• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
the-one-you-feed-podcast-eric-zimmer-logo-dark-smk
  • About
    • The Podcast
    • The Parable
    • Eric Zimmer
    • Ginny Gay
  • Book
    • How a Little Becomes a Lot
  • The Podcast
    • Episodes Shownotes
    • Episodes List
    • Anxiety & Depression
    • Addiction & Recovery
    • Habits & Behavior Change
    • Meditation & Mindfulness
  • Programs
    • Overwhelm is Optional Email Course
    • Wise Habits
    • Free Masterclass: Habits That Stick
    • Coaching
  • Membership
  • Resources
    • 6 Sabotuers FREE eBook
    • Sign Up for Wise Habits Text Reminders
    • Free Masterclass: Habits that Stick
    • Free ebook: How to Stick to Meditation Practice
    • Free Training: How to Quiet Your Inner Critic
    • Anti-Racism Resources
    • Blog
  • Contact
    • General Inquiries
    • Guest Requests
  • Search
Wise Habits Texts
Eric's New Book!

Featured

How to Bounce Back After a Layoff with Yowei Shaw

September 10, 2024 Leave a Comment

Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, Yowei Shaw delves into how to bounce back after a layoff and navigate the related difficult emotions. With a wealth of personal experiences, she offers insights and advice for individuals struggling to cope with the aftermath of job loss. Her candid storytelling and unique rituals for emotional healing provide a source of inspiration and hope for those facing similar challenges.

In this episode, you will be able to:

  • Learn how to navigate and heal from the emotional impact of layoffs
  • Discover the powerful benefits of cognitive diffusion techniques for managing emotional distress
  • Explore the transformative potential of creating personalized rituals for emotional healing and resilience
  • Uncover the stigma and challenges associated with reemployment after a layoff
  • Understand the impact of the meritocracy myth on the employment landscape and individual well-being


Yowei Shaw is an award-winning podcast host, producer, and self-proclaimed emotional-investigative journalist. She’s the host of Proxy, a show about niche emotional questions, answered through conversations with strangers who have shared experience.  In her previous life, she spent many years making NPR’s Invisibilia podcast, first as producer, then as co-host and editorial lead. Her work has also been featured in places like This American Life and Pop Up Magazine. In her spare time, she makes fan art of her friends and dabbles in bodywork, mostly to get to say “Yowei Shpa.”

Connect with Yowei Shaw:  Website | Instagram | Patreon

If you enjoyed this conversation with Yowei Shaw, check out these other episodes:

How to Strengthen Your Resilience with Linda Graham

How to Create Emotional Agility with Susan David

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

00:00:00 – Yowei Shaw
When people in my life are going through a hard thing, I just listen. I don’t try to say, oh, you must be feeling x, or oh, it’ll be fine, I try to listen. First.

00:00:18 – Chris Forbes
Welcome to the one you feed. Throughout time, great thinkers have recognized the importance of the thoughts. We have quotes like garbage in, garbage out or you are what you think ring true. And yet for many of us, our thoughts dont strengthen or empower us. We tend toward negativity, self pity, jealousy or fear. We see what we dont have instead of what we do. We think things that hold us back and dampen our spirit. But its not just about thinking. Our actions matter. It takes conscious, consistent, and creative effort to make a life worth living. This podcast is about how other people keep themselves moving in the right direction, how they feed their good wolfen, thanks for joining us. Our guest on this episode is Yowei Shaw, an award winning podcast host, producer, and self proclaimed emotional investigative journalist. She’s the host of proxy, a show about niche emotional questions answered through conversations with strangers who have shared experience in her previous life. She spent many years making NPR’s Invisibilia podcast, first as a producer, then as a co host and editorial lead. Her work has also been featured in places like this, American Life and pop up magazine.

00:01:47 – Eric Zimmer
Hi Yoe. Welcome to the show.

00:01:49 – Yowei Shaw
Thank you for having me. What an honor.

00:01:52 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, well, it’s an honor for me to talk to you. You were involved in one of the great podcasts of our age, Invisibilia. So I’ve known your work for a while, as do many people who listen to NPR and follow NPR podcasts. And we’ll get into your time in Invisibilia. And then what kind of came after that? Getting laid off. But before we get into all that, let’s start like we always do with the parable. And in the parable, there’s a grandparent who’s talking with their grandchild, and they say in life there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear. And the grandchild stops, thinks about it for a second, looks up at their grandparents and says, well, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

00:02:49 – Yowei Shaw
I love this parable. I love thinking about it because I feel like it’s actually, what drives my work, what powers it like? I’m really drawn to that emotional noise between the good wolf and the bad wolf. You know, we all have the good wolf and bad wolf constantly chattering. There’s always that struggle about countless different issues every day. And I am really drawn to examining those battles that we feel like we can’t settle on our own, that we have trouble settling. And I like trying to make sense of it. And so this is sort of like why I am now calling myself a little bit tongue in cheek, an emotional investigative journalist, because I want to investigate those battles and then try to report on it. That’s sort of how I deal with my feelings in general. I’ve been a reporter now for 15 years, which is most of my adult life, and that’s sort of how I deal with those battles between the good wolf and the bad wolf when I can’t figure it out through therapy or by meditation or talking about it with friends. And so I found that when you report on your feelings, when you talk to experts who can help contextualize that battle, what systems and ideas and histories have led to you having this particular battle of voices, how can maybe you think about it differently in a way that’s more helpful to you, and then getting to talk to strangers who have shared experience, who can tell you how they’ve dealt with it, that battle themselves, I found that really helpful. And so, yeah, I feel like that’s sort of like what I like to do in general for myself and for other people.

00:04:41 – Eric Zimmer
I love that title. An emotional investigative journalist. That’s great. And one of the things that many psychologists in different schools of psychology will talk about is this idea of getting distance from our thoughts and emotions. Right. Being able to sort of separate from them. And that’s exactly what you’re describing and why it’s helpful for you. It’s by reporting on it and asking about it and looking at it from different angles. It’s a way of disentangling. It’s a way of creating that distance in the healthy sense of the word, not distance in the unhealthy sense of the word, but in the sense of disentangling. Or the founders of acceptance and commitment therapy would call it diffusion, not being fused with those thoughts and emotions. They call it cognitive diffusion. So I think that’s kind of what you’re describing there, and it’s a well known way of working with thoughts and emotions skillfully.

00:05:37 – Yowei Shaw
Wow. I have a lot of questions for you. I did not know about this. I’m gonna ask you for some book recs after this.

00:05:45 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:05:45 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah. I feel like now that you’re saying this is an actual technique that has been studied for how to deal with your emotions and move through them, I think that, yeah, reporting on my feelings is one way I’ve been able to do that through work for myself and for other people. Also found that creating a ritual through a kind of absurd art project has also been really working for me lately. And what do I mean by that? Okay, so recently, I got laid off and felt really bad, and I felt a lot of shame. And one of the things that happened afterwards was, like, I knew that I needed to be around my people, like, the people who loved me, and yet I wanted to get away from them. I didn’t want anyone to look at me like, I felt so, so much shame that I didn’t want anyone. Like, other people’s gaze felt like. It was like daggers, you know, it was, like, hurting me. And so after I got laid off, I was like, okay, I know I’m having this issue, and you could, like, frame it in terms of the parable. Like, the good wolf is like, you know, you need to be around your people who love you. These people love you. They’re not thinking about you differently. They want to support you. Then the bad wolf is like, no, everybody hates you. Nobody wants to be associated with you anymore. You’re such a burden. Like, get over it already. And so what I did was, I tricked out my basement to be a massage parlor. I like massage. I like dabble. I love getting massages. And I dabble in a bit of bodywork for other people as a form of care. And so I created Yowei spa, which was like, I got a massage table. The theme was pink. I got some fake plants. I got a hot towel steamer. I just tricked it out. And then I sent around a sign up sheet to my friends and was like, yo. Eh, spas open for business. And basically, I ended up massaging a friend a week for the entire summer after I got laid off. And, like, I think that was my way, like, just creating a fun, weird ritual to try to deal with the bad wolf voice in me.

00:07:59 – Eric Zimmer
I love that. And the hot towel steamer that’s going for it. Now, here’s a dream I’ve long had, and maybe you, as a fellow lover of massage and a reporter, maybe I’ve met the person who can help me bring this to life, which is that I feel like there should be massage review services. Like, you go to get a massage, and you don’t really know where to go. There’s so many different choices. And so I thought, like, would that not be the dream job? Like, to be a massage reviewer? Like, that would be brilliant.

00:08:31 – Yowei Shaw
Yes. For every local paper. Now you have the restaurant critic. You need a bodywork critic. You need alternative health, body work, whatever critic. For acupuncture, for massage, for. There’s so many different services these days. I love that. Now I’m going to try to manifest that as my new job for both of us.

00:08:53 – Eric Zimmer
You’re in New York, right?

00:08:55 – Yowei Shaw
I’m in Philadelphia.

00:08:56 – Eric Zimmer
Oh, Philadelphia. Okay. All right. I thought you were in New York. I have my cities mixed. Well, Philadelphia is a big enough city. You could probably pull that off. I’m not sure. In Columbus, Ohio, there are plenty of.

00:09:05 – Yowei Shaw
Places to review who need our services.

00:09:08 – Eric Zimmer
I think in Columbus there is. Yeah. I would read a massage reviewer for sure before I went. Anyway, that, and this is strange. My other dream career that I think about maybe someday when I retire is similar. I want to be a dog masseuse.

00:09:25 – Yowei Shaw
Wait a minute. Do you have a dog?

00:09:27 – Eric Zimmer
I do, yes.

00:09:28 – Yowei Shaw
And do you already dabble in dog massage?

00:09:30 – Eric Zimmer
Oh, yes. Yes, yes.

00:09:32 – Yowei Shaw
Wow.

00:09:32 – Eric Zimmer
I might like to massage her more than she likes to be massaged. I’m not entirely sure. Sometimes she really seems to like it.

00:09:38 – Yowei Shaw
She likes to spread out your services.

00:09:39 – Eric Zimmer
And every once in a while she’s like, get off of me. Yeah, exactly. Leave me alone. So, yes, I love that. It just seems like that would be a lovely career.

00:09:48 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah. Now, I have another thing I’m going to ask you about after this is I want to learn how to do cat massage for my two cats.

00:09:54 – Eric Zimmer
Okay. Well, I’m going to assume it’s similar. I’m not qualified for this job, but there is such a thing, and they do offer training in it anyway. Okay, that’s not what we’re here to talk about, but apparently we both could talk about massage for a long time. But what we’re going to talk about is led to you creating the yo e spah. Did I say it right?

00:10:14 – Yowei Shaw
Yowie spah? Yes.

00:10:15 – Eric Zimmer
What led to you creating that, which was you getting laid off. So you worked your way up to being a co host of a popular show called Invisibilia, which was a great show. You’d been a reporter for it. You became a co host, and then you were laid off. Talk to me about that experience, maybe how it happened and how you felt.

00:10:37 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah. Okay. So at NPR, we had an unusual layoff, which is because NPR told us, gave us a huge heads up that they were going through budget trouble and they needed to lay 10% of us off, and we’d find out who in a month. And so I had a whole month with the rest of my colleagues to sort of have panic attacks, sweat it out, have sleepless nights, do a lot of teeth grinding. And then the day came where we’d find out who got the email, you know, to let us know that you needed to have a meeting with HR. And I ended up getting the email. And, yeah, I have to say that in the beginning, I was numb. I think. I think that, like, that whole month leading up to the actual layoff kind of functioned like a form of exposure therapy. Like, I was just getting used to the idea that I might lose my job for an entire month. And so in some ways, I was not surprised. Cause I knew it could happen. But on the other hand, it still felt like a shock. Like, I still was so completely thrown. And it was very confusing to me because getting laid off in journalism these days, I mean, that’s practically a rite of passage at this point. I knew that was the deal going into this profession. NPR had literally told me and my colleagues that I might get laid off, and yet I was still so shaken to my core, I felt like my operating system was glitching. And, yeah, basically for the next several months after that, I went through this rollercoaster ride of feelings. There was a lot of shame. There was a lot of spiraling about what could I have done differently? Was it this mistake, or was it that mistake? There was a lot of paranoia about interacting with other people and potential employers. I went to, like, a journalism conference last summer for Asian American Journalists association, and I just remember just being so paranoid. Like, anytime anyone asked me, like, how are you? Like, I would be this close to just, like, bursting into tears or, like, you know, have you found another job? Yeah. Just really benign questions would throw me for a loop. And, yeah, I basically, like, I knew I had about as good of a layoff as it gets, truly. Like, we had a very good union contract at NPR, so I got severance. There was healthcare for, like, a few months after. I had savings. I’m married. I have a husband who can support me. I don’t have kids. You know what I mean? I had a lot going for me materially to help soften the landing here. And yet emotionally, I was just completely a mess. And that disconnect between my material reality and my emotional reality was really, like I said before, whenever I have an emotional problem like this, that I can’t figure out. I start to report on it. And so that’s what I did. And I ended up reporting this series trying to understand, like, why do layoffs mess us up so badly? And I just want to say, you know, this is just my experience. I have friends who got laid off from the same company and did not experience it this way. But I do think a significant portion of Americans do experience it this way, and that’s what I was interested in figuring out.

00:14:19 – Eric Zimmer
So you’ve alluded to some of the emotional difficulty that was there. You’ve alluded to shame. I assume there was fear in there, embarrassment, which sounds like shame. What were the primary sort of emotions that you were going through? Are there others that ive missed?

00:14:39 – Yowei Shaw
Fear, shame, embarrassment? Theres other ones, too. Lets take them one by one. So, yeah, so we already covered shame, which was really confusing to me. Why I would feel like the company told me it’s not my fault. That’s the definition of a layoff. It’s a no fault termination. You’re getting laid off because of something that has to do with the company, not because of you. And they generally always tell you, it’s not you. It’s not about your performance. This is just a business decision. And yet, why was I taking it so personally? Why did I feel like this was an indictment about me? Why did it feel like NPR was rejecting everything about me? Why did I feel deficient? So that was a big one. And then, yeah, fear. Thank you for mentioning that one. Yes. Even though I am relatively privileged, I was still really scared. I’m the primary breadwinner for my family. I was, like, afraid about kind of running through all the scenarios that might happen. Well, if I don’t get a job for these many months. Okay, well, then what will happen if we lose the house? And where will we move? And da da da da, how will we feed the cats? Just kind of spiraling in those material ways. And then there was also fear around getting another job. And this was also, I mean, the podcast industry is not doing great at the moment, especially the narrative podcast industry of the bottom has fallen out of it. So there is some point to that fear, some justification around maybe I won’t be able to find another job, but also, I have 15 years of experience. I am a pretty seasoned podcast person. It didn’t totally make sense how afraid I was compared to my circumstances. And then I was like, oh, have I peaked? Like, is this it? Is this, like, the pinnacle of what I’ll be able to do? In podcast journalism, and I’m trying to think, what are all the other emotions? I think also, the thing that really stuck with me was, like, why do I feel like people are looking at me differently? Is this just in my head, or are they looking at me differently? It felt like a kind of microaggression, you know, when people would say things to me like, have you found another job yet? Are you gonna be changing switching industries? Are you just, like, little things that became so much bigger when your entire body is a scuffed knee, you know? And so I really wanted to understand, just, like, why is this just me being a drama queen, or is there something to, like what I’m feeling? Are there systems and dynamics contributing to the way I feel?

00:17:47 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. And so what did you find out as you began to investigate this? What did you find out about what happens to people during layoffs and why it impacts, again, not everyone, but some of the people, so strongly?

00:18:04 – Yowei Shaw
Yes. Okay. So the first thing I learned, I mean, the history on layoffs is pretty wild. It’s very interesting. Like, before the 1970s, companies pretty much avoided white collar layoffs. This is a pretty recent phenomenon. If a company were to experience layoffs, that would be an indictment of the company. The company needs to feel shame now. It’s flipped. So now we accept layoffs as just like, that’s just what business has to do these days. But it wasn’t always like that. And so that was the first kind of data point of like, oh, okay, so it wasn’t always like this. There are these structural things that are happening that are leading to this situation in the first place. And then I talked to this sociologist, Oprah Shaw, who has done a lot of really interesting work on stigma and laid off workers and unemployed workers. I went to therapy during this whole period, and honestly, talking to him was more enlightening and revelatory than any therapy session I had at this time, because he could just. Everything I was telling him about what I was feeling, he would be like, yep. There’s a reason for that. Yep. All these people that I talk to feel exactly like that. Yep. And some of the things he told me were that the stigma that I’m feeling, this kind of paranoia around. Are people looking at me differently? Are people looking at me differently? Like, that’s not just in my head. Like, people probably are looking at me differently. And that was, like, a huge relief to sort of just be like, I can call it like it is these feelings that I’m feeling, this intuition, like I’m not wrong. And yeah. There’s just a lot of stigma around not just laid off workers, but unemployment in general. When you grow up in school, your teachers are asking you, you know, what do you want to be when you grow up? You don’t really. I don’t even know if the word unemployment is mentioned. I don’t think it was mentioned to me during my schooling years. We don’t have much familiarity with it.

00:20:10 – Chris Forbes
Right.

00:20:11 – Yowei Shaw
Even though it’s a fact of this economy. And he said that the stigma really comes down to this myth of meritocracy that we have in this country. Basically the idea that your actions and hard work equal your position in life, in society. And even though the myth of meritocracy exists in a lot of countries, there have been research studies that find that in the US, we believe it the most and the hardest and the deepest. What that means is if you get laid off, well, then it’s your fault. You know? Like, that’s the emotional story that I think I was telling myself, even though intellectually I know that’s not how it works. And so he helped me kind of solve this puzzle that I was feeling where I was like, I know it’s not my fault. I know I shouldn’t feel like this, and yet I feel like it’s my fault. I feel like this is about me. And he talked about interviewing a union organizer whose job it is to explain to workers how our economy works. And even a union organizer would feel like it’s her fault, even though intellectually she knows it’s not. Talking to him about that, talking to him about hiring discrimination that unemployed workers and laid off workers face that it’s twice as hard to get a job interview than someone who has the same credentials. That was also disheartening, but also helpful in that it’s like that whole system versus the individual thing of, is it me? Is it just me, or am I part of a pattern? And I feel like there’s a moment where it just clicked for me. Like, oh, I’m part of a pattern. These feelings I’m feeling. I’m not an alien. There are reasons why I feel this way, and that helped me make sense of it.

00:22:36 – Eric Zimmer
There’s so many things in there I would like to go back and touch on. But the question that just came to mind is, you’re a journalist working in a podcast industry, doing something that clearly really matters to you. Do you think it’s harder in that circumstance than when you’re laid off from a job that maybe you are less personally invested in yeah, I think.

00:23:04 – Yowei Shaw
Absolutely. Absolutely. And yet part of me also, I have my hackles up when I get asked this question, because I think there’s this whole movement right now around, like, work shouldn’t be your identity. And, like, we know better than to, like, you know, care so much about our jobs and life is about so much more than work. And I guess as somebody who’s very, very into her work and, like, it is a huge part of my identity. But I also. I’m like, how can it not matter your job? You know, I feel like in that movement, there’s a little bit of, like, you spend so many hours of your life doing this thing, you have social networks around this occupation. To not have it, part of your identity seems unrealistic. I think that’s one response I have to that question. And then, of course, absolutely, yes. If I didn’t care so much, it would hurt a lot less. Absolutely.

00:24:14 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. I certainly didn’t mean it in any sense that the ideal thing would be to care less. Actually, I think, all in all, to have a job that you care about deeply and provide provides you meaning is the better situation than to have one where you simply go through the motions. Right. I mean, that’s just my personal opinion, but I do think in general. Right. The more you care about something when you lose it, the harder it is to lose it. It’s sort of one of life’s equations, that it’s just true. When I think about things that I’ve lost that really, really hurt, usually the consolation, I find is, oh, but I really, really cared, so that’s good, right? Like, I had something I loved enough to lose it. And I think to your point, though, there are aspects of what we’re talking about that probably happen at all different levels, because, yes, we are invested in our work. Most people take some degree of meaning from it, and our relationships are there. I find it so interesting, this idea of the myth of meritocracy. And as I was listening to your podcast called proxy, and I think it’s a three episode arc that’s about this process. And as I was listening to that, and you started talking about the myth of meritocracy, as somebody who probably has bought into the myth of meritocracy to some degree over my lifetime, I don’t buy into it into the same degree that I used to. I had a little bit of like. But it kind of is true. Sort of. And I think what’s interesting about it is that it’s one of those things that’s true. And not true at the same time. And what I mean is that it is true that how much effort you put in and how hard you work and all that is an element in what goes into being successful or not successful. But it’s far from the only element, as we can see. Right. We know people who are very talented, who the world just does not treat fair for a thousand different reasons. So it’s one of those things that, like, on the one hand, I’m like, well, but you can’t totally throw it out. And yet, on the other hand, it’s nothing true. I mean, I suffered a layoff. I told you about it a little bit. It was a long time ago, but, I mean, I was working as hard as you could possibly work at the time. Right. It was just that early online company got bought by another company and the layoff occurred. And so I can see in all different cases that the myth of meritocracy is just that. The other thing I thought was interesting is we’re talking about the stigma. And I found this idea that people who are unemployed have a far harder time getting job than someone employed. Right. There’s an old saying which is the best time to look for a job is while you have a job. Right. And it’s just based on that very. At least in my mind, I always heard that phrase to mean exactly that. Right. That for whatever reason, you look like a better candidate when you have a job versus when you don’t have one. But it was amazing to hear I, as you did this investigative reporting, how open recruiters really were about this fact, about just pretty much straight out saying, like, yes, we get a lot of applicants. It’s hard to sort them out. So one way that we do so is if you have a job, we rank you higher than if you don’t.

00:27:35 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah, it was wild to hear what recruiters would say. And basically it’s discrimination when you think about it, when it’s like a characteristic about you that you cannot help, you know, that you cannot change, necessarily. It’s a form of bias and discrimination that is just openly accepted in our employment system. And, yeah, that’s wild that we’re just like, yep, that’s just the way it is.

00:28:03 – Eric Zimmer
Well, it’s based on that same sort of half true thing about the myth of meritocracy, right. Because you’re assuming that if somebody doesn’t have work, it’s because something they have done. And while in certain cases. Right, like, some people who would come to you to look for work and they don’t have a job is because they’re not very good. You know what I mean? Like, there are those people, but it’s certainly not everybody with layoffs. And I think these part true things, it’s easier to throw something out that’s completely always false.

00:28:33 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah. And, you know, these recruiters also talked about how, you know, even the ones who didn’t really buy into that way of thinking, they’re like, they don’t see a resume and see, oh, you’ve been laid off. That means you are a worse performer. There were recruiters who talked to the sociologists who were like, maybe that’s true, maybe it’s not true. It’s getting at what you’re saying. This half truth, this partly true assumption for these recruiters because they just have a huge pile of resumes to get through. And also they don’t want to get in trouble with the manager that they’re hiring for. Like, what if it is true and they end up letting somebody in that isn’t going to do a good job? And so they just are conservative and sort of err on the side of, well, let’s talk to the people who already have a job. Let’s just err on the side of, you know, we just want to be safe.

00:29:27 – Eric Zimmer
It reminds me of another saying. I was in the software business for a long time before I became a podcaster. And so there was an old saying that, like, nobody ever got fired for hiring IBM. And what they mean Washington. It’s the safe choice, right? It’s just the safe choice. Like, it may not be the best choice, it may not be the right choice, but it’s the choice that everybody would at the end of the day go, well, that sort of makes sense. So I can’t penalize, you know what I mean? It’s that same sort of thing. Now as somebody who, you know, sort of made my way through the startup business without a college degree and all that. Like, I sort of was like, well, you know, I didn’t like that phrase, you know, you want to hire somebody like me, the punk rock weirdo that showed up at your door today is your best choice. So all these things are true. So the other thing that I thought was really interesting is that one of the things that I think is obvious and you heard is that if you show up for an interview, so you’ve been laid off and now you’re back out and you’re looking for a job, if you have a sense of a desperation or be of negativity about what happened or negativity or feelings of doubt about your own ability. That’s not good for getting a job. You don’t want to show up with that. So it would seem that ignoring what we’ve just been talking about, not knowing that to be true, might be better. Because if I know that you’re going to discriminate against me, then I’m going to be more doubtful. I’m going to be more afraid. But it seems like that the research that this gentleman that you were mentioning did shows that that’s actually not true, that there is a way of both recognizing the stigma, recognizing the difficulty, allowing the negative emotions to be there, and then also not projecting them as you go into trying to find other work. How does that happen?

00:31:21 – Yowei Shaw
This is something that I was experiencing myself as I was reporting the story on layoffs. I was reading all these depressing statistics about how layoffs are linked with higher risk of divorce, higher risk of decreased earnings, you know, higher risk of hospitalization, just like all these bad things that layoffs are linked to. And I was starting to get in my head, like, oh, no. Like, am I going to end up as one of these statistics? Like, I got to get another job. Like, uh. And I asked ofracharon, the sociologist, this question of, like, it seems like it would be counterintuitive, like, it would not be helpful. It seems like it would not be helpful to learn about all these depressing statistics.

00:32:01 – Eric Zimmer
Right?

00:32:01 – Yowei Shaw
And what he said was, he said that, yes, it hurts, but also it helps you see that it’s not your fault if you do have trouble. It’s that depersonalization thing that we were talking about earlier. So, Oprah, Shaw, the sociologist, he did this study where he got all these volunteer career coaches and all these people in Boston who were out of work looking for a job, long term unemployed. He had the coaches try a different approach called sociologically informed support, which to me, I love that term. It’s so nerdy, it’s so funny to me, it’s hard to say, sociologically informed support. So basically, what happened was, at the beginning of the day, Ophir would go up in front of everyone and be like, I’m sorry to tell you, folks, but here’s what it is. And would just go through all the odds that are stacked against them. And then he would say, I know this hurts. I know this sucks to hear this, but I want you to know this so that you don’t blame yourself for having a hard time getting another job. There’s a reason, a concrete reason why you are having a hard time, because if you blame yourself, if you internalize all those failed job interviews, all those rejections, all that silence from employers, then it’ll make it harder for you to get a job, because you will be even more negative. You will be even more insecure. You know, you’ll just leak more negativity, which will then make it harder to get a job, which will make you feel even worse about yourself. And then you just start to, like, get into this vicious cycle of negativity, you know, like, it’s harder for you to get a job that makes you feel worse about yourself. That makes it then harder to get a job when you go show up for an interview, and then you just end up in this really toxic hard loop. And so what the sociologist recommends is important to know what you’re dealing with. What are the odds that are stacked against you? How hard is it for you to get another job and then get up and sort of shake it off, and then you need to get to work looking for that job. You need to go ask colleagues for a recommendation. That’s the best way to sort of overcome that bias against unemployed workers or laid off workers is a recommendation from somebody inside the company. And you basically need to prepare yourself for a marathon, not a sprint. And you need to protect your mental health. You need to prioritize it. You need to understand that there are all these negative feedback loops that could be coming from maybe a spouse who’s maybe blaming you for not finding work or for getting laid off, maybe your friends who maybe don’t understand or have distanced themselves, who knows? There are a number of negative feedback loops that you could be dealing with. And so you sort of need to, like, map out all the negative feedback loops that you might be dealing with, and then find your safe people, find the people that you can vent about your negative feelings, and they won’t judge you. They won’t say, oh, well, that’s your bad attitude. That’s why you’re not getting another job, right? You know, people you can be safe with and then just keep trucking along until you get that chance, because the longer you are unemployed, the harder it is to get a job. And the best way to deal with all those negative consequences that come with unemployment and laid off is getting another job. It’s just like this mental jiu jitsu you have to do with yourself that I find very interesting and really goes against what the dominant approach is with career coaches and career centers, which is very, like, pull yourself up by the bootstraps. You can do it. You just need the right attitude. You just need the right resume. You just need the right outfit. You know what I mean?

00:36:22 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:36:22 – Yowei Shaw
And all that matters. All that stuff matters. This is not to say that you shouldn’t learn how to interview better or you shouldn’t polish your resume. All that stuff matters. But also, it is harder for you to get a job.

00:36:36 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. It’s a little bit like recognizing the effects of what trauma can do in your life. Because on one hand, it’s frightening to hear things. Like, for example, there’s something called the adverse Childhood Effects survey. If you get a high score on that, meaning you had a bunch of adverse things happen to you as a child, the list of consequences of things that can happen to you is long, right? I mean, it goes from addiction to heart disease to depression. I mean, it’s just not a happy story. So on one hand, it would be kind of good to not know that. And yet, of course, you’re having impacts from it that are actually happening. Like you said, it’s this jiu jitsu, a little bit of like, okay, I know that that’s all true. I know that that has all having an impact on me. And at the same time, I’m determined not to let that be the whole story. And I think that’s. We’re talking about something similar here. Yes. As a person who’s lost your job, their stigma against you getting rehiredde, it’s harder to get it right. There are these negative things that can occur. You’re dealing with negative feedback loops of people who don’t understand, people who think the fact you don’t have a job as your fault, you’ve got all that happening. To pretend it’s not happening makes you feel insane, right? To pretend it’s not is to sort of feel crazy. Same thing. If somebody has a bunch of adverse childhood effects, to pretend that that stuff’s not having an effect makes you feel crazy because you’re like, well, something isn’t right. You can’t let it be the whole story either. Otherwise it becomes self fulfilling prophecies at the same time. And I think people who are dealing with difficulties, systematic difficulties of any sorts, run up against this, which is, yes, the system is not fair, and yet you still have to find a way within that not to let that be the thing that defines you. And I don’t know exactly how people do that. I mean, I think we all wrestle with it, but it’s one of those sort of true, half truth things we talked about before where if you end up only accepting one side of that, your reality is not whole, I guess. Does that make sense?

00:38:44 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah, it really makes sense. It makes me think about. So one of the things that the sociologist found was most helpful in doing this mental jujitsu of trying to, like, hold the bad statistics in one place and also stay hopeful and, like, prepare yourself for the marathon ahead so that you don’t end up becoming a. A statistic. One of the things he found that was most helpful for participants was the solidarity, how important it was to talk about it with people who understand and won’t judge you, who won’t blame you for having a bad attitude. It’s the support group model. He said that in these career centers, usually when somebody raises their hand and says, I’m having a hard time, they’re told, shh, don’t talk about it. You don’t have the right attitude. You know, that’s not encouraged in these places most of the time. And so where does all that negativity go? You know, you internalize it or, you know, comes out in weird places. And so that’s one lesson that I think is, like, kind of common sense, but also really important to remember for all kinds of problems that you face is, like, the importance of. Of being able to share and vent in a safe space.

00:40:27 – Eric Zimmer
I interviewed a woman recently. She wrote a book about dark moods and their benefit. In it, she described an experience she had of reading a book. That’s gonna take me a second to set up, but I think it’s actually gonna be worth it. If not, Chris will cut it all out. But she’s describing a woman who is getting back into the job market after having been a parent. Right. And so kids are going off to school. She’s been out of the job market for 20 years. She’s older, and she’s expressing to her husband and son her concerns that her skills aren’t really up to date. And she knows that, you know, older women, it’s harder for them to get hired and all of this. Right. And her husband and son just are saying to her, no, no, you’re wonderful. You’re great. You’re going to be just fine. Right. And the psychologist who was writing the book was describing how they were. Right. And she had what the psychologist was calling a negative explanatory style. The woman writing this book had a big problem with this. Right. She was like, well, but of course there’s discrimination against women of a certain age, and you don’t have, like, of course she’s right. And I’m reading it, thinking, well, they’re both actually right in a way. Right. And this is exactly what we’re talking about. If she completely internalizes that attitude, then, yes, she’s going to have a hard time finding a job. And yet, if she doesn’t, if nobody recognizes those factors, she’s going to think that she’s all the problem. And the answer turned out to be relatively simple. Right. Which was that what she needed was her husband to just say, yeah, I understand, you know, that’s frightening. That’s hard, of course. Yes. I bet it’s going to be harder for you than it might be, say, for me, if I was to go look for a job like that’s all true. And then she’s heard. Because when we’re not heard on stuff like that, what my experience is is we end up arguing for our own limitations. We end up trying to convince everybody that we’re right, that it really is that bad and that hard. Whereas most people, if that difficulty is acknowledged, then we can move on to solution. But if nobody will acknowledge that difficulty, we end up arguing for it instead of then being able to move into this piece you talked about, which is like, okay, how do I prepare for the marathon, not the sprint?

00:42:49 – Yowei Shaw
That’s really interesting. Yeah. It reminds me of this experience that I would have again and again after my layoff, wherever, with friends and family, people who love me and want the best for me, when I would talk about my feelings of shame, despair, and maybe being a little melodramatic, whatever, people would sort of cheerlead me sometimes and sort of be like, no, no, no, you got this. You’ll be fine. Look at how much experience you have. Da da da da da. And it always bugged me. Like, it always made me so it was just like, no, no, no. Like, yeah, I know. And also, like, these are my feelings right now, and I’m allowed to feel these negative feelings, right? And, like, I know you want it to be okay. You want to put a band aid on it, but, like, we don’t know if that’s gonna happen. Like, if I will come out of this right. It’s almost like you want some acknowledgement of your reality, your emotional and material reality, so that you don’t feel insane.

00:43:52 – Eric Zimmer
Yes.

00:43:53 – Yowei Shaw
You don’t feel like people are trying to crowd out your feelings. This whole experience with my layoff has really taught me that when people in my life are going through a hard thing, I just listen. I don’t try to say, oh, you must be feeling x or, oh, it’ll be fine. I try to listen first to what they’re saying, you know, because I think we’re uncomfortable with, like, those kinds of hard feelings because we want the people in our life to be okay.

00:44:21 – Eric Zimmer
Of course.

00:44:21 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah. One other thing I’m thinking about to go back to this myth of meritocracy is there’s been some interesting research. It’s very preliminary. There’s some research that suggests that when people don’t expect to be laid off, they are more emotionally wrecked than people who are aware of the possibility. And I think this gets at the same kind of thing we’re talking about, where it’s like, just knowing, having a kind of realistic view on what could happen helps prepare you more for the possibility so you’re not totally destabilized if it happens. And I think, yes, the myth of meritocracy, it’s half true. It’s half not true. And also, it’s a comforting story to tell yourself, because then if you have control, if you work hard, if you’re telling yourself that if you work hard, you will be safe, if you do a good job, you will be safe, then you can have control in this volatile, scary economy where people can be laid off and fired because we have at will employment.

00:45:35 – Eric Zimmer
Right.

00:45:35 – Yowei Shaw
That was one of the biggest lessons for me from all of this reporting, was like, oh, okay. It could be not motivating to think, oh, if I do a good job, I still might be laid off. I was afraid that I might kind of go in that direction of like, oh, like, well, then what’s the point? And kind of throw my hands up in the air. And I found that that’s not where I am right now. Like, I don’t have a salary job right now. You know, I’m doing my own thing, shooting my shot with this new podcast. But I just. I think that reality, even if it hurts, it is generally always more helpful than the false story. That’s comforting.

00:46:16 – Eric Zimmer
I tend to agree. I think what’s interesting about that is, like, many things we’re talking about is this balance. Right? Because if we were to really grasp and spend a lot of time thinking about how truly out of control we are in this world, it would be paralyzing. We would never get out of bed. Right?

00:46:37 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah.

00:46:37 – Eric Zimmer
As poet Mark Nepo calls it, the terrible knowledge that anything can happen to anyone anytime is true. You can’t live in that constant recognition of that fact, or you’d be a basket case. And yet there’s some amount of recognition of that that’s really useful, right? To really realize, like, yeah, like, life is a frightening and scary place, and terrible things happen to really good people all the time, and good things happen to bad people, and average things happen to average people. Like, it just all happens. And so it’s interesting, I think getting laid off at the age that I did, I was 28. My wife was six months pregnant with my son. I mean, it was a terrifying experience. I think that there was something about that that just I, from that moment on, did not believe that my safety came from a company. And I remember, I mean, I worked in software startup companies. So I guess for a while you do that. You just kind of know, like, well, the odds are pretty good this thing is not going to make it. I went on to do consulting for these really big companies, Fortune 100, Fortune 500 companies. And my mom would be like, I wish they would hire you. And I’d be like, they actually offered to hire me. And I said no. And she’s like, you’re crazy. And I was like, mom, do you think that working for this company is, like, safe? Do you actually think that, like, the fact that they hired me as an employee is safety? It’s not anymore. I understand in your day and age, perhaps it was, but it’s not anymore. You know? And I felt like the fact that I was a consultant and knew that I was going to need to prove to somebody else anywhere from three months to six months to a year from now that I was worth hiring was more safety. Again, there’s no complete safety, but it was more safety because I just assumed that sooner or later, they’re going to be done with me and I’m going to have to go convince somebody else. And so I just always felt like the fact that I knew that made me stay a little bit more on top of certain things. It’s not that any of its safety, but I think there was a. I’m not counting on a company to take care of me because. Because I don’t think that’s a safe bet anymore in today’s world. I’m not demonizing companies. I’m just saying that, like, as we know, if they need to cut costs, they’re going to cut costs. And if you happen to be part of that, you’re going to be gone.

00:49:11 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah. I’m curious if your relationship with risk changed after that moment. Because my relationship with risk has changed as a result of my layoff. I would say that I am a pretty risk averse person, generally speaking. Maybe it’s like being the daughter of immigrants who are the children of refugees. It’s just like, I want to be safe. We need to have savings. Security is very important to my operating system after kind of, if the quote unquote worst thing professionally happened. I know it’s not the worst thing, but it’s one of the worst things. Just losing your job, it kind of liberated me from this kind of grasping need to control and be safe. This new thing that I’m doing, which is starting a podcast, I mean, it’s not a good time to start a podcast. I really might fail. I probably will fail, but I’m having fun doing it. I’m learning a lot, and it’s okay if I fail. Like, I think it has really rewired my relationship with failure, and just, like, my tolerance for it and my tolerance for risk, I’m grateful for that, actually.

00:50:27 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. It’s hard for me to know what recalibrated my relationship with risk. I was a homeless, heroic at 25, so I clearly wasn’t playing anything safe to begin with. But this job was my first attempt to try and be safe. And it was interesting because when I got laid off, I actually did gamble a little bit because I was given severance, and I applied for unemployment. And I recognized also that there was job retraining money available. And so I took some of the severance and some of that money, and I invested in a series of software related courses, thinking like, I might be able to actually come out of this even better off, which it turned out to be the case. And so I think I was taking a risk then and then working in software startup companies. Like I said, after that, I think I just. You do that long enough, your relationship to it is just very different.

00:51:26 – Yowei Shaw
It’s like the water you swim in.

00:51:27 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, it is. It is the water you swim in to a certain degree. And so I think I just, over the years, built more and more of a tolerance for it. Although it’s interesting, is, like, get older, I’m finding my risk tolerance becoming a little bit more like, well, hold on a second. Like, do you realize, like, the chance that, you know, this is, you know, I mean, running a podcast, right. Like, we’re in a pretty good position as a podcast, and yet it is hard out there. It is harder than it’s ever been out there. And there’s risk. You know, there’s. There’s risk I am aware of very regularly.

00:52:03 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah. Yeah. I don’t know. It’s like, it has really made me want to shoot my shot more in general. I feel like it has kind of unleashed this kind of aggressive, but not in a bad way, I hope. We’ll see. But just kind of this version of me that’s like, yeah, I’m gonna go for it, and it’s okay if I fail. I’ve already failed on my face in a very public way, so why not shoot my shot? Why not try? Yeah. I just feel less afraid.

00:52:35 – Eric Zimmer
No, yeah, I think that’s good. I think that’s good. I think that’s ideally the way to move to the best of our ability. We’re about out of time, but I would be remiss if I did not at least ask you about one of the things that you did as part of this project is you decided to create a layoff song. This sounds a little bit like the yowei shpah, but you decided to create a layoff song.

00:53:09 – Yowei Shaw
It’s exactly like the yo eh shba. I’ve discovered that I’m really into inventing weird rituals as a way of healing. So basically what happened was I was laid off, feeling bad, trying all kinds of things to try to feel better, reporting a series about it, doing this yo ei spa thing, massaging my friends, like, doing a lot to try to feel better. And I have to say, like, six months after the layoff, I was still feeling really, really bad. I really was not much further than I was at the very beginning, and that kind of bummed me out. And then I had this recital coming up. So one of my hobbies is I pole dance. I’m not good. It’s just for fun. My studio has this, like, very cute, kind of nerdy seasonal recital where you can do a solo or a group dance or whatever. And so I had a recital coming up, and I had signed up to do a solo thing, and you have to choreograph your own thing. And I’d never done it before. And I was like, what am I going to do? What am I going to do? What song am I going to choose? And I was like, I know what I’ll do. I need to do an interpretive layoff dance because that sounds fun to me. Dress up in a Kleenex box and it’ll just be this ridiculous kind of joyous reclamation of this whole situation. And so then I started looking for layoff songs to dance to. Maybe not surprisingly, there are not that many layoff songs out there. It is not a well developed genre as of yet.

00:54:44 – Eric Zimmer
You slumb the depths of country music. You sure there’s not more out there?

00:54:48 – Yowei Shaw
You know what? I should have. But you know what?

00:54:51 – Eric Zimmer
That’s where you’re gonna find them. Sure.

00:54:54 – Yowei Shaw
But also, I’m not sure that would match the vibe of my choreography of the pole dancing.

00:54:59 – Eric Zimmer
Yes.

00:55:00 – Chris Forbes
Yes.

00:55:00 – Yowei Shaw
So, anyways, I was like, why not just make my own layoff song? We’re already here. Why not go all the way? And I’m very lucky to have a music producer as a husband who can make it. So and so he helped me out, and we made this ridiculous song called Gold Star. And the reason why it’s titled gold Star is because after I got laid off, I remember people would do all kinds of nice things for me. Send me fried chicken. I love fried chicken. People would get me a massage. I love massage. Just all these nice things. But what I really wanted, if I’m being honest, was a trophy, okay? I just wanted a trophy to my self esteem. Something to combat the negative voices in my head. Like, basically, I want a gold star to sort of combat what I’m feeling. And so this is, like, I’m hoping it finds laid off folks, you know? This is sort of a gold star. Like, I’m soothing myself, and hopefully, you know, this can be a gold star for you. And then I made this ridiculous pole dancing video that is available online right now, though it might not be forever, because I might come to my senses and decide to pull it from the.

00:56:17 – Eric Zimmer
Internet if it’s still out there. When this episode releases, we’ll put a link in the show notes. I’ve heard the song. I have not yet watched the video. The thing that made me laugh the most during that process, though, I mean, every part of it is great and funny, was your husband introducing you to auto tune, which is a way of trying to make those of us who don’t sing very well sound coherent. And it’s so funny because he was like, I’ve never seen my computer have to work this hard. And it’s funny because this is quite some time ago, probably at least 15 years ago, I went to a friend’s house in Tennessee, and I used to be a songwriter, and so I had some songs, and I was trying to sing. And we got what must have been a very early version of autotune, right? It was a box. You didn’t plug it in your computer. And the running joke, basically, after that was that, like, anytime it tried to process me, the box would start smoking. It had to work so hard. So when he said, I’ve never seen this machine work this hard, I had a good laugh. I was like, I’ve been there. Oh my gosh.

00:57:24 – Yowei Shaw
Yeah. Autotune is my friend. Thank God for autotune.

00:57:29 – Eric Zimmer
Yes.

00:57:30 – Yowei Shaw
There’s no way I would have the courageous to have sung that song or put it on the Internet without the help of a lot of autotune.

00:57:38 – Eric Zimmer
All right, well, we are gonna wrap up now in the post show conversation. We’re gonna talk a little bit longer cause I wanna talk about you’ve launched this new podcast to report on this, but there was an interim step in there along the way that ended up, I think, being the hardest, maybe emotional moment for you of this whole journey. And I’d like to talk about that a little bit in the post show conversation. Listeners, as always, if you would like access to that, if you would like access to ad free episodes, a special episode I do each week called a teaching song and a poem. And to be part of our community, we have community meetings once a month. We’d love to have you be part of the community and you can do that by going to oneyoufeed.net join Yowei. Thank you so much. This has been really enjoyable from top to bottom.

00:58:27 – Yowei Shaw
Thank you for having me. This was so fun. Thank you for listening to my song and not judging me too harshly.00:58:33 –

Eric Zimmer
No, it’s a good pop song.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

How to Overcome Cynicism and Embrace Hope with Jamil Zaki

September 6, 2024 2 Comments

Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, Jamil Zaki discusses his new book on how to overcome cynicism and embrace hope. With a focus on trust, cynicism, and the dynamics of influence, Jamil’s research provides profound insights into fostering positive connections and combating societal divisions. With his expertise and dedication to understanding human nature, he offers a compassionate and thoughtful perspective on fostering hope in a world often marred by cynicism.

In this episode, you will be able to:

  • Understand how personal perceptions shape behavior and decision-making
  • Embrace hopeful skepticism to navigate cynicism and find a positive outlook
  • Explore the profound impact of trust on building resilient communities
  • Discover the power of solutions journalism in driving positive change
  • Recognize the role of cynicism in shaping societal dynamics and control

Dr. Jamil Zaki is a professor of psychology at Stanford University and the director of the Stanford Social Neuroscience Lab. He trained at Columbia and Harvard, studying empathy and kindness in the human brain. He is interested in how we can learn to connect better. He has published over 100 peer-reviewed articles and received about two dozen awards from scientific associations and universities. In 2019 he was awarded the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), the US Government’s highest honor for researchers at his career stage. In addition to his academic work, Dr. Zaki is active in outreach and public communication of science. He has written about human connection for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, The Wall Street Journal, The Harvard Business Review, and The New Yorker. He is the author of The War for Kindness and Hope for Cynics.

Connect with Jamil Zaki:  Website | X

If you enjoyed this conversation with Jamil Zaki, check out these other episodes:

How to Find Hope and Kinship with Father Greg Boyle & Fabian Debora

Human Nature and Hope with Rutger Bregman

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

00:00:00 – Jamil Zaki
I was talking with the columnist David Brooks recently and he said that he asks his students each year, do you think people are generally good or bad? And he said that over the last ten to 15 years, the proportion of students who say, yeah, I think people are generally bad has skyrocketed.

00:00:23 – Chris Forbes
Welcome to the one you feed. Throughout time, great thinkers have recognized the importance of the thoughts. We have quotes like garbage in, garbage out, or you are what you think ring true. And yet for many of us, our thoughts dont strengthen or empower us. We tend toward negativity, self pity, jealousy, or fear. We see what we dont have instead of what we do. We think things that hold us back and dampen our spirit. But its not just about thinking. Our actions matter. It takes conscious, consistent, and creative effort to make a life worth living. This podcast is about how other people keep themselves moving in the right direction, how they feed their good wolf thanks for joining us. Our guest on this episode is Doctor Jamil Zaki, a professor of psychology at Stanford University and the director of the Stanford Social Neuroscience Lab. Jamil trained at Columbia and Harvard studying empathy and kindness in the human brain, interested in how we can learn to connect better. Today, Jamil and Eric discuss his book, Hope for Cynics.

00:01:42 – Eric Zimmer
Hi Jamil, welcome to the show.

00:01:44 – Jamil Zaki
Thanks so much for having me.

00:01:45 – Eric Zimmer
I’m excited to have you on. We’re going to be discussing your latest book, which is called hope for the surprising science of human goodness. But before we get into that, we’ll start like we always do, with a parable. And in the parable, there’s a grandparent who’s talking with their grandchild, and they say in life, there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear. And the grandchild stops. They think about it for a second, they look up at their grandparent and they say, well, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

00:02:29 – Jamil Zaki
I love that parable. I think about it all the time. And to me it speaks to something that is deeply true about people, based on not just my personal experience, but also my experience as a behavioral scientist and research psychologist, which is that our beliefs about the world are realities. Our inner realities are self fulfilling prophecies that change the lives we live and the relationships that we build. So if you have the belief that, in general, fear will win out, that in general, people are selfish and greedy and dishonest, well, then you’ll treat people that way, and they’ll treat you accordingly. That, I suppose, would be feeding the bad wolf. And if you instead choose to hope and to be more driven by the data, you will put faith in people, and they will bring their best out for you. I suppose that would be feeding the good wolf. I think that. Well, I love this idea in general, and I love that this is how you start your conversations, because I don’t think we focus on this enough. I don’t think that we understand as a culture how much power we have through our habits of mind to change the reality that we reside in. It really speaks to one of the most profound insights from all of psychology.

00:03:54 – Eric Zimmer
There’s something you talk about in the book. I’m jumping ahead a little bit here, but you say that Maya Angelou once advised, when you show people who they are, believe them. But what people show you depends on who you are. And then you go on to quote a psychologist, Vanessa Bones, maybe something called influence neglect. Say more about that.

00:04:17 – Jamil Zaki
Yeah, Vanessa. Vanessa Bonds is a great psychologist who studies, again, this idea of influence neglect, which I think people should really try to internalize if they can. She has a great book about this called you have more influence than you think. And in general, the idea is that we imagine that other people are just who they are and that when we observe them do something, we’re learning about their true colors. This is wrong in at least two ways. First, people are totally different in different circumstances. If you put somebody at a high stakes poker table and then put them with somebody they disagree with about a political issue and then put them with their child, you will see three completely different people. They might be in the same body, but the different situations draw out different versions of who they are. So that’s, number one, is that when you see somebody, you’re only seeing one version of them. Insight number two, which comes from Vanessa’s work, is that the version that you see has a lot to do with you. I think a lot about Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, right? That when you try to observe the physical world, the mere fact that you’re observing it at a quantum level causes it to change. And I often think Heisenberg applies to subatomic particles. But we also have Heisenberg’s friends and Heisenberg’s colleagues and family members. Right? When we observe somebody, the fact that we are part of their situation changes who they become in that moment. And so I think that we have a lot of responsibility and a lot of opportunity. I write and think a lot about trust, for instance. And we tend to imagine that trust is a risk that we are taking on. We worry about being betrayed, and that’s a fair worry. But what I don’t think we realize enough is that when you trust somebody, they often become more trustworthy because human beings reciprocate what others give to them. And when you distrust somebody, they often become less trustworthy because we retaliate the harms that other people do to us. So when we make decisions around other people, I think it’s critical to remember we’re choosing not just to learn about the person, but how we want to influence them, which version of them we want to bring out.

00:06:32 – Eric Zimmer
Right. It’s completely obvious on one level that how we treat other people has to do with how they treat us. If I had gotten on this call with you and been like, yeah, thanks for coming on. That book kind of sucks, but I can’t wait to talk about it.

00:06:45 – Jamil Zaki
Right?

00:06:45 – Eric Zimmer
Like, it’s obvious you and I would be having a different conversation right now. So it’s really obvious. And yet, like you said, most of us don’t actually think of it that way. It makes me think about one of my favorite things that, you know, listeners are probably like, he’s going to bring up the fundamental attribution error again, but I am because it’s such a great example. Right? And the fundamental attribution error, as I understand it, is that, like, if I saw you acting in an angry way, assume you’re an angry person. But when I act angrily, there’s a very good reason for it. Right? Circumstances apply in my case, but in your case, it’s who you are. As if circumstances aren’t playing an equally sized role in exactly how you are behaving.

00:07:33 – Jamil Zaki
You’re singing my song, Eric. I mean, I could talk about the fundamental attribution error all day.

00:07:37 – Eric Zimmer
Kindred spirit.

00:07:38 – Jamil Zaki
Finally, you know, the fae, as it’s called in my nerdy corner of the world, is most associated with one of my colleagues, the late, great psychologist Lee Ross. Lee was a brilliant and very kind person who thought a lot about how we think about each other. And I actually want to share with you that later in his career, Lee said that there’s the fundamental attribution error where we typecast people based on their behavior. We don’t realize how malleable other people are. But Lee said there’s also the truly fundamental attribution error, which is our sense that when we perceive something, we’re doing so objectively, this is what’s often known as naive realism. Right. That if I think a song is good, it’s because it’s good. If I think that that dress is black and blue and you think it’s white and gold, the question is not whether I’m wrong. The question is, why are you wrong? What’s wrong with your visual system? Right.

00:08:35 – Eric Zimmer
Right.

00:08:35 – Jamil Zaki
And this sense of the truly fundamental attribution error, the illusion of objectivity, is at least as damaging to our relationships and our ability to connect with others as the regular fundamental attribution error.

00:08:49 – Eric Zimmer
I love that because, indeed, that is the true fundamental attribution error, that we actually see the world in some kind of way, it actually is, versus very much a reflection of our conditioning.

00:09:03 – Jamil Zaki
That’s right. That’s part of why I love the two wolves parable, because it speaks to the idea that there is no single reality. And I think about this all the time. A lot of my work these days centers around the question of, are people fundamentally kind or cruel, compassionate or callous? Good or bad? And these are philosophical questions that will never be answered, I think, in a clear, scientific way. But the way you answer the question matters enormously. And the way that we answer these questions has been changing. I was talking with the columnist David Brooks recently, and he said that he asks his students each year, do you think people are generally good or bad? And he said that over the last ten to 15 years, the proportion of students who say, yeah, I think people are generally bad has skyrocketed.

00:09:55 – Eric Zimmer
Wow.

00:09:56 – Jamil Zaki
And data bear this out, right? So, as I write about in the book, in 1972, about half of AmEricans believed most people can be trusted. And by 2018, that had fallen to a third of AmEricans, a drop as big as the stock market took in the financial collapse of 2008. So we are living through a deficit in trust and in our faith in each other. And you might just say, well, that sounds like it feels bad, but, hey, maybe people are just right. But I think the point, again, to this idea of the truly fundamental attribution error is that when you perceive that, it changes how you act in the world. And if a lot of us lose faith in each other all at once, it literally changes the world that we create together.

00:10:41 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. Makes me think of some of the research we start to see about loneliness, which is that if you’re lonely, you begin to think more suspiciously of other people, which, of course, makes you more lonely. It’s this negative spiral that you get into that is a feedback loop that is not headed in the right direction. There’s something that you say in the book, though, about this idea that when you ask people, they will say that people are not good. To the extent that we used to believe maybe that people are good, but that if you then ask people are the people that you know in your life better or worse than they used to be, they’ll say they’re about the same. So it’s like on one level, we are saying out there, beyond what we actually can see with our own eyes, it’s all bad. But when I look with my own eyes at the people around me, well, actually, people seem pretty good.

00:11:41 – Jamil Zaki
Yeah, brilliantly put, and I appreciate you picking that out. I think that this speaks to both the nature of the problem and to some potential solutions, or at least treatments for the problem. Cynicism, this idea that people are generally self interested and untrustworthy and rotten is very prevalent on our screens, on tv, on our computers, on our doom scrolling, endless feed phones. There is a vast perception that people in general are pretty terrible. And that’s for a bunch of reasons. One is that these media companies that give us this information have learned that human beings have a natural instinct to pay lots of attention to negative information. So they feed us more and more negative information, and we feed the wolf that is based on fear and judgment from that information. And by contrast, when we go off of our screens and interact with actual human beings, things go much, much better. The way that I think about it is that there is a neighborhood size hole cut into our cynicism. And as you put it beautifully, when we think about abstractly what people are like, we’re terribly judgmental. We’re quite hopeless. But when we think about the people we know, or even just the people we see on a regular basis, we feel completely different. And that, to me, is really sad, because it suggests that there are really big misperceptions that are clouding our ability to see each other clearly and to connect with each other. But it also speaks to a gigantic opportunity, which is that if we can move past those misperceptions and actually pay more attention to the good data that we’re taking in, the accurate data that we’re taking in from our real lives, there are pleasant surprises everywhere.

00:13:38 – Eric Zimmer
I. Yeah, I love that idea. So let’s back up a second and maybe start from the beginning a little bit more. You say early in the book that, exploring decades of research, I discovered that cynicism is not just harmful, but often naive. I think we’ve talked a little bit about the harmfulness, right. The way that if we perceive others to be a certain way, we’re going to get that back in response to a certain way. So that’s one of the ways it’s harmful. Are there other ways that it’s harmful?

00:14:09 – Jamil Zaki
Oh, yeah. Unfortunately, cynicism seems harmful in basically every way scientists can measure. Cynics tend to be less healthy than non cynics, so they tend to suffer from more depression, loneliness, heart disease. They die younger than non cynics, so all cause mortality greater among cynics. Cynicism does not help us succeed. So if you follow cynics and non cynics overdose ten years of their careers, cynics earn less money and are less likely to rise to leadership positions in their work. Cynicism, not surprisingly, bad for our relationships. It’s also bad for our communities. Cynical communities tend to be less civically engaged. People vote less if their trust in each other is low, they donate to charity less, volunteer less, and even engage in activities like self harm more. So really, the most famous line about cynicism is probably from Thomas Hobbes, the philosopher, who in Leviathan said, we need a strict government because left to our own devices, human life is nasty, brutish and short. Unfortunately, that probably applies best to cynics themselves. Right. It seems that, again, through self fulfilling prophecies, if you write people off, it’s just enormously difficult to be vulnerable. And if you’re unwilling to be vulnerable, it’s enormously difficult to build the relationships that human beings depend upon for psychological nourishment. And that’s a really tragic. Again, another of these vicious cycles that we see in the psychology of cynicism.

00:15:42 – Eric Zimmer
Before we move on to cynicism being potentially naive, I suppose we should define it a little bit, or I would imagine many people listening to this are going, well, am I a cynic? I don’t know. Right. I mean, some people know, you can sort of tell. Some people know they’re cynics, we know some people, we can be like they’re cynics. But for a lot of us, we might be like, well, am I? I’m not entirely sure. What are we talking about here? When we say someone’s a cynic?

00:16:06 – Jamil Zaki
Yeah, it’s a really important question. I think of cynicism as, and I want to be clear, I’m talking about modern cynicism, not the school of cynicism, which was an ancient philosophical school, but modern cynicism. Is a theory, the theory that in general, people are selfish, greedy and dishonest. And there are ways to measure that in yourself. For those of your listeners who really want to go deep, you can find online the cook medley cynical hostility scale, which is a questionnaire developed in the 1950s. It includes questions like the do you agree or disagree that most people are honest, chiefly through fear of getting caught? Eric, I wonder whether you agree or disagree with that.

00:16:52 – Eric Zimmer
In classic fashion for me, I would actually ask about five follow on questions to that. I’d be like, well, honest about what? I think we can be honest and dishonest about different levels of things. Maybe it’s easy to be dishonest about small things, but about big things, or how much is the harm that would come from being dishonest? So, absolutely, I’m terrible at these sort of tests because I’m always like, well, I don’t have enough information to answer this question.

00:17:23 – Jamil Zaki
You sound just like a social scientist. This is what we always do. We love to say, you can’t answer that question. You need context. Yeah, but in general, right, there are 50 questions sort of like that. Do you think people are honest chiefly through fear of getting caught? Do you agree that people generally don’t like helping one another? Do you think that most people can be trusted? These yes or no questions, and they’re pretty negative statements, and the more of them you agree with, the higher you would score in cynicism. Another way to think about cynicism is through what that theory does in terms of our behavior. Right. So if you think that most people are on the take, they’re just out for themselves. Well, that’s going to change what you do.

00:18:04 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:18:04 – Jamil Zaki
Trusting people is a gamble. It’s a social gamble. We put faith in somebody and we stand to gain if they show up and we stand to lose if they don’t. And cynics think of that as a sucker’s bet. They think of it as a terrible gamble. And so they’re much less likely to trust people in economic games. They’re less likely to trust people in terms of opening up about their struggles or putting faith in people in any way. So that’s another way that you might look to yourself and your own behavior to assess your cynicism. How much are you willing to bet on other people?

00:18:40 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. In that regard, I’m not a cynic. I do think people are generally good and can generally be trusted. And yet I believe also in the parable of wolves. Right. We all have good and bad things in all of us. But in general, I’m not cynical about people where I might tend towards more cynicism. And I wonder if this is a different aspect of it. Is cynicism towards the size of the problems that we might face societally. So I may be hopeful about people in general, believe people are generally good, they want to do the right thing, they’re decent people, and not feel hopeful at all about, say, our ability to solve the climate crisis. And so is that cynicism? Is that something different? What is it when it’s not applied at an individual level or a personal level, but at a scope of the problems that we face? Level?

00:19:38 – Jamil Zaki
Yeah, that doesn’t sound very cynical to me at all. And I should share, by the way, I really appreciate you being transparent about where you fall on all of these dimensions. I want to also be open with your listeners because I feel like sometimes when somebody writes a book about something like cynicism, they’re saying, oh, it’s bad, it hurts us. It sounds like they’re calling other people out or judging people. I want to be really open, and you know this from reading the book, Eric, but yeah, I struggle immensely with cynicism. In fact, I would consider myself a cynic at the time that I started writing this book, and now I would consider myself a recovering, definitely not recovered, but recovering cynic. So for those folks out there who feel this way, I’m right there with you. I’m not standing apart. I think that to your point about, well, on the one hand my faith in people, and on the other hand, my faith in our ability to tackle a problem here, you’re really nicely getting at some of the dimensions of hope. So maybe we can talk about what hope is and we can try to put these pieces together.

00:20:39 – Eric Zimmer
Sure. Yeah.

00:20:40 – Jamil Zaki
So hope is different from optimism. Optimism is the idea that things will turn out well, and sometimes it can be a complacent feeling. Right. You think? Well, I think the climate crisis sounds bad, but I’m sure scientists will figure something out in the next 30 years. So there’s nothing really that I have to do here. I think optimism actually is really similar in some ways to cynical hopelessness, which is, hey, nothing’s going to happen. I’m a doomer. So again, I don’t have to do anything, right? Because my actions, if you are certain of the outcome, then your actions do not matter one way or the other. And I think sometimes that can be fair and totally uncynical. For instance, if there was a giant meteorite headed to Earth and all the nuclear weapons in the world aren’t enough to stop it and we will be obliterated in six months. It would in no way be cynical to say I think we’re going to be obliterated in six months. That would be realistic. I think with things like solving or even addressing the climate crisis, this is a little bit different because it’s a collective action problem. And so our belief in each other now relates to our hope for the future. Right? Hope is the idea that things could turn out better and that our actions mattered. It’s an empowered and action oriented emotion. And one thing that I write about with respect to climate is that people in the US at least greatly underestimate how much other voters in the US care about the climate crisis. So it could be that I don’t think we’re going to be able to do anything about it because I think I’m the only one who cares. If that’s where you’re coming from, Eric, then I would say, well, maybe let’s look a little bit more at the data about what other folks want. And maybe if you realize that other people want the same thing you do, maybe there’s a little bit more collective efficacy, a sense of possibility for what we could do together.

00:22:54 – Eric Zimmer
Lets go back for a second to the claim that cynicism is not just harmful, which we covered, but often naive. Talk about the naive piece.

00:23:04 – Jamil Zaki
This I think is so important because it counters to my mind what has become a cultural stereotype. When I write about hope and talk about hope, I get made fun of constantly. What is this, Obama 2007? Come on. It’s so try hard. It’s cringe, it’s naive, sometimes even worse. It’s privileged, it’s toxic to hope, it’s denying our problems. And by contrast, people say, yes, cynicism, it feels bad. But you know what? Cynics are right? And so if it feels bad to know the truth, well then I guess I’ll feel bad. To which I would say, not so fast. Let’s look a little bit more closely at the data. And it turns out that the data here are quite clear at a number of levels. One, people think that cynics are smarter than non cynics. So if you ask people, if you describe a cynic and a non cynic, you say who will do better at cognitive tests? Who will be wiser? 70% to 85% of people pick the cynic. But then if you actually give cynics and non cynics cognitive and social tests, cynics do worse than non cynics now, why is that? Well, cynicism, as we’ve been talking about, is a blanket theory. It’s an assumption about people. And if you move through the world with an assumption about people, you won’t engage in a lot of critical thinking. You will paste that assumption on to every situation in your life. It’s actually a very unthinking, or in other words, naive way of viewing the world. And it turns out that that makes cynics wrong in a bunch of different ways. In fact, even folks who would not consider themselves cynics tend to underestimate people. There’s decades of evidence that people don’t realize how trustworthy, generous, open minded, and warm others are. So cynicism here, it’s naive in terms of the way that people are thinking, which is resting on assumptions. And it’s also demonstrably wrong when you compare our cynical assumptions to the data about what people are really like.

00:25:07 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. And you talk about moving from cynicism to something that you call skepticism or maybe hopeful skepticism. I mean, it’s not just plain skepticism, but it’s a skepticism with a modifier.

00:25:22 – Jamil Zaki
That’s right. No, you nailed it. It’s hopeful skepticism. Yeah. Again, I love the opportunity to help people understand when two words that they’re using interchangeably mean completely different things. That’s like one of my jobs as a research psychologist. And that’s true here as well. We often think that cynicism and skepticism are the same, but they’re really not at all. So cynicism, again, a blanket assumption about people that we use to argue basically for how bad everybody is. A cynic will pick up any evidence that somebody does something negative or harmful, and they’ll say, aha, that’s who they really are. And they’ll explain away evidence about the person’s positive qualities. Right. They’re thinking like a lawyer in the prosecution against humanity. Skepticism is not a lack of faith in people. It’s a lack of faith in our assumptions. If cynics think like lawyers, skeptics think like scientists. They say, wait a minute. What evidence do I have to support each claim that I’m making, each belief that I’m carrying? And it turns out that skeptics, well, first of all, skepticism and cynicism not correlated with each other in people, right? So being one doesn’t mean that you’re the other. And second, whereas cynics tend to fall for conspiracy theories more, they tend to do worse at understanding other people, skeptics do much better they learn more quickly and they’re more adaptable. And then the hopeful piece to hopeful skepticism is simply an understanding that oftentimes our factory settings, our default mode, is too negative. So it’s an open mindedness to the evidence that the world and other people bring, plus knowledge that we have a bias and preparedness to push against that bias.

00:27:10 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, you say in the book that cynics imagine humanity is awful. Skeptics gather information about who they can trust. And then this last part in particular, being less cynical then, is simply a matter of noticing more precisely. And I really love that idea of just like you said, set our assumptions aside and let’s actually notice and pay closer attention and question our own default settings about the way things are.

00:27:44 – Jamil Zaki
Yeah, that’s exactly right. And I think that oftentimes, again, skepticism here can actually not be simply different from cynicism. It can be a treatment for cynicism. When you think about cognitive behavioral therapy for depression and anxiety, what a therapist will often do is say, a patient will say, okay, I think that I’m awful or worthless, or I have personally, Eric, some social anxiety. So I’ll often think that people are judging me or don’t like me. And when I was in therapy, my therapist would say, okay, well, Jamil, you’re a scientist. Defend that claim. What evidence do you have that people really don’t like you? Has anybody ever acted like they like you? If so, then you’re maybe not making a complete argument. And that idea of what I call turning our skepticism on our cynicism, being skeptical about our cynical assumptions, is a mindset shift that can allow us to say, well, wait a minute. Where is all of this coming from? And I think oftentimes we trust our instincts. People are even proud. They say, I’ve got a lot of intuition. I trust my gut. To which I say, fine, you can do that. But oftentimes our gut instincts are really awful. We have gut instincts that tell us, be nicer to people who are your same race than somebody who’s a different race. Or when you’re hungry, judge people more morally. We would never trust those instincts and the instinct to always look at the worst parts of people’s behavior, the worst parts of the world is adaptive in certain ways. Maybe it helped us survive 200,000 years ago, but that doesn’t mean it’s helping us now. So I think that we don’t need to trust our gut when it comes to cynical judgments. We can be skeptical. We can be open minded instead.

00:29:35 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I’m always a little bit skeptical of the intuition. It’s a big thing in personal development, which is just trust your intuition, trust your gut. And I’m like, well, kinda sometimes there’s plenty of times our gut sense leads us way wrong. And a lot of the research, particularly if you look at some of the stuff about, like, even Malcolm Gladwell’s, that’s Kahneman thinking fast and slow. But this idea of intuition, people who are trusting their intuition in those stories he’s telling, are people who have thousands of hours of experience in that very thing, to the point where they’ve internalized vast amounts of information. And so it’s not that I’m totally against intuition, but I’m just not a believer that, like you said, like, it’s always right. I think it’s used right. It is an input into a system that should have multiple inputs.

00:30:29 – Jamil Zaki
This is brilliantly put. This is a really nuanced and important point. You’re saying that, hey, wait a minute. Intuition is more useful if you have expertise, because you have a crude experience that feeds into that intuition. I do want to complicate that even more. Eric, if I may, please.

00:30:46 – Eric Zimmer
I love complication.

00:30:48 – Jamil Zaki
I can tell your game for this, which is awesome. So a lot of people would say, yeah, in fact, my cynicism counts as expertise because I’ve been around people. If you feel hope or you trust people, that’s because you’re naive. I am not naive. I’ve been around the block, and I’ve learned, through tough one lessons, through betrayals, through disappointments, that people can’t be trusted. And I think that that’s actually the illusion of expertise more than its real expertise. Because, as you said, expertise means you’ve got a lot of information that’s going into your intuitions. But one thing about cynicism is that it causes us to take information in in an uneven way.

00:31:29 – Eric Zimmer
Yes.

00:31:30 – Jamil Zaki
I’ll give you an example. Right. So when you trust somebody, and that was the wrong choice. Oh, you get feedback. Right. You learn that that was a mistake. You maybe think about that mistake for months or years or decades, but when you don’t trust somebody, and that is a mistake, when you miss an opportunity for a friendship or the love of your life or the greatest business partnership you would ever have, you don’t know that betrayals are visible. Missed opportunities are invisible. And that means that the information that we’re taking in is only really half of the information that we could take in. And in that way, our experiences don’t always lead to expertise. If we’re taking in information in a way that’s biasing us more as we gain more experience.

00:32:19 – Eric Zimmer
Absolutely. And because those experiences that are negative like that, we weigh far higher also, right?

00:32:28 – Jamil Zaki
Yes.

00:32:28 – Eric Zimmer
It’s an example of a trauma perpetrated on somebody. They obviously and rightfully so, weigh that very, very highly. But it’s not indicative of the reality out there. And I love that idea of saying that. It’s that we’re not taking in information in a balanced way. And I think that’s why what you’re saying about our experiences of people, right, because the news is unquestionably and always going to point out the negative. It’s the person who went into Starbucks today, refused to wear a mask and threw their coffee at the barista.

00:33:04 – Jamil Zaki
Yep.

00:33:05 – Eric Zimmer
Right?

00:33:05 – Jamil Zaki
Yep.

00:33:06 – Eric Zimmer
And that’s what you hear. But simple. Paying attention will tell me that I’ve been into thousands of Starbucks thousands of times and I’ve never once seen a bit of behavior like that. And it just is this sort of not fully bringing things in. And one of my favorite sort of counters to cynicism is, I think about there’s uncertainly people behaving poorly right at this very minute. Of course there are. And there are also so many people behaving kindly and decently and nobly, or just fine, decently. You drive down the road and that’s the case. It’s like we are all somehow hurtling down the road at 70 miles an hour, largely obeying the rules and getting along. And the occasional person that counters, that is the exception, not the rule, but it’s the one that we then say people are idiots, like you said. Can we take in more information and keep the negative information from assuming too big of a role? It’s like we weight it with like ten points of preference for every good thing we see. But it’s probably even way worse than that. The ratio, if we were to give it a ratio.

00:34:19 – Jamil Zaki
The person who cuts me off in traffic is the star of my day’s story. The 950 people who follow traffic laws all around me on that same drive float into the landfill of my lost memories. That’s true of so many things. Plane crashes is a major news story, and it should be. It’s a tragedy. Of course. 60,000 planes land without crashing is a non story. In some ways, the exceptions are what we focus on rather than the rules that make those exceptions exceptional.

00:34:56 – Eric Zimmer
Precisely. Yeah. If 1000 planes crashed a day, we would cease to pay much attention to it. We’d just be like, well, planes crash all the time. I mean, it wouldn’t make the news anymore. It’s the same thing I always think. Like, we talk about things that are dangerous, and I’m like, I think statistically, the most dangerous thing that we do, and we all do it every day, is get in a car, is drive.

00:35:15 – Jamil Zaki
Absolutely.

00:35:16 – Eric Zimmer
It’s far more dangerous than all these other things that we worry about, and we do it every day with barely thinking about it, which shows you that we’re not actually adding up the reality in a coherent way.

00:35:29 – Jamil Zaki
Exactly. Last year, I surveyed 1000 AmEricans, and I asked them, in general, do you think that the pandemic. So 2020, early pandemic, 20, 2021, and 22, do you think that people around the world during those years became kinder, less kind, or did they stay just as kind as they had in the years before the pandemic? And 60% of my sample believed that the world had become less kind during the pandemic. Barely 20% thought that it had become kinder. But the data from this massive project called the World Happiness Report are clear and go in the exact opposite direction. Volunteering, donating to charity, and helping strangers all increased enormously over the pandemic. So there’s two pieces of news there. One, the good news. When push came to shove during one of the hardest times, the worst disasters most living people have experienced, we showed up for each other. That says a lot. The second thing, most people don’t know that that happened, which I think is a tragedy. And again, whenever I talk about this stuff, people will say, wait a minute. You can’t discount people who commit murder or assault or do awful things. It’s like you said, right? Saying that plane crashes almost never happen would be a disservice to people who really are devastated by those events. And, of course, I in no way want to diminish the real harm that is going on all around the world right now. The question for me is not, is everybody good? Is everybody helpful, is everybody kind? But rather, can we correctly understand the average person? And I would say that it’s very clear that the average person underestimates the average person. And that is both a really sad state of affairs and, again, an opportunity. Because if we recalibrate, not only will we know each other better, there will be much more reason to have hope for the future that we can build as a community.

00:37:30 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I love that idea. Let’s talk about two neighborhoods in a japanese city. I don’t know how to pronounce Japanese.

00:37:39 – Jamil Zaki
Kobe.

00:37:39 – Eric Zimmer
Kobe. Thank you. Yeah. And I’m not even gonna pronounce the two neighborhoods. I’ll let you. I’ll let you. I’m just gonna stay out of this. Or let you do that.

00:37:45 – Jamil Zaki
Yeah. So we were talking earlier about how cynicism hurts individuals, and trust and vulnerability can help individuals and how that’s also true at the community level. And I was telling you that trusting versus less trusting communities tend to be more civically engaged, more economically prosperous. But it’s also true that trust, the bonds between people in a community, strengthen that community, especially during difficult times. And one amazing example of that that I write about and learned a lot about for the book is this disaster, this earthquake that occurred in the japanese city of Kobe in 1995. And it was a horrible disaster. Thousands of people died and hundreds of thousands of buildings were destroyed. There are two neighborhoods in the general Kobe area that are not that far apart, Mano and Mikura. And they’re similar in socioeconomic status, population size, et cetera. But they were different in a key way, which is that Mano had this history of organizing together as a community to advocate for environmental protection. The details matter less, but what you need to know is that these people counted on one another. They had been through struggles together. The level of interconnection in this neighborhood was high. Makura had less of that history. And when the earthquake struck, there were fires that followed the earthquake, massive fires. And the trust that folks in Mano had made a huge difference. People in Makura kind of waited for the fire department to arrive, and many of them lost their homes and sadly, many lost their lives. People in Mono did not wait. They organized kind of in a grassroots way. Came up with a bucket brigade and pulled hoses from factories and were taking water from the rivers around there. The tragedy was still a tragedy in both neighborhoods, of course, but the number of homes lost in Mano was a quarter of what it was in Makura. The number of lives lost in Mano was one 10th of what it was in Makura. So we think about trust as great when things are good, but trust is probably even more powerful when things are going terribly. And it’s one of the fundamental needs that we have in times of adversity is to be able to count on one another.

00:40:26 – Eric Zimmer
There’s another story in the book about. Actually, I’m just gonna tee it up and let you tell it. But it’s about two villages.

00:40:34 – Jamil Zaki
Yeah, absolutely. It’s funny, you know, because we’ve been talking about the parable of the wolfy feed. And I think that’s often a parable at the individual level. Right? Like about personal development, I think of the brazilian fishing village example as actually one version of when we feed a different wolf as a community than another community does. So in southeastern Brazil, there are two villages separated by about 30, 40 miles. Again, similar in a lot of ways, religion, socioeconomic status. Theyre both fishing villages. And one village is by the ocean. And it turns out that in order to fish on the ocean, you need heavy equipment and large boats because the waves are large and its pretty dangerous. And so that type of work is fundamentally cooperative. Fishermen work in teams on the lake because theres no waves and the fish are smaller. People work independently, and actually, they often run into each other on their small boats only when they’re competing for the best fishing spots. And about ten years ago, economists, including a friend of mine, Andreas Liebrandt, went to those villages, and they gave the fishermen in those villages different social games to play, assessing how trustworthy they were and how generous they were. And it turned out that when fishermen started their career, it didn’t matter which village they were in, they were equally trusting, equally trustworthy, and equally generous. But over time, the environment shaped these people. If you were in a cutthroat, competitive workplace, you became less trusting and less trustworthy over time. And if you were in a cooperative, positive sum workplace, you became more trusting and more generous over time.

00:42:23 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, it gets back to what we talked about earlier, which is where your view of other people will shape the behavior you get back from them.

00:42:33 – Jamil Zaki
Exactly, yeah. And I think it’s also not just your view of other people, but the structures that you are in. I think that one thing about today’s culture is just how unequal we are. Times of great economic inequality tend to be less trusting. Times and places that are more unequal tend to be less trusting as well. And that’s not because people have a bad attitude. It’s because structurally, when things are very unequal, people often feel like they have to compete, like their lives are a zero sum struggle to meet their basic necessities.

00:43:08 – Eric Zimmer
There was something that you said in the book. You say that it didn’t matter who they were. Rural and urban, liberal and conservative baby boomers and Gen Z may not agree on much, but they all believe humanity is in a state of vicious decline and that we yearn for a gentler, friendlier past that never was. Is this just a feature of human beings as we age?

00:43:34 – Jamil Zaki
It’s an interesting question. So this is work by Adam Mastrioni and Dan Gilbert, who look at this illusion of moral decline. They look at surveys over a 70 year period, hundreds of thousands of people. And at all times, people say things were great 20 years ago, but they’re terrible now in terms of morality. Right. People were great 20 years ago and not so much now. And the irony, of course, is that some of the people in these surveys, they’re now other people’s 20 years ago. Right. So people in 1970 think that 1970s AmErica is very untrustworthy and unkind compared to the 1950s, but people in the 1990s think that 1970s AmErica was great.

00:44:14 – Eric Zimmer
Right? Right, exactly.

00:44:16 – Jamil Zaki
And so I do think that there is a little bit of nostalgia here. I think that because we have this negativity bias when we’re thinking about what’s happening now, we’re so hyper focused on the threats in our environment. There’s also something known as the psychological immune system, which is the idea that over time, we acclimate to our circumstances and even block out some negative things that have happened in the past. So Dan and Adam think that it’s a combination of these two effects that we’re seeing. One, I’m so focused on everything bad that’s happening now. And two, I tend to sugarcoat the past, and you put those together and you get this illusion that things are getting worse, even when they’re demonstrably, in some cases, getting much better.

00:44:59 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. I always think of it as a sure sign of getting old, and I’m exaggerating a little bit. But when I look at the sort of ways in which we ossify potentially as we get older, it’s one of the big ones. On my internal checking, like, am I starting to say things like, it was better when, as, like, a sign that tells me that, like, I need to keep, like you say, keep taking in more data.

00:45:28 – Jamil Zaki
I feel the same way about being confused by younger generations. And, you know, I think the worst version of that is being judgmental of younger generations. I hear all the time, because a lot of my work focuses on empathy and kindness. Aren’t young people just jerks? Aren’t they self centered, narcissistic influencers? And I think, no. And I also want to know how many of these folks do you know, I teach college students every day. I think I have a lot of experience with young adults, and they are some of the least selfish, most globally conscious people I’ve ever known, much more than I was at their age. So I think when we start stereotyping people who are younger than us, that’s a red flag that maybe we’re getting older than we realize.

00:46:09 – Eric Zimmer
Exactly. Talk to me about what solutions journalists.

00:46:14 – Jamil Zaki
Are solutions journalism is an attempt to provide an antidote, or at least counter programming to many of the things we’ve been talking about as we’ve been talking about. Generally, journalists and news organizations focus on the negative because that’s what will keep us clicking and scrolling and watching. But that gives us a biased sense of the world. Right? We’re basically only being shown the worst half of humanity by news organizations. So solutions journalists try to do the opposite. Now, I should say that when I say do the opposite, I do not mean puff pieces about a dog that was stuck in a tree but is rescued. Or even great stories, like a veteran comes home to their family who doesn’t know that they’re there. There are all these beautiful stories that we call human interest stories that are of just lovely anecdotes. That’s really great, and that’s completely fine. But solutions journalism is not that. It’s instead using journalism and storytelling to teach people about folks who are really trying to address big problems that we’re facing. So, for instance, young people engaged in activism to combat the climate crisis, or to roll back gerrymandering and re empower voters in the midwest, or people who have been imprisoned advocating for their rights to vote. This is news about positive trends that are directly related to the negative news that we hear all the time, not disembodied or apart from news. Oftentimes, I think the old stereotype is you hear four days and 55 minutes of bad news and then the last five minutes on Friday is a human interest story that’s supposed to basically be an escape from reality. Solutions journalism is not an escape. It’s a confrontation with negative journalism by saying, yeah, these same issues. There are positive developments on those fronts.

00:48:16 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I loved the story about gerrymandering in Michigan that you tell. Do you want to walk us through that very briefly?

00:48:24 – Jamil Zaki
Sure.

00:48:25 – Eric Zimmer
Because I think it’s a great example of this and the sort of example of something positive happening around an issue that often seems intractable.

00:48:34 – Jamil Zaki
Yeah, this is the story of Katie Fahey, 26 year old Michigander, who worked in a recycling plant. I mean, really not somebody who was high up in politics or involved at all, although she was engaged. And after the 2016 election, she wanted to find a nonpartisan issue, something that people generally agreed on that she could make movement on. And it was gerrymandering. Right. Kind of anti democratic splitting of districts such that votes don’t count as much. And she created this grassroots campaign, and people laughed her out of every meeting that she had at first, she’s, again, this young woman, not taken seriously, but she did it. She collected 300,000 signatures from around Michigan and got a ballot initiative passed. And now Michigan is one of the most democratic states in the nation, meaning that people’s votes are relatively counted compared to more gerrymandered states. I think it’s such a great example of how not being willing to lose faith in each other can actually create positive change.

00:49:40 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, it’s a really great story. And to hear about how she did it and the different people who came together. And it is an example of this solutions journalism that is really useful. And you talk about your couple of hot button issues. One is democratic institutions crumbling, and this is a great piece of solutions journalism to that. And you’re also, you said I’ve become a climate doomer. I also think there is good news on the climate front along with all the bad news. It’s not that they replace each other, but I’ve spent more time looking for stories that highlight some of the good things that are happening again, not as a way of becoming optimistic necessarily, but as a way of seeing a more full picture.

00:50:30 – Jamil Zaki
That’s right. And I think it’s important this point you raise, finding and seeking out positive news is not a matter of putting rose colored glasses on and being complacent. Finding good news a makes us more accurate because having only bad news in our feeds is like wearing mud colored glasses. Right. So trying to balance the information that we get is not putting on a pair of rose colored glasses. It’s taking off the bias that we’re already wearing, or at least most of us are. And second, it’s not complacent. You know, when we read, when we learn that other people support climate action, in many cases of social movements that empowers us, people with hope are more likely to agitate, to take part in protests, to pressure lawmakers to make change. So being hopeful is not being complacent. In fact, it’s the opposite.

00:51:21 – Eric Zimmer
There’s a book, you’re probably familiar with it, Hans Roslane, and it’s called possibilism. Is that the. No. What’s the name? Factfulness. But he talks about, he says in the book, I’m not an optimist or a pessimist, I’m a possibilist. I love that idea. Because what he’s saying is that both the positive and the negative, they’re both true. There are negative things in the world, there are positive things in the world, but that he’s focused on possibilism and he basically says that recognizing the good things that are happening does not make him naive. It makes him somebody who can believe in positive action happening. And you sort of say this somewhere else also, that when we don’t believe that good things can happen, you say it forecloses on the possibility of anything better. And I love that idea of cynicism becomes, again, as we’ve mentioned, in different ways, self fulfilling prophecy to a certain extent, because if you don’t believe that things can get better or have gotten better in certain ways, you won’t do anything different.

00:52:31 – Jamil Zaki
And I want to be really clear, that’s helpful to a certain group of people, that’s helpful to elites or others who want the status quo to remain. I mean, autocrats, authoritarians, they use cynicism. They cultivate cynicism in their people because a population that doesn’t trust itself is much easier to control. Right. So I think we often confuse cynicism with a radical emotion. And actually, it’s the opposite. It’s often a tool of people in power to remain in power. Yeah. I love, of course, factfulness. I’ve often, when I was writing hope for cynics, felt like I was in conversation with Hans, and he’s a public health scholar and focuses on trends in the world that are positive. And I think that as a psychologist, I’m very focused on our view of each other. And I think that those are really bound up with one another because to the extent that we believe in each other now, we can also believe that those positive trends can continue, that we can continue them. And to the extent that we lose faith in each other, we also lose faith in the future that we can build.

00:53:35 – Eric Zimmer
Well, I think that is a beautiful place to wrap up. Thank you so much, Jamil. I’ve really enjoyed this conversation. I really enjoyed the book. It’s called hope for the surprising science of human goodness. We’ll have links in the show notes to where people can get the book and find other parts of your work.

00:53:52 – Jamil Zaki
Thanks so much, Eric. This has been totally delightful.

00:54:11 – Chris Forbes
If what you just heard was helpful to you, please consider making a monthly donation to support the one U feed podcast when you join our membership community. With this monthly pledge, you get lots of exclusive members only benefits. It’s our way of saying thank you for your support. Now, we are so grateful for the members of our community, we wouldn’t be able to do what we do without their support. And we don’t take a single dollar for granted. To learn more, make a donation at any level and become a member of the one ufeed community. Go to oneyoufeed.net. join the one ufeed podcast. Would like to sincerely thank our sponsors for supporting the show.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

The Power of Kindness: Stories from the Best of Humanity with Lucia Knell & Gabe Reilich

September 3, 2024 Leave a Comment

Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, Lucia Knell and Gabe Reilich discuss the power of kindness through stories of the best of humanity. They are on a mission to showcase the extraordinary impact of simple acts of kindness in the digital age and are dedicated to spreading positivity and compassion that captures the essence of human goodness. With their deep understanding of the digital landscape and its effects on mental well-being, they bring forth a refreshing perspective on the profound influence of heartwarming stories.

In this episode, you will be able to:

  • Understand the impact of social media on mental health and how to navigate it effectively
  • Discover the power of following positive news accounts on Instagram to boost your mental well-being.
  • Learn how to improve mental health through mindfulness techniques and practical tips
  • Hear inspiring stories of human kindness and the profound impact they can have on mental health and community support

Lucia Knell is the Vice President of Upworthy, where she’s worked since 2014. She’s spent her career championing the belief that the internet can and should be used as a tool to unite people vs. stoke division. Her expertise in social media has garnered millions of engagements and catalyzed a movement to combat negativity online. An ardent advocate for mental health, she also believes in the power of taking breaks from the internet. Her work has been covered in the New York Times, Glamour, Vogue, Fast Company and mental health publication Made of Millions. She is the co-author of the book, Upworthy – Good People: Stories from the Best of Humanity

Gabriel Reilich is the head of content and innovation at GOOD & Upworthy. Devoted to his mission of spreading optimism, he believes the internet can be a force for good, and is dedicated to leveraging it to amplify the best of humanity. Throughout his career, he has created content and crafted impact campaigns for numerous respected brands, nonprofits, and non-governmental organizations such as Google, GoFundMe, and the World Food Programme. He is the co-author of the book, Upworthy – Good People: Stories from the Best of Humanity

Connect with Lucia Knell & Gabe Reilich: Lucia’s Website | Gabe’s Website | Upworthy Instagram

If you enjoyed this conversation with Lucia Knell & Gabe Reilich, check out these other episodes:

Human Nature and Hope with Rutger Bregman

How to Find Hope and Kinship with Father Greg Boyle & Fabian Debora

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

00:00:00 – Lucia Knell
There’s an opportunity on social media to use it as a tool, but it really does in some ways, go back to the user again, taking a conscious stock of who am I following? How does it make me feel? And is there an opportunity here to start unfollowing the accounts, purge the accounts that make you feel down, and start to fill it more with accounts that inspire you, make you laugh, lighten you, enlighten you, and allow you to go outside, offline and live your best life.

00:00:35 – Chris Forbes
Welcome to the one you feed throughout time, great thinkers have recognized the importance of the thoughts. We have quotes like garbage in, garbage out, or you are what you think ring true. And yet, for many of us, our thoughts don’t strengthen or empower us. We tend toward negativity, self pity, jealousy, or fear. We see what we don’t have instead of what we do. We think things that hold us back and dampen our spirit. But it’s not just about thinking. Our actions matter. It takes conscious, consistent, and creative effort to make a life worth living. This podcast is about how other people keep themselves moving in the right direction, how they feed their good. Wolfenheid thanks for joining us. We have two guests on this episode, Lucia Nell and Gabriel Rylik. Lucia is the vice president of Upworthy. She has spent her career championing the belief that the Internet could and should be used as a tool to unite people versus Stoke division. Her expertise in social media has garnered millions of engagements and catalyzed a movement to combat negativity online. Her work has been covered in the New York Times, Glamour, Vogue, Fast Company, and mental health publication made of millions. Gabriel is the head of content and innovation at good and upworthy, devoted to his mission of spreading optimism, he believes the Internet can be a force for good and is dedicated to leveraging it to amplify the best of humanity. He has crafted impact campaigns for numerous respected brands, nonprofits, and non governmental organizations such as Google, GoFundMe, and the World food program.

00:02:29 – Eric Zimmer
Hi Gabriel. Hi Lucia. Welcome to the show.

00:02:31 – Gabe Reilich
Hi.

00:02:32 – Lucia Knell
Thank you so much for having us.

00:02:34 – Gabe Reilich
Thank you so much. We’re so happy to be here.

00:02:36 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I’m excited to have you guys on. We’re going to be discussing your book, which is called good stories from the best of humanity, which is a title that I couldn’t resist the minute I heard it because we all need more good stories and we’re going to talk all about that. But before we do, we’ll start with the parable. In the parable, there’s a grandparent who’s talking with their grandchild. And they say in life there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear. And the grandchild stops, thinks about it for a second, looks up at their grandparent and says, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

00:03:25 – Lucia Knell
First of all, I love this parable, and I was excited to think about what it means to me
I’ve done a lot of thinking and work around how you treat yourself first. And I think it really matters how you talk to yourself, what kind of behaviors you implement to show your self respect and show yourself that you love yourself, so that you can then be empowered to go out into the world and exhibit those behaviors towards others. And so to me, the one you feed again needs to start with being mindful and self aware of what kind of language am I using towards myself today? What sorts of behaviors have I set up to either show myself that, eh, I don’t really care that much, or I actually really value myself and I’m treating myself like I would a friend. That’s where I begin. I think it starts from that place before you can go out into the world and act from a place of love and kindness and bravery and respect, etcetera.

00:04:23 – Gabe Reilich
Yeah, I think it’s a great parable and it really got me thinking as well. I think my first instinct upon listening to it is to be like, okay, we have two wolves here. I’ve got to ignore this one wolf and concentrate on the one that embodies more noble characteristics. I think there’s a danger in that, in that instinct, because you can’t look away from the negative impulses, you can’t look away from the difficulties, because if you do that, that wolf might be gorging itself behind you and gaining strength. So I think it’s important, at least when I was thinking about it, to approach both sides from a sense of curiosity, what is motivating these two wolves? Why am I drawn to one or another, given what’s going on in my life? And to take it from there. And then I think it’s a lesson in approaching things in a very conscious way. And then the other word that I couldn’t help but think about in the parable is just the word feed. And this is a pretty prominent word in our culture right now, and particularly in the work that we do in the space of social media and digital environments. You are exposed to a feed all the time. Okay? You open up the app, and that’s what it’s called, a feed. And it’s constantly pouring out at you. And I think it is important to actually put it in that context of food as potential nourishment, as attention, and where that is being directed and what kind of force and power that it has and how you are shaping that, because I think that feed is also being directed towards those two wolves inside you.

00:06:03 – Eric Zimmer
Back to what you were saying, Lucia, I thought was interesting as I was listening to you, is I thought that your book is about finding the best stories about people, like, finding people doing good things, right? And it occurred to me that that can also be implied internally. We can look at the good things that we do and choose to focus more on those things than the things we do that are not as good. And yet we do exactly the opposite generally. Right. We generally amplify our problems and don’t pay attention to our good things. So I think this applies internally. And then, you know, Gabriel, obviously, to your point, the feed that we’re getting fed to us has a tendency to way over amplify the negative. That’s nothing new. Media has been doing that as long as there’s been mass media, and yet that is what we take in most of the time. And you guys, as a social media company, are actively going the opposite direction from that. You’re actually trying to put some positivity into the feed.

00:07:12 – Lucia Knell
That’s exactly right. We have set out on a mission, a noble mission, dare I say, to inject points of light into a feed that otherwise feels pretty dark. And I think the difference between how news and media used to work is that you’d get the paper every day, you’d rifle through it, you’d sort of read the sections you want to read, put it down, and then move on with your day. And now we have an addiction to something that lives in our pocket, and we have this impulse where every time we feel bored, every time we are standing in line at the pharmacy, every time we are multitasking on a meeting, we’re looking at this feed. And if the majority of what you’re seeing in sort of this inundation fire hose of information you’re getting all the time in real time, is negative or is stressful or anxiety or fear inducing, of course you’re going to feel that way. And so I think we’ve been able to step back and look at the reality a little bit and look at this behavior and sort of the state of social media, as it were, and say, whoa, whoa, whoa. This is happening really quickly. So what can we do to actually act as a counterbalance to that sort of information that’s being fed to Gabriel’s point constantly? And we’re really proud of it.

00:08:32 – Gabe Reilich
Yeah. You know, to Lucia’s point, you know, social media and information in general, I mean, it’s a force, and it’s a tool. You know, we’re not completely passive in the way that we use it and our agency and how we engage with it. And interestingly, you know, in terms of the genesis of ad upworth on Instagram, it started in a simple way where we wanted to have more agency in what we saw. Lucia and I started building the account shortly before the pandemic, and the reason we started doing it was because we just wanted to see more proof points of human decency in the world. We knew they were out there. We thought it would be great to have a place to catalog them so that we could refer to them ourselves and that so others could, as well. And at the time, five years or so ago, this was a pretty novel concept to kind of create a feed in this way. Now there are many more accounts that share positive news and vibes and ideas out there, and I’m so glad that there are. It’s great to see the idea taking a foothold. And so we started doing it for ourselves in the sense that, like, well, what can we do with this tool? You know, even just thinking of it as a way to bookmark things that’ll be beneficial to ourselves, because it’s hard to, you know, be prescriptive about what the world needs, necessarily, but it’s easier to understand what you need as a person. And when we started doing that and given some world events that happened shortly after, we found out that this was something that people wanted in their lives, and it grew really quickly, and it was a confirmation that, you know, these stories aren’t something to be dismissed, that people coming together, that moments of kindness and decency and love and joy and compassion are compelling and important and fulfill a fundamental need for people.

00:10:16 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, you said prescriptive, and I think that’s what’s interesting about a lot of the quote unquote positive content that’s out there is that it is prescriptive. I mean, this show has a huge prescriptive element to it.

00:10:30 – Gabe Reilich
Right.

00:10:30 – Eric Zimmer
We’re bringing people on talking about how to live their best life with the idea then that people who are listening can apply that to their life. The challenge with prescriptive, though, is there’s a pressure in it to be different. What I love about what you guys do is that’s not what this is. It’s stories about basic goodness of people that all we have to do is take on board. There’s nothing to be done. I think the term is moral elevation. It elevates us morally simply by hearing stories of people doing good and decent things. And I’m a big believer that for as much bad as there is in the world, and there’s plenty of it, that there is way, way, way more good. We just never see it. You know, for every bad thing that’s happening, there are tons of moments of just the smallest little kindnesses or love or decency that is never amplified. So I love the idea of using social media to amplify that. I’m curious why being a social media company and stepping into that fray, which I think is great, to use the technology for good, you’ve now pivoted to a much older form of technology, a book. Why?

00:11:41 – Gabe Reilich
I’ll start with this. It is interesting. We can post something onto social, onto Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and reach 10 million people in a couple hours, which is an incredibly powerful thing. And it’s a little bit of the Spider man mentality. With great power comes a certain amount of responsibility, pivoting to a book where it’s like, okay, you’re going to be reaching one person at a time, maybe a couple, if someone’s reading it out.

00:12:07 – Eric Zimmer
Loud, and it’s going to take you a couple of years to do it. I mean, the length of time in a book publishing process is hilarious compared to social media.

00:12:17 – Gabe Reilich
And I think that’s where the truth about this lies is. The length of time. I mean, this book took a long time. This was a multi year long project of gathering stories, interviewing people. Our followers, each one of them came from a follower of the account to understand their experiences, to learn more about them, and to share that with the world in a way that really mattered. When we could have just taken a screenshot of a comment that they left and shared it with people. And we do do that, and it reaches a lot of people. The problem is the ephemeral nature of content on the Internet. You can have something that really is profound and hits people deeply, but then it’s on to the next thing and the next thing and the next thing. And that is the nature of the beast. And I’m not putting a moral judgment on it one way or another, but it’s just the reality of what we operate in. And some of these things that we would see, we would ask a question to the audience, tell us about a moment that you experienced kindness from a stranger, what comes to mind? And we would get thousands and thousands and thousands of responses. We could maybe elevate one or two of those, and we wouldn’t even read most of them, and we wanted to. And when we did, we saw that there was such a strong power that these had to influence people’s. I’m not going to speak for other people, but for myself to influence my perspective on the amount, as you said, the amount of untold decency and goodness that is happening out there. And it was a lot. And we thought that these stories deserve to be treated with the kind of respect that only a book can provide. You put it on the page, it’s there, and it lasts forever in a way that things do not last forever on the Internet. I mean, how many times have you read a quote or seen something that somebody said or a post, and you’re like, oh, God, I wish I could find that again. And you’re frantically searching, and eventually you give up and you get fed the next thing that piques your interest. So the main goal was to bottle that feeling that people get from reading these and to synthesize it and put it in a place where people didn’t need to look at a screen to get it and knew where they could find it at any moment. And, Lucia, I know you like to speak about that as well.

00:14:21 – Lucia Knell
Yeah, I mean, something I think about now, and maybe this is a controversial thing to say. Gabriel’s like, don’t say it is. Reading a book has become a radical act in 2024. A physical book. I mean, no kindles, no offense to kindle readers, they’re great sometimes, but being able to pick something up, touch it, smell it, you can’t touch the Internet, you know? And there’s something to think about that where, to Gabriel’s point, something that actually, we know has the power to resonate with. People were able to give those stories what they deserve, which is to be able to preserve them and preserve the feeling they give people versus just watching them sort of tragically swept away. And these algorithms are now built to get you to keep moving and get you to keep clicking. And so they’re actually built to have your attention for maybe, you know, two, 3 seconds, half a second, whatever it is and then say bye bye onto the next thing and keep you hooked. And so I guess moving to a book format kind of from, like, a mindfulness perspective, which I would love to talk more about with you, Eric, gives you the chance to get offline, take a deep breath, take a break from screens, get in bed, you know, read a couple stories of this book, and just breathe for a second, give your eyes a break, give your brain a break, and focus in a way that social media does not afford us in 2024, and we’re really proud of that.

00:16:19 – Eric Zimmer
That all makes a ton of sense. I will not get into the physical book versus kindle debate.

00:16:25 – Lucia Knell
Sorry.

00:16:26 – Eric Zimmer
It tears at my soul on a regular basis. Anyway, kindles are okay for the type of reading I do for this show. They’re a lifesaver because I can highlight and export those highlights and work with them. And I love a physical book. And so I’m always sort of torn between the ability to capture things that I want to go back to, which kindle gives me, versus the desire to hold a book in my hand and the fact now that I’m old, glasses. Right. And do I have the right lighting and all that, where a kindle, you just kind of adjust all that. So it’s an internal battle.

00:17:00 – Lucia Knell
Okay. Prokindle. Prokindle.

00:17:02 – Gabe Reilich
Whatever it is, it, you know, gives you the opportunity to stay with something a little bit longer.

00:17:06 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:17:07 – Gabe Reilich
And that’s what matters.

00:17:08 – Eric Zimmer
Exactly. Exactly. So as you guys went out there and cultivated these stories, they were not new to you. You were seeing stories like this and posting stories like this for a long time. So that’s not new to you. But you then chose to pick a subset of them and talk to the people who had submitted them to get more information about the story, and I assume to rewrite it in a way that makes it sort of compelling for a book and it. While still honoring the person’s voice and all of that. I’m curious, what did you learn about people or something from this later process that you didn’t already know from being exposed to all these types of stories anyway?

00:17:50 – Lucia Knell
Yeah. There’s a hunger from people to tell stories about people in their lives that impacted them positively. You know, we have a chapter in the book about teachers. Who’s that teacher who changed your life? And upon, you know, asking people, can we hear more about this person, you know, from 30 years ago who impacted you in some way and then influenced you and encouraged you to, you know, take this program, and now you’re a lawyer, and you want to talk about it, and you never got to thank them, etcetera. People were chomping at the bit to talk about these things. And so, for me, it’s like everyone has a story like this. If you think about who’s that teacher who changed your life? Or what’s the time you experience kindness from a stranger? Or when you think of the term good, good people, who comes to mind? You know, don’t think too hard about it. Everyone has a person, and everyone wants to talk about them and share that story. It’s a beautiful thing.

00:18:46 – Gabe Reilich
Yeah. I mean, that hunger is a real thing out there, you know? And I think a lot of times, even though the tools are there to make it different, it’s a one way communication that’s going on in digital environments. You’re putting something and you’re talking at people broadcasting your life. You’re broadcasting your views, what you think, your values, and there is a real desire for it to be a conversation and for people to be heard and a hunger to connect. And I think that was the initial thing that surprised me about what was happening on our account, which is that when we would ask a question or even when we would share a story that resonated with people, that so many folks would start commenting with experiences of their own, that it would trigger a memory that they needed to share, that they needed to tell people, that the world needed to know about someone in their life or an experience that they had that was like this. And that was interesting to me, to know that there was such a well of desire to share these moments of human connection and profound impact. And so to give people the opportunity to tell those stories in a way that would last forever, and then also for people to open up and be willing to do that, I think was something that surprised me and moved me a lot.

00:20:02 – Lucia Knell
There are 101 stories in this book. Gabriel and I have our own stories, which is very exciting, but 99 people from our community opened up and shared their stories. It’s a lot of people.

00:20:13 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. I’m sure you had way more than that and had to select which ones actually go into the book. Yes. This might be a good time to pause and allow you guys to read. Each of you read a story. Not your story that’s in the book, but a story that you really loved. So whichever one of you has a story first can just jump in and read the name of the story, and we’ll go.

00:20:37 – Lucia Knell
This is a story. In our chapter, our first chapter called the kindest of strangers.

00:20:44 – Speaker E
It’s called sky’s the limit by Brittany FDA I graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a bachelors in government. So as you can imagine, I had been rigorously prepared for my first job out of college, waiting tables at the cheesecake factory. Im the oldest of four girls and spent the greater part of my life raising little sisters. When I was 14, my father was sentenced a 99 year prison sentence. Less than a year later, my mother, who struggled with substance abuse, left. Rather than let their failures deter me, I worked even harder, finishing high school and college. I wanted to show my sisters I could do it so they would be inspired to do the same. Unfortunately, I graduated college in December 2008, right smack in the middle of the great recession, so jobs were pretty tough to come by. I was lucky to have any job. I knew that. Still, I wanted a bigger slice of that proverbial pie, not just a literal cheesecake. Desperate for advice, I visited an old UT professor and pled my case. He told me to go to law school.

00:21:46 – Lucia Knell
People in my family aren’t lawyers.

00:21:48 – Speaker E
They need lawyers, I retorted. Britney, he replied, you don’t even need to practice law with that degree. Just having it already opens up so many doors. I thought of my sisters.

00:21:59 – Lucia Knell
We needed open doors.

00:22:00 – Speaker E
When I got home, I booked an LSAt test. I studied hard on my own, and when I sat for the test, I scored 158 out of 180. It was an okay score, but I needed a great one to get into a competitive school. I looked into test prep courses. I knew they gave people an edge.

00:22:17 – Lucia Knell
But that came at a price.

00:22:18 – Speaker E
$1,200, to be exact. I’d need to clock in 165 hours to cover the cost, and that’s not factoring in the living expenses. No way I could afford it. I went to bed feeling like I’d been stabbed in the heart. It wasn’t fair. I wanted to go to school again. On one particularly glum Sunday morning, I wove through the restaurant, pitcher in hand, summoning up every ounce of will to smile. Among the tables, I noticed sky, one of our regulars, sitting alone in an old dress, her grey hair swept into a low bun. I filled her glass, and the smile we exchanged was genuine. It was nice not having to make the effort. I walked back into the kitchen, leaned against the walk in, and closed my eyes. Britt, a coworker, said. I opened my eyes. Skye was just talking about law school. You want to do that, right? You should talk to her. It was a slow morning. None of the managers were working. I decided that it would be a good idea to have that conversation. Skye, I said. Can I sit with you a little while? Of course, sweetie. I heard you know a lot about law school. I was wondering, do you know anything about applying? Skye told me that some years prior, she’d opened an accounting firm with her husband. It was so successful in the last year that she decided to follow an enduring dream of practicing law. She signed up for an LSAT prep class, fully intending to take the exam.

00:23:37 – Lucia Knell
When, tragically, her husband died. So she decided to pursue an MBA.

00:23:42 – Speaker E
Instead, a skill more relevant to the firm. I recommend taking a prep course 100%, she said. Her kindness put me at ease and encouraged me to open up about my childhood. I know I can’t get into the best schools with the scores I have now, I said. But those courses are out of my league, financially speaking. Skye nodded her head as I spoke. Everything will work out. I’m sure of it, she said, recharged by her empathy. I got up and went back to work, refilling ice water and delivering factory specials. Here you go, sir, I chirped, presenting an enormous order of fettuccine Alfredo. The dish clinked on the table, wide noodles sprawling across the plate like my underutilized, college educated brain. A few days later, Skye returned, another old dress, same grey bun, sitting at her habitual booth. I greeted her with a big smile, but before I could speak, she interrupted, I want to give you my prep course. My eyes widened. I already paid for it. She put up a hand, shooting down potential protest. They’re telling me it’s not allowed for me to transfer it over to you, but I’ll figure it out. And she did. I finished the prep course that summer and took the LSAt the following fall. My score jumped from a 158 to a 167, which put me in the top 93%, which in turn got me Boston College law school. I graduated cum laude in 2013, moved back to Texas, passed the bar, leaving me with only one final hurdle. I had to choose between corporate law or public service law. I chose the latter because of sky. Sometimes it feels like life is stacked against you, a tower of dirty dishes piled high in a restaurant sink. Other times, it feels like life’s a friend you didn’t know you had a sweet older woman in a booth at the cheesecake factory who decides to help you achieve your dreams. Because of sky, I’m no longer shackled to that restaurant, unable to move forward. Instead, I’m a lawyer working hard for the people. As a rule, I strive to emulate sky by listening to and supporting my clients, giving them a fighting chance in this world.

00:25:44 – Eric Zimmer
Thank you, Lucia, for that beautiful story. I’d like to ask you guys about a term that I saw in your press kit, and it’s mean world syndrome. What is mean world syndrome? And how is upworthy affecting that?

00:26:02 – Gabe Reilich
Yeah, you know, mean world syndrome is one of those things that I can’t remember how I came across it. Maybe just a random Wikipedia dive one day, but it’s a terminal. That was coined by media professor George Gerbner in the 1970s. Basically, it posits that when people are exposed to violence related content to negative, reinforcing narratives about the world and people around them, that it increases fear and anxiety and pessimism. Basically a heightened state of alert. You see more threats around you, you perceive more threats, so you are in a more anxious state. Basically, it states, well, if this is true, then the narrative that we are fed influences how we perceive the world. And so if all you see are negative narratives about the world around you, that it’s dangerous, people are greedy, things are bad, you’re going to start thinking that that is reality. And while it is certainly true that these things exist, that there are evil forces at work there and there are bad people, it’s not the whole story. So if you buy into it, then you start engaging in the world from a place where you feel that there is danger all around you, and that affects how you interact with people. So that got me thinking. And I think this is something that we all inherently know to be true. This is the parable of the wolves. This is, what are you feeding the two wolves inside you, which wolf are you feeding? But is the opposite also true? You know, if you shift your perspective, if you take a look at the good that surrounds you, the joy, the compassion, the decency, both far away, you know, stories that don’t affect you, and also stuff that happens to you on a day to day basis or reflecting on things that have happened to you through your life, how does that affect your perspective? If it allows you to see that there’s more good happening and you carry that feeling with you out into the world, it almost becomes a bit like a self fulfilling prophecy, right. You are more likely to treat people kindly. You’re more likely to engage with folks out there in a positive way, and therefore, more of these moments are probably likely to happen. And so the perspective is kind of like the first step in crafting the kind of world that I think we would have like to live in.

00:28:27 – Lucia Knell
I think it speaks to this idea of creating this space in your body and your mind for goodness to enter and for the possibility that there’s good all around you if you look for it. And so I think it enables you to operate from this mindset of giving people the benefit of the doubt that we’re all doing our best day to day. And this could be in a micro sense, too, right? It’s like if you’re open to noticing things, like someone holding the door open for someone else, someone holding the subway door open as someone’s running to the subway, if you’re living in New York City, smiling at a stranger when you pass them on your street, little things that signal to you, you know, even in traffic. We’re both based in Los Angeles in traffic, letting someone go in front of you and then giving the little wave. It’s like these are, dare I say, like, sweet, cute, human things that I think happen all the time. And they’re lovely if you let yourself experience them and not overlook them of, like, yeah, yeah, yeah. And then focus on something, you know, angry or me and someone did that day. And so I think there’s so much positive energy and good energy around us, but for all the things based on all the things we’re talking about, we’re so conditioned to focus on what’s going wrong.

00:29:49 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. I thought of a couple things as you guys were talking. The first, Gabriel, to something that you were talking about. I was thinking about another set of scientific studies that I’ve seen that show that the more people are socially isolated, the more they start to believe the worst about other people, which, of course, then causes you to be more socially isolated, which then causes you to believe the worst. Right. And it’s a self perpetuating loop and mean person syndrome, I think, is a similar thing. Right. Once you’ve got a little of that orientation, we look for what we already believe. That’s how we do things. And so, for me, really actively going against that has always felt important. And it made me think of another phrase that I use a lot, which is, is this useful? And I think about that a lot when I’m thinking about my thoughts, because oftentimes, there’s not a truth that people are good or that people are bad or that there are good things in the world or there are bad things in the world. There’s absolutely both. However, what’s the more useful orientation for me to take a. To have the best outcome in life that I want and to be the person that I want to be. And my experience is that is a way of orienting to the world that sees the best in people and looks for that in people. And then I think you’re often surprised because that’s what you get, and not in a Pollyanna way. It doesn’t mean that bad things don’t happen. It just means if I have to think about how I want to oriented, there’s a conscious choice, I think, to orient away from mean world syndrome and a conscious choice to say, if I’m going to be engaging in social media, can I be making sure that my feed is cultivated with things like upworthy, that are putting those things in front of me?

00:31:46 – Speaker E
Yeah.

00:31:46 – Lucia Knell
I talk sometimes about healthy habits on social media and what, you know, I recommend to friends and family, which is to do what I call a social media cleanse, where it’s sort of taking stock of what you’re seeing often or what the algorithms are serving you based on what you’re clicking and how are they making you feel. So listen to your body, right? Are you getting a rapid heartbeat because you’re looking at something and then it’s activating some comparison culture or some comparison inside of you? Is it stoking fear and anger? Again, it’s not about being Pollyanna and turning away from problems, but you have an opportunity on social media to curate a feed that inspires you, that uplifts you, that feeds your curiosity about the world, or encourages habits or hobbies, rather, that make you feel like you, or make you feel excited to be you, or inspired to go out and take that dance class, or inspired to go out and garden because it makes you feel good? And so there’s an opportunity on social media, to Gabriel’s point, to use it as a tool. But it really does, in some ways, go back to the user and say, again, taking a conscious stock of, who am I following? How does it make me feel? And is there an opportunity here to start unfollowing the accounts, purge the accounts that make you feel down, and start to fill it more with accounts that inspire you, make you laugh, lighten you, enlighten you, and allow you to go outside, offline, and live your best life.

00:33:26 – Gabe Reilich
And, you know, to what you were speaking about, Eric, you know, you spoke about loneliness, right? And the surgeon general and others, you know, they speak to the epidemic of loneliness that is happening in this country and throughout the world. And it’s not an epidemic, and it’s not a problem because it’s sad. It’s sad that people are lonely. I mean, it is right that we’re ahead, all so hungry for connection, and we have these wonderful tools at our disposal, and they’re not necessarily giving it to us what we’re actually looking for, but it is detrimental to the fabric of our society. Like you said, you know, the more that you are removed, the worse that you think about the world around you. And that’s why it’s so important to be plugged in and to be supported and to feel a connection to community. And there are ways that social media can give that in a really positive way. There are ways that social media gives that in a very dangerous way that reinforces the worst in us. And that’s why I think it’s important to take stock of our relationship to it in general. Is it giving you what you need in terms of how you want to feel about the world? And, you know, I’m sure for many people, it is. It’s like you’re sharing funny memes with people. That’s a wonderful way to connect, and it makes you happy, and it’s a great thing, but in other ways, it could be reinforcing the worst impulses. And if that’s happening, you know, I think there’s an interesting thought experiment that you can do sometimes, which is like, what are the things that make me angry about the world or mad about people or distrustful? And where am I seeing that? How often am I experiencing that in real life, in my interaction with people? And how often am I just being exposed to that through a screen? And if you find yourself saying, oh, I mean, everything that’s making me angry is coming through a screen. And, sure, yeah, it’s peppered around with good jokes and nice crafts and fun things and distractions. Well, that’s something to pay attention to, because what really matters is what’s happening in real life and your interactions with people in real life, because that is reality. What’s happening on a screen, there are forces at work that are beyond your control. There is money to be made. There are narratives to be sold. There is attention to be gathered for whatever purpose that people wants it. Sometimes wonderful purposes, sometimes not so wonderful. When you’re out in the real world, you are the one in control. And so I think it’s just important to keep that in mind.

00:36:06 – Eric Zimmer
Now, Gabriel, let’s have your story that you wanted to read.

00:36:09 – Gabe Reilich
So, this is a story called Curly Fries by John v. I was pretty bummed out. I’d been driving for hours and wasn’t much looking forward to the destination. I was 23 and working for the coast guard. I’d enlisted three years earlier, just a few months prior to 911, and emerged from boot camp two weeks into a war. After training at forts across the country, I was sent to Port Aransas, just south of Corpus Christi, to act as a sea marshal under the newly formed Department of Homeland Security. The majority of my time there was split between high risk boardings on incoming foreign ships and search and rescue missions along the Texas coast. The dangers were high, the hours were long, and the sleep was inconsistent. We’re talking 72 hours on call shifts filled with a whole lot of pressure and not much compassion. I’d get homesick often and would visit my parents nearly a full day’s drive north of Erie, Illinois, whenever I could. I was coming back from one of these visits and still half a day’s journey ahead of me. The night before, I’d slept in my truck as usual, craving human contact as much as food, and I pulled into a diner just outside of Texarkana. I looked awful but figured I’d be in good company. Here I was sitting at the counter when a man walked in. Long black hair, goatee, face full of scruff. He had dirty jeans and a chain wallet. Classic trucker vibes through and through. What struck me the most was his shirt. It depicted curly from the three Stooges holding a fork into a light socket. Underneath it simply read curly fries. Maybe I was delirious from the solitude, but it got me good. I started laughing. Cool shirt, I told him. We got to chatting. Everything about me screamed military coast guard shirt, high and tight haircut, 0% body fat and mouth like a sailor. The trucker moved to sit next to me and revealed he was a Vietnam vetted. Vets like him love talking to enlisted guys like me. Barring Desert Storm, most of them haven’t had a chance to feel understood by the generations that came before us. There’s a bond there that’s difficult to describe but easy to understand if you’re in our shoes. He could tell we were part of the same brotherhood. I guess he could also tell that I seemed down. How you getting back to Corpus Christi? He asked. I told him I usually took the I 35 to San Antonio and then the I 37 east. Hell no, brother. I’ve been driving loads down there for years. Let me tell you how to go, he replied, leaving his eyes. Its a way better route. He told me I needed to see the real Texas, not just the interstate. I was game. I grabbed the mapquest printout from my truck and handed it over along with a pen. He took his time, outlining turn by turn directions for me, noting the best restaurants, towns, and miscellaneous sites to take in all the way to Corpus Christi. It was a humble gesture, but his enthusiasm and care were contagious. I was already feeling less bummed out, even if my 23 hours trip was about to turn into a 30 hours one. My turning point came at the city limits of Lagrange. Until then, I’d been contemplative, enjoying the sights, but still too aware of what I was driving back to. But something really shifted at Lagrange. The ZZ top song of the same name, for the uninitiated, was a fave to play on the boat patrols. And now, here I was, just outside the real McCoy. I took a picture of the sign with my disposable Kodak and hopped back into the truck. I felt different after that. I noticed the miles and miles of open, untouched land, the deer in the fields, the pastures full of cows, the wild hogs, the enormity of it all, the state I lived in. It took me by surprise. For the very first time, I cranked up the music, and a sense of peace washed over me that I still feel to this day. None of this changed the fact that I was now behind schedule. Of course, my brain was stressed, but my brain was always stressed. My soul was happy. That was different. When I finally got back to Port Aransas, I shared the story of curly fries, the first of many times I would do so. It was one of the first things I told my wife when I met her in Corpus Christi. I can’t even tell you why. I guess it just made me happy and brought me that sense of peace. Two months after I left the service, my first daughter was born. Her birth was complicated and she was diagnosed with cerebral palsy. The years that followed were filled with many, many trips to the children’s hospital. When you live through something like that, you spend a lot of time looking to the past instead of living in the present. Curly Fries was a story and a feeling, so I went back. Often. Somehow it even got linked to another song somewhere down in Texas by Jason Boland. I’d sing my daughter that song, and inevitably the story would follow. She passed when she was six, but I’d spent her life sharing the feeling of that day with her. It’s a simple thing to draw a new route for a stranger and shine a light on places they haven’t yet considered. It’s just as simple to take a leap of faith and follow that route. The result of that exchange is a little more complicated to understand. The trip Curley made for me eventually connected memories, songs and people as much as it did places I think of one and then another follows, all colored by that sudden sense of peace. It’s become a roadmap for my mind away from chaos and sadness, straight to a mysterious joy. Thanks, Curly.

00:41:02 – Eric Zimmer
Wow, that’s beautiful and sad, and yet that’s great. Thank you for reading that one.

00:41:08 – Gabe Reilich
Thank you. I mean, it’s honest, you know? And, yeah, that’s what hits me so deep. It’s one of those stories that reminds you how sadness and joy are so intertwined, inextricably so, you know, that you can’t have one without the other. You know, there’s a, I forget what the exact quote is, but it’s something the effect of, like, you know, you can only fill your well with joy as deep as you’ve dug it with grief.

00:41:34 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:41:34 – Gabe Reilich
And that’s one of those stories. And it really sticks with me too, because, you know, it talks about, it’s a small thing, and it just meant so much to him. And now I carry that feeling with me where I’m like, okay, what is it that I’m gonna do that might have an impact like this on someone? You never know.

00:41:49 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. The other thing I loved about that story even more than, you know, Curly, and the kindness he offered was how this gentleman was able to take a feeling of peace that he experienced and continue to go back to that. That’s what really stood out to me. And I’ve had moments in my life. I’ve been a Zen student and studied fairly deeply. And I’ve had some of what they consider those sort of enlightenment moments, right. Where, like, everything comes alive and becomes one thing, and then those pass. And the challenge I found is how to live from that place even when the feeling isn’t there. And that’s what this guy was trying so hard to do. And he was connecting things in his life back to this thing. He was trying to start from an orientation of peace and latch things onto it. I just think it’s really beautiful how he used that beyond feeling peace for two minutes as he drove through the Texas countryside and actually used that as an anchor for the way he navigated the world. It’s really, really impressive in that way.

00:43:10 – Gabe Reilich
Yeah. You know, those moments, and I think it’s another thing that most of us have, something where we’ve experienced a feeling like that, and those are gifts and to remember them and to use that mysterious power that they hold to transcend time and space and transport you back to that moment where you felt that and then carry it with you in moments when you need it. I mean, it’s a real thing, and it just takes some reflection sometimes to try to remember what they are.

00:43:41 – Eric Zimmer
Yep, I’m gonna pivot from childhood cerebral palsy to bipolar disorder. I am a bag of laughs around here today.

00:43:52 – Lucia Knell
Honestly. That is funny. I genuinely find that funny to you.

00:43:58 – Eric Zimmer
Lucia, because your story in the book, and I mean, by your story, it’s not the one that you read us, it’s the story that you wrote for the book about you, talks about being diagnosed with bipolar, and I was wondering if you could a share the kindness that came out of that for you. But then I’d also just love, if you’re open to sharing what managing that in an ongoing way has looked like for you.

00:44:24 – Lucia Knell
For sure.

00:44:26 – Speaker E
Yeah.

00:44:27 – Lucia Knell
I mean, first of all, I think it’s important to recognize the stigma around, in my case, bipolar two. I think that was a huge part of my journey, was just being able to accept it, you know, accept and grieve, in my case, that this is a disorder that I was diagnosed with, and it’s one that’s hard to swallow. For all of those reasons, I think a lot of mental health issues and diagnoses the folks, beyond having to suffer from the effects of the disorder, also have to grapple with the stigma, the shame, the perceived judgment from people, from society. Talk about social media feeding into harmful stereotypes, and media in general feeding into harmful stereotypes around mental health issues was a huge struggle to Gabriel’s point. You know, with grief comes joy. A joyful piece of this journey for me was my community coming out in droves when I was suffering. And so in the moments where I was unable to get out of bed because I had a depressive episode that lasted six months, the story depicts my brother flying out from New York to LA the same day when I called him, saying, I can’t get out of bed. And he ended up living with me for six months. My family, my friends coming out to, you know, while I was going through various treatments, calling me, saying, hey, hey, I’m gonna come with you to Cambridge, Massachusetts, while you’re going through this. And me saying, what are you talking about? And a friend of mine saying, I wouldn’t think twice. And so, looking back now that I’ve recovered and being able to recognize how profoundly moving it is that my community rallied in the way that they did is profound. I feel so lucky. And also, you know, Gabriel really came through, not that I wouldn’t expect it, but as my colleague and friend, we were going through this book process, literally, when this all happened. To me in the middle of the book process, like, really bad timing. And he was the one to call.

00:46:48 – Speaker E
Me when I was literally at a.

00:46:49 – Lucia Knell
Treatment center towards the end of it saying, hey, I need you to work on this with me. I need you back. And that was everything to me, in fact, that helped me get through this in many ways. And so there’s a deep connection to this process for me and my community that came from a moment in my life that was deeply painful. As far as managing the diagnosis and mental health experience, a lot of it is actually really relevant to this conversation where I practice a modality of therapy called DBT, dialectical behavioral therapy. And it’s really rooted in mindfulness. So taking moments away from screens, going outside, noticing smells, noticing colors, listening to birds, it’s, like, very sensory, and it really helps me to ground myself. Day to day routine is huge for me of being able to self regulate. Most of it, for me is about self regulation. Also medication, like, please believe. And so huge advocate for meds. Huge advocate for therapy. Again, community. It takes a village. Feeling supported and heard and being able to check in with people when I’m not doing well and knowing that they have my back and it’s hard and joyful and weird and scary and exciting, and it’s kind of become a huge part of my life.

00:48:18 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I think you’re similar to me in that I sort of. My phrases, I throw sort of the kitchen sink at my depression. Right. It’s been everything. It’s not one thing. It’s not just medicine or it’s not just therapy. I’m significantly older than the two of you, so I’ve been in this for quite a long time. And so what? Those things are. Have changed over time, but I found a way of, by sort of stitching all these things together to be relatively symptom free.

00:48:48 – Lucia Knell
Amazing. I love to hear that. I also think going through something like this or any, you know, trauma, once you get to the other side, brings a real sense of gratitude, where regardless of what’s going down, you know, day to day, I kind of look at it and say, I’ve been through a lot worse, and I’m actually grateful that these are the kinds of problems I’m dealing with, or challenges, rather. I’m like, not too bad, you know, like a bad day at work, a bad day in this. It’s like, I can get through that, so I’m very grateful.

00:49:18 – Eric Zimmer
Well, thank you for sharing that with us. I think that’s a great place for us to wrap up. Gabriel, Lucia thank you both so much for coming on the show, for the work that you’re doing with upworthy, of putting good things out into the world. We’ll obviously have links in our show notes to upworthy and to the book, so and congratulations on your first book.

00:49:39 – Gabe Reilich
Thank you so much Eric. It’s been an absolute pleasure.

00:49:41 – Lucia Knell
Thanks Eric. It’s great.

00:49:59 – Chris Forbes
If what you just heard was helpful to you, please consider making a monthly donation to support the one U Feed podcast when you join our membership community. With this monthly pledge, you get lots of exclusive members only benefits. It’s our way of saying thank you for your support. Now, we are so grateful for the members of our community, we wouldn’t be able to do what we do without their support, and we don’t take a single dollar for granted. To learn more, make a donation at any level and become a member of the one U feed community, go to oneyoufeed.net join the one ufeed podcast would like to sincerely thank our sponsors for supporting the show.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

How to Build Resilience after Heartbreak with Florence Williams

August 30, 2024 1 Comment

Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, Florence Williams explores how to build resilience after heartbreak. Through her in-depth conversations with leading neuroscientists, psychologists, and researchers, Florence delves into the physiological and emotional complexities of heartbreak, providing valuable insights into the profound impact on individuals. Her work explores the science behind emotional distress, highlighting the correlation between heartbreak and its effects on the body. With a focus on evidence-based findings and personal experience, she offers several practical strategies for building resilience and finding meaning in the face of adversity.

In this episode, you will be able to:

  • Discover effective strategies for coping with heartbreak and loneliness
  • Explore the transformative power of nature for improving mental health
  • Learn how to build resilience and find new beginnings after divorce or heartbreak
  • Cultivate awe and beauty as powerful tools for healing and self-discovery
  • Uncover the significant benefits of social connections on overall well-being

Florence Williams is a journalist, author, and podcaster. She is a contributing editor at Outside Magazine and a freelance writer for the New York Times, New York Times Magazine, National Geographic, The New York Review of Books, Slate, Mother Jones and numerous other publications. She is also the author of The Nature Fix: Why Nature Makes Us Happier, Healthier, and More Creative and Heartbreak: A Personal and Scientific Journey

Connect with Florence Williams: Website | Instagram | X | Facebook

If you enjoyed this conversation with Florence Williams, check out these other episodes:

Florence Williams on Spending Time In Nature

How to Navigate the Path of Grief with Dr. Joanne Cacciatore

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

00:00:00 – Florence Williams
Your brain doesn’t really make the distinction between being rejected by love and being sort of cast out of the klan to lie on the savannah and be circled by hyenas. You know, your body registers this as a very threatening state, like a physically threatening state.

00:00:24 – Chris Forbes
Welcome to the one you feed. Throughout time, great thinkers have recognized the importance of the thoughts. We have quotes like garbage in, garbage out, or you are what you think ring true. And yet, for many of us, our thoughts don’t strengthen or empower us. We tend toward negativity, self pity, jealousy, or fear. We see what we don’t have instead of what we do. We think things that hold us back and dampen our spirit. But it’s not just about thinking. Our actions matter. It takes conscious, consistent, and creative effort to make a life worth living. This podcast is about how other people keep themselves moving in the right direction, how they feed their good wolf, thanks for joining us. Our guest on this episode is a repeat guest at the one U Feed podcast. It’s Florence Williams, a journalist, author, and podcaster. She’s a contributor, contributing editor at Outside magazine and a freelance writer for the New York Times, Slate, Mother Jones, National Geographic, and many, many others. Today, Florence and Eric discuss her new book, a personal and scientific journey.

00:01:44 – Eric Zimmer
Hi, Florence. Welcome to the show.

00:01:46 – Florence Williams
Hi, Eric. So great to be here. Thank you.

00:01:48 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, it’s wonderful to have you back on. We had you on, I don’t know the date. It’s been years at this point. We talked about your last book, which was all about nature. Your current book is called a personal and scientific journey. And you’re just such a great writer. It’s such a well written and beautiful book.

00:02:07 – Florence Williams
Thank you.

00:02:07 – Eric Zimmer
So we’re going to talk about that, but before we do, let’s start like we always do with a parable. There’s a grandparent who’s talking with their grandchild, and they say in life there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear. And the grandchild stops and thinks about it for a second and looks up at their grandparent and says, well, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

00:02:45 – Florence Williams
I’ve thought so much through this project about the power of negative emotions. So I had never experienced heartbreak before. And when it happened, it so knocked me off my socks, changed the way my body felt, changed my health, changed the way my cells were functioning. And that’s what really drove me to write this book. So, you know, I had to confront, why is it that uncomfortable emotions are so difficult to deal with? Why do we avoid them? And so the one you feed, you have to make a choice sort of on a daily basis. Like, how are those negative emotions going to play you, and how are you going to play them? And I think it really became a driving kind of pursuit while writing this book.

00:03:30 – Eric Zimmer
I love, are you going to play the emotions or the emotions going to play you? I really like that take because it doesn’t say anything about that. You have to get rid of the emotion, right? Which, you know, it’s not a repression, it’s a relationship. You know, it’s how are you relating to and working skillfully with these difficult things?

00:03:49 – Florence Williams
And, in fact, I would say one of the profound and surprising lessons for me through this process was to sort of embrace the negative emotions while not letting them exactly play me. But they’re the ones who teach you, you know, and they’re sort of what you have to move through in order to grow. And I think I had been living my life pretty differently, you know, before that.

00:04:13 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. So I’m going to ask you to tell a little bit of your story of heartbreak, but I’m curious, were you looking into this at all before it happened to you? Was this on your radar in any way as a writer, as a person who’s looking at different things? Or did it emerge wholly from, like, oh, my God, I’m right in the middle of this, and it’s terrible? What do I do?

00:04:34 – Florence Williams
I have to admit, it wasn’t really on my radar.

00:04:37 – Eric Zimmer
Okay.

00:04:37 – Florence Williams
And in some ways, I feel badly about that, because I have friends, you know, who went through heartbreak at various times, and I don’t think I was the best friend to them. I think I tended to sort of dismiss heartbreak as being sort of the realm of melodrama, a little bit overwrought, you know? Okay, so you got dumped by someone. You know, obviously that person was a loser. Move on.

00:05:00 – Eric Zimmer
That’s right. They’re not the right fit for you. Lots of fish in the sea come on.

00:05:04 – Florence Williams
Yeah. Pick yourself up. Don’t be so dramatic.

00:05:08 – Eric Zimmer
Yep, yep. So tell us a little bit about the events that led you kind of into this.

00:05:14 – Florence Williams
Sure. Well, I met the man who would be my husband when I was 18 years old. It was literally my first day of college, and we dated for seven years, and then we got married, and we were married for 25 years, two kids. And I think, like a lot of long marriages, I mean, there are moments of connection and there are moments of disconnection. And I guess I always had this sort of bedrock faith in it, and I had a desire, really, for it to work. I mean, there were so many things I was attached to about my life, but, you know, he didn’t really feel the same way, unfortunately. And I think often with heartbreak, when there’s a separation like this, a romantic split, one person wants it more than the other, and I was the one who didn’t want it. I was afraid of it. And it also kind of surprised me, honestly. So, you know, at one point, he told me that he wanted to go find his soulmate, you know, and that I wasn’t. It.

00:06:10 – Eric Zimmer
Ouch.

00:06:11 – Florence Williams
Ouch, right? Big ouch. And so I felt that rejection, and I felt that pain really deeply, you know, in my heart, in my stomach, in my pancreas, in my body. I had always thought that heartbreak was something that was in your head. There was a lot of sadness, and that heartbreak was sort of a metaphor. But as I kind of launched my investigation into what was happening to me and why I felt this way, I learned that our bodies really register this kind of pain in ways that I don’t think really get acknowledged or talked about enough.

00:06:46 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. And we’ll go into that. I certainly like you. I have a history, I guess, unlike you. You’ve got sort of the one heartbreak. I’ve got a whole string of them.

00:06:56 – Florence Williams
I’m sorry.

00:06:57 – Eric Zimmer
You know. Well, it’s interesting. The biggest one was to my ex wife, mother of my son. And I look back on that as both the most difficult period of my life and perhaps the most fertile period of my life for so many things. There was so much opportunity for transformation in it. I wouldn’t wish it on anybody.

00:07:19 – Florence Williams
Yes, I. I can really relate to that. Do you think, Eric, that it gets easier, that heartbreak gets easier the more you go through it? Or does it get harder? Is it cumulative? I’ve only had one big heartbreak, so I still don’t know the answer to that.

00:07:30 – Eric Zimmer
That’s a great question. I don’t think it gets easier. Well, no, I don’t think it gets easier. I do think there is a cumulative nature. You talk about this in the book, which is that the problem with heartbreak, unlike, say, death. Right. That kind of grief that comes from that is there is a element of I must not be lovable. That’s embedded in it. And when that happens multiple times, it’s almost as if you’re like, well, see more evidence. You know, I’ve got. I’ve got multiple pieces of evidence to back up this theory. Yeah. And it’s so interesting. I have been in a really good relationship with Ginny listeners. I’ve heard her on the show, and it’s been, I think, six plus years, and it’s been really good, and they’ve been six great years for me as far as my own development and all that. And I kind of wonder, like, how would I handle heartache now, heartbreak now? And I think the answer is it would still be extraordinarily painful, regardless of beast. I just don’t think it’s something that you evolve past.

00:08:32 – Florence Williams
I wonder, though, I guess the hope would be that at some point you don’t buy that story anymore of not being good enough.

00:08:39 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I think there’s that, and I think there’s the other element. That is an interesting question to think about, which is how much of how strongly I am affected by heartbreak has to do with things that have happened to me in the past that haven’t been healed.

00:08:56 – Florence Williams
That’s right. That’s right. I think that’s one of the things you learn. Yes, yes. It all comes back around.

00:09:03 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. So I’d like to think if it happened again, I would be in better shape because I had healed a lot of things. But I still think, based on the way we’re wired up, that it would be very painful. So let’s talk about that. You know, one of the things you said you thought heartbreak or sadness was something that was in your brain as if it didn’t exist. But what we know, and you point out, I’m going to let you elaborate on, is that that sort of pain triggers the same places in the brain that actual, real physical pain does.

00:09:30 – Florence Williams
Yeah, that’s right. I set out to talk to neuroscientists and immunogeneticists and psychologists to find out sort of why our bodies get so kind of implicated in our emotions. And one of the things I learned, there’s been so much research on people who fall in love and the neurotransmitters associated with falling in love. I think it’s kind of probably a fun research area.

00:09:54 – Eric Zimmer
Your subjects are all happy.

00:09:56 – Florence Williams
You know, your subjects are happy. It’s all sunny. But I spoke early on to Helen Fisher, who is a biological anthropologist, and she has scanned the brains of dumped people. And while they’re looking at pictures, actually, of their sort of rejecting departing beloved. And she found that the parts of the brain that get activated are similar. Not exactly similar, but basically the same, you know, very similar to where we process physical pain. And also parts of the brain light up that are associated with craving and addiction.

00:10:31 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:10:32 – Florence Williams
You know, just because someone stops loving you doesn’t mean you stop loving them. And your body on some level, kind of misses them and notes their absence and registers that absence. And you sort of want that back. You want those brain chemicals back, if not the person itself.

00:10:47 – Eric Zimmer
Right. And in the book, you mentioned multiple times, there’s this profound feeling of not being safe.

00:10:54 – Florence Williams
Yes.

00:10:55 – Eric Zimmer
That happens when you’re dumped. The early stages of it, for me, they feel a little bit like panic.

00:11:01 – Florence Williams
Absolutely.

00:11:02 – Eric Zimmer
I wouldn’t call it a full panic attack, but it is a, to use a word you’ve got in the book, hyper vigilance. Right?

00:11:07 – Florence Williams
Yeah. You feel deeply imperiled. And it makes sense because if you think about sort of how we evolved as mammals, we are supposed to feel safety in numbers. We form deep attachments that drive our every sort of behavior. And when your primary attachment partner takes off, you literally feel alone. Your brain doesn’t really make the distinction between being rejected by love and being sort of cast out of the clan to lie on the savannah and be circled by hyenas. You know, your body registers this as a very threatening state, like a physically threatening state. And so that starts this cascade of stress hormones, norepinephrine, you know, that. Then talk to our cells, talk to our organs, talk to our immune systems where white blood cells get made in our bone marrow. And they’re designed to be very responsive to our environment and it turns out to our social state. One of the researchers I talked to said, you know, our cells listen for loneliness, and when they detect it, boy, they really kick into high gear because it’s not a place where we are supposed to live for a long time.

00:12:18 – Eric Zimmer
Right. So let’s talk about some of the things that heartbreak slash loneliness does to the body. You know, we know how it feels. We can register the pain, but there are changes throughout the body that occurred. You notate a lot of them in the book. So I wonder if you could just elaborate on a couple of them.

00:12:37 – Florence Williams
Yeah, I mean, that feeling of sort of near panic or hypervigilance sets off some very specific symptoms. For example, sleeplessness, agitation, difficulty digesting, because your body’s sort of gearing up for some kind of, you know, fight or flight. For me, it was a lot of weight loss. My blood sugars were sort of messed up. I mean, deeply messed up. My gut bacteria was messed up. I ended up with an autoimmune diagnosis some months after the split. That was type one diabetes. And what I learned from talking to researchers is that sometimes these autoimmune diseases do, in fact, have an emotional trigger. They are made worse by inflammation. And inflammation is kind of the key. So when I talked to a psychologist at the University of Arizona, David Spara, he said to me, you know, the story of divorce is an inflammation story. You know, I had never heard that before. And so then I met with a researcher at UCLA, and we actually analyzed my genetic markers, my transcription factors, which are basically signatures for inflammation. And we did this at various time points after the separation. And that became kind of one of the central threads of the book, kind of looking at how my cells were responding to loneliness and how they were responding to different science based interventions that I was very eager to try in this sort of urgent bid to feel better, to feel healthier.

00:14:02 – Eric Zimmer
I love that aspect of the book. You’ve got biomarkers that you’re trying to sort of pay attention to to see what’s working, what’s not, in addition to just the. The correlation and making the correlation to how I’m actually feeling. Right. And I think that naturally, a lot of us will emerge from heartbreak and hopefully start going, all right, what’s this next phase of my life look like? And we start adding and building things in which I think is a natural process, and you go through it. And I just love that you’re also bringing the science along with it. You know, it’s interesting, when you said that the story of divorce is an inflammation story, there’s also. You’re talking about heart health at a different point in the book. One of the people you quote, the tragedies of life are largely arterial. So there’s actual heart aspects to this also.

00:14:51 – Florence Williams
Yeah. It’s so fascinating to me that, you know, for millennia, cultures across time have known that the heart is in some ways the seat of the emotions, probably because it’s, you know, one of the few organs we can actually feel. We can feel it pumping.

00:15:05 – Eric Zimmer
I.

00:15:05 – Florence Williams
We know it stops sometimes, you know, during crises. And people have known for a long time, too, that, you know, of course, husbands and wives sometimes die within a couple of days of each other or within months of each other because their heart stop. But it was only in the 1990s that researchers in Japan were able to start imaging the heart during heart failure to see that people were coming into the hospital with sort of symptoms of heart attack, but there was no sign of an arterial blockage, which is. Is kind of the standard cause of a heart attack. Instead, these people were experiencing this weird distension of the left ventricle quadrant of the heart. So it was like ballooning out and then being unable to pump correctly. And they named it Takeatsubo, after a lobster pot, which has this very bulbous head and a narrow neck. So it looked like this quadrant of the heart. So it’s the stress hormones, like adrenaline, landing on receptors in the heart and causing it to just literally balloon out like that and sort of freak out. So we know now that takeotsubo makes up about 5%, probably, of all heart failures, you know, showing up in the hospital. About 5% of those cases will result in death. Another 20% will result in, you know, continued sort of cardiac risk. And we know that especially middle aged, postmenopausal women are about 80% of the patients, which is kind of interesting. So there seems to be something protective about the estrogen sort of counteracting that adrenaline. But we know that people suffer this kind of heart failure after the death of a spouse or the death even of a pet. Sometimes it’s after the death of a sports team that you’re particularly. There are cases in the literature men suffering this when their sport team loses the World cup. And sometimes it just seems to happen, you know, for no known reason. But this is really interesting. There are cases that really spike after natural disasters when there’s a lot of, you know, adrenaline that makes sense. And there’s just recently a new study showing that cases have spiked during the pandemic, during COVID Interesting, especially in women.

00:17:16 – Eric Zimmer
Interesting. So do we know of any things that make any factors that make us more susceptible to the really damaging effects of heartbreak or of having, like, heartbreak tear us up more? Is there anything that sort of says, like, people like this or have had this happen or this sort of thing are more likely to have, like, just heartbreak, to feel catastrophic versus people who might say, well, you know, yeah, I mean, again, I’m not saying anybody’s gonna be like, well, big deal, right. But I seem to be one of those people. For whatever reason, it was earth shattering to me.

00:17:53 – Florence Williams
Yeah, right.

00:17:54 – Eric Zimmer
And I had friends who, yeah, it was painful, but it did not seem to just devastate them in the same way it did me. And I just don’t know. Is there anything that explains that sort of difference?

00:18:06 – Florence Williams
Yes, you know, we know that there are personality traits that seem to make people both more resilient and a little bit less resilient. You know, the data is not destiny here. But in general, people who, on personality tests, you know, sort of register as being a little bit more neurotic, a little bit more introspective, a little bit more anxious, you know, sort of tend to ruminate and cognitively engage, you know, with their emotions, are going to be harder hit, you know, by some of these emotional blows. And also, we know that people who’ve had early life traumas and childhood traumas are going to be more susceptible, you know, to future challenges. But I was so encouraged to talk to Florence Williams at the University of Utah, who said, you know, yes, we know heartbreak is really hard, and we know that especially, you know, people who split up after these long term relationships and divorces. Do you have higher risk for early death? They have higher risk for depression. They have higher risk for metabolic disease, for cardiac disease? I mean, it’s kind of a grim litany, frankly. But we also know that there are certain traits that make you more resilient. And this was the really heartwarming news to me. You can actually cultivate some of those traits and try to become better at them. And the one that was surprising to me and changed the trajectory of my whole reporting over the two or three years of this book was, she said, the people who can really engage with beauty, people who can experience awe on a regular basis, who can cultivate awe, these are the people who seem to be able to make more meaning and sense of their tragedies. They can create more connections between their frontal cortex, which is kind of their seat of their self concept, and their sensory and motor parts of their brains, in a way that that helps them create meaning, helps them find perspective, helps them experience conflicting emotions like, yes, utter pain, but also, wow, joy and beauty and possibility. The people who might be able to find a kernel of optimism in that, that became true for me during the course of my journey. So I just glommed onto that as life saving advice. Not only could I experience beauty, but she was telling me that I could get a. Get better at it.

00:21:02 – Eric Zimmer
The trait you’re describing is often considered on a standard personality test. How open are you to new things? Right. How open are you in general?

00:21:11 – Florence Williams
Yes.

00:21:11 – Eric Zimmer
And there’s a lot of people that say, you know, where you land on that personality test is sort of where you are. Like, these things don’t move. Right.

00:21:19 – Florence Williams
They don’t tend to move much.

00:21:21 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. You’re stating that you’re either introverted or you’re not right? Yeah. And so, you know, openness to new experience and the ability to find beauty, you’re saying, is trainable. What are some of the ways to do that?

00:21:34 – Florence Williams
Well, she’s a huge fan of starting early. So, for example, childhood art education. You know, it’s just tragedy, really, that we don’t have more of this, you know, in our schooling system in the United States. But this kind of developing an appreciation for art and for beauty is a lifelong gift that’s going to help you survive totally the blows of life. And so, you know, wonderful if we could start that early. But with things like awe and beauty, you know, it’s sort of like a mindful practice. You can go out, you know, around your block and you can say, okay, I’m going to find some things that are beautiful on this walk around my block, and I’m going to look at this flower. There’s a way to sort of, and I love this micro dose awe that I learned about from a study that I participated in where there’s an acronym for awe, awe, where the a is attention. So, you know, on your walk or as you’re going through life or even inside your house, you know, if you have a house plant or you have an incredible meal or you’re looking at your baby, you know, attend. Right? Just pay attention to that. And of course, philosophers talk about this all the time, that attention is love and love is attention. You know, don’t space out while you’re looking at this beautiful blossom. And then the w is for weight, so stay with it. Stay with that attention. And the e is just exhale just two breaths.

00:23:02 – Eric Zimmer
Say that last one again.

00:23:04 – Florence Williams
Exhale, exhale. You know, so you may be staying with this moment of Beauty for a couple of breaths. You know, it’s like a 1 minute practice. And if you do it a couple times a day, there is some emerging data showing that it really does improve people’s well being. It improves their moods. It improves their feeling of purpose in their lives. It gives them some perspective. We know that the science of awe is so interesting also relatively new field of study. But in the presence of something beautiful, we are kind of naturally pulled out of our own thoughts. Our rumination sort of stops dead for a minute when the moon comes up or when we notice the owl in front of us on the path or whatever it is. And I’ve had that experience where I’ve been just so lost in some kind of conversation that I’m thinking about that I had. And then this owl jumped out in front of me on the trail, and it was like, whoa. Completely stopped thinking about what I was thinking about. I felt the presence of something beyond myself. Right. And that in itself is an incredibly helpful just feeling of connection and perspective.

00:24:13 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. I love that acronym usage. And I love the idea of the weight and the exhale. Reminds me of Rick Hansen, who talks about a practice taking in the good, which is pretty much the same thing. If you’re HavInG a good experience, stay with it a little bit. Give it. Savor it. Give it a little more attention. There are other attentional exercises that I think can be very helpful in this regard, too, which is things like, you know, I often play with seeing the edges of everything.

00:24:46 – Florence Williams
What would be an example of that?

00:24:48 – Eric Zimmer
Well, if I’m looking out my window right now, I mean, I’ve looked out this window 10,000 times. Right. And what we know, you know, about the brain’s sort of predictive nature, right. Is that there are. Some people believe that I’m not even really registering what’s out there at some level. Right. My brain is sending down a prediction of what it expects to see. My senses are sending up what they do see, and if they match, I never have to process it. So something like looking at the edges would just be like, let me look at the edge of everything I see. Where are the edges of that building? Where are the edges of that tree? It just causes me to have to actually look.

00:25:26 – Florence Williams
That’s interesting.

00:25:27 – Eric Zimmer
Or you could do this with color. You know, let me see all the green that’s out there. It’s a way for me of. I think, of actually looking.

00:25:36 – Florence Williams
Yeah. And it pulls you into some kind of process that’s not about your head, your thoughts.

00:25:42 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, that’s right. Now, the thing that you’re talking about, though, is the element that goes a little bit beyond that, which is how do you then go from that sort of mechanical thing into a little bit more of a state of almost appreciation. Right. But as they say, I think Mary Oliver said it best. Right. That attention is the beginning of devotion. Right.

00:26:05 – Florence Williams
There you go. Yep.

00:26:06 – Eric Zimmer
You know, so how do we devote ourselves to something? We pay attention to it. And I think, you know, my Zen training talks so much about this, about just the ordinary thing. If you give it enough attention, it will come alive.

00:26:17 – Florence Williams
And I think you do get better at it the more you do it.

00:26:21 – Eric Zimmer
Yes.

00:26:22 – Florence Williams
For example, I’m during the pandemic, one of my little rituals, when I, you know, we all felt so housebound and isolated, and I would walk every night to go look at the sunset. And it just became, you know, this automatic part of my day. It’s like, oh, time for the sunset. I’m gonna run, run down the street and go look at the sunset. And it’s, when you do that, it’s impossible not to sort of drink it in, you know, like this bomb it just, you. You become better at doing it, I think.

00:26:49 – Eric Zimmer
So you found over that time that you began to develop the skill of appreciating the sunset more.

00:26:55 – Florence Williams
Yeah. And really trying to sort of access the awe in it as well.

00:26:59 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:27:00 – Florence Williams
To find myself stilled by that beauty.

00:27:03 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:27:04 – Florence Williams
And then the other interesting thing that happened is that there were a number of my neighbors doing the same thing. And so, you know, I would see the same people every night and I felt closer to them. You know, I didn’t know them, but pretty soon I did and we would say hello. And so it became not just this personal awe experience, but it became a collective awe experience, which was incredibly comforting and, you know, a really nice anecdote to loneliness. If you can experience that kind of unselfing in the presence of other people, it sort of amplifies it, I think.

00:27:39 – Eric Zimmer
So it sounds like you had a location that multiple people agreed was an optimal place to watch a sunset from. Is that accurate? Yeah.

00:27:47 – Florence Williams
So I live in Washington, DC, and I’m about, I don’t know, five blocks or so from the bluffs overlooking the Potomac river. So it’s one of the few places where you actually can get a little bit of a vista.

00:27:59 – Eric Zimmer
Got it.

00:27:59 – Florence Williams
It looks west and there’s the sunset. Wow. I mean, it just, you know, some nights it was. It was lame, but usually it was pretty great.

00:28:06 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. Yeah. So let’s move into. Now we’ve talked about what heartbreak is, how difficult it is for us, the things it does to us. Let’s talk about where did you start to turn for healing? I don’t think we’re going to get through all of it, but maybe, you know, highlight a few key places.

00:28:26 – Florence Williams
Sure. I became so motivated to try to do what was kind of science based in my kind of urgent bid to get healthier. And so I turned, per this conversation with Florence Williams, I turned to spending a lot of time in nature trying to focus on beauty. I went on a wilderness trip to even try to kind of crank up the volume on the awe and the immersion. So I embarked on a 30 day wilderness trip. I did half of it alone, which had kind of some unexpected results, I would say. Actually it was good in some ways. It was not as helpful in other ways. I did some EMDR therapy, which is supposed to be good for emotional trauma, and there’s some interesting emerging research about that. And I did some psychedelics, actually working with a clinician in a therapeutic setting, again, to, I would say, heightened the awe kind of dose that I was trying to go for. And there’s a lot of science there, of course, and it was really helpful to me.

00:29:23 – Eric Zimmer
So let’s start with nature. You wrote a book called the Nature Fix, which was all about how nature is healing for us and critical for us as humans. Did you find yourself naturally just. I guess that’s a funny sentence, naturally turning into nature, like you just kind of knew it and you went to it? Or was it a case of sort of having to rediscover that?

00:29:43 – Florence Williams
I was so primed already to think that nature could be helpful. Having written the nature fix, I felt like I was leaning on every lesson I learned from that book, not just because, you know, the subtitle of that book was how to be health, happier, healthier, and more creative. Now I felt like I needed it to survive. You know, it was a whole different level of kind of need. And so it was an intuitive place for me to try to seek help. But in that book, I only talk about sort of the dose curve of nature immersion up to three days. Like, I end the book with the so called three day effect. It talks about the interesting things that happen to your. Your brain and your body after three days outside. And I felt like, okay, but I feed a lot more than three days because this is a really big heartbreak. I’m going to go for 30 days.

00:30:32 – Eric Zimmer
So what were the aspects of that that felt really healing? And what were the aspects of that that felt more challenging?

00:30:38 – Florence Williams
Well, I did half of the trip with other people and half of the trip alone. So the first half was the half with other people. And, you know, for me, I loved the planning the trip. Even the logistics of an expedition can actually pull you out of kind of the limbic parts of your brain and force you to sort of be really cerebral in a way that’s helpful. Right. To deep emotions. And then I also just wanted to spend good times with my friends and family. I felt so much comfort from being surrounded by them. I had all of these friends and family who signed on, and so I felt very supported by them. They were helping me kind of self actualize, but also, they just also really liked being on the river. And so it was kind of a lot of jolly times. Say it was sort of jolly and fun.

00:31:25 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:31:25 – Florence Williams
And then everyone disappeared and it was like, okay, now I’m going to do the really deep work here. I’m going to learn how to be alone because I have not ever in my life been alone since I met my husband when I was 18. I’m going to learn to access bravery since I’m scared of this future that looks so different and so feel so insecure. I wanted to feel the metaphor of paddling from one destination to another tell.

00:31:55 – Eric Zimmer
Listeners about what the trip was real quick.

00:31:57 – Florence Williams
Yeah, so it was 30 days down the green river in Utah, starts in southwestern Wyoming, and then flows through a lot of Utah to merge with the Colorado river in Canyonlands National park. It’s one of the sort of premier river trips you can do in the United States where you can be on the river for that long. You know, most of it is through public land. So you need a series of permits to go through these different canyons. There are different permitting agencies, including indian reservation. So it’s, you know, it’s logistically complicated for the solo piece. I was in Canyonlands National park for most of that. Also some Bureau of Land Management land. And so there’s only one resupply point in that two weeks, one road that goes in. So I had to sort of line that up, you know, plan the food. And I felt like I just needed to mark this passage in my life by doing something kind of grand and something that would carry me through this passage into what I thought would be kind of a better story of myself as literally the pilot of my own boat. Metaphors were just irresistible to me.

00:33:11 – Eric Zimmer
And so what were the good and bad parts of those 15 days?

00:33:15 – Florence Williams
I think that I did access a lot of bravery. I think I felt like, okay, I can be alone. I can take care of myself. I can be self reliant. But I also had this realization that I don’t want to be, that I don’t want to be alone. I don’t want to take care of myself. I learned that. And it’s just through the absence of having other people around me that the value of having other people around you is to help you not feel so bad about yourself. You know, that if you tend to go down these dark rabbit holes, it’s the company of people you love who help pull you out of that. You know, it’s one of the tremendous values of our social, you know, instincts. But, you know, beyond that, we are healthiest when we don’t just rely on ourselves. It’s kind of our cellular superfuel as a species that we do help each other. And so if we deny ourselves that opportunity, we’re just not going to kind of hit our real potential, I think. And those were all big revelations for me because I don’t think I had wanted to rely on other people so much. I think I did want to kind of embrace this kind of self reliance. You know, this is the myth that we’re all sort of fed from such an early age. I also wanted to connect with people through dark emotions. You know, I think I had been taught that dark emotions aren’t necessarily something you want to share with other people. Nobody’s comfortable with them. Let’s just put on a happy face and keep going. And I found myself so resisting that and wanting to sort of have more authentic connections with people in my life that necessarily involved expressing that.

00:35:18 – Eric Zimmer
I think earlier on, and this is certainly my journey also in this, which was earlier on my view of spiritual development, of getting healthier, of being psychologically well, all that was kind of. There was an element of self reliance in it, and there was an element of psychologically healthy people don’t need other people. Right. Sort of a codependency. Right. The opposite of codependency. Codependency was saying, you know, you lean on other people too much, you care too much what they think, it’s what rules your life. That’s a problem. And certainly it can be. But more and more, I’m seeing people talking about the fact that we are social creatures that do need each other, and there is a healthy way to do that. Not only is there a healthy way to do it, it is healthier for us to do it, to find connection and that we thrive best in connection with other people. And it just seems that that is a theme that is coming up more and more.

00:36:25 – Florence Williams
I love it that people are talking about this more. And in some ways, I think one of the silver linings of the pandemic is that we have realized the value of connection more, and we’ve kind of fallen on our knees a little bit and said, yeah, this is a hard time. Let’s talk about mental health. I think those are really, really positive developments, but I also worry about, especially younger people now who do consider themselves the loneliest demographic, which is so interesting. They’re the most anxious, they’re the most lonely. They’re the most concerned about their mental health. I worry about them, and I think that they live in very challenging times where they are not making the authentic connections, maybe that we sort of grew up with in the absence of the Internet, in the absence of social media.

00:37:13 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. I think there’s another element to that that I think is interesting, which is there’s an idea out there that stress becomes stress when you perceive it to be harmful to you. Or let me say that differently, stress becomes harmful when you perceive it to be harmful. Harmful. Right.

00:37:30 – Florence Williams
Right.

00:37:30 – Eric Zimmer
And I’m going to make another analogy, which is sleep, right? I’ve rebelled a little bit in my own head and with people close to me a little bit with what I refer to as the sleep police, right. Because now everybody is saying, like, you’ve got to get 8 hours of sleep or, you know, you’ll, you’ll get the bubonic plague next week, right? Which I get the over correction saying, look, this is really important, but I have restless leg syndrome. And when it kicks in, I don’t sleep well. Well. And so now I’m not sleeping well. And all I’m hearing all the time is how destructive it is to me that I’m not sleeping well. And I worry that all this research about how bad it is to be lonely could be doing the same thing to people who are already lonely. And now they’re being added to that is, oh God, how bad is it for me to be lonely? And to the extent that any of those things help us take positive change, to the extent that the sleep police help somebody to go, you know what? This 5 hours of sleep nonsense I’m doing isn’t really a good idea. I should put more effort into getting sleep really positive. To the extent that knowing how destructive loneliness is to us helps us move towards positive direction, I think it’s helpful. But I worry about a tipping point with all this stuff.

00:38:51 – Florence Williams
I think you’re right, but loneliness is such an interesting emotion because it’s subjective. So you can be in a marriage and feel lonely. You can live in a house full of people and feel lonely. And yet it seems to have a very highly adapted reason, which is that it is a signal. The feeling of loneliness tends to make us feel like there’s something we don’t have that we want. There’s a disconnect between what we want and what we have. And by noticing that and feeling it, it actually is supposed to, I think, propel behavior drives us to seek a little bit of comfort or a little bit of connection. The irony though, is that if you feel lonely for too long, it kind of does the opposite. It makes it harder for you to have connection because you’re more suspicious of other people. You maybe feel worse about yourself. It’s one of these emotions, sort of like heartbreak, that I think exists for a reason, but it can also kind of morph into something more destructive if it lasts for too long.

00:39:54 – Eric Zimmer
That’s a really great point. It turns into something that’s harder to get out of the longer you’re in it.

00:39:59 – Florence Williams
Right.

00:40:00 – Eric Zimmer
And what I find really interesting is, you know, you just stated something, which is that kids these days, you know, teenagers, are considered the loneliest. Now, forever, it’s been senior citizens. Right. Senior citizens were, you know, it was just very clear they were the loneliest. And we understand why. Right. Their partners are passing away. Their friends are passing in a way. They don’t have a job. Right. They’re isolated in ways. But it is sort of stunning that kids feel that way now. I’m not even sure what to do with that information.

00:40:30 – Florence Williams
I don’t know either, but I think we need to pay attention to it. I’m really concerned about it.

00:40:34 – Eric Zimmer
Me, too. I’m concerned that the people who generally have the most energy to solve that problem don’t feel like they can solve it. You know, youth does have an energy of, I feel like, the ability to make things happen. And I get. When you’re 70, it’s much harder to be like, all right, I’m going to go to three social events today. Right. You’re tired, but when you’re 18, that’s a different thing. And so, yeah, I’m with you. I find it somewhat alarming.

00:41:02 – Florence Williams
Yeah. It’s why I feel, frankly, so motivated to talk about the things that can help build resilience, such as authentic connection to other people, but also to the natural world. You know, I really do believe that by helping young people connect to nature, by helping them get out of their own anxieties a little bit, you know, I do very strongly feel that it’s part of the solution.

00:41:26 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I do, too, 100%. I remember my last bad heartbreak, and I remember exactly what I did. I just made a last minute decision to go to this nature retreat in Ohio for, like, four days. And it’s basically. It’s entirely off grid. You’re by yourself more or less, except meals are provided for you. And it was transformative for me. It kicked off something really valuable in my life. And, you know, nature was certainly a big part of that. So I think that is one path. And did your research lead you into other paths out of loneliness for people?

00:42:00 – Florence Williams
Yes. So, you know, I told you that we did this experiment where we looked at my white blood cells for markers of inflammation and also for markers of virus fighting ability, which is something you really want when you’re going into a pandemic.

00:42:15 – Eric Zimmer
Yes.

00:42:17 – Florence Williams
With this researcher, Steve Cole, who has, in fact, done a lot of interventions with populations where he’s looked at their immune cells and how they may improve after, for example, they try Zen meditation or after they try volunteering in schools. And what he has found is that where he sees the best improvements in people’s immune cells immune profiles is not necessarily when they report feeling happier or kind of more mirthful or they’re able to seek more pleasure. He says that he sees the biggest improvements when they feel like they have meaning in their lives and purpose in their lives. And that’s not the same thing as waking up every morning, you know, feeling amused, totally, and sort of, you know, calm. It’s this kind of larger. Right. North Star. And so I thought that was fascinating and also not something that we hear of as an antidote to heartbreak or an antidote to loneliness. You know, it’s not necessarily being with other people. It’s feeling like you’re doing something worthwhile, like, there is a why that you are answering in your life. And eventually, ideally, that will lead to feelings of connection with other people.

00:43:26 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. My experience. I mean, I have sort of a close, firsthand experience with that, which was in AA, which was a big part of my life for a long time. That was the foundational element. Right. Which was to work with other people who were struggling with what you were struggling. And that’s not exactly what you’re saying, but what it was was purpose, it was service, and it was connection.

00:43:49 – Florence Williams
Exactly.

00:43:50 – Eric Zimmer
The line that I remember was nothing. So much ensures immunity from drinking than working with another alcoholic. There’s some AA people out there who are gonna be like, you didn’t quite get that. But it’s close. It’s close. And so, yeah, I agree. I think that’s so important. The other thing I’ve been thinking about, I think a lot about how do people build community? How do people go from being lonely? You know, how does this happen? And one of the things I’ve realized recently is that it’s not that I realized. I found some research recently that said, you know, in order to make connection with a new person, right? So if you’ve already got existing connections, right. Nurture them. Right. But if you need to make new ones, you’re just like, I just don’t have any in my life, or I have very few, and I need to make new ones. It takes a lot of time it does, yeah. And so what I see a lot of people doing, and I’ve done this in the past, is I go, all right, you know what? I got to find some connection. I’m going to go to the local meditation group because I’m interested in meditation. There’ll be people there that are like me, and that’s how I’m going to do it. And I go once or twice and I don’t feel connected because that’s not how it works. And so then I go, this isn’t working, and I give up. Or I do a volunteer thing that only happens once or twice, and that’s not enough time either. So one of the things that I’ve been talking with people about is really saying, you know what? Pick a couple things. But it’s going to take a commitment. It’s going to take, I’ve got to keep going even when I’m uncomfortable, even when I feel like I don’t fit in even in the beginning, because it just takes a certain number of hours. The research is different on how long it is, and I’m always skeptical of, like, 21 days to a new habit. Right. It’s so variable. So it takes more than seeing somebody twice for an hour.

00:45:35 – Florence Williams
That’s right. And I think that there are other ways to connect and to feel connection. I mean, you know, face to face with other people is one way. It’s a great way. But you can have a meaningful connection with a pet. You can have meaningful connection. And I’m really big on this with nature. You know, if you have a sort of favorite spot or a couple of spots where you can go where you get to know the seasons and you get to know the birds and you get to know, you know, the patterns of the water or the rocks. You know, it sounds a little goofy to say it, but I think there’s some compelling research here showing that when people can feel connected to the natural world, it can be a great antidote, actually, for loneliness.

00:46:16 – Eric Zimmer
Yes. I think that’s a really important point to kind of keep coming back to. It’s not only other people. There are lots of ways to connect. And even back to what we were talking about earlier around beauty and art, I have deep connections to pieces of art, pieces of music, things that do feel like connection, they are valued.

00:46:36 – Florence Williams
So I guess, like the great trifecta, you know, to sort of sum it up, the great trifecta of kind of heartbreak antidote or loneliness antidote seems to be this sort of beauty plus connection plus purpose. I think it’s very hard to rely too much on one of those over the other. It seems to be, you know, in combination seems to be sort of a pathway into ultimately feeling a sense of belonging, feeling like the things that you do matter, and ultimately, of course, increasing your capacity for love, which is really what it’s all about.

00:47:11 – Eric Zimmer
Well, I can’t think of a more beautiful place to just kind of wrap up. That was a great summary there. Beauty, purpose and connection. I want to take a second and let you share a little bit about. There’s an audio version of your book, which I think is really exciting. One of the things that’s so great about so many of these books like yours is you talk to so many interesting people and we get you sort of giving us that in the writing, but I think in the audiobook, we can actually hear these people, right?

00:47:40 – Florence Williams
Yeah. Thanks so much for asking about that. I’m really proud of this audiobook that we made. That’s very unusual. As I went around reporting the research for this book, I had my tape recorder and I taped everyone I talked to. I also taped myself in an audio journal. I taped my friends. I taped my therapist. And so when we made the audiobook, we decided to actually pull that tape into the book. So it’s not just me reading the text, it’s actually these real conversations layered in as well as really beautiful music and sound design. And so it feels like a very immersive, I think, audio experience, and I hope people will check it out.

00:48:19 – Eric Zimmer
And it sounds like a lovely companion for being heartbroken.

00:48:24 – Florence Williams
I hope so. You know, I really wanted the book to be hopeful because I think that heartbreak is, you know, as difficult as it is, it is a path to transformation and how lucky that we can get that 100%.

00:48:37 – Eric Zimmer
Well, Florence, thank you so much for coming back on. It is always a pleasure to talk with you.

00:48:42 – Florence Williams
You too, Eric. Thank you so much for having me.

00:49:00 – Chris Forbes
If what you just heard was helpful to you, please consider making a monthly donation to support the one U Feed podcast when you join our membership community. With this monthly pledge, you get lots of exclusive members only benefits. It’s our way of saying thank you for your support. Now, we are so grateful for the members of our community, we wouldn’t be able to do what we do without their support, and we don’t take a single dollar for granted. To learn more, make a donation at any level and become a member of the One U feed community, go to oneyoufeed.net Slash join the One U Feed podcast. Would like to sincerely thank our sponsors for supporting the show.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

How AI Can Elevate Spiritual Intelligence and Personal Well-Being with Deepak Chopra

August 27, 2024 Leave a Comment

Watch on YouTube
Listen on Spotify
Listen on Apple Podcast

In this episode, Deepak Chopra, a renowned figure in the fields of holistic health and spiritual wellness, discusses how AI can elevate spiritual intelligence and personal well-being His expertise in integrating Eastern philosophy with Western medicine has made him a leading voice in the dialogue surrounding the impact of AI on spiritual intelligence, suicide prevention, and mental health awareness. Through his insights and initiatives, Chopra continues to inspire holistic well-being and enhanced spiritual awareness among individuals seeking personal growth and fulfillment.

In this episode, you will be able to:

  • Discover how to unlock the power of Dharma in your life
  • Explore the profound impact of AI on expanding your spiritual intelligence
  • Learn effective strategies to address mental health challenges in young people
  • Uncover powerful techniques for overcoming depression and reclaiming your joy
  • Embrace the role of technology as a tool for enhancing your overall well-being

Deepak Chopra is the founder of the Chopra Foundation, a non-profit entity for research on well-being and humanitarianism, and Chopra Global, a modern-day health company at the intersection of science and spirituality. He is a Clinical Professor of Family Medicine and Public Health at the University of California, San Diego and serves as a senior scientist with Gallup Organization. He is also an Honorary Fellow in Medicine at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow. He is the author of over 95 books translated into over forty-three languages, including numerous New York Times bestsellers. For the last thirty years, Chopra has been at the forefront of the meditation revolution, and in his latest book, is Digital Dharma. TIME magazine has described Dr. Chopra as “one of their top 100
most influential people.”

Connect with Deepak Chopra: Website | Instagram | X

  • Sages & Scientists Symposium
  • Never Alone Initiative
  • Digital Deepak

If you enjoyed this conversation with Deepak Chopra, check out these other episodes:

How AI Answers Life’s Biggest Questions with Iain Thomas & Jasmine Wang

How to Live in the Light with Deepak Chopra

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

00:00:00 – Deepak Chopra
What we call anger is the memory of trauma. Hostility is the desire to get even. Guilt and shame is blaming yourself and the depletion of energy that happens with those emotions is actually what we call depression.

00:00:21 – Chris Forbes
Welcome to the one you feed. Throughout time, great thinkers have recognized the importance of the thoughts. We have quotes like garbage in, garbage out or you are what you think ring true. And yet for many of us, our thoughts dont strengthen or empower us. We tend toward negativity, self pity, jealousy or fear. We see what we dont have instead of what we do. We think things that hold us back and dampen our spirit. But its not just about thinking. Our actions matter. It takes conscious, consistent and creative effort to make a life worth living. This podcast is about how other people keep themselves moving in the right direction, how they feed their good wolves. Thanks for joining us. Our guest on this episode is returning for the second time on the podcast. It’s Deepak Chopra. He is the founder of the Chopra Foundation, a non profit entity for research on well being and humanitarianism. And Chopra Global, a modern day health company at the intersection of science and spirituality. Deepak Chopra is board certified in internal medicine, endocrinology and metabolism. He’s a fellow at the AmErican College of Physicians and a member of the AmErican association of Clinical Endocrinologists. He serves as clinical professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego. He’s also the host of the podcast Daily Breath and the author of over 90 books, including the one discussed here, digital how AI can elevate spiritual intelligence and personal well being.

00:02:09 – Eric Zimmer
Hi Deepak, welcome to the show.

00:02:10 – Deepak Chopra
Thank you for having me again, Eric.

00:02:12 – Eric Zimmer
Yes, pleasure to have you back on. We’re going to be discussing a couple of different things here. We’re going to be discussing a new book you wrote called Digital how AI can elevate spiritual intelligence and personal well being. We’re also going to talk about a new initiative you have called the Never Alone initiative. But before we get into all that, we’ll start like we always do, which is with the parable. In the parable, there’s a grandparent who’s talking with their grandchild, and they say in life there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear. And the grandchild stops and they think about it for a second. They look up at their grandparent and they say, well, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

00:03:07 – Deepak Chopra
My life is about two freedom from suffering and how can you live the best life possible, as in the phrase follow your bliss? Joseph CAMpbelL so when I talk about digital Dharma, or dharma in general, which is a difficult concept for most people, dharma is how do you fit into the order of the universe? Ultimately, who you are beyond all the labels and definitions and stories about you, and ultimately who you are, is a field of infinite potential. You are immeasurable. You are infinite. You are timeless. You are eternal. And only your stories are in the realm of the finite. So how do you get to that place which is independent of the good and bad opinions of the world? How do you get to that place which is fearless? How do you get to the place where you feel beneath no one, and not necessarily superior to anyone either? How do you get to that place of ultimate freedom to follow your bliss, the best life possible?

00:04:28 – Eric Zimmer
That’s a beautiful answer. And I’m going to dive in for a second on this word dharma, just a little bit for a second, because dharma, as you said, is sort of our path or the path, yes. And you’re talking about this timeless awareness that is inside of us that is bigger than our personal stories. Would that be an accurate way of saying it?

00:04:52 – Deepak Chopra
Yes.

00:04:53 – Eric Zimmer
So, given that, is my dharma different than your dharma?

00:04:57 – Deepak Chopra
Well, if you understand dharma also as life purpose, then dharma exists at several levels. And you could almost say it’s an extension of Abraham Maslow’s idea of the hierarchy of needs. So your dharma is to be secure. Safety and survival for yourself. Your dharma is also to seek personal pleasure, whether, you know, personal pleasure through the five senses, because we are essential beings. Your dharma is also about changing adversity into opportunity. But those are very basic levels. Survival, safety, transformation, power, self esteem. Those are very basic. Beyond that, your dharma starts to move in a direction which is more spiritual. Love and belongingness, creative expression and insight and intuition and imagination, higher consciousness and transcendence, which is enlightenment. So, yes, along the way, we choose different paths, but ultimately, the peak of the mountain is total freedom and unleashing your infinite potential. That is common to you and me. Along the way, you know, many paths leading to the peak of the mountain.

00:06:25 – Eric Zimmer
That’s a great way of summarizing. I really like that, that we’re all going to have our different paths up to the mountain. But at a certain level, there is this timeless, infinite thing that is the same in me as it is in you. But on our way to that, we are actually very different. And our paths will reflect and should reflect that difference.

00:06:46 – Deepak Chopra
Correct.

00:06:46 – Eric Zimmer
So before we get into your latest book, Digital Dharma, I want to spend a little bit of time and talk about something called the Never Alone initiative. Can you share with me what the never alone initiative is?

00:07:01 – Deepak Chopra
I’ll share with you how it started. So it started during COVID or just when Covid came. And I and some of the people in our foundation, we learned that suicide was the second most common cause of death among teens. We also learned that every 40 seconds, somebody in the world was dying from suicide. And even when he says second most common cause of death amongst teens, the first common cause is accidents and drugs, which is also linked to depression. So depression, anxiety, anger, hostility, shame, humiliation seems to be actually the pandemic right now. The teens were saying that it’s difficult to get through a day without crying. So we launched never alone as a community platform with four basic ideas. Attention, deep listening, affection, deep caring, and love. Appreciation, noticing the uniqueness of everyone, and acceptance, accepting everyone just as they are because they’re so unique. And then we actually used an emotional chatbot, an AI chat bot, to talk to the teens. And we were able to intervene in 6000 suicide ideations, and there were 20 million conversations happening geniusly. But over the years, what we’ve also realized is that there are superior AI platforms in dealing with depression proteins, and that probably was not our expertise. So what we have moved in the direction of never alone is a whole program called freedom from suffering, where you’re never alone, because it’s obvious that people are hyper connected and still lonely. So, you know, now we are creating programs on never alone for people to actually be educated on how they can lead a life which maximizes their potential but also connects them, you know, in the spiritual relations of the east, they say if you have maximum diversity, shared vision, emotional and spiritual bonding, and complementing each other’s strength, no problem is unsolvable. So never alone has become a platform, not only for young people, but people of all demographics, to create online and offline communities just based on the forays that I mentioned. Attention, affection, appreciation, acceptance, but also to educate them on how service, community, and some kind of reflection or spiritual inquiry or introspection practice can help elevate their lives and create freedom from suffering for them and for others. So community, spiritual discipline, and selfless service.

00:09:55 – Eric Zimmer
It’S a beautiful idea. So along with the never initiative, the healing practices that you talked about, attention, appreciation, acceptance, and affection. You also talk about sort of four toxic beliefs that are leading many of our young people to these states of despair. No one cares about me. I don’t matter. I’m weak and powerless, and I’m destined to be a victim. Talk to me about why those four beliefs felt like the key toxic beliefs you guys wanted to focus on.

00:10:28 – Deepak Chopra
It’s basically Eric’s social conditioning and cultural conditioning and parental conditioning. And we keep recycling those ideas, you know, so generation after generation, we recycle those ideas that ultimately lead to trauma. And every distress in any person can be traced to trauma, either in their childhood years or maybe even before that. You know, what we call intergenerational trauma. So what we call anger is the memory of trauma. Hostility is the desire to get even. Guilt and shame is blaming yourself, and the depletion of energy that happens with those emotions is actually what we call depression. They’re all related. Ultimately, everything can be traced back to trauma. You look at the putins of the world, or you look at, you know, the tyrants of the world. They are the ultimate, final expression of a traumatic experience that they had when they were children. So this is very important to understand that mainly emotional spirit. Let’s not even not talk about spiritual intelligence, but our emotional intelligence is shaped by our childhood experiences. And those who have been traumatized inflict trauma, only hurt people, hurt other people. This is a deep understanding, which then tells us there’s a more compassionate way to understand people who we think are toxic. And the first responsibility is get over our own toxic, limiting beliefs.

00:12:06 – Eric Zimmer
Another question I have related to this, and I’m curious what you think about this. We have, on one hand, seen an unprecedented amount over the last, let’s call it, decade, of discussion about mental health. The stigma has certainly lessened to a great degree. Maybe not around all mental disorders, and maybe not around suicide specifically, but around anxiety, depression. We talk about these things in a way we never did. The stigma isn’t there in the way that it once was. And yet, by most measures, things are getting worse in young people’s mental health. And so I’m just curious how you think about the role of lessening stigma and worsening mental health. And is there a connection? Is there a way in which the way that we’re talking about these things isn’t helpful? Are we talking about them too much? Are we missing the boat? Or is this just sort of a lagging indicator, so to speak, when we.

00:13:10 – Deepak Chopra
Talk about the stigma? I think the only way to remove the stigma is that there’s no one that has not had a, at some point in their life, mental distress. If somebody says, I’ve never had any mental distress, then, you know, they’re either lying or they’re in denial. The range, though, of mental distress starts with mild anxiety and then deeper degrees of sadness, and then there’s psychosis and schizophrenia and ultimately even suicidal ideation. So it’s a broad spectrum of people who feel sad, basically. Broad spectrum. They all have to. First of all, when we remove the stigma, we can say one way to handle the stigma is everyone has had something or the other within this range of what we call depression or sadness. That’s how we handle the stigma. Why we are not so successful is we are trying old methodologies, okay? We try psychotherapy, we try medication, and they work, but in a very limited way. And treating depression is not just above the neck. You know, we think we have to treat something here in the brain. Okay? Treating depression is a total body experience. It includes good sleep, it includes exercise, it includes healthy relationships, includes a good diet, it includes mindfulness practices, how do you breathe, how do you relate? So it’s a total body mind, exercise experience all at the same time. There’s a lot of new research on our autonomic nervous system, which is the part of our nervous system which is below our conscious awareness, and yet it dominates us. Okay? So there are two parts of the autonomic nervous system. One is in the survival mode, which is called the sympathetic nervous system, which is responsible for the fight or flight response. And right now, the world is on sympathetic overdrive means stress. There’s another part of the nervous system called the parasympathetic nervous system, which is getting prominence now. It’s called the rest rejuvenate and digest system. Basically, it’s the healing system of the body. There’s one dominant nerve there. It’s called the vagus nerve. And now we are recognizing that the vagus nerve can be activated through eye exercises, through facial expressions, through tone of voice, through singing, through chanting, through deep breathing, through heart awareness, through interoceptive awareness, which means how do we practice awareness of what’s happening inside the body? Through laughter, through social engagement. And activating the vagus nerve is probably the healthiest way to get rid of depression because it enhances our social interactions, but it also makes us feel healthier and joyful. And anything we can do to improve that will be helpful in tackling this pandemic rather than focusing just above the head.

00:16:42 – Eric Zimmer
Later in the book, you’re talking about wholeness in general. And you talk about that, a real picture of depression is a many causes, many cures. That’s it type thing. Right. And I’ve certainly had depression at different points throughout my adult life. And that’s been, my experience is lots of different things cause it. It’s hard to tweeze apart what they are, but it’s multicolored, and it has taken a variety of really just sort of trying everything from lots of different approaches as what’s turned out to be the most robust sort of ongoing support for it. That also, not only by taking that approach, lessens depression, but just increases overall well being in so many categories.

00:17:29 – Deepak Chopra
Yeah. And there’s so many new disciplines now like nutrition and psychiatry. You know, some people will respond to just changes in their diet, and there’s no universal way of predicting which diet will work for you. But now with the advent of AI and the ability to measure biomarkers and even things like heart rate variability and other things, you know, sleep patterns, activity levels, breathing patterns, looking at metabolic rates, and using AI to actually correlate biological parameters with moods, we can have very specific intervention now, since you mentioned that. By the way, in addition to digital Dharma, which I’m holding in my hand right now, I have a new project called Digitaldepoc AI. It’s not an app. You can go on your browser anytime. And you can ask me a question in either Arabic or English or Spanish, and you’ll get my voice answering your question, and you won’t know the difference between me and my voice, but you’ll research 95 of my books, 35,000 questions that I’ve answered over four decades and everything I’ve done on YouTube or social media, and give you a very precise answer. Try it yourself afterwards, Eric, Digitaldepug AI and see if you have a question about mental health, well being, health in general, and spirituality, and test it out. Here it is. Companion to digital dharma.

00:19:09 – Eric Zimmer
This better not be digital Deepak I’m talking to right now. I expect real Deepak for these interviews.

00:19:14 – Deepak Chopra
Well, I’m not going to answer that question.

00:19:18 – Eric Zimmer
It’s crazy what these things can do. I just. I mean, I don’t have 93 books, but I have hundreds of hours of podcast interviews and me talking. I fed them to a similar thing and ask this clone of me questions, and it answers like me, but even more coherent. It’s stunning. It’s frightening and amazing. It’s not publicly available like digital Deepak. I keep him walled off.

00:19:45 – Deepak Chopra
I think we should have a digital Eric publicly available based on your podcast. Yeah.

00:19:51 – Eric Zimmer
Well, maybe the digital Eric needs to interview the digital Deepak, and we need to see what kind of craziness comes. Exactly. So let’s talk about AI. That’s your latest book, Digital Dharma, how AI can elevate spiritual intelligence and personal well being. You say early in the book that the reason that this idea of AI being able to help with well being and spiritual awareness is that few of us would link the two words consciousness and machine together. Why do you feel that AI is a tool that can help us become more spiritually aware, can help our spiritual development and our personal well being?

00:20:37 – Deepak Chopra
I think a lot of people are very savvy into what AI is and because they’re interested. But the general public in large does not understand what we call AI. The general public. And I would say in one word, anybody who understands air will say it’s not sentient, it’s not even intelligent. It’s not, certainly not conscious. What it is is a large language model. And this is very important to understand because our entire experience of the human universe is based on language. About 40,000 years ago, the human species, homo sapiens took a different road than all other species, including other hominins, or hominids, as they’re called. There were eight different kinds of humans up to, say, 40,000 years ago, when historians, deep historians, tell us something happened called the cognitive revolution, and that is homo sapiens. You and I, our ancestors, they took a different road than even the other hominids. We created a language for telling stories. All the other species and biological organisms have language, but the language is only for three mating calls, Mitchell. Reproduction, food calls, and danger calls. That’s how the species survives mating, reproduction, food, and avoiding danger. Then this particular species, which is us, we created a language of telling stories. There’s a phrase, to be human is to have a story. And the first stories were gossip. And the most common stories today are gossip that never went away. But then there was another story. It was called money. Another story called latitude, longitude, colonialism, empires. The entire human experience is built on stories, which then became other stories, which we call models. The models of physics, the model of mathematics, the model of biology, the models of philosophy, the model of science, the model of technology. There’s no human being who has access to all these stories. AI gives us access to the greatest minds of humanity from the beginning of the hunter gatherer age, through the greek Enlightenment and the european Enlightenment and the eastern sages of the upanishads. So there’s no human being who can have access to this kind of knowledge base. And this gives us a direction for wisdom. So there’s data, there’s information, there’s knowledge, and there’s wisdom. Wisdom is knowledge that can uplift us, that can improve our lives, that can even ultimately create a more peaceful, just sustainable, healthier and joyful world. And AI is a tool. It’s giving us all these roadmaps. But we have to remember that the map is not the territory, just in the same way as the menu is not the meal, you have to eat the meal, you can’t eat the menu, and you have to travel these different paths that AI is pointing to. So AI is a tool for everything that you can possibly do to improve your well being and spiritual intelligence. There’s a dark side to it, because that’s a dark side, is there? With any technology, even the invention of fire and then automobiles and then jet planes and the Internet, you know, the divine and diabolical is the human story. They go together. You started this conversation with that. You know, you can live a good life or you can live a bad life. They go together. You can’t have one, just like you can’t have up without down, hot without cold, you know, plus without minus, etcetera. All experiences. By contrast, it’s your choice. Which path do you want to travel? And, you know, so far, the spiritual path has been the path less traveled. When we think of spiritual people, we think of luminaries, Jesus Christ, Buddha, you know, Socrates, the sages of the Upanishads or of the Bible. But now that path is available to all of us.

00:24:54 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I think that’s one of the things that people often miss about AI, is that it is, in a very real sense, us. Right? I mean, it is the collective human knowledge, both in its great degree of profoundness and, you know, nonsense. AI has been trained on all of that.

00:25:16 – Deepak Chopra
I think you point to something very important. Don’t even call it artificial intelligence. AI stands for augmented human intelligence.

00:25:24 – Eric Zimmer
And so what you’ve made an attempt to do is to use AI for good, which I think is wonderful. I’ve been actually, you and I are involved in another project. You don’t know this, but rebind AI, of course. I did a book for them on the Tao Te Ching.

00:25:43 – Deepak Chopra
Wow.

00:25:44 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:25:44 – Deepak Chopra
That’s wonderful.

00:25:46 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:25:46 – Deepak Chopra
Yes, rebind. I did a book on buddhist thought. So it goes together with your.

00:25:54 – Eric Zimmer
What I loved about that project is that it was a chance to use this technology, like you said, for good. I’m a pretty big believer that the horse doesn’t go back in the barn once it’s out. Right. And so then the question is, what can I do with a horse that’s good and trying to figure that out. I think that most of us are just experimenting right now, trying to figure out, like, what is good, what is helpful, what works.

00:26:19 – Deepak Chopra
I believe that technology is part of the evolution of the human species, and once the technology comes, it can’t go back. Just like a child that’s born, you can’t return to the womb. It’s there. You can’t unlearn language once you’ve learned it, you can’t unlearn how to walk. Once you learned how to walk. The same thing holds true for technology. Either you adapt and use it to the best or you become irrelevant. That’s a darwinian principle.

00:26:48 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. So one of the things that we do know about AI, and I think maybe people make a bigger deal out of it than it actually is, and yet it’s real. It happens, is this tendency of AI to sort of hallucinate things. When you were working on digital Dharma, you know, to what extent did you find AI things that turned out not to be useful? Obviously, in the book, you’ve put in the prompts and the things that worked and that were useful were you, as you were going through that also discarding things where you were like, wait a minute, that’s, you know, that isn’t quite right or that isn’t useful.

00:27:30 – Deepak Chopra
Large language models that are out there, whether it’s chat, GPT, or it’s whatever other models, bing, etcetera. And I use all of them. When you pose a question that has never been asked before or a question that’s not familiar, even though it’s couched in language that is not familiar, then the AI makes up the answer. And that’s what hallucination is. And, you know, there are many times that happens. It’s not that common, by the way, but it’s something that will improve over time. But that’s why I created my digital twin, I would note, access any other material right now other than the material that I have created over four or five decades, there’s no possibility of hallucination. If you go to, say, digital epoch AI, that is what differentiates our AI from all other AI’s right now. So, yes, hallucination is a problem, but it’s being understood and it will ultimately be solved. But if you restrict the search engines to just a particular domain, then hallucination is unlikely. And as we speak now, there are things being developed called small language models instead of large language models. So you have AI just for, say, genetics, AI just for neuroscience, AI just for mathematics, where the chance of hallucination would be much less.

00:29:05 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I think that’s where a lot of really interesting things yet to come are, is exactly in that area where we say, instead of you being trained on everything that it can suck up, we’re going to train you on like you did. I’m going to train you on my books, which means if you’re going to say something, it is going to be something I have already said because I’ve sort of hemmed you in here to a certain degree. Yeah. So you talk about that. The guru role can be renovated for our times using AI. Say more about that.

00:29:37 – Deepak Chopra
Traditionally, in, in India, the guru was a spiritual guide and also embodied the wisdom that the guru imparted. Today, the whole realm of GUrus has become more cultish. It’s more about the Guru than about the wisdom. And sometimes the Guru and the wisdom imparted, you know, I can recycle ancient wisdom. There’s no problem with that. I can speak the language. Am I embodying it is the traditional GUru. So what AI does now, because it has access to all the wisdom, it gets the cultish, you know, Guru worship out of the way, which I think is more germane for our times, you know, and I’ve always felt that even when I took it, that, you know, people who practice, say, religion, like Christianity or Buddhism, you know, and they think of Jesus as the MesSiah, which is very appropriate to their religion. But if I was a follower of Jesus and Jesus was pointing to the moon, I would look at the moon instead of worshipping the finger. Okay, so this is what happens with us. We like the experience and the wisdom that is being imparted to us, and then we make the person who’s the messenger, the divine entity. That messenger may or may not be a divine entity, thats fine. But if Jesus had an experience, I want to learn how to have that experience. Okay. Rather than just, you know, believing his experience, Buddha had an experience. I want to know what that experience is. How can I get that experience rather than being a worshipper of Buddha? Now, thats your choice. You can do that, too. You can worship the messenger, but can you actually get the message and can you embody it in your own life? And I think AI helps us do that.

00:31:56 – Eric Zimmer
In essence, what you’re saying is that AI allows us in this case to separate the message from the messenger. Would that be a way of saying it.

00:32:06 – Deepak Chopra
Yeah, it does. It does. And not only to separate the message, to embody the message, if it resonates with us now in spiritual traditions, the message is actually very simple. It’s wisdom, courage, and embodying that. And compassion. Wisdom, courage, compassion, embodying that. And, you know, if you look at the spiritual experience these days, Eric, it’s very fashionable for people to say, I’m not religious, but I’m spiritual. It’s kind of sounds cool, but it’s, the religious experience and the spiritual experience are identical. It’s finding an identity which is transcends space and time. Your true identity outside of space and time, timeless, eternal soul or whatever. Number one. Number two, spontaneous ethical morality. Truth, goodness, beauty, harmony, love, compassion, joy, equanimity. That’s the second. And third is loss of the fear of death. This is common to all the religions. Okay, the experience. Now, people forget that that’s the experience. They just like the message, so they love the messenger, which is appropriate too, you know, because the message sounds amazing. But how can I have that same experience? How can I find my true self? How can I have spontaneous ethical behavior, not imposed, I don’t have to follow the Ten Commandments, but spontaneous ethical behavior. And thirdly, how can I lose the fear of death? Because that’s another part of the whole journey, spiritual journey, something called the dark night of the soul. So, you know, you and I, or anyone out there is ultimately going to get old. Consider old already, because I’m 78 chronologically, not biologically. You get old, you have infirmity, and then there’s death. That will never go away. No matter how healthy you are, no matter how much money you have, no matter what kind of relationships you have, you will get old, you will get infirmity, and you will die. That’s where spirituality comes in.

00:34:12 – Eric Zimmer
I’m going to take us a slightly different direction for a second, but this is a question that’s been on my mind lately. As somebody who is chronologically also getting older, everybody’s. Yes, I guess that’s true. All of us. I think there are different points in our lives where it becomes a little bit more kind of in your face, so to speak. And I was the sort of person that thought that I didn’t have much fear of death. Something has happened in the last couple years where the fact that I’m going to get old, I am getting old, am going to die, has become more salient. Do you feel like sometimes that the only way to truly get through that fear is to actually encounter it for real? Yes.

00:34:56 – Deepak Chopra
And somehow I was lucky enough to have that imparted to me in my childhood. You know, my mother would say that since everybody is headed in the direction of dusty death, to be in denial of it is actually to create more fear. But to be aware that death is stalking you every moment of your life. You look behind and the prince of death is behind you. Then you look behind again, and he’s closer. There was some french philosopher, he said, I forget the name right now. He said, we are all on death row. The only uncertainty is the method of execution and the length of reprieve. So I’m very conscious of the prince of death behind me and getting closer. That makes every moment absolutely very precious. Because when I die, particular storyline will die, but not the consciousness that weaves infinite stories for itself.

00:35:56 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. Like I said, it’s the sort of thing that I’ve thought a lot about. And maybe it’s just looking over my shoulder and seeing like he’s gaining ground has caused me to be a little bit less nonchalant about it than I was before. But I have also been sort of framing it in the sense of like, okay, well, now is a new chance to reckon with it yet again, right? Because it’s going to keep coming.

00:36:22 – Deepak Chopra
And it’s a chance to ask yourself, who am I? Am I that fertilized egg? Or am I that baby or toddler or teenager, young adult, mature adult, all the way to dusty death? In fact, if you identify with anyone of those stories, then you are actually denying something much more profound. Who you are is not your current storyline. In fact, we worry about children that don’t develop. Right. If your child didn’t develop into teenage years, you would worry. If you were stuck at teenage years, you would worry also. So evolution is part of our journey, and change is part of our experience. And actually change and flow is what consciousness does. And we want to get stuck at a particular stage of development, which would be very worrisome. We would all be frozen mummies in a universe that would be a museum.

00:37:23 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. Let’s talk about something else you talk about in the new book, where you talk about two companions. I and it explain that for us.

00:37:32 – Deepak Chopra
That analogy is taken from an ancient aphorism in the vedantic tradition where you have the metaphor of two birds and they’re identical. The birds are identical. One bird is enjoying the fruits of pleasure and pain. So you see one bird pecking at a fruit and basically going through life, pleasure, pain, both. You can’t have one with it. And the other is watching silently, not participating. And there. So we have these roles. One is we are totally immersed in the role, and that’s our ego identity, our personality, or whatever we think, our self images created by social constructs. But there’s a deeper awareness that is the background against which this change occurs. Right now, people may be listening to us or watching us on the screen. Okay, but what is really here that is not changing? This program is changing. Our conversation is changing. After you finish with me, you’ll have another program. There could be infinite number of programs on this screen these days. It’s easier to understand that, you know, you have Netflix and you have Amazon. You have this, that you can have an infinite number of programs that are all changing, but the screen is a constant. So it is the constant non change in the midst of the changing scenery. You are not the scenery. You are the seer, in which the scenery appears. That’s a profound spiritual insight, that the more you identify with the scenery, you’d be overwhelmed by it, which is the common condition in the world right now. But if you actually identified with the seer, which is the non changing factor, in the midst of the changing scenery, you would have peace, equanimity. You would recognize that it’s your destiny to play an infinity of roles. But you’re not the roles you play.

00:39:32 – Eric Zimmer
And so the eye is the bird that’s pecking at the pleasure and pain, and then the. It is the bird that’s watching that phrase. It is a strange phrase to try and identify with, I know, but it.

00:39:48 – Deepak Chopra
Is that non local being or spirit that you are. You know, John Wheeler, one of the greatest modern scientists, he said, we are the bit of the. It. The. It is non changing, and we are the bits of it that constantly change and transform.

00:40:07 – Eric Zimmer
So we are nearly out of time. But I wanted to give you a second to just tell us briefly about something called the sages and scientists symposium that you have coming up.

00:40:18 – Deepak Chopra
Thank you for asking that question. So, September 13, 14th and 15th at Sanders Theatre, which houses 1000 people, we are bringing together for three days thought leaders in the field of well being, in the field of humanitarianism, and in the field of astrobiology. So it’s about the future of well being, the future of humanity, and the future of the cosmos. You may or may not know that current astrobiology, biology, which is a new discipline, there are departments of astrobiology, many universities, Harvard, Princeton, Oxford, Cambridge, Arizona, that are now positing that there are 60 billion habitable planets in the Milky Way galaxy, in the same way as you and I are advanced civilizations, and there are 2 trillion galaxies. So this is actually current science. You can look it up, go to AI and whatever and look it up. So this is a very surprising thing right now that you know that we are part of a past tapestry of life that seeds the entire universe. That’s the finale of the conference. But it starts with the future of well being. Genetics, epigenetics, CRISPR gene editing messenger RNA, all of that. Then it goes into, you know, how can we create peace and social and economic justice? How can we tackle climate change? How can we create health and well being? That’s the future of humanity and finally, the future of the cosmos. So we invite anyone who wants to attend sagescientist.org dot.

00:41:59 – Eric Zimmer
If I were not going to be in Europe at that time, I would be seeing you there. But it sounds like a wonderful conference. We’ll have links in the show notes, and if you just search sage and scientists and Deepak, I’m sure you’ll find it. Deepak, thank you so much for coming on. It’s a pleasure to see you again. And in about eight minutes from now, when you release your next book, we will maybe do it again.

00:42:24 – Deepak Chopra
Okay. Yeah, it’s coming. The next book is.

00:42:29 – Eric Zimmer
I’m sure it is.

00:42:30 – Deepak Chopra
Unveiling the matrix.

00:42:32 – Eric Zimmer
Okay. All right. Take care, Deepak. Thank you. Bye.

00:42:51 – Chris Forbes
If what you just heard was helpful to you, please consider making a monthly donation to support the one U Feed podcast. When you join our membership community with this monthly pledge, you get lots of exclusive members only benefits. It’s our way of saying thank you for your support. Now, we are so grateful for the members of our community, we wouldn’t be able to do what we do without their support. And we don’t take a single dollar for granted. To learn more, make a donation at any level and become a member of the one u feed community. Go to oneyoufeed.net. join the one ufeed podcast would like to sincerely thank our sponsors for supporting the show.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

Finding Courage in Life’s Daily Struggles with Kelly Corrigan

August 23, 2024 Leave a Comment

In this special collaborative episode, Kelly Corrigan and Eric come together to discuss wide range of topics with an overarching theme of how to find courage in life’s daily struggles. From Eric sharing his overcoming addiction story to Kelly sharing her overcoming cancer story, they explore the many challenges and uncertainties of life.

In this episode, you will be able to:

  • Discover how to curate a social media feed that uplifts and inspires
  • Explore the impact of technology on mental wellness and how to harness its benefits
  • Learn effective strategies for breaking free from addiction and reclaiming control
  • Embrace the power of intellectual humility to foster deeper connections and understanding
  • Uncover the courage within ordinary moments and the transformative impact it can have

Kelly Corrigan is the author of four New York Times bestselling memoirs in the last decade, earning her the title of the poet laureate of the ordinary from the Huffington Post and voice of a generation from O magazine. Kelly has also penned some very popular op-eds about applying to college, becoming an empty nester, and giving advice to teenagers. She is the host of the popular podcast Kelly Corrigan Wonders.

If you enjoyed this conversation with Kelly Corrigan, check out these other episodes:

How to Embrace Uncertainty with Suleika Jaouad

Strengthening Our Resilience with Linda Graham

By purchasing products and/or services from our sponsors, you are helping to support The One You Feed and we greatly appreciate it. Thank you!

patreon

If you enjoy our podcast and find value in our content, please consider supporting the show. By joining our Patreon Community, you’ll receive exclusive content only available on Patreon!  Click here to learn more!!

Episode Transcript:

00:00:00 – Kelly Corrigan
If you want to have a big, juicy, fast moving, energetic conversation, you can’t really do that unless people have opinions, because two people who are really steeped in intellectual humility are just going to kind of look at each other without words and say, yeah, it’s kind of hard to know.

00:00:23 – Chris Forbes
Welcome to the one you feed. Throughout time, great thinkers have recognized the importance of the thoughts. We have quotes like garbage in, garbage out, or you are what you think ring true. And yet for many of us, our thoughts dont strengthen or empower us. We tend toward negativity, self pity, jealousy or fear. We see what we dont have instead of what we do. We think things that hold us back and dampen our spirit. But its not just about thinking our actions matter. It takes conscious, consistent, and creative effort to make a life worth living. This podcast is about how other people keep themselves moving in the right direction, how they feed their good. Wolf, thanks for joining us. Our guest on this episode is Kelly corriganhood. She’s written four New York Times bestselling memoirs in the last decade, earning her the title of the poet laureate of the ordinary from the Huffington Post and voice of a generation from O magazine. Kelly has also penned some very popular op eds about applying to college, becoming an empty nester, and giving advice to teenagers. Kelly is the host of the popular podcast Kelly Corrigan Wonders.

00:01:48 – Eric Zimmer
Hi Kelly, welcome to the show.

00:01:50 – Kelly Corrigan
Thanks. Welcome to my show.

00:01:52 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, this is a collaborative episode where we’re going to just have a conversation. We’re both people who have talked to countless other wonderful people. I think you’re one of the better interviewers out there, and this is something I pay attention to. And so we’re just going to have a collaborative conversation about the different things that come up. But why don’t we start the way this show always starts, which is with the parable.

00:02:16 – Kelly Corrigan
Sure.

00:02:16 – Eric Zimmer
And in the parable, there’s a grandparent who’s talking with their grandchild. And they say in life, there are two wolves inside of us that are always at battle. One is a good wolf, which represents things like kindness and bravery and love, and the other is a bad wolf, which represents things like greed and hatred and fear. And the grandchild stops. They think about it for a second. They look up at their grandparent and they say, which one wins? And the grandparent says, the one you feed. So I’d like to start off by asking you what that parable means to you in your life and in the work that you do.

00:02:48 – Kelly Corrigan
So I have lots of associations with it. I mean, I rely on thinking fast and slow. The great Daniel Kahneman work as a touch point for me in all my thinking. And so I think about system one and system two. And then I’ve done lots of episodes with philosophers. Like, there’s this woman at Yale named Tamar Gendler who goes through the ancient philosophies and what each of them has to teach us about modern happiness. And there’s always this desire to come up with a metaphor or a parable that explains our nature to us in a way that’s really simple, that there are these two wolves, or that there’s an elephant and a rider, or there’s a charioteer, and there’s two horses. And the one horse is your desires and impulses, and the other horse is your rational mind. And then Kahneman took it to the system one and two. So all of that springs to life for me. And then this other thing that I’ve said to my kids for a long time when I and listening to them and thinking, oh, you’re catastrophizing. Is you live in your head. Make it nice in there, you know, almost like decorating a room. Like, put in a soft rug and give yourself a beanbag chair and put pretty things on the walls. Like, that’s where you live. That’s where it’s happening. That’s where you’re making sense of your identity and your existence and your relationships. And so just recognize that there’s always agency, because there’s always you at the back of things, interpreting events. And that involves a lot of choice. We’re not watching a movie of our lives. We’re actors in the movie of our lives, and we’re writers of the movie of our lives, and we’re the directors and we’re the editors. And so it doesn’t mean that our lives can defy physics, but it means that we’re playing a role and what it feels like to us. So that came to mind too. What does it mean to you? How do you think about it?

00:04:43 – Eric Zimmer
Well, I mean, I’ve thought about it a lot of different ways over reading it all these years, but, I mean, I think in its essence, it is about choice, right? It’s about that I have choice and the choices that I make about what I do and what I think and what I engage in and what things I feed myself, you know, physically, but also in what I read and what I watch and what I do. All those things are important. They matter. And I also like it because it makes it sound like this battle is going on inside everybody, which I think normalizes what it’s like to be human.

00:05:18 – Kelly Corrigan
Is it?

00:05:19 – Eric Zimmer
And I also like it because it also sounds like it’s kind of close. Like, it’s not like the, you know, the good wolf is running away with it. You know, it’s like, you know, we’re not quite sure what’s going to happen here, so.

00:05:31 – Kelly Corrigan
Right, right. It’s anybody’s. Yeah, it’s a toss up.

00:05:33 – Eric Zimmer
Exactly. Now, I think, like all the things that you sort of just mentioned, whether it’s Kahneman’s system one or two, or Jonathan Haight’s excellent elephant and the rider and all of these things, they’re all models for something that is far more complicated than that. And so this parable is a vast oversimplification of our inner landscape. Sometimes it might be nice if there were only two things in there going on instead of a pseudo conflicting goals. Yeah, exactly. A veritable Noah’s ark in there.

00:06:06 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah. I was thinking about how it applies very specifically to a variety of things as well. Like, to the food you eat, to the media you consume, to the way you set up your social media account. Like, you can sort of turn your mind all day long toward vitriol or toward beauty, toward inspiration or toward desperation. I find those little pockets of agency very encouraging. Like, I have really tuned my social media feed to something that just brings me reels and reels and reels of wonder, you know, like an elephant and its baby standing by a tree in the serengeti, away from the sun, or a whale that’s opening its mouth and all these fish are coming into its mouth, and it’s like, closing in on them. Or a painter, a time capsule type capture of somebody painting something really beautiful, or ballerinas working together to make this message. If you use a drone camera to catch it from overhead, or little kids dancing to Beyonce. I have created a positive feed by saying yes to all the beauty and wonder feeds and saying no to all the vitriol and superiority feeds.

00:07:20 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I think that speaks to the nature of so many of these things in the world that I think a lot of people want to label as either they’re good or bad and recognizing that they’re tools. And how do we use these tools wisely in a way that is best for us? There are amazing things we can see on social media if certain things surface. I don’t use it very much, but today a friend sent me a picture of a Boston terrier. I love Boston terriers. I had one until last fall, and she passed, and it’s Boston terrier running and jumping on this inflatable ball, and it goes flying through the air, and you’re like, this animal is in trouble and is back after that ball with not the slightest thought. It’s just the most amazing thing to watch. And it just made my whole morning.

00:08:10 – Kelly Corrigan
Right, right. I wonder what that tendency says about us, that we want to blame the tool instead of blaming the way we use the tool. Like, per your earlier point about this desire to create a binary where something is good or bad, rather than saying, like, well, these are the functions of social media, and we are using it to good ends or bad ends or varied ends. But when you take that victim mentality, like that’s been laid on us, there’s nothing we can do about it. It’s ruining everything. I feel like you’re giving away this great opportunity to harness it for your own purposes, and hopefully they’re good purposes. But I just wondered if you have an opinion about why it’s easier to blame the tool than blame the way we use the tool.

00:08:59 – Eric Zimmer
Well, I think it goes to so many different things where we grasp for easy answers, and there usually aren’t any. The role of technology in our lives is a very complicated and nuanced issue. And so I think there’s some of that. I think there’s some degree, like you’re saying, of not wanting to take responsibility. I think there are valid criticisms to be made of a system in which young people are growing up within and the way that our attention is, you know, people are trying to manipulate it for profit. But I agree with you that I think, I am a big fan of nuance, and I actually can tell from your writing that you are also, I’ve just seen it over and over in your writings and in your conversations, this sense of, like, well, not so fast. Like, it’s a little more complicated than that. And so I think that’s what I sense a lot in these are technology discussions, is people wanting an easy answer.

00:09:56 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah.

00:09:56 – Eric Zimmer
You know, it would be nice if we could just blame it all on the tech companies. Well, that’s part of the story, but it’s certainly not the whole story.

00:10:03 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah. And it’s kind of like saying, like, magazines are bad or books are bad. Like, that’s actually how foolish a statement it is, because, you know, there’s the economist and there’s hustlere and there’s Sports Illustrated and there’s teen vogue, and, you know, so, I mean, I guess the distinguishing feature of social media is that there’s the user generated content. Yeah, but again, those are choices that you can make. I mean, I don’t follow many friends or peers. So an example that often gets thrown up around social media is, you know, everybody’s pretending to have these great lives, and then you get sucked into this idea that everybody’s vacation was better, everybody’s Christmas morning was better, everybody’s running further, exercising more, having more time with their grandparents. But that’s completely shutoutable. I mean, you just don’t have to use it that way.

00:10:59 – Eric Zimmer
Yes.

00:10:59 – Kelly Corrigan
I mean, you don’t have to use it at all. It’s not a requirement.

00:11:02 – Eric Zimmer
Yep. So it’s not.

00:11:05 – Kelly Corrigan
I wonder if you have examples at the ready of ways that you feed it the right wolf. Like, you must have habits of mind and habits of behavior. I mean, I know that you’re an addict who’s in recovery, and I know that oftentimes people add structures to their lives, like meetings or meditation or gratitude journals, etcetera, to ground them in something that represents their values and their sort of deepest desires for their own wellness. I wondered if you had a few off the top of your head that you used to feed the right wolf.

00:11:42 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, it’s wild that you just use the phrase habits of mind and habits of behavior, because I’m working on a book right now, and that’s one of the underlying core ideas, is that we have both habits of mind and habits of behavior that we can cultivate, and they reinforce each other for sure. So just to hear you use that phrase, I was like, wow, just writing about it yesterday. I mean, I think that, yeah, there are some things for me, and some things change over time, and some things remain very consistent as an addict. And some of that addiction, I think, was driven by depression, which I’ve also dealt with over the years. For me, exercise is sort of a non negotiable. For me. Like, it just seems to be the. If I could only have one thing that I could use, really, for even my mental health, it would be exercise. I’ve used meditation a lot over the years. I think there’s a habit of mind in general, of trying to not believe my thoughts too much, or at least like, be willing to interrogate them. That sounds harsher than it is, but being willing to question them and being willing to sort of see that everything, in many ways, is a story. You were referencing this a little bit earlier, right? That there are some things that are factual. Right. You and I are on Riverside right now and having a conversation that’s fairly factual. Right. But the smile on your face. I could be taking three different ways. Right. I could be making up all kinds of stories about what that means. And they would all be just that, stories. Because, I don’t know. And so I just think that is a foundational thing for me in a habit of mind, is always looking at that and saying, okay, what am I making this mean? And what else might it mean? Or what else could it mean?

00:13:37 – Kelly Corrigan
Are you sure?

00:13:38 – Eric Zimmer
Are you sure? Yeah.

00:13:39 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah. My husband and I have signal sentences to each other like, are you sure? And maybe. And when we say maybe, what we mean is, like, you might be just making shit up. Like, this might really not be nearly as true as you’re letting yourself believe it is. So it often happens when we’re speculating about one of our kids and how they’re doing and they live far away from us and we’re imagining. And then we’re starting to attribute motives to various people in the story. A boy who we thought liked them and doesn’t like them anymore, or some girl in her sorority who we’ve never met. But somehow in the story, we are ascribing motive to all the different characters in this little tale we’re telling.

00:14:28 – Eric Zimmer
Yep.

00:14:28 – Kelly Corrigan
And then the other person is. We’re really trying to train each other to at least both of us, not fall for our own nonsense at the same time. So assume that we will continue to make up stories spontaneously and without being conscious of it. But then as the other person’s doing it, well, I’ll tell you what happened. I mean, when she handed in that paper that time, I’m sure the teacher was like, what are you doing? Why are you at. And then the other person’s just supposed to say maybe, and it’s just a signal that, like, you’re making shit up. And you really don’t have very much information here at all. And then the other one, when it’s happening to us, when we’re telling a story about a problem in our own lives, the thing we’re trying to practice saying to each other is, are you sure? Are you sure that Tony wants this and Persona wants that and Alon wants that? Like, are you sure? It was like, maybe you should just ask.

00:15:22 – Eric Zimmer
Do you find sometimes that you’re fairly invested in a story or an emotion around the story, and you hear maybe, or, are you sure and you bristle a little bit? Or is it something that you sort of right away know what your partner’s trying to do there?

00:15:37 – Kelly Corrigan
I don’t bristle. Yeah, I don’t bristle. I mean, I have a terrible habit. I wonder if you have it at all from podcasting where, because, you know, our jobs involve, like, constant learning in preparing for these conversations, then having these conversations. And you meet a lot of people. I mean, I’ve interviewed probably 700 people now between the PBS show and the podcast and live events. And it has this dangerous potential consequence, which is that you sort of think you know things. You know, you sort of feel like you understand human nature a little bit better because you’ve interviewed all these people, or you understand human relationships because you’ve interviewed Esther Perel and other famous therapists, or you think that you understand wellness because you’ve interviewed Francis Collins at the NIH, or you understand spirituality because you interviewed Father Greg Boyle, or you understand music because you interviewed David Byrne. Like, it’s a natural outgrowth of being in this kind of constant learning posture. And I’m an enthusiastic learner. And one of the ways that I learn is I repeat it back. So if I’m reading a book, for sure Edward, my husband, will feel as though he’s reading it as well, because every time I put it down, I’ll say, here’s something for you. Listen to this. And when I read the paper in the morning, and when I read axios in the morning, I’m giving it back to him. And he’s like, Kelly, I’m literally reading the exact same thing right this second. I’m like, I know, but I need to say it to own it. Like, that’s how I internalize a piece of information is I have to say it out loud. I have to pass it along somehow. It’s probably why I podcast and write books. And that can dupe you into a state of intellectual arrogance where you do feel that when you’re listening to a kid tell you a story about something that happened with their friends or at their summer job, that you do have a fairly persuasive true self story about what and why? Cause, you know, you’re like, weaving in a little Astaire peral. You’re weaving in a little Francis Collins. And, you know, they’re big thinkers. And, I mean, I got to talk to Daniel Kahneman before he died. Like, you don’t think I was like, a totally out of control arrogant after that for a couple days? Like, insufferable. So I don’t know what the adage is, but it’s something about, like, a little bit of information is dangerous. Like, brushing up against big time thinkers can sometimes have this terrible knock on effect of you thinking that you really have a handle on something when you probably don’t. So when he says maybe, I think, oh, thank you.

00:18:07 – Eric Zimmer
You listen.

00:18:08 – Kelly Corrigan
Thank you, thank you, thank you. Oh, yeah. Although he did just walk in on our podcast recording, and although he’s done that before, and we’ll do it again. Eric, I do really like and respect the man I’m married to, and so I am sort of inclined to be grateful for his feedback, generally speaking, not about how I do the dishwasher, but, you know, like, important things.

00:18:30 – Eric Zimmer
I wonder, is there actually an officially right way to load the dishwasher? Because.

00:18:35 – Kelly Corrigan
No, don’t even. Don’t touch it with a ten foot pole. You’re going to put me in the most foul humor. It is the dumbest argument. We’ve had it a million times. And, yes, of course, there could be a way where you get the maximum number of dishes. That’s what he would say. But I roll it up one and say, is that what we’re doing in life? Is that our goal right now, to get the maximum number of dishes? Or is our goal to have, like, a peaceful after dinner period of collaborative work in the kitchen so that we can finish up and go upstairs and lie our bodies down? Is the goal efficiency, or is the goal the mood? And I say to you and to all listeners everywhere that the goal is the mood.

00:19:19 – Eric Zimmer
I agree.

00:19:20 – Kelly Corrigan
Thank you. Thank God I didn’t have to hang up on you. You can hear me getting whipped up about it.

00:19:24 – Eric Zimmer
Yes. No, I’m not going to try and instruct you on the proper way to load the dishwasher. Just. I just find it interesting that everybody thinks there’s a proper way. That’s all. It’s fascinating that we all have a relatively strongly held opinion, like, everything.

00:19:40 – Kelly Corrigan
Don’t you think we have strongly held opinions about everything?

00:19:42 – Eric Zimmer
I think we have a tendency to be.

00:19:43 – Kelly Corrigan
It feels safer. There’s like, a safety in it.

00:19:46 – Eric Zimmer
Sure.

00:19:46 – Kelly Corrigan
False security, I guess.

00:19:48 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. Well, it’s nice to feel like, you know what’s going on and to feel like, you know, you have some answers in this chaotic, sometimes frightening, confusing world.

00:19:59 – Kelly Corrigan
And the other thing is that when you cop to uncertainty and when you, like, reconnect to intellectual humility, because, say, your partner said maybe is, then there’s not that much to talk about, like, in terms of conversational fodder, which is this is just like, kind of a tactical thing. If you want to have a big, juicy, fast moving, energetic conversation, you can’t really do that unless people have opinions?

00:20:27 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:20:27 – Kelly Corrigan
Because two people who are really steeped in intellectual humility are just going to kind of look at each other without words and say, yeah, it’s kind of hard to know. I don’t really know what to do about public education in AmErica.

00:20:41 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:20:41 – Kelly Corrigan
You know, I don’t really know what the cutoff date should be to terminate a pregnancy. Me neither. Kind of hard to say. The conversation would just fall. It would just disappear.

00:20:50 – Eric Zimmer
And would you say that you’re that sort of person or you have lots of opinions?

00:20:55 – Kelly Corrigan
Well, I mean, the thing I have the strongest opinion about is how we shouldn’t have strong opinions.

00:20:59 – Eric Zimmer
Right.

00:20:59 – Kelly Corrigan
So the most animated I get you’re hearing it right now, and this is the kind of thing that it’s about. What I feel strongly about is that our nature is driving so much of our interactions in a way that is counterproductive to what we most want and need. Like, if let’s say that a super need of all mankind is belonging, there’s a cheap way to get it. You just put on the same shirt as the other guy, put the same bumper sticker on your car, start screaming and yelling the same things like chanting in a crowd with posters and I. That’s very bonding. I mean, you definitely feel that you belong, but it’s not really based on you and them. It’s not really that you found something, a special and important way to relate to each other. It’s that you cheaped out and you went for this. It’s, you know, it’s just like cheering for a football team, you know? Like, are you really connected? Am I really connected to every other Golden State warriors fan in the United States? A little bit, but not really. I mean, I love that team, but not as much as I love people who embrace uncertainty. But that’s not a team.

00:22:42 – Eric Zimmer
Those things are interesting, right? Because obviously, if you’re a fan of the Golden State warriors, you recognize there is a place for that communal experience and pulling for the same team, and that ultimately, it really doesn’t mean very much. What’s the famous joke like? It’s, you know, like, rooting for people who all wear the same clothes. Like, I am notoriously bad at having favorite teams in anything because I just am like, well, I mean, I will form an opinion of a group of people and be like, well, that’s the team I want to root for based on the people that are in it, not the uniform they’re wearing or the traditional, which makes me the absolute classic fairweather fan.

00:23:23 – Kelly Corrigan
Right, right.

00:23:25 – Eric Zimmer
But like you, nothing really animates me in the same way, except when people think they’re certain of something, and then I feel this perverse need to almost argue with them, even if I agree with them, even if I actually hold their underlying belief, if they hold it too strongly and they’re just certain, it just brings up something in me, and I find myself wanting to argue against it. I do this with my. My partner Ginny. I have to watch for it because I’m like, okay, that’s the wrong approach. Why would you want to do that? But it is sort of a habitual response in me.

00:24:02 – Kelly Corrigan
It’s such a turn off to me. Certainty. Yeah, it’s just such a turn off. It seems unsophisticated, you know, like when people wag their finger and say, I’ll tell you what you need to do to fix the transportation in AmErica. And it’s like, really? Really? You think there’s like a one sentence answer to transportation in AmErica? Like, I just think you sounded like a fool. Or, you know, these. I just know. I guess I’m old enough to know people who have now devoted 30 or 35 years to solving a single kind of societal problem. We know this great woman, this kid used to babysit for us who’s been working on homelessness in the Bay area, you know, since she was 20 years old and she’s 70. Can’t figure it out.

00:24:47 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:24:47 – Kelly Corrigan
So when you hear somebody on television or at a cocktail party say, I’ll tell you what they need to do about homelessness, I think, really, you cannot possibly think that you could solve homelessness. You can’t possibly. It’s so insulting to this woman that I know who’s been on it for 50 years with a big brain and a big heart, and she still can’t crack it. Like, don’t insult the people who are actually doing the work. These kind of sideline men, not in the arena. People who are so flippant about these nice, complex issues. Yeah, it’s a huge, huge turn off. So tell me about what you feed when you’re feeding the wrong wolf and how easy is it for you to catch yourself? Like, when was the last time you did something that you were like, that is so antithetical to my actual values and goals in life. I cannot believe I’m doing this again.

00:25:41 – Eric Zimmer
There’s a saying that I’ve heard in the past, and I think about it a lot, which is that the road gets narrower. And what I mean by that is the things that I used to do. Right. I mean, I was a homeless heroin addict at 24 and, you know, but just a card carrying criminal. I mean, I was just not. I was not a good. I was not a great person to myself or anybody around me. And so over the years, I think what has happened is that the things that I do that are sort of off the mark. It gets narrower and narrower. And I’m not trying to paint myself as a saint. I’m just saying that I don’t very often have huge moments of, like, why did I do that? That was so wrong. I would say that my not feeding the good wolf tends to be more these days in omissions versus commissions of things. Right. It’s not so much that I blew up at somebody that I shouldn’t have. It’s that I missed an opportunity to say something that might have deepened the relationship because I was afraid. It’s those sort of things. And so I have to hunt a little bit more for them because it’s very easy to justify those sort of things also. But I would say that that’s probably what it is. It’s, I’m not doing something that would have been good to do.

00:27:08 – Kelly Corrigan
Right?

00:27:09 – Eric Zimmer
Or I think I also wrestle with the question that I think everybody probably does to some degree. But, you know, how well am I spending my time? Am I using my time to things that I feel like really matter, while also recognizing that I can’t always be doing things that really matter? Like, I just don’t have the capacity to do it right. And I think as I’m getting older, I’m also learning what does the energy level look like and capacity of me in my early fifties versus me in my early thirties and trying to figure out, like, okay, you know, I’m not playing guitar for 2 hours every night after dinner because I’m really tired. Is that okay? Do I just go, well, that’s just kind of where you are right now. Or do you push? So, I mean, they’re more subtle things. But I would say it’s either I’m not taking an opportunity to deepen a relationship because I’m frightened of a difficult conversation, or I am using my time in a way that I wish I was using to be more creative or more involved in helping someone or that sort of thing. It’s not as exciting as it used to be when I could be like, well, you know, I did three armed robberies last week. I mean, that’s a more dramatic story than the one I just told, but.

00:28:35 – Kelly Corrigan
Life gets less dramatic as we get older.

00:28:37 – Eric Zimmer
Yes, yes.

00:28:38 – Kelly Corrigan
Tell me a little bit about your early twenties. How you ended up, where you ended up, how much repair did you have to do after rupturing? What I would assume is just about every important relationship in your life, plus your relationship with yourself, plus your relationship with society. That’s a lot of breakage.

00:28:59 – Eric Zimmer
It was a lot of breakage. I mean, there’s sort of a long version and a short version of how I ended up. Where I ended up. The short version is that I began, like many teenagers, to experiment with drugs and alcohol, and from almost the very beginning, had a very strange relationship with them. You know, I would do things like, people would get together and they would go drink in the night, and I would wake up in the morning and see some of the alcohol left over and be like, well, why not drink that? I didn’t do it often, but it was strange, right? I got drunk on mouthwash and, you know, would lead youth church groups that I was involved in and everybody getting drunk on mouthwash. I mean, I was a bad influence from the very beginning. And then in high school, I started a tutoring program for disadvantaged children, and I saw what alcohol and drugs in their family’s life was doing, and I was like, okay. I became basically straight edge for a few years, and then I went away on a trip, and I came back, and my girlfriend was dating my best friend, and I was just in so much pain over that that somebody offered me a drink, and I said, okay. And it was almost as if I was just off to the races after that. You know, I would be exaggerating if I said I didn’t draw a sober breath for the next six years, but not exaggerating by a ton. Yeah, it was like some switch just flipped. And so it was alcohol, and then alcohol led to marijuana, which then led to maybe lsd, which then led to maybe cocaine was showing. I mean, I was capable of abusing any and all of those things. And by the time I was about 22, I played music and bands, and I joined a band where I didn’t know it at the time, but three of the four people, the other three people in the band besides me, were intravenous heroin users.

00:30:58 – Kelly Corrigan
Wow.

00:30:58 – Eric Zimmer
And one night, somebody said, do you want to try it? You know, I tried it and I snorted it. And just over a relatively quick period of time, I became physically addicted to it, but I was no more addicted to that than I was to alcohol or marijuana. There’s just a physical component to it that’s different, and it’s a far more expensive habit, at least it was then than the cheap mad dog I could drink or whatever, right? And so that all of a sudden then became about having to get high and get a fix, which led to criminal activity.

00:31:38 – Kelly Corrigan
How much time passed between the first time you did heroin and the second time you did heroin?

00:31:43 – Eric Zimmer
Maybe a few weeks.

00:31:45 – Kelly Corrigan
And during those few weeks, were you thinking about it? Were you thinking, I’m absolutely gonna have to do that again?

00:31:50 – Eric Zimmer
I don’t think so. I can’t recall. I mean, because I would have been, like, really drunk and high on marijuana and drinking in between that timeframe, right? So it crept up quickly until I do remember one night being like, why do I feel so sick? Why do I feel so lousy? And I was like, holy shit, I have a physical addiction here to this. And sure enough, I went and used the heroin, and I felt immediately better. And I was like, uh oh.

00:32:23 – Kelly Corrigan
How many times do you think you did heroin?

00:32:25 – Eric Zimmer
Oh, I don’t know. I mean, let’s say I did it for three years, maybe, and I did it two or three times a day, so I don’t know. A thousand? I don’t know. I’m not entirely sure. A lot.

00:32:39 – Kelly Corrigan
Wow.

00:32:39 – Eric Zimmer
I mean, enough that I weighed 100 pounds at the time. I had hepatitis c. I mean, I was dying. I mean, I was in really bad shape. Between that and the fact that when I finally made it to treatment, quote, unquote, sort of the last time, I was facing 50 years in potential jail time, and, I mean, things were pretty bad.

00:33:00 – Kelly Corrigan
Who were your closest relationships the first time you did heroin, or did you not have any? Was that part of the.

00:33:06 – Eric Zimmer
No, no, I did. I did. I would say it was a group of friends that I’d been friends with for a few years, but they were people who largely. Maybe not to the extent that I did, but were people who were drinking pretty heavily. Right. I played rock music in bands, and so I was in that scene, and everybody was kind of that way. My close friends were.

00:33:27 – Kelly Corrigan
So nobody would have said, dude, you’re out of control.

00:33:30 – Eric Zimmer
Well, no. People started to. Even within that group, people would start to be like, whoa. Yeah.

00:33:37 – Kelly Corrigan
Even among heavy users, they were noticing.

00:33:40 – Eric Zimmer
Yes, yes. But that was kind of the case. I feel like from even very early on in my drinking, like, I was just even around people who partied a fair amount, there was something. I just had a slightly different gear. Not than all of them, but most of them.

00:33:59 – Kelly Corrigan
Were you always aware of that? Like, were you in a tiny conversation with yourself where you would say, yes, this is not the same. We’re not having the same experience here. I need this more. I want this more.

00:34:10 – Eric Zimmer
I did notice that, I mean, I started relatively early, maybe a year and a half into drinking and all this where I decided that, like, okay, I gotta get out of Columbus. This is a problem. Like, this isn’t working. And so I decided to move. In retrospect, poorly considered decision, but I moved to San Francisco, and nothing changed, right? I mean, I just, what happened is I would come out of blackouts and not know where I was at all, whereas in Columbus, I’d be like, oh, how did I get here? But I would know where I was because I grew up there in San Francisco. I’d come out of a blackout and be like, well, I don’t have the foggiest idea where I’m at right now. Like, I don’t know how to navigate from where I am. So nothing really changed.

00:34:52 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah. What’s the story with your parents?

00:34:55 – Eric Zimmer
Two parents, upper, sort of middle class, you know, white collar background, but they both, I think, had untreated mental illness. My father’s manifested as rage, and my mother’s manifested as a very withdrawn depression. And so I was a troubled child from very early on. I mean, I was. By the time I was ten, I was a kleptomaniac, right? And so I can look back and be like, okay, something wasn’t right, and I can theorize on what those things were. And I know a lot about what things are supposed to happen in childhood and attachment and all of that. And I think I didn’t get what I needed developmentally. I don’t really have anger at my parents. They were just doing kind of what had been done to them, and they were doing kind of the best they could in the circumstances. And yet it wasn’t kind of what I needed to be a person who felt comfortable in their own skin.

00:35:54 – Kelly Corrigan
And so what was the turning point? Like, why did you stop? How did you not just do it until you died?

00:36:01 – Eric Zimmer
It’s interesting. Cause, like I said, I’m kind of working on a book. I got a book deal with HarperCollins recently, and I’m working on it, and so I’m revisiting a lot of this stuff, right. And the easy version of the story, right, is that I just got arrested at work. Like, I mean, the police came into my place of employment. I worked in a restaurant, and they came in and they arrested me and took me out in handcuffs.

00:36:26 – Kelly Corrigan
Oh, my God.

00:36:26 – Eric Zimmer
And it turns out that where I was working was one of the ways that I was stealing money. And I had been temporarily living in a van that the owner of the restaurant had. And so all of a sudden, all of that was gone. What little bit of home I had, this van was gone. My ability to make the money that I needed. In addition to stealing, I was also working, like, 16 hours a day to try and keep up with this habit. All of that was gone. And I just went into treatment detox, because I was like, I don’t know what else to do right now. I’m going to be very sick, and I don’t know what to do. And while I was there, they said to me, you should go into long term treatment. And I said, I don’t think so, because who knows what possible. What I thought I had to get back to? But then I went back to my room, and I had a moment of clarity, and I went, you’re gonna die if you go back out there. By now, I knew I had hepatitis C. And I just knew, like, you’re either gonna go to jail or you’re gonna die. And so I went to long term treatment, which then led to a halfway house. And that was the turning point. That’s the easy version. The more complicated version is I’d been working on ways to not be the way I was, like I said, since this first move to San Francisco. Right. Which would have been preceded by lots of times of me trying to just do less. You know, just don’t do it so much. And years of that. Right. And so, yeah, there’s one moment I can point to. That was the moment at which I never did it again. But that moment was preceded by lots of other little moments and was followed, far more importantly, by countless other little moments. Right. If we were going to film the movie of my life, there’d be the scene I just told you. But that scene wouldn’t mean anything if it weren’t for the thousands of little decisions I made day after day after that to get sober. So there’s a convenient narrative that you hit a bottom, and that’s what it is. But it tends to be a little more complicated than that.

00:38:28 – Kelly Corrigan
Isn’t that narrative structure so imposing?

00:38:30 – Eric Zimmer
Totally.

00:38:31 – Kelly Corrigan
What’s the nadir? What’s the climax? What’s the denouement? Love it. Who’s the main character? Who’s the hero? Who’s the villain? It’s just so imposing. And it’s so easy to look for those beats. I mean, even as I’m asking you questions, I’m sort of of asking you to tell me the story in terms of these narrative beats. And that’s not, of course, the way it is, because that’s the story we love because it has this drama to it that the stories we live have much less drama. It’s, you know, choices and thoughts that you’re having every single day. It’s feeding. It’s feeding the right wolf every day for 20 years. Yes, but nobody wants to hear that story. You know, the truth of the story is. And then on Tuesday, I woke up and I said, I think I’ll walk outside for ten minutes. And then on Wednesday, I thought, instead of having a drink, I think I’ll call my old friend. And then on Thursday. And you would just go on like that for 20 years, itemizing a list of minuscule choices that equal your sobriety, your life.

00:39:41 – Eric Zimmer
That equal a life of sobriety. Yeah. Yeah. That is the way life is. And we were talking earlier about certainty and believing you can fix things. Early on in my recovery, I believed that now that I had gotten sober and I was in a twelve step program, and twelve step programs tend to think they know how to get people sober. And they do know how to get some people sober. You know, I thought, I know the answer to addiction. And 30 years on, I feel less equipped over and over and over again to feel like I know what somebody should do to get over addiction.

00:40:14 – Kelly Corrigan
Right.

00:40:15 – Eric Zimmer
I know what I did. I know what worked for me. I know some things that work. I know some guiding principles that I think are useful. But life is complicated, and addiction is an enormously complicated syndrome. It is a multi causal thing.

00:40:32 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah. Syndrome’s really the right word for it. That really helps broaden your sense of it. You know, that it has all these factors that are interacting with each other, with you and with your environment at all times. When you think about what kind of repair has been necessary for you, has there been any particular person or group of people, including potentially yourself, that has been hardest to repair with, hardest to forgive and to be in relationship with?

00:41:29 – Eric Zimmer
It’s interesting because in the twelve steps, right, there are two steps that are all focused on repairing. There’s the 8th step, which is you make a list of all people you’d harmed. And 9th step, you actually go out and try and make amends to those people. So, I mean, it’s baked into the heart of the program because almost nobody will get to a nadir of addiction without having done a lot of rupture. So yeah, there were a lot of relationships to repair, but a lot of relationships also had to be sort of just let go. I mean, there was certainly a lot of relationships that did not make the transition from my using days to my sober days. Now, I was fortunate in that a number of people, over time, started. I’m not saying I was the only one, but there were a few people that started to get sober, and I think a lot of other people were seeing it and going, oh, there’s a path. And so it was interesting to see a lot of friends that I was sort of like, well, that friendship is gone, come into recovery. And that was a beautiful thing. So there were obviously crimes I’d committed that I needed to make amends for. Right. The state had its own ideas of how I was going to make amends for the crimes that I had committed. I was extraordinarily fortunate that I did not go to jail. And that’s probably. You could base that 95%, probably, on privilege. You know, I was given opportunities that most people aren’t given. I was given a diversion opportunity where, if I completed all the tenants of this thing, they gave me, the multiple felonies would disappear. And I had to do that. Right. I mean, I had to go make financial amends. I had to do a huge amount of community service. I had to. To drug test, you know, drug free for years. I had to see a parole officer. I mean, there were a lot of things I had to do, and if I hadn’t, they would have given me sort of a maximum sentence. And I was able to do those things, thankfully. But again, I recognize that was a. That I was given a gift there.

00:43:32 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah.

00:43:33 – Eric Zimmer
To do that. That was probably based to some degree on my background and my color.

00:43:37 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah, yeah. How about to yourself? Like, how do you look at that version of you?

00:43:42 – Eric Zimmer
Primarily, I feel a lot of self compassion for that person. You know, that person was in a lot of pain and just did not have any way of coping and existing in the world that wasn’t extraordinarily self destructive. And a few years earlier, I had formed this tutoring program for disadvantaged children, and I was taking high school students from around the area that tended to be coming from, quote unquote, better high schools, high schools that you were getting a really good education, and we were going into elementary schools that were more disadvantaged, and I was organizing all that. And so there was that. And then a few years later, I’m a completely different person. And so, yeah, there was a lot of, like, that’s one repair I could never make, is that program that was off to a great start and had this framework that I think could have continued and extended fell apart because I wasn’t there to shepherd it through, you know, a couple of years when it would have sort of become self sustaining. There was no repair for that. And then I guess I should actually say there’s like, three steps in twelve step programs, because there’s another step, which is the 10th step, which is continue to take personal inventory. And when we’re wrong, we promptly admit it. And that’s a big one. Right. For me, is the keeping the street kind of clean as I go.

00:45:02 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah.

00:45:03 – Eric Zimmer
You know, really recognizing when I’ve been unkind or when I’ve done something that I don’t want to do, or fessing up to that and trying to deal with that in real time has stopped me from getting into places where there’s been a whole lot more really big ruptures. But I certainly was out there trying in whatever ways I could to make amends to my parents. I had really good friends at that time, took really terrible advantage of. I would say things like, I want to go to treatment, but it’s a $200 application fee, and get somebody to give me $200. I mean, I laughed at it and then spend it on drugs. There’s just lots of that kind of stuff, stealing from friends, things that if I hadn’t repaired and if I didn’t have a real understanding of the pain that that me was back then, I think I might feel differently. And then there’s the fact that I have been able to, because of that addiction and a commitment to help others who are suffering from it, transform it into something that has been, I would say, a net positive overall. Like, if you were to look at the total amount of pain that I caused then versus the total amount of healing I’ve been able to be involved in since then with a very conscious effort, it balances the scales a little bit.

00:46:28 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah. Yeah.

00:46:29 – Eric Zimmer
It doesn’t balance it for everybody, though. There are certain situations that were not repairable, people who did not want to be repaired. It’s not like I was able to repair everything, but if I was to just take a total net good to the world, I feel like that was actually a good overall because I was young enough. Thankfully, I was young enough that I’ve been able to have all these years in recovery.

00:46:55 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah. Yeah. So, like, units of damage versus units of repair, you’ve crossed over.

00:47:03 – Eric Zimmer
I believe so. I mean, another analogy is when I was in the halfway house, right? Like, I was on disability, I was taking money, you know, from the government, and there was money being given to the halfway house that I was in, you know, like probably Medicaid money and all that. And in the grand scheme of things, in my case, I’m not saying this is the case in everybody’s case, but in my case, the government came out way ahead of. Right. By rehabilitating me at that day and age. I have paid way more in tax dollars over the years than I actually took out, which I think is the way those systems are intended to work. I’m not saying they always do, but sometimes they do.

00:47:42 – Kelly Corrigan
Right. And that’s like, as a side note, that’s just an important part of the discussion around incarceration, because that can happen. 100% that can happen if we’re paying as taxpayers year after year after year to keep people in jail with no hope of rehabilitation, and then there’s also no hope that they’ll become taxpayers, not only for society does it not ever get to balance out, but for that individual, you don’t get the satisfaction of thinking, I’m putting something back in the till. It took a lot, and I’m putting a lot back in.

00:48:13 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:48:13 – Kelly Corrigan
And that must be so important to your sense of self, and it must be a real foundation to stand on in terms of self compassion. It’s like I’m just going to keep trying to add to the good. Yeah, you can’t do that if you’re incarcerated. I mean, what good can you do in there? All you can do is, no, it’s just such a sin, really.

00:48:34 – Eric Zimmer
Oh, yeah. My story would probably have been radically different had I been sent to jail, even for a few years. And I’m not saying that there are not situations in which people do need to go to jail. Of course there are, but are far better off with rehabilitating people, and ideally rehabilitating them before we need to rehabilitate them from what has happened to them in prison. Right, right. I mean, I’m not naive on those fronts, but I do think we’ve got the balance wrong.

00:49:04 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah. Yeah. Thanks for letting me ask all those hard questions.

00:49:07 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. So can I ask you a few questions?

00:49:11 – Kelly Corrigan
Sure.

00:49:12 – Eric Zimmer
This quote comes completely out of context, but I have to know, and we.

00:49:16 – Kelly Corrigan
Can’T wait to hear what you’re gonna say. Go ahead.

00:49:20 – Eric Zimmer
This is the quote.

00:49:21 – Kelly Corrigan
Is it my quote? I don’t know.

00:49:23 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

00:49:24 – Kelly Corrigan
Oh, dear.

00:49:24 – Eric Zimmer
Something you said? Yeah.

00:49:25 – Kelly Corrigan
Oh, dear.

00:49:26 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. Yeah. So I don’t know what to say about a man who calls a perfectly adorable three year old a fucker, but my hero comes to mind. That made me laugh out loud when I read it. And just, I had to be like, what is she talking about? Cause again, I’m sure it’s from a story somewhere in a book, but it was just the one line. I was like, what?

00:49:48 – Kelly Corrigan
So I had cancer in my thirties. I had a one year old and a two year old. I was in chemotherapy. My hair had finally started falling out. And so we shaved my head, and I stayed home and cried for a couple days. And then I felt like maybe I was ready to go out into the world. And my kids were one and three. And so Georgia, my older daughter, was in preschool at the time. And during the early days of my cancer treatment, you know, people drove her everywhere all the time. And so I was feeling like I really wanted to drive carpool. I felt like that would be a real victory for me. So I put this scarf on my head and I put on mascara. I still had eyelashes at the time. They fall out, too, eventually. And I put on my favorite jeans, and I called my next door neighbor, and I said, I’m going to take the kids to preschool today. And she said, oh, wow, like, you don’t have to do that. And I said, no, no, I really want to. You know, I’m ready to, like, take my look on the road. And then I got Georgia, and we went over there, and, you know, you have to take your baby with you wherever you go, too. So I got Claire in a diaper, and I got Georgia in her little outfit for preschool. And I get them all situated in the car, and we go next door, and I pick up their kid, and she says, come on down. Come on down. And this kid looks up at me and says, you look like a monster. And the mom said, oh, my God. I just saw monstrous ink. And I was like, oh, my God. You mean like the one where the person’s head is like a giant eyeball? Like, that’s what I look like to this kid.

00:51:20 – Eric Zimmer
She didn’t make it better, did she?

00:51:22 – Kelly Corrigan
No, she didn’t make it better. So then all of a sudden, I just got a wave of anxiety. And I thought, oh, my God, I can’t go into a preschool. Cause they don’t know. They don’t have any context for this. And they could say anything to me. I don’t think I’m sturdy enough yet. So I said, I think maybe you should take them in. Here, take my card. I gave her my keys, and I went home, and I grabbed the phone, and I flopped on the sofa, and I called Edward, and I said, he called me a monster. And Edward said, who did? And I said, max, next door. And he said, that fucker. And I thought, oh, my God, I’ve never loved you more that you’re gonna punch out a three year old for hurting your 36 year old wife’s feelings. So that is the origin of that line. And that moment, I think, a lot about attunement, and it’s such a hit or miss thing. You know, even when you love people so much and you’re trying so hard, you can still just miss the note. And there were a lot of occasions in that year that I was in treatment where Edward picked up the note kind of effortlessly and was right where I wanted him to be. Like, if I was in the mood to start googling stage three cancer life expectancies, he would do it with me. And if I was in the mood to go on the deck and have a corona and listen to Bob Marley, he would do it with me. And if I wanted to cancel plans at the last minute, he would do it for me. And in that moment, the way he took my side like that, it was just sort of a heavenly moment of attunement, because he could have said, oh, Kelly, do we really care what a three year old said about you? He cared more than I did. He was madder than I was. And so I have a lot of very fond and tender memories from being sick. And that was why the mom.

00:53:20 – Eric Zimmer
It’s a beautiful story with a very funny line. You were talking about how you and your father both had cancer.

00:53:28 – Kelly Corrigan
Uh huh.

00:53:28 – Eric Zimmer
And that your dad and mom sort of turned towards goddesse.

00:53:33 – Kelly Corrigan
Yes.

00:53:33 – Eric Zimmer
And you and Edward turned towards Google.

00:53:36 – Kelly Corrigan
Yes.

00:53:37 – Eric Zimmer
And a friend of yours was able to explain the miracle of your father through a rational thing about how the doctor knew these things. And you sort of said, well, you sort of landed on that. Neither your parents faith nor the reason of your friend really explained what happened there.

00:53:55 – Kelly Corrigan
Oh, that’s interesting. I mean, I remember it was so interesting to me. The first thing my father did when he got diagnosed, the first thing I did. So he went to church and I went to Google. And then when it was all over and both of us survived, his survival a little bit more miraculous than mine, my mom said, oh, there were just so many people praying for your father, as if that explained it. And, you know, that’s such a troubling statement because all kinds of wonderful people die all the time for whom many people have been praying.

00:54:32 – Eric Zimmer
Right.

00:54:32 – Kelly Corrigan
And I said, gosh, don’t you think it has more to do with these medications that people have labored to develop over time. Like, I really am alive because of a medication. I had stage three her two new ERPR positive cancer, which was not survivable, that that strand was really not survivable. 20 years ago. I definitely have been gone, and I had a huge tumor, 7 cm by 4 cm. So it was just like this big piece of calamari. And then, you know, the free markets and big pharma and some really devoted scientists and chemists and biologists got together and they created a set of medications and surgical procedures and interventions. And here I am talking to you. And so I tried to put that in front of my dad, and he said, oh, lovey, what do you think makes a person want to work that hard to cure cancer? As if I was missing the most obvious reflection of God in the world. He and my mother both have always put a foot in the door for me in terms of faith. Like, the door cannot close because of them. It was such a strong part of both their lives, central and a real comfort. It wasn’t, they weren’t righteous about it. They weren’t finger waggy. They did not use it as a weapon against other groups of people. It was like a heated blanket to them. It was like a warm place to rest, and. But then when we got married, the padre, as my uncle Jimmy put it, the padre said, life is a mystery to be lived. And then my uncle Jimmy put his arms around us afterwards at the reception and said, I never heard anything so true in my life. Life is a mystery to be lived. And so I guess where I came out was that we’ll just stay with the mystery on this one. We’ll just let it be an unknown. We’ll just leave the question mark in.

00:56:38 – Eric Zimmer
Place back to the lack of certainty.

00:56:41 – Kelly Corrigan
Yeah, yeah. And there’s a real joy in that for me. There’s, like, joy in not knowing. I mean, first of all, I’m not required to know. None of us are. And we are small, and there is a lot that we haven’t figured out yet. And there’s tons of things that we thought were absolutely true over the centuries that are absolutely not true. And so I think best to be humble.

00:57:02 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah. I’m a longtime Zen practitioner, and there’s a saying not knowing is most intimate, and I love.

00:57:11 – Kelly Corrigan
That’s nice. Yeah, that’s really nice. I like that.

00:57:13 – Eric Zimmer
I also love to think about, like, what do we all believe to be completely true today? Scientifically, that is completely wrong. I know, because there’s gotta be a wide swath of it. I just don’t know which part of it it is, but it’s fascinating to think about. Maybe we can wrap up by talking about your recent TED talk around ordinary moments of bravery. What did you mean? Or what do you mean when you use that phrase, ordinary moments of bravery? And why did you want to give a TED talk on that?

00:57:45 – Kelly Corrigan
Well, the theme of the conference was the brave and the brilliant. And it was clear that there would be tons about AI and space travel and quantum computing. And I just felt that someone should stand up and say something about invisible interpersonal bravery. My kids are 21 and almost 23, and I have some very close friends with whom I share a lot and am reciprocated, and they’re sharing with me. And so I know that every one of us has been put to the test in the most incredible ways, where someone comes to you and says, I cut myself. I weigh myself before and after every meal I steal. I bought a gun. I stopped taking the medication. I’m using again. I hear voices. I mean, these are all true things that have been said to my friends by their children. And if you don’t think what happens next is exquisite bravery, you’re not paying attention, because there’s so many possible reactions in that moment, and 99% of them are wrong. Wrong as in damaging or at a minimum, unproductive. And I think to be brave in the face of such high stakes, there’s just nothing that you’ll care about more than these people and their well being. And you’re so electrified with adrenaline and anxiety. I mean, I don’t know what the cocktail is that’s flowing through your body in that moment, but I’m going to say it’s as strong as heroin. Like, there have been moments where a kid has looked at me and said something, and I have been in a completely different physical state. And, yes, you’re still required to put an expression on your face, shift your posture and say the right thing. And I was positing in the TED talk that the right thing is. Tell me more. What else? Go on. That there’s just these seven words that you can turn to every single time. Because I think what’s behind them is, I don’t think this is so easy that I can solve it in a sentence. I’m not going to tell you what to do. I’m not going to dive in and be the hero. I’m not afraid of what you’re going to tell me next. I can withstand this in its entirety. I don’t think everybody does that. I think most people either leave one way or the other. They take the phone call, they go to the bathroom, they say they have to work, they have an early flight. They somehow wind down the conversation. So that’s like one way that people miss their opportunity for bravery, and then the other way is that they become the hero. They say, you know what? Here’s what we’re going to do. We’re going to call this person and that person, and if they don’t answer, we’re going to call this person, and the next thing we know, and I’m going to take you in that car, we’re going to put you in that rehab and we’re going to. And the bravery that I was trying to elevate was really born out of total intellectual humility, which is, oh, my God, I wouldn’t dream of trying to solve this. I don’t think I could. I don’t think it’s my job and I don’t think I could. And rather, I’m communicating that I don’t need to take over, that I believe that you will solve it and that my only work here is to facilitate your discovery of the whole story. Tell me more. What else? Go on. And it was very satisfying to give it to that audience because the conference starts on a Monday and I didn’t go until Thursday night. So it was basically like the last thing that happened before the big dance party. And as I predicted, there was a really big emphasis on AI and space travel. And here I was talking about this. Hi. Human intelligence, or EI, emotional intelligence. And then we went straight to the dance party and just, I just hugged 150 strangers. Like, people would just point at me and come up and we’d just hug and it was too loud to talk. And I knew what they were feeling and I knew what I was feeling. And we just would jump around and hug and then the next total stranger would come up, same thing would happen. So I felt certain after it was done that I had said something that felt true to other people as well and just kind of an under acknowledged fact.

01:02:32 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah, I watched it and I love it. I love the core idea of ordinary bravery because I do think that the number of beautiful, selfless, caring, loving things that happen in the world over and over and over, day after day after day, there are so many of them. And like you’re saying there are these moments you find out your father has Alzheimer’s or your, you know, your partner’s mother has Alzheimer’s. These moments, they do take a bravery and you said earlier, it’s, you know, required to sit down and do that, but actually, it’s not required. It’s most. And as you said, most people don’t, you know, it’s a very conscious choice to stay in it with people. And I thought the talk really spoke to that beautifully. Yeah.

01:03:22 – Kelly Corrigan
There’s all these movies where the most devastating scene is a person trying to unburden themselves and the. And the other person rejecting the moment. We just. We were rewatching succession, and Kendall, this kid tries to unburden himself to his mother, and she says, oh, is this gonna be difficult? Let’s do it in the morning. And then when he wakes up, there’s just a note that says, I’m so sorry, I had to go. Maybe we’ll talk about that later. Or like ordinary people, which was the searing movie in my childhood and maybe yours, too, where Mary Tyler Moore plays this just unapproachable mother and this poor kid, Timothy Hutton, is trying to say, what hurts? And she just can’t do it. And when you watch a scene like that or you see one unfold on the pages of a book, because that’s the only time you’re gonna see it, you won’t be able to witness it. Otherwise, you’d have to be a fly on the wall in somebody else’s house. But when you see these play out in fiction, I just don’t think there’s anything more devastating.

01:04:30 – Eric Zimmer
Yeah.

01:04:31 – Kelly Corrigan
Than that micro rejection of, like, I.

01:04:34 – Eric Zimmer
Don’T want to do this.

01:04:36 – Kelly Corrigan
I don’t want to talk about this.

01:04:38 – Eric Zimmer
Tell me more. What else? Go on.

01:04:40 – Kelly Corrigan
That’s right. All day long.

01:04:42 – Eric Zimmer
I think that’s a great place for us to wrap up.

01:04:44 – Kelly Corrigan
Fantastic. So good to talk to you. Thanks for asking to do this. I really enjoyed it.

01:04:49 – Eric Zimmer
Thank you so much. Kelly.

Filed Under: Featured, Podcast Episode

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Footer

GET YOUR FREE GUIDE

Sign-up now to get your FREE GUIDE: Top 5 Reasons You Can’t Seem To Stick With A Meditation Practice (And How To Actually Build One That Lasts), our monthly newsletter, The Good Wolf Feed, our monthly email teachings about behavior change as well as other periodic valuable content.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

  • About Eric and Chris
  • Transformation Program
  • All Episodes
  • Shop
  • Reading List
  • TED Talk
  • Membership
  • Spiritual Habits Workshop
  • Buy from Amazon- Support Us
  • Contact Us

The One You Feed PRACTICAL WISDOM FOR A BETTER LIFE

Quicklinks

  • Home
  • About Eric Zimmer
  • About Ginny Gay
  • About the Parable
  • About the Podcast
  • Podcast Episode Shownotes
  • Contact: General Inquiries
  • Contact: Guest Requests

Programs

  • Free Habits That Stick Masterclass
  • Wise Habits
  • Wise Habits Text Reminders
  • Membership
  • Coaching
  • Free ebook: How to Stick to Mediation Practice

Subscribe to Emails

Subscribe for a weekly bite of wisdom from Eric for a wiser, happier you:

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

By submitting your information, you consent to subscribe to The One You Feed email list so that we may send you relevant content from time to time. Please see our Privacy Policy.

All Materials © 2026 One You Feed | Terms | Privacy Policy |  A Joyful Site