other people. Experience this kind of living. Jesus. And she endured unbelievable hardships. You know, I mean, she was a missionary in China. She lost her first husband. She had crazy health issues.

Claire Hoffman 00:12:54  And she kind of ended up living, you know, just before the World War, on the road with her mother and her young children. Preaching from town to town. And she just truly felt called. You know, I sort of imagined almost like a shamanic hippie or something, right? Like, she just is, like she just had this sense of, like, this was what she was supposed to do. And she comes to Los Angeles in 1918. It’s, you know, one of the century’s great success stories she shows up with, as she said, $10 and a tambourine. And within, you know, the span of five years, she builds the largest church in America. Like truly every like brick and pew paid for by altar calls that she raised with her mother. And she builds the Angela’s Temple in 1923, which is arguably the first megachurch in America. And she goes on to create kind of what was known as the best show in town. You know, I mean, 15,000 people coming on Sundays to see, you know, kind of Hollywood style entertainment.

Claire Hoffman 00:14:02  So she’s also considered sort of the founder of what we know of today as Christian entertainment. And she also started one of the first Christian radio stations. So she was like just this incredible pioneer. But most people don’t know about her because in 1926, at the height of her fame, she walked into the ocean and disappeared. And it was this national news story. Two people died looking for her. 40,000 people stood on the beach searching for her. Like true devotees style followers. And 36 days later, she walks in from the desert of Mexico in the middle of the night and tells a sort of unbelievable story of being kidnapped in broad daylight and held prisoner, and threats of being sold into sexual slavery. Just a totally bizarre story.

Eric Zimmer 00:15:01  Yeah, the book is incredibly compelling. Five pages in. Or maybe less than that. I was like, Holy mackerel. Right. Because you you very quickly set up how big of a deal she is, how famous she is, and then the fact that she just disappears and the rest of the book is sort of setting up how she got to that point and then kind of what happened after that point.

Eric Zimmer 00:15:24  And before we go into the trial and whether she actually was kidnapped or what actually happened, and maybe we don’t even know. I thought we could talk a little bit more about her before we get there, because there was one thing in the book that stood out to me a little bit, and it was that when she was doing what she seemed kind of born to do, right? She was just really good at it, right? When you get that famous doing something, it’s because you’re good at it. When she was doing that, at least early on, before fame became its own monster, she seemed like she was a pretty happy person. But there’s a point early on where she tries to become like a regular old housewife, and I mean, she just falls apart, right?

Claire Hoffman 00:16:16  Yeah. It’s incredible. A contemporary biographer of hers called her a flamingo in a chicken coop, which I think is like just the perfect description, right? On all accounts. I mean, she’s relatable, but she’s also like a once in a century personality, you know? And she was just this incredible force.

Claire Hoffman 00:16:35  And, I mean, everything that was happening was happening at a time when the expectation for women was essentially just to be a mother. You know? I mean, there was not a housewife. And, you know, I mean, when she started her ministry, I don’t think women could even vote in the majority of states or hold land.

Eric Zimmer 00:16:52  Or a bank account.

Claire Hoffman 00:16:53  Or have a bank account. It makes all of these achievements of hers. You know, you really have to kind of underscore it that it was just incredible obstacles. But yes, she tried to live life as a normal person in a little apartment with her second husband and her two young children, and it was as if she was physically destroyed by it. She ended up having a couple of, you know, what she called nervous breakdowns, hysterectomy, incredible, like internal bleeding, all these kind of awful things. And she sort of lost her mind. I mean, I guess that’s the definition of a nervous breakdown 100 years ago.

Claire Hoffman 00:17:33  But she writes about, like, all the smallness of everything drove her mad. And her neighbors, you know, would say like, oh, she was a nice, you know, blonde, but, you know, didn’t seem to take her housework seriously.

Eric Zimmer 00:17:45  Yeah. And then she gets back into preaching and seems to make sort of a miraculous recovery. And what captivated me about that was not just like her being a flamingo in a chicken coop, and that’s part of it, I think the smallness. But the other part of it, I think, is this being called by something that feels bigger. I know for me that when I am part of feeling like I’m contributing something to the world, like that was sort of the healing of my addiction to a large degree. And so I just was struck by that element of hers, where once she got back to what she felt like was hers to do, she suddenly all better.

Claire Hoffman 00:18:33  Yeah. I mean, I feel like Amy for all her ups and downs.

Claire Hoffman 00:18:37  There are some really instructional aspects of her life, and one of them is that she was totally unstoppable, and she really did follow a sense of mission. She did not make herself small. And I think that chapter that you’re talking about, it’s really instructional to me of like, you know, I think a lot of people make themselves smaller than they were meant to be. And for me, in some ways, I see religion as just the available runway for her at that moment. You know what I mean? She was a true believer. I’m not questioning her faith. Religion was a pathway for her bigness, and I think she felt called. She was somebody who was meant to be public facing, and she had put herself into a corner and into a small life, and it was absolutely unbearable. And, I mean, I find myself an introverted writer, but like, I, I sort of am like, okay. Like she got, like really weird. Like she did some really weird stuff.

Claire Hoffman 00:19:46  Sometimes she was rewarded and sometimes she wasn’t, but she would not be stopped. And I think that’s something really admirable to see.

Eric Zimmer 00:19:55  One of the themes in the book, and it’s one that you’ve explored through your writing a few different ways, is kind of the cost of fame. You’ve written about Amy Winehouse, you’ve written about Prince. There are others, but you’ve really looked at this idea of fame. And I’m curious, do you see a point for her at which fame began to become a problem, or is it really just much more gradual and nuanced than that?

Claire Hoffman 00:20:26  Yeah, I think it is gradual, but thank you for asking that question because this is like my favorite thing actually. You know, if there were fame studies, that’s what I would get like my PhD in, because I find this whole question of people who are treated as gods on earth as just endlessly fascinating. And for Amy, I start to see evidence of it in the early 1920s, before she builds her temple while she’s still on the road.

Claire Hoffman 00:20:58  But she’s getting a lot of attention for being a faith healer. and she travels around the country and she starts to attract just wild crowds, huge crowds. You know, people come from surrounding states and they, you know, wheel their children and their sick relatives. I mean, there’s a point in the book where people are like passing bodies through windows of a building to try and get their loved ones to Amy to touch. Right. She’s sort of treated as this like portal to, you know, another realm almost. And during that time, you know, I mean, it’s incredible pressure. She’s she’s working like 12 hours on the stage doing these healings. She kind of is dragged away at the end of the night, like covered in sweat and dirt. And I noticed, I mean, she wrote quite a few memoirs, as was her way. no personal letters, just lots of memoirs. She starts to write about herself in the third person in this kind of disassociated way. Right. And I found that really interesting, like where she starts to have trouble seeing herself as an individual looking out in the world and is just seen as this kind of she uses the royal we sometimes, but like how she’s seen by others, starts to confuse how she sees, if that makes sense.

Eric Zimmer 00:22:23  And you mentioned that you think that religion was a path for her, and not that she didn’t believe in what she did, but but that it was a way of, of sort of putting herself out there. Were there things in her make up, her personality that you’ve seen in common with other people who are famous as far as something that she needs from others?

Claire Hoffman 00:22:48  Yeah, it’s a great question. I mean, you know, I mean, certainly she was an incredible talent. So there’s that like really, you know, completely unique, totally mesmerizing. Right? Like, she had an ability to capture attention. She was a showstopper. You know, she would get up on a stage, she’d stand in front of her tent, and people just stopped and were mesmerized. And, you know, I mean, you think about Justin Bieber playing his music on the street in Canada. They were actually from almost the same exact place, which is just a fun fact. Or, you know, Amy Winehouse as a young woman going into record and that voice just kind of stopping everything, right? Like these.

Claire Hoffman 00:23:31  There is fundamentally a talent, and I think there’s also part of that talent is the experience that you get in the room. These are people who have the ability to transport you. They have the ability to stop your mind, stop your thoughts and just capture your attention, so to speak, and everything that means, right? That’s why they call them spellbinding. Mesmerizing, showstopping, right. Like these these qualities where they just capture you, so to speak, in terms of, you know, what she got from it. I think, you know, she had a real desire for an audience. She had an insatiable desire to be loved. The back half of the book kind of explores that dark side. You know, where the negative view that the world started to have of her kind of destroyed her in some ways, because she was so attached to public perception of her.

Eric Zimmer 00:24:54  As I’m thinking through this and talking about it, it’s thinking about the role of religion or spirituality. And in its practice, it’s often intended, and I don’t mean this in a bad way, to make you seem less special in a way.

Eric Zimmer 00:25:12  right? It connects you to everybody else, and it ideally would reduce your ego, and it would help you see your place in the greater scheme of everything. Right? And so to me, it’s almost the opposite effect of that. But she is an example of where that certainly didn’t counterbalance the desire for fame. And we can certainly look at plenty of other spiritual communities where the leaders are clearly egomaniacs to some degree, and where whatever the religion or the teaching is, isn’t actually working on them in that way.

Claire Hoffman 00:25:47  Yeah, it’s an interesting question, because if you read about and I’ve included some of those in the book, her actual religious experiences, you know, I mean, she’s laid out on the ground, as you say, she’s slain is the term that they use, right? Like, she’s just laid out, laying in the dust, surrounded by others, weeping and crying. And it is that. Yeah. Like what you’re talking about that kind of religious experience of like, I’m nothing and this is everything, right? So that does seem to be an element in her own religious experience, especially early on.

Claire Hoffman 00:26:23  But at the same time, absolutely. She saw herself as divinely chosen. She saw herself as a selected vessel for God to bring the gospel. And so there is a sense of specialness. I mean, she said time and again, I want the largest microphone possible, and I want love, like I want to be in love. That’s what she wanted. So. Yeah. Do with that what you will.

Eric Zimmer 00:26:49  I’m going to take famous slightly different direction here because I want to get to what potentially is so corroding about it. One of the things I often wonder is, as we have all become internet personalities to some degree or other, right? Nearly everyone is on social media and is wanting to get more attention, more attention. Is there a connection to that and fame? Is fame corroding because of the way it causes you to seek out certain adulation? Or is it when you actually get it? Is when it becomes pernicious? Or probably both?

Claire Hoffman 00:27:32  In my experience reporting this book and reporting on famous people, what I have seen is a certain loss of self and even, you know, reporting on the Transcendental Meditation movement and our guru in reporting that book.

Claire Hoffman 00:27:51  You know, I’d always thought like, oh, he took advantage of us, right? Like he was constantly raising money. He had these crazy schemes like, you know, we were victimized by him. But in reading, you know, private papers and private recollections of him. I also kind of saw him as victimized, like. By our expectations of who he was supposed to be. And that really shifted things for me and definitely made me think about celebrities. You know, where they end up sort of caged by the audience. And I see that in Amy, and I worry about that for my 14 year old when she posts stories on Instagram, you know, of HoCo. like, I think there is this thing where you stop having the experience for the experience, you stop being yourself for yourself, and you start performing, and the performance takes over everything and the audience’s expectation of you. So whether you’re a guru and your audience expects you to be enlightened. Whether you’re a evangelist who people think is a living saint on earth, you know, whether you’re a 14 year old girl who’s supposed to just look hot all the time.

Claire Hoffman 00:29:18  You know what I mean? Like, I think I see the through line as, like, losing touch with your individual experience and having to just be projecting out and experience all the time.

Eric Zimmer 00:29:30  Yeah, there’s a term and maybe you’ve heard it. I don’t really even know where it comes from, but it’s called audience capture. And the idea is that someone starts out doing something and they get an audience that could be a huge audience. It could be a relatively small audience. And as you said, that audience starts to have some degree of expectation. And that person then finds themselves in that role, often not even quite aware of it, but oftentimes very aware of it, where they are living into the persona that they created. And as you said, they are not then. Being authentic to who they are and authentic to the ways in which they might change or develop different interests or be more complex than the simplistic facing story.

Claire Hoffman 00:30:22  Yeah. I mean, if I fast forward to the end of the book, at the end of Amy’s life, I see so many parallels with Amy Winehouse, with Prince, with Michael Jackson.

Claire Hoffman 00:30:35  I mean, particularly Michael Jackson, where, you know, he was living in sort of exile for reasons good and bad. And, you know, I was struggling with addiction and had a dream of coming back and being a star and having it feel the old way. Right. So in in the summer before Michael Jackson died, you know, he talked all the time about his comeback, right? He was getting ready for his comeback tour, and Amy had almost the exact same thing she was. She had been in conservatorship for years. Every aspect of her life controlled by her accountant. You know, she had a nurse who was living with her full time. And I’m guessing she was on quite a bit of medication. She was estranged from her family. And, you know, in the spring before she died, she got herself out of conservatorship, put her son in charge, filed papers to start. You know what would have been the first religious television? Making her the first televangelist. And she was getting ready for her tour to come back.

Claire Hoffman 00:31:46  You know, and there was so much energy and excitement and stress around that. And that’s really where I sort of saw these, like, modern day celebrities that I’ve encountered towards the end of their last chapter where they. They’re kind of trapped in a two dimensional place where they’re not who they were before, but they want to go back. And I think time is a bitch. I don’t know if you can say that on this podcast, but.

Eric Zimmer 00:32:14  You can absolutely say that.

Claire Hoffman 00:32:16  I could, I could say even more. But I think, you know, time is an aspect in all of this, right? Like we’re talking about ego. We’re talking about experience. We’re talking about, you know, the expectations of others. But time is a big piece of this, right? And in terms of change and transformation. And so I think, yeah, like these people get stuck in an idea of how they think things are supposed to be, but for a million reasons, they aren’t that way.

Claire Hoffman 00:32:44  And it becomes unbearable.

Eric Zimmer 00:32:46  Just to give people a little context on Michael Jackson, you wrote his obituary for rolling Stone.

Claire Hoffman 00:32:52  I did, yeah, I spent the summer that he passed away covering every aspect of his death and Rolling Stone’s big look back at what happened and investigating his death and the circumstances. So it really that surprised me when doing this book of like, oh my gosh, like this. You know, woman living in 1940s Los Angeles had such a similar story, you know, even down to the kind of the language of like, oh, I’m going to get ready for my comeback. And, you know, a love of downers.

Eric Zimmer 00:33:23  Obviously, things for her start to go wrong after the disappearance, right? She disappears, comes back, says she was kidnapped and then is largely not believed by an awful lot of people, including Los Angeles law enforcement, who consider putting her on trial. Talk a little bit about what this suddenly not being revered as universally starts to do to her.

Claire Hoffman 00:33:49  It drives her crazy, you know, and I think she had spent a decade up until this point, being a person who translated the world and the unseen and the unknown to other people.

Claire Hoffman 00:34:08  That was part of her gifts, you know, was like giving prophecies, articulating the divine, I would say. And so I think she had a real strength and palette as a storyteller. She came back to Los Angeles and, you know, told pretty much the same story over and over of, of her kidnapping. You know, it’s like a movie, like it’s a crazy story. And, you know, she escapes by sawing off the ropes on her wrists on a serrated maple syrup can and running through the desert through, you know, incredible heat and also darkness and rattlesnakes and, you know, I mean, it’s like she’s a she’s the star of a movie. And people just Immediately had an issue with it, and they could never find any evidence of the place where she said she was kept or the kidnappers. Yeah, it seemed like that doubt in her just just drove her crazy. Like, she she dug in her heels and she began to see the world in darker terms. Right.

Claire Hoffman 00:35:15  Her ministry up until that point had been very warm, very accepting, very heaven oriented, I would say. You know, there was not a lot of devil in Amy McPherson’s preaching. She was really about all the kind of beautiful, transformative, almost kind of feminine love aspects of Christianity and being born again. And yeah, after that, her sermons got like very dark. And, you know, she would have, you know, the devil depicted on her stage chasing her. And she called out, you know, the Catholics of the world for prosecuting her. And it really changed. My theory is that this had to do with her mother.

Eric Zimmer 00:36:00  Okay. Before we go down that you said when immediately people started to doubt her. There was very good reasons to doubt her, right? I mean, based on the evidence that was coming in, it sure seemed like she had made this story up. Now, she might have painted it as people were out to get her, and there probably were people who wanted to see her not succeed.

Eric Zimmer 00:36:22  Right. You talk about how the LA underworld did not want her to do well. There were other preachers who did not want her to do well. There were forces aligned against her, but she wasn’t blackballed for no reason.

Claire Hoffman 00:36:36  Yeah, I mean, it’s sort of why I love this story. You know, when I first started looking into her, I assumed that she was falsely accused. You know, I like any good kind of 90s feminist. I assumed that she had.

Eric Zimmer 00:36:50  Been believe the woman.

Claire Hoffman 00:36:52  Yeah, I believe the woman. I always believe the woman. Yeah. And when I, you know, started going into the court transcripts and all the newspaper archives, it was like, oh, like the evidence is really building up. But she also was right that there were people out to get her, and there were people trying to, you know, take her down and use this opportunity to destroy her. I just love that, you know, where it’s like she was a liar and she was right.

Claire Hoffman 00:37:20  You know, she and all of it’s a little bit of a world of her own making, which I think is just so incredible. You know, I mean, it was just like the biggest scandal. And, you know, all this drama ensued. And, you know, she was screaming from the rooftops. You know, and on the radio every night about being persecuted. And she was right. And they were also right. You know.

Eric Zimmer 00:37:44  Yeah. In the midst of all that, there’s a really maybe it means a lot. Maybe it means nothing. You can let me know what you think. But there’s a point where someone is talking about identifying her in another city and saying, like, I saw her in this other city so she couldn’t have been kidnapped. All that. And how did you know it was her? Oh, it was because of her fat ankles. Based on the way you tell it, it’s almost as if she stops caring about being accused of lying of everything else, and is obsessed with the fact that someone thinks she has fat ankles.

Eric Zimmer 00:38:21  I was just struck by how we all can be that level of insecurity or vanity. It’s striking.

Claire Hoffman 00:38:29  Yeah, I mean, this is how I see her. Kind of like playing on different levels. You know what I mean? Like, she’s telling the story over and over, and I truly believe she began to believe it. Like, I think at some point, probably pretty early on, she did a version of it in her head and she lived it. And that was her story. You know, the angles is just hilarious. And this, you know, it’s a through line. It happens throughout that summer and fall. It happens in the courtrooms. You know, they ask her to show her ankles. You know, I mean, it’s it’s unreal. People are looking at their own ankles. It is, to me, kind of a perfect snapshot of the kind of ways that women were being judged and looked at and taken apart, and she was totally a part of that. So she resented it and was like, it’s unfair.

Claire Hoffman 00:39:19  But she was also like, wait, my ankles are actually not that bad. You know, I mean, it’s mind fuckery at its best in my mind.

Eric Zimmer 00:39:28  So, yeah. One of the things that’s also wonderful about this book is that it features Los Angeles in the late 19 tens 1920s as a fascinating place, which it obviously is. A lot of books that I love have come out of there, like the noir tradition of crime writing comes out of there like LA was like this amazing place and also a really dark underside to it. And so you’re seeing the underworld and you’re seeing how connected the gangs are in politics and how roped in the newspapers are. And it’s just a really great portrait of a particular time.

Claire Hoffman 00:40:27  I think that if you were going to make a the one you feed video game, you would make it in 1920s Los Angeles because they called it sunshine and Shadows. I mean, that is the definition of noir is a dream that is broken, right? I love those books. I love that time.

Claire Hoffman 00:40:47  There’s so much that comes out of it in terms of film and art and religion. It’s so fascinating. And I think it is this time where people came to Los Angeles, as they do now, to start over and to transform and to leave the past behind and become a new person. And whether that means economically or spiritually or cosmetically. You know, I mean, it’s the classic story. And she was completely part of that, and her followers were totally part of that. But there’s also a predatory aspect of that. First of all, you know, people act out, you know, they act out their addictions, they act out their dark side. And there’s also a lot of people who take advantage of, you know, these people who are trying to transform, you know, or inside their dream.

Eric Zimmer 00:41:44  You mentioned a moment ago. I don’t know what you say. It all came down to her mom. Was that what you said?

Claire Hoffman 00:41:50  Well, I think everything does.

Eric Zimmer 00:41:52  Doesn’t it? Always.

Eric Zimmer 00:41:53  Yeah. no. Mom ism. Mother’s out there. Joke. What do you mean?

Claire Hoffman 00:42:00  I think her mother saw her as prophesied from the day she was born. You know, that’s part of her story. And it was part of her success as her mother. She was an only child. And her mother, you know, took her when she was a baby to the Salvation Army and said, like, this child is chosen by God. And that was just part of her legacy. It’s how she opens, like all of her biographies, basically is this pivotal moment. And the book is reported, it’s journalistic. It’s it’s based on factual accounts. But if you’re asking me like what I think walking away from it. I think that she was a normal 36 year old woman at the height of her fame, who was interested in her former employee and decided that running away with him seemed like a great idea at the time and maybe immediately regretted it. Maybe they got in that house after like five days and she’s like, yeah, I’m good or whatever.

Claire Hoffman 00:43:02  Or she missed the fame and she missed the audience and she missed her world. She missed her family. And and she came back. And I think her commitment to telling that story, where she was kidnapped and victimized, where she hadn’t been a sinner, so to speak, was about her mother and this idea that her mother held of her as being this pure being.

Eric Zimmer 00:43:26  I didn’t research as fully as you. I’m not sure I would arrive at the same conclusion, only in that I think there are a lot of factors that go into her being in a cage, right? Let’s just say that before she disappears. She’s in a cage. Like she can do certain things and certain things. Only now she’s able to do all kinds of things that other women at the time aren’t able to do. But she’s still kind of by painting herself, whether it was because of what her mother put into her head. As a as you said, a saint, not a sinner, gave her no room to move when, as you said, she sort of fell in love with someone outside of marriage and didn’t know what to do about it.

Eric Zimmer 00:44:08  Okay, with all of that? You spent a lot of time in her world. You jokingly emailed me that you told me in 2021, you thought you were almost done with the book, and then you email me in 2025. So you were with her for a long time. Did writing about her change anything in you?

Claire Hoffman 00:44:27  I would say, you know, in researching the end of Amy’s life and kind of where her legacy ended up, I feel like grace is a really important concept. And as I said, you know, I didn’t grow up Christian like that’s not an idea that I grew up with, I would say, or have an attachment to. And who knows if I’m even thinking about it. Right. But I really kind of loved this idea and wished for more of it for her. To me, Grace is like this beautiful notion of forgiveness and acceptance of our humanity. And I think it’s it’s missing in that way that a lot of religions and, you know, society kind of divides us, right? Like this divided self.

Claire Hoffman 00:45:11  And I feel like grace is, you know, just this beautiful concept and Christianity of like, love and acceptance and embrace of the lightness and the darkness. And I’ve tried to give that to myself, you know, because I think that when we see the world that way as so divided or we see ourselves that way. Like this is good behavior. This is bad behavior. It perverts, you know, for want of a better word or deforms. You know, I think that it starts to cage us in a sense. And I see, I mean, again, as somebody who did not grow up Christian, who is not Christian, I find that notion of love and acceptance that is at the core of Christianity so beautiful and that that love and forgiveness and that grace can kind of release us is just beautiful. I think it’s really beautiful. You know, I mean, part of writing about a, I mean, as a sort of quasi Hindu married to a Jewish person, like Christianity is like not part of my life, so to speak.

Claire Hoffman 00:46:22  But so I feel like I can kind of admire it from the sidelines. I would also say like, I mean, I am a person who lives in the world and reads the newspaper every day. You know, I mean, Trump’s pastor is a Pentecostal preacher and is working in the white House every day. And there’s a part of me that I think it’s important to look at what the predominant narratives are. You know, there’s a majority of Americans identify as Christian. And I think it’s really important to understand that faith and to think about these ideas and in a way that is empathetic. I would say.

Eric Zimmer 00:47:04  Yeah, I love the idea of extending grace to other people. I think it’s a beautiful idea. And I also find it hard to extend grace to people who are not doing the same thing at all. I’m not naming anybody here. I’m just saying in general, it gets hard to extend grace. I think it’s why when a spiritual leader falls, they fall so hard is because they’ve often really like.

Eric Zimmer 00:47:30  They’ve done part of the painting of themselves as this way. But I do agree. I mean, I’m obviously somebody as a recovering heroin addict. Right. Like I’m glad there was grace in the world for me, right? I mean, I was not a good person at one time or. Let me say that differently. I did a lot of things that were that were not good, that were bad, and that were harmful. And so I’m glad that parts of the world extended grace to me, and that I was able to extend it to myself. And because I do believe in second chances, and I do believe that people make mistakes, and we shouldn’t let a single mistake or a couple mistakes that people make be the entirety of their story.

Claire Hoffman 00:48:13  Yeah. I wish that the conversation in Christianity in America was more about these ideas, and I think there are ways that Christianity has been so fundamental in the world of recovery. You know, I mean, I have a friend who is a recovering alcoholic who went and did rehab in the basement of Amy’s church like three years ago.

Claire Hoffman 00:48:36  And I mean, he grew up in that tradition. So it was a world that he connected to and made sense to him. You know, he sees her church as fundamental to saving his life and saving his family. I feel like Grace is so beautiful. I mean, I say this as a person who got kicked out of high school for fighting, like, I’m not like that. Like I’m not that nice. Yeah, but maybe that’s why I like, sort of romanticize it. Like I love revenge. I love revenge just the best. You know? I’m hateful. You know, when you think about forgiveness for when we do bad things, there is like, that kind of soft wash feeling of, like, letting go, you know, and moving on. Yeah. And, you know, I think that’s beautiful. As a non-Christian, it’s something that I’ve taken away and I’ve thought a lot about in terms of Amy’s story, because I don’t think she was extended a lot of grace.

Eric Zimmer 00:49:35  Yeah, well, that is a great place for us to wrap up. You and I are going to continue in the post-show conversation, because I would be deeply remiss in my duties to my friend Chris, if I did not talk about you and your limo ride with David Lynch because he’s a huge David Lynch fan, I would be letting him down as a friend. I’m not going to do that. So you and I and the post-show conversation are going to talk about David Lynch, Transcendental Meditation, your experience with him. Maybe we get to Eckhart Tolle, I don’t know. But listeners, if you’d like access to this, what’s going to be mesmerizing? Post-show conversation, special episodes I create just for you, and most importantly, to support us because we can use your help. Go to one you feed join. Claire, thank you so much. It’s a pleasure to have you back on. And in another decade when you have another book. No, I’m teasing you and me. I probably will not be doing this in a decade.

Eric Zimmer 00:50:33  And you’ll write another one in less than ten years, I’m sure.

Claire Hoffman 00:50:36  I hope so. I will be back, and I hope it won’t be so long.

Eric Zimmer 00:50:40  That was not a very graceful way to end the interview, now, was it?

Claire Hoffman 00:50:44  I deserve it. You’re speaking right to my soul there.

Eric Zimmer 00:50:48  Thank you so much for listening to the show. If you found this conversation helpful, inspiring, or thought provoking, I’d love for you to share it with a friend. Sharing from one person to another is the lifeblood of what we do. We don’t have a big budget, and I’m certainly not a celebrity. But we have something even better. And that’s you just hit the share button on your podcast app, or send a quick text with the episode link to someone who might enjoy it. Your support means the world, and together we can spread wisdom one episode at a time. Thank you for being part of the one You Feed community.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Footer

GET YOUR FREE GUIDE

Sign-up now to get your FREE GUIDE: Top 5 Reasons You Can’t Seem To Stick With A Meditation Practice (And How To Actually Build One That Lasts), our monthly newsletter, The Good Wolf Feed, our monthly email teachings about behavior change as well as other periodic valuable content.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

The One You Feed PRACTICAL WISDOM FOR A BETTER LIFE

Quicklinks

  • Home
  • About Eric Zimmer
  • About Ginny Gay
  • About the Parable
  • About the Podcast
  • Podcast Episode Shownotes
  • Contact: General Inquiries
  • Contact: Guest Requests

Programs

  • Free Habits That Stick Masterclass
  • Wise Habits
  • Wise Habits Text Reminders
  • Membership
  • Coaching
  • Free ebook: How to Stick to Mediation Practice

Subscribe to Emails

Subscribe for a weekly bite of wisdom from Eric for a wiser, happier you:

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By submitting your information, you consent to subscribe to The One You Feed email list so that we may send you relevant content from time to time. Please see our Privacy Policy.

All Materials © 2025 One You Feed | Terms | Privacy Policy |  Powered by Tall Poppies